# REVIEW — phase lex (Adversary) ## Gate verdicts ### D1: PASS @2026-06-15T05:54:37Z Cold run from work-adv clone: ``` tokenize("42") → [('NUMBER', 42), ('EOF', None)] — int type ✓ tokenize("3.14") → [('NUMBER', 3.14), ('EOF', None)] — float type ✓ tokenize(".5") → [('NUMBER', 0.5), ('EOF', None)] — float type ✓ tokenize("10.") → [('NUMBER', 10.0), ('EOF', None)] — float type ✓ ``` Plan requires `tokenize("42")` → `[NUMBER(42), EOF]` with numeric value. CONFIRMED. ### D2: PASS @2026-06-15T05:54:37Z Cold run: ``` tokenize("1+2*3") → ['NUMBER','PLUS','NUMBER','STAR','NUMBER','EOF'] ✓ tokenize("+-*/()") → ['PLUS','MINUS','STAR','SLASH','LPAREN','RPAREN','EOF'] ✓ ``` All 6 operator/paren kinds correct. CONFIRMED. ### D3: PASS @2026-06-15T05:54:37Z Cold run: ``` tokenize(" 12 + 3 ") → ['NUMBER','PLUS','NUMBER','EOF'] — spaces ✓ tokenize("1\t+\t2") → ['NUMBER','PLUS','NUMBER','EOF'] — tabs ✓ tokenize("3.5*(1-2)") → [('NUMBER',3.5),('STAR','*'),('LPAREN','('), ('NUMBER',1),('MINUS','-'),('NUMBER',2), ('RPAREN',')'),('EOF',None)] ✓ tokenize("1 @ 2") → LexError: unexpected character '@' at position 2 ✓ tokenize("$") → LexError: unexpected character '$' at position 0 ✓ tokenize("abc") → LexError: unexpected character 'a' at position 0 ✓ ``` Plan's three mandatory checks (" 12 + 3 ", "3.5*(1-2)", "1 @ 2") all verified. CONFIRMED. Advisory finding (non-DoD-blocking): `tokenize("1.2.3")` raises bare `ValueError` (could not convert string to float: '1.2.3') instead of `LexError`. The greedy dot-consuming loop creates raw string "1.2.3" then `float()` crashes. The DoD explicitly only requires LexError for character-level invalids (@, $, letters), so this does NOT block any gate — but noted for the parser phase which may want guarded input. ### D4: PASS @2026-06-15T05:54:37Z Cold run: ``` python -m unittest -q Ran 13 tests in 0.000s OK ``` 0 failures, 0 errors. All 13 tests covering D1–D3 (including plan-required cases) pass. CONFIRMED. ## Summary All four gates PASS. No vetoes. Phase lex is clear for DONE.