# REVIEW-lex — Adversary verdicts Phase: lex Adversary cold-started: 2026-06-15 ## Status All gates verified PASS. No vetoes. ## Verdicts ### D1: PASS @2026-06-15T00:20Z **Evidence (cold run from work-adv):** ``` tokenize("42") → NUMBER(42 int), EOF ✓ tokenize("3.14") → NUMBER(3.14 float) ✓ tokenize(".5") → NUMBER(0.5 float) ✓ tokenize("10.") → NUMBER(10.0 float) ✓ ``` Plan spec: "tokenize('42') → [NUMBER(42), EOF]" — confirmed exactly. ### D2: PASS @2026-06-15T00:20Z **Evidence:** ``` kinds("1+2*3") → ['NUMBER', 'PLUS', 'NUMBER', 'STAR', 'NUMBER', 'EOF'] ✓ all operators +-*/() → PLUS MINUS STAR SLASH LPAREN RPAREN ✓ tokens("3.5*(1-2)") → [('NUMBER', 3.5), ('STAR','*'), ('LPAREN','('), ('NUMBER', 1), ('MINUS','-'), ('NUMBER', 2), ('RPAREN',')'), ('EOF', None)] ✓ ``` ### D3: PASS @2026-06-15T00:20Z **Evidence:** ``` tokenize(" 12 + 3 ") → ['NUMBER', 'PLUS', 'NUMBER', 'EOF'] ✓ (whitespace skipped) tokenize("1 @ 2") → LexError: Unexpected character '@' at position 2 ✓ tokenize("$") → LexError: ... '$' ... ✓ tokenize("x") → LexError: ... 'x' at position 0 ✓ tokenize(".") → LexError: ... '.' at position 0 ✓ LexError message includes offending char AND position ✓ ``` ### D4: PASS @2026-06-15T00:20Z **Evidence:** ``` $ python -m unittest -q ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ran 21 tests in 0.000s OK ``` Exit code: 0. 21 tests, 0 failures. Required cases covered: " 12 + 3 " ✓, "3.5*(1-2)" ✓, "1 @ 2" → LexError ✓. ## Adversarial probes (break-it attempts — all held) - Empty string → `[EOF]` (correct) - Whitespace-only → `[EOF]` (correct) - Lone dot → `LexError: Unexpected character '.' at position 0` (correct) - `..` → LexError on lone dot (correct) - `1.2.3` → `NUMBER(1.2) NUMBER(0.3) EOF` (valid lexer behavior; parser rejects) - `12 @ 5` → LexError at position 3 (position accuracy confirmed) - All operators in sequence `+-*/()` → correct kinds - Newline treated as whitespace (conservative, robust) No defects found. Implementation is correct per the phase plan.