docs(examples): add builder-solo — single builder, no adversary (control)

A single Builder that builds AND self-verifies (same DoD rigor), with NO
independent Adversary and no claim/review handoff. The control for measuring
what the AI adversary costs (its tokens, ~half of a loop-pair run) and buys
(independent cold verification vs self-certification).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-06-15 02:34:50 +00:00
parent 924874aafa
commit a0f7652e9e
7 changed files with 192 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
# Phase `json` — machine-readable output
**Mission.** Extend the `wc.py` from the previous phase with a `--json` mode, without regressing any
`wc`-phase behaviour. Single source of truth for this phase.
(The phase config gives the Builder `claude-opus-4-8` for this phase — an example of a per-phase
model override; the Adversary stays on the default model.)
## Definition of Done
- **D1 — json output.** `python wc.py --json FILE` prints a single JSON object:
`{"lines": N, "words": N, "chars": N, "file": "FILE"}` (valid JSON, parseable by `json.loads`).
With stdin (no FILE), `"file"` is `null`.
- **D2 — composes with flags.** `--json` honours `-l/-w/-c`: only the requested counts appear as keys
(plus `file`). E.g. `wc.py --json -l FILE``{"lines": N, "file": "FILE"}`.
- **D3 — no regression.** Every `wc`-phase gate (D1D4 there) still passes unchanged.
- **D4 — tests green.** `test_wc.py` is extended for the JSON cases and `pytest -q` is all-green.
## How the Adversary verifies (cold)
```bash
pytest -q # D4 + D3 regression
printf 'a b c\nd e\n' > /tmp/f.txt
python wc.py --json /tmp/f.txt | python -c 'import sys,json; d=json.load(sys.stdin); \
assert d=={"lines":2,"words":5,"chars":10,"file":"/tmp/f.txt"}, d; print("ok")' # D1
python wc.py --json -l /tmp/f.txt # D2: expect {"lines": 2, "file": "/tmp/f.txt"}
```
The Builder restates the exact commands, expected JSON, and commit sha in
`machine-docs/STATUS-json.md`. When every DoD item has a fresh PASS in `machine-docs/REVIEW-json.md`
and there is no `## VETO`, the Builder writes `## DONE` to `STATUS-json.md` — this is the last phase,
so the watchdog then fires the one-shot `reporter` (see `agents.toml` `[loop].on_complete`).

View File

@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
# Phase `wc` — a word-count CLI
**Mission.** Build a small, dependency-free `wc` clone in Python: a script `wc.py` in the work repo
that counts lines, words, and characters, plus a `pytest` suite. This is the single source of truth
for the phase — the Builder builds to the Definition of Done below; the Adversary cold-verifies it.
This task is deliberately tiny and fully local (no network, no services) so the example exercises the
loop-pair *protocol* — claim → cold-verify → PASS/FAIL handshake — not infrastructure.
## Definition of Done
Each Dn is an independent gate. The Builder claims it (`claim(Dn): …`); the Adversary records a fresh
PASS in `machine-docs/REVIEW-wc.md` after re-running the check from its own clone.
- **D1 — default output.** `python wc.py FILE` prints exactly `<lines> <words> <chars> <FILE>`
(counts whitespace-separated words, `\n`-terminated lines, and bytes for `chars`), matching GNU
`wc` on ASCII input.
- **D2 — flags.** `-l`, `-w`, `-c` restrict the output to that single count (e.g. `wc.py -l FILE`
prints `<lines> <FILE>`). Flags may combine; output order is lines, words, chars.
- **D3 — stdin.** With no FILE argument, `wc.py` reads stdin and prints the counts with no filename.
- **D4 — tests green.** A `test_wc.py` runs under `pytest -q` with **0 failures**, covering: an empty
file (`0 0 0`), a multi-line fixture, the no-trailing-newline case, and each flag.
## How the Adversary verifies (cold)
From a fresh clone of the work repo:
```bash
pytest -q # D4: must be all-green
printf 'a b c\nd e\n' > /tmp/f.txt
python wc.py /tmp/f.txt # D1: expect "2 5 10 /tmp/f.txt"
python wc.py -l /tmp/f.txt # D2: expect "2 /tmp/f.txt"
printf 'a b c\nd e\n' | python wc.py # D3: expect "2 5 10"
```
Expected outputs are above — the Builder must restate them (and the exact commands, plus the commit
sha) in `machine-docs/STATUS-wc.md` so the Adversary can re-run without reading the Builder's
reasoning. Any mismatch is a FAIL with repro steps in `machine-docs/REVIEW-wc.md`.
## Out of scope (defer to a later phase or DEFERRED.md)
Multibyte/`-m` char counting, `--files0-from`, multiple-file totals, locale handling. JSON output is
the next phase (`plans/json.md`).