autonomic-bot
985dc06e47
Two recipes could not see CVEs at all. mattermost-lts has an empty GitHub advisory feed and renders its security bulletins client-side, so a text sweep finds nothing; mumble publishes nothing anywhere the registry points. Both returned '?' - nothing measured - which is honest but useless. NVD is CPE-indexed and carries structured version ranges, so it answers where the vendor does not. Declared per recipe as 'nvd-cpe: <image> = <cpe:2.3:...>'. mattermost-lts 10.5.0 -> 10.12.4 165 CVEs mattermost-lts 10.11.22 -> 10.12.4 0 CVEs (measured, not unknown) mumble 1.3.0 -> 1.6.870 2 CVEs Both NVD range forms are used: versionEndExcluding is a patched version; versionEndIncluding means the fix version is unpublished but the upgrade delivers it whenever it crosses X. That 0 for the actual mattermost upgrade is the interesting one, and it needed a new rule to be correct: a fix on the line you upgrade FROM was already yours. mattermost patches every maintained line at once, so 10.11.22 -> 10.12.4 crosses 10.12.1 while 10.11.22 already had the 10.11.4 backport. Without the rule the scan claimed 12 CVEs the upgrade did not deliver. The rule is skipped for placeholders: '7.4.X' parses to a bare 7.4 and would read as 'already fixed at 7.4', which silently dropped redis CVE-2024-46981 and took discourse 140 -> 139 before I caught it. 79 tests. discourse 140 / gitea 2 / mailu 2 / keycloak 12 / plausible 6 unchanged. Fleet sweep: 0 recipes with no usable CVE source, down from 2.
cc-ci-plan
Self-contained handoff package for building the cc-ci Co-op Cloud recipe CI server with two autonomous Claude loops (a Builder and an adversarial Reviewer) running over days.
Start here
- Read
plan.md— the full plan and single source of truth (mission, Definition of Done, architecture, milestones, the two-agent coordination protocol, loop discipline). - Read
kickoff.md— how to launch and supervise the loops. - Run
./launch.sh startto bring up both loops + the watchdog.
Files
| File | Purpose |
|---|---|
plan.md |
The Phase-1 plan (build the CI server). Agents treat it as their single source of truth. |
plan-phase1c-full-reproducibility.md |
Phase 1c (runs first): make the VM fully reproducible from git (all secrets incl. the wildcard cert in sops, in a separate private cc-ci-secrets repo as a flake input; base stays well-parameterized) and do the genuine throwaway-VM live rebuild to close D8 honestly (the "infeasible by design" was overstated). |
plan-phase1b-review-lint.md |
Phase 1b (after 1c): deterministic linting/formatting in CI + a white-box review checklist (real tests, DRY harness, idempotent Nix, no footguns/secrets), ending in a full cold re-verification of all D1–D10 — now covering 1c's refactor. |
plan-phase1d-generic-test-suite.md |
Phase 1d (after 1b, before 2): a generic install/upgrade/backup/restore suite that runs on any recipe with zero config, with a recipe's own test_<op>.py overriding or extending the generic (Builder's call) and reusing the generic's deployment — no redeploy, plus optional custom install-steps; recipes needing special setup fail the generic form gracefully. The test-architecture foundation Phase 2 builds on. |
plan-phase1e-harness-corrections.md |
Phase 1e (after 1d, before 2): three operator-review corrections to the shared generic harness — (HC1) upgrade goes previous-release → PR head via deploy --chaos; (HC2) repo-local PR code runs only for approved recipes (default = cc-ci overlays + generic only); (HC3) the generic runs by default alongside an overlay, skipped only via explicit opt-out. |
plan-phase2-recipe-tests.md |
Phase 2 (after Phase 1e): build on the corrected generic suite — author the recipe overlays (port recipe-maintainer tests as test_*.py) + define custom install steps where a recipe fails generically. |
plan-phase2b-test-performance.md |
Phase 2b (after Phase 2, before Phase 3): empirically measure where test time goes and reduce it (image cache, readiness tuning, dedup deploys, warm infra, concurrency) — no weakened tests. |
plan-phase3-results-ux.md |
Phase 3 (after Phase 2b): beautiful YunoHost-style results — per-run level, image-forward PR comment (badge + summary card + app screenshot), polished dashboard. |
IDEAS.md |
Deferred/future ideas, parked out of current scope. |
brief.md |
The original one-page brief (context only; plan.md supersedes it). |
kickoff.md |
Launch & supervision guide. |
launch.sh |
Starts both loops + a watchdog; restarts dead loops; stops on ## DONE. |
prompts/builder.md |
Builder loop prompt (fed to claude by the script). |
prompts/adversary.md |
Adversary loop prompt. |
Before launching
- Set the org in
plan.md(git.autonomic.zone/recipe-maintainers/cc-ci) and lock the six proof recipes (§8). - Ensure the launching shell has: SSH+sudo to
cc-ci, the Gitea token,git.autonomic.zoneaccess. - Preconfigure test-app DNS + TLS (plan §4.0): point a wildcard
*.ci.commoninternet.netrecord at a gateway that TLS-passthroughs to cc-ci, and pre-issue the wildcard cert (*.ci.commoninternet.net+ci.commoninternet.net, via Gandi DNS-01) into/var/lib/ci-certs/live/on cc-ci. The agent handles everything else on cc-ci (Traefik file provider → that cert, swarm, routing) and does no ACME; renewal (~90 days) is an out-of-band operator task, so the DNS token never goes to the agent. export CC_CI_REPO=https://git.autonomic.zone/recipe-maintainers/cc-ci.gitso the watchdog can detect## DONE.
What "done" means
The loops stop only when all of plan.md §2 (D1–D10) hold and the Adversary has independently
re-verified each within 24h. The watchdog then tears the loops down automatically.