Files
cc-ci-orchestrator/cc-ci-plan
autonomic-bot b0bdce2c15 add /cve-check and /cve-check-and-upgrade
/cve-check answers 'what are we exposed to that an upgrade would fix?' without
running an upgrade: per-recipe, resolve the available window for EVERY image
(sidecars included), run the advisory scan over it, adjudicate whatever pass 1
could not decide, publish a report. Read-only — no PRs, no CI, no merges.

/cve-check-and-upgrade does that sweep, then runs /recipe-upgrade only on the
recipes whose upgrade actually closes a CVE, worst severity first, and reports
on both. --min-severity high for just the urgent ones; --dry-run prints the
queue and stops. Never merges.

Deliberate choices, each written into the skills:
- externals are SWEPT but never upgraded here — a security sweep that skipped
  deployed software would misreport exposure, but we don't maintain them.
- an unknown count never justifies an upgrade AND is never treated as clean;
  it goes to the Addendum.
- no upgrade available means 0 CVEs, not '?'.
- subagents are told which CVEs justify their upgrade, so the PR says why it
  exists — a PR naming the RCE it closes gets reviewed sooner.

recipe-report.py grows a page kind: 'cve' files as cve-DATE.html so a sweep
can't overwrite a weekly edition, while BOTH appear in the same archive index,
suffixed 'full report' / 'CVE check'.

/help and /cc-ci-status updated to route to them.
2026-08-11 04:04:59 +00:00
..

cc-ci-plan

Self-contained handoff package for building the cc-ci Co-op Cloud recipe CI server with two autonomous Claude loops (a Builder and an adversarial Reviewer) running over days.

Start here

  1. Read plan.md — the full plan and single source of truth (mission, Definition of Done, architecture, milestones, the two-agent coordination protocol, loop discipline).
  2. Read kickoff.md — how to launch and supervise the loops.
  3. Run ./launch.sh start to bring up both loops + the watchdog.

Files

File Purpose
plan.md The Phase-1 plan (build the CI server). Agents treat it as their single source of truth.
plan-phase1c-full-reproducibility.md Phase 1c (runs first): make the VM fully reproducible from git (all secrets incl. the wildcard cert in sops, in a separate private cc-ci-secrets repo as a flake input; base stays well-parameterized) and do the genuine throwaway-VM live rebuild to close D8 honestly (the "infeasible by design" was overstated).
plan-phase1b-review-lint.md Phase 1b (after 1c): deterministic linting/formatting in CI + a white-box review checklist (real tests, DRY harness, idempotent Nix, no footguns/secrets), ending in a full cold re-verification of all D1D10 — now covering 1c's refactor.
plan-phase1d-generic-test-suite.md Phase 1d (after 1b, before 2): a generic install/upgrade/backup/restore suite that runs on any recipe with zero config, with a recipe's own test_<op>.py overriding or extending the generic (Builder's call) and reusing the generic's deployment — no redeploy, plus optional custom install-steps; recipes needing special setup fail the generic form gracefully. The test-architecture foundation Phase 2 builds on.
plan-phase1e-harness-corrections.md Phase 1e (after 1d, before 2): three operator-review corrections to the shared generic harness — (HC1) upgrade goes previous-release → PR head via deploy --chaos; (HC2) repo-local PR code runs only for approved recipes (default = cc-ci overlays + generic only); (HC3) the generic runs by default alongside an overlay, skipped only via explicit opt-out.
plan-phase2-recipe-tests.md Phase 2 (after Phase 1e): build on the corrected generic suite — author the recipe overlays (port recipe-maintainer tests as test_*.py) + define custom install steps where a recipe fails generically.
plan-phase2b-test-performance.md Phase 2b (after Phase 2, before Phase 3): empirically measure where test time goes and reduce it (image cache, readiness tuning, dedup deploys, warm infra, concurrency) — no weakened tests.
plan-phase3-results-ux.md Phase 3 (after Phase 2b): beautiful YunoHost-style results — per-run level, image-forward PR comment (badge + summary card + app screenshot), polished dashboard.
IDEAS.md Deferred/future ideas, parked out of current scope.
brief.md The original one-page brief (context only; plan.md supersedes it).
kickoff.md Launch & supervision guide.
launch.sh Starts both loops + a watchdog; restarts dead loops; stops on ## DONE.
prompts/builder.md Builder loop prompt (fed to claude by the script).
prompts/adversary.md Adversary loop prompt.

Before launching

  • Set the org in plan.md (git.autonomic.zone/recipe-maintainers/cc-ci) and lock the six proof recipes (§8).
  • Ensure the launching shell has: SSH+sudo to cc-ci, the Gitea token, git.autonomic.zone access.
  • Preconfigure test-app DNS + TLS (plan §4.0): point a wildcard *.ci.commoninternet.net record at a gateway that TLS-passthroughs to cc-ci, and pre-issue the wildcard cert (*.ci.commoninternet.net + ci.commoninternet.net, via Gandi DNS-01) into /var/lib/ci-certs/live/ on cc-ci. The agent handles everything else on cc-ci (Traefik file provider → that cert, swarm, routing) and does no ACME; renewal (~90 days) is an out-of-band operator task, so the DNS token never goes to the agent.
  • export CC_CI_REPO=https://git.autonomic.zone/recipe-maintainers/cc-ci.git so the watchdog can detect ## DONE.

What "done" means

The loops stop only when all of plan.md §2 (D1D10) hold and the Adversary has independently re-verified each within 24h. The watchdog then tears the loops down automatically.