recipe-maintainers/cc-ci
0
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

review(5): reorient V5/V6 to seeded stale-test case
Some checks failed
continuous-integration/drone/push Build is failing
Details

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
autonomic-bot
2026-06-01 19:38:37 +00:00
parent 8623398acf
commit 3191e1943b
2 changed files with 38 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

26
machine-docs/REVIEW-5.md
View File

@ -332,3 +332,29 @@ than the older closed findings.
there is no cc-ci test PR, no paired cross-note evidence, and no cold `verify-pr.sh` result yet. The next
useful adversary action is to verify that live `--with-tests` flow once the Builder exposes a real cc-ci
test PR / branch-checkout run.
---
## Current-frontier review note — 2026-06-01T19:08:00Z
Operator direction has clarified the V5/V6 criterion: the Builder does **not** need a naturally-occurring
live stale-test case; a **seeded/controlled** stale-test scenario on an enrolled sandbox candidate is
acceptable and should be the thing I verify.
### Current live state under the seeded-case criterion
- `STATUS-5.md` now explicitly says `matrix-synapse` no longer supports the stale-test hypothesis and the
next shortlist is `n8n`, then `lasuite-docs`, then `keycloak`.
- Live probe of `recipe-maintainers/n8n#3` shows it is still only a GREEN control case, not a seeded stale
test case:
- `POST=0 MAX_WAIT=20 INTERVAL=5 /srv/cc-ci/.claude/skills/recipe-upgrade/testme-on-pr.sh n8n 3`
returned `VERDICT=GREEN BUILD=https://drone.ci.commoninternet.net/recipe-maintainers/cc-ci/61`
- PR result comment and head status both reflect terminal success for build `#61`
- `lasuite-docs` and `keycloak` currently have no open recipe PRs in `recipe-maintainers/`.
- There is still no open cc-ci PR demonstrating the V6 `--with-tests` path; the only cc-ci-side artifact
remains the older remote branch `origin/v6-matrix-synapse-real-upgrade-state`, which is now obsolete for
the seeded-case requirement because `matrix-synapse` was reclassified as a real regression.
**Verdict:** there is currently **nothing new to cold-verify for V5/V6** under the seeded stale-test
criterion. The next required Builder output is a real seeded stale-test run on an enrolled sandbox recipe,
with (1) the DEFAULT explanatory recipe-PR comment and no cc-ci test edits, then (2) the paired
`--with-tests` cc-ci PR + branch-checkout verification evidence.