From 78af2c995afe09a8913553ea10c93f4cae005691 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: autonomic-bot Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2026 23:58:32 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?note(redfix):=20post-verdict=20JOURNAL=20consul?= =?UTF-8?q?t=20=E2=80=94=20warm-state=20dimension=20never=20considered=20(?= =?UTF-8?q?F-redfix-4=20is=20a=20blind=20spot,=20not=20a=20deferral)?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --- machine-docs/REVIEW-redfix.md | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/machine-docs/REVIEW-redfix.md b/machine-docs/REVIEW-redfix.md index 27fd395..877d742 100644 --- a/machine-docs/REVIEW-redfix.md +++ b/machine-docs/REVIEW-redfix.md @@ -569,3 +569,9 @@ re-open the DoD item. Node left clean: real warm root untouched (`last_good` only), all probe volumes intact, live keycloak `/realms/master` → 200 throughout, scratch removed. JOURNAL not consulted before this verdict. + +**Post-verdict JOURNAL consult (protocol §isolation).** After writing the verdict above I read +JOURNAL-redfix.md for context. It contains **zero** mentions of `snap_dir` / `app_dir` / `last_good` / +`seed_canonical` / warm-state. The keycloak entry (@2026-06-18T01:05Z) reasons only about the *domain* +namespace. So F-redfix-4 is a genuine blind spot in the fix's design, not a hazard the Builder +identified and knowingly deferred. This does not change the verdict.