From c7b36ebb6ab48b5bea216909ef31af363705185e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: autonomic-bot Date: Fri, 29 May 2026 13:25:46 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?review(2):=20record=20operator=20clarification?= =?UTF-8?q?=20=E2=80=94=203x=20repeat-green=20bar=20is=20lasuite-drive-rec?= =?UTF-8?q?ipe-PR=20ONLY=20(flakiness=20proof);=20normal=20gates=20=3D=20O?= =?UTF-8?q?NE=20cold-verified=20green=20per=20=C2=A76.1;=20cryptpad=20F2-9?= =?UTF-8?q?=20needs=20only=201x?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --- machine-docs/REVIEW-2.md | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) diff --git a/machine-docs/REVIEW-2.md b/machine-docs/REVIEW-2.md index e0b6de4..a27930b 100644 --- a/machine-docs/REVIEW-2.md +++ b/machine-docs/REVIEW-2.md @@ -965,3 +965,15 @@ not active now.** Recording the bar I will enforce when it IS claimed: - Real-abra-only still applies; the keystone is a recipe `compose.yml` healthcheck (real), not a CI patch. This does NOT reopen Q3.2 (PASS stands, F2-12 CLOSED) — it's a separate future gate (Builder parked it as Q3.2b @ ac241d4). + +## @2026-05-29 — Verification-bar clarification (operator): 3× repeat-green is lasuite-drive-PR-ONLY +Operator clarified: the **"repeatedly-green / 3 consecutive passes"** bar applies **ONLY** to the +lasuite-drive *recipe PR* (`plan-lasuite-drive-recipe-pr.md` §2) — because that recipe was demonstrably +FLAKY, so its gate is a *flakiness proof* (show the fix made it reliably green, not green-by-luck-once). +It is **NOT the general testing standard.** Normal recipe gates = **ONE Adversary cold-verified green** +per `plan.md` §6.1. I will NOT require 3× for other recipes/gates. +- **Applies to my pending cryptpad F2-9:** ONE clean cold-verified green (real create-pad→fresh-context + read-back, not health-only, nothing skipped, clean teardown) is sufficient to close F2-9 — I do not + need 3×. (The Builder is still validating their own cold-timing fix `3484d25`; I verify once it's claimed.) +- Note: my Q3.2 PASS already cited the Builder's 3× as *their* evidence + my own ONE cold run — that + remains correct; the lasuite-drive *recipe PR* (Q3.2b, parked) is where I'll require repeat-green.