claim(rcust): M2 — merge+2 approved fix-forwards green, canaries 7/7, 21/21 reconciled vs corrected baseline (3 lasuite via accepted L5≡L4+OIDC equivalence, bluesky-pds justified exclusion), drone path covered (356/357), zero leaks

JOURNAL-rcust.md

@@ -283,3 +283,14 @@ run 204 on 06-09 (hours pre-deploy of the refactor) still shows 6 rungs — clea
 baseline matrix's "L5" rows need a schema-equivalence reading, declared in STATUS BEFORE the claim
 rather than negotiated after the Adversary trips on it. Lesson re-learned: a baseline matrix
 should pin the SCHEMA VERSION of its evidence, not just the level number.
+
+## 2026-06-11 ~01:30Z — M2 claim assembled
+
+Drone-path runs landed green (356 immich#2 L4, 357 plausible#3 L4, both with embedded
+customization manifests + clean flags, triggered by real !testme comments). Zero-leak verified
+after everything. Plausible's missing screenshot.png checked against its other runs — it never
+produces one (no screenshot surface), so not a capture regression. Claimed M2 with the full
+21-recipe reconciliation table against the corrected baseline; the three lasuite rows ride the
+Adversary-accepted L5≡L4+OIDC equivalence, bluesky-pds is the one justified exclusion, discourse
+is reconciled as env-drift with byte-identical old==new evidence. Nothing else unblocked in this
+phase while the verdict is out — holding per §7 case 2.