Commit Graph

2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
858e0f582f fix(harness): redact secret-named meta values in the customization manifest (rcust)
All checks were successful
continuous-integration/drone/push Build is passing
Adversary heads-up (inbox 2026-06-10T19:06Z): meta values are repo-public by construction, but
the manifest lands on the dashboard — a field literally named SECRET_KEY_BASE showing a value
(plausible's committed CI dummy) is needless secret-scan noise. Mask values whose key NAME is
secret-shaped (SECRET|PASSWORD|TOKEN|CREDENTIAL|word-segment KEY), top-level and nested dict
keys; the key name stays visible. Unit test pins redacted vs passthrough (KEYCLOAK_URL).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-10 19:09:09 +00:00
68954be53e feat(harness): P5 — customization manifest (rcust)
All checks were successful
continuous-integration/drone/push Build is passing
One block at run start answering "what does this recipe customize?" across every surface
(non-default recipe_meta keys, ops.py pre-ops, install_steps.sh, compose.ccci.yml, lifecycle
overlays by source, custom-test counts, active CCCI_SKIP_GENERIC* env overrides — !!-flagged when
riding a CI run, P2c), printed to the run log and embedded verbatim in results.json under
"customization". Pure presentation — building/printing it never influences a verdict; the
manifest honors the HC2 repo-local gate so it never advertises code the run will not execute.

Unit tests: synthetic recipe exercising every surface -> complete + deterministic + JSON-clean;
HC2 invisibility; env-override flagging; render golden lines; build_results threads the dict
verbatim (key always present, None when absent).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-10 18:57:26 +00:00