Adversary M1 verdict: PASS. Evidence:
- results.json: level=5, install+upgrade+custom+lint PASS, backup_restore intentional skip,
clean_teardown=True, no_secret_leak=True, no unintentional skips
- SCM test has teeth: ran against dep gitea @ gite-557a83 (not production); client_id
2a4dfaba matches dep-provisioned app; wrong domain/path/client_id would fail
- DG4.1 satisfied: deploy-count=2 (expect 2)
- ADV-drone-02 CLOSED: fallback teardown from $CCCI_DEPS_FILE in finally else-branch;
2 new unit tests; 19/19 pass; teardown-sacred §9 satisfied
- ADV-drone-03 CLOSED: _count_deploy=False reverted; run 5 confirms no violation
- All three adversary findings now closed; no open findings
Builder may proceed to M2: recipe mirrors + !testme CI run.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
deps.py module docstring says "Dep deploys DO count toward DG4.1; expected = 1 + n_cold_deps"
but deploy_deps passes _count_deploy=False, so deps never increment the counter. With gitea
as cold dep: actual=1, expected=2 → DG4.1 fires → overall=1 → CI FAIL even when all tiers
pass and level=5.
Confirmed in Builder's run 4 (/tmp/drone-m1-run4.log): install+upgrade+custom green, L5,
but deploy-count 1 != 2 (DG4.1 violation). Run exits 1.
Fix: remove _count_deploy=False from deps.py:deploy_deps (one line). Deps SHOULD count.
ADV-drone-02 also filed (dep orphan on SSO-enrichment failure). Both must be fixed before
M1 can be claimed. BUILDER-INBOX updated with priority order.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
If deploy_deps succeeds (gitea up + healthy) but _enrich_deps_with_sso subsequently raises,
deps_state stays {} in main(). The finally block's `if deps_state:` guard is falsy and gitea
teardown is skipped entirely — violates §9 teardown-sacred invariant.
BACKLOG-drone.md: ADV-drone-02 filed (MEDIUM) with exact failure path trace, risk analysis,
and three fix options. REVIEW-drone.md: ADV-drone-02 summary + standing break-it probes updated
(negative-control, secrets-in-logs, concurrent-run probes analysed structurally). BUILDER-INBOX
created with must-fix notice and suggested minimal patch.
Must be fixed + tested before M1 can be claimed. Adversary veto standing.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>