cc-ci-orchestrator/cc-ci-plan/plan-phase5-verify-upgrade-flow.md

# cc-ci Phase 5 — verify the `/recipe-upgrade` + `testme-on-pr.sh` end-to-end flow

**Status:** QUEUED — the **FINAL** phase, after Phase 4. Transition: auto (last in the launcher
sequence); the watchdog STOPS after it (build complete). **Owner:** Builder + Adversary loops
(Adversary cold-verifies); the orchestrator may also drive it.
**This file:** `/srv/cc-ci/cc-ci-plan/plan-phase5-verify-upgrade-flow.md`
**Phase order:** … 3 → 4 → **5**.

---

## 0. Why this is LAST

The `/recipe-upgrade` and `/upgrade-all` skills live in the **orchestration repo**
(`/srv/cc-ci/.claude/skills/`) and drive cc-ci by posting **`!testme` on a recipe PR**
(`testme-on-pr.sh`) and reading the verdict back **from the PR**. That flow only works once cc-ci is
**fully built** — specifically it depends on **Phase 3 (results UX)**: the run's result must be posted
back to the PR (a Gitea commit status and/or result comment on the PR head) for `testme-on-pr.sh` to
read it. So this verification can only run after the CI server is complete. It proves the upgrade
tooling actually works end-to-end **before** the weekly `/upgrade-all` cron is activated
([[cc-ci-upgrade-all-cron]] — activate only after the build is done).

**Use a sandbox recipe for the live runs** (e.g. `custom-html-tiny` or a dedicated throwaway recipe),
and **close every PR opened during verification afterward** — do not pollute real recipe mirrors, and
**never merge** anything.

## 1. Definition of Done (Adversary cold-verifies → `machine-docs/REVIEW-5.md`)

- [ ] **V1 — `!testme` on a recipe PR is the real gate.** Posting `!testme` (as the bot, a
      collaborator) on a recipe mirror PR triggers bridge → Drone → harness, runs the suite, and
      **posts the run + its result back to the PR** (commit status on the PR head and/or a result
      comment, per Phase 3). A `!testme` from a **non-collaborator is rejected**. A bad trigger
      (`!testmexyz`) does NOT fire. (Re-uses the existing !testme D-gate evidence.)
- [ ] **V2 — `testme-on-pr.sh` reads the verdict correctly.** `POST=1` posts exactly **one**
      `!testme`; `POST=0` polls WITHOUT re-triggering; the helper returns `VERDICT=GREEN` on a passing
      PR, `VERDICT=RED` on a failing PR, `VERDICT=PENDING` while in flight, and a `BUILD=<url>` that
      points at the Drone build. (Drive a known-green and a known-red PR head.)
- [ ] **V3 — `/recipe-upgrade <sandbox-recipe>` (DEFAULT mode) end-to-end GREEN.** On a recipe with a
      real available upgrade: it reconciles the mirror, opens a recipe PR with the bump, `!testme`
      runs and **results appear in the PR**, GREEN → `RESULT: SUCCESS`. **Nothing merged.**
- [ ] **V4 — 3-iteration regression loop.** Seed a real upgrade regression (e.g. a deliberately bad
      image tag) → `!testme` RED → fix on the recipe branch → re-`!testme` → GREEN, all within **≤3
      `!testme` runs**, each recorded in the PR. With a persistent regression, after 3 runs it leaves
      the PR open and reports `RESULT: FAILED — upgrade not green after 3 !testme runs` (does not
      weaken anything to force green).
- [ ] **V5 — stale-test DEFAULT = comment, no test edit.** With a genuinely stale test for the new
      version, default mode (no `--with-tests`) leaves an **explanatory comment** on the recipe PR
      (upgrade looks correct; which test is stale + why; "re-run `--with-tests`"), modifies **no
      test**, and reports `RESULT: SUCCESS-PENDING-TESTS`.
- [ ] **V6 — `--with-tests` opens + verifies a cc-ci test PR.** The same stale-test case under
      `--with-tests` opens a cc-ci test-update PR (dedicated branch, separate clone — never `main`,
      never the loops' clones), **verifies the recipe upgrade WITH the test change applied** via the
      branch-checkout harness run (`verify-pr.sh`, since `!testme` uses prod tests), pairs the two PRs
      with cross-notes, and reports `RESULT: SUCCESS+TESTPR`. Nothing merged.
- [ ] **V7 — mirror reconciliation.** After a run, the `recipe-maintainers/<recipe>` mirror `main` is
      **identical to upstream main**; an open PR whose change is already in upstream main is
      **auto-closed** (merged-upstream); a superseded open PR is **closed and replaced** by the new
      one. (Seed each case and confirm.)
- [ ] **V8 — `/upgrade-all` DEFAULT run.** `--dry-run` lists candidates correctly; a live run over a
      small set (1–2 sandbox recipes) opens recipe PRs **using default mode (never `--with-tests`)**,
      surfaces "tests look stale" PRs in its own summary section, runs **sequentially with teardown**
      between recipes, and the summary leads with the PR list. Confirms the weekly cron never
      auto-edits tests.
- [ ] **V9 — cleanup.** Every PR opened during verification (recipe + any cc-ci test PR) is **closed**
      and any sandbox deploy is **torn down**; the box is left clean.

## 2. Method / notes
- **Sandbox first.** Prefer `custom-html-tiny` / a throwaway recipe for V3–V8 so real recipe mirrors
  aren't spammed. For the seeded-regression (V4) and stale-test (V5/V6) cases, construct the seed on a
  sandbox recipe / a scratch branch, not a real upstream recipe.
- **Real path throughout** — real `!testme` → bridge → Drone → harness → results-in-PR; real `abra`.
- The skills are at `/srv/cc-ci/.claude/skills/{recipe-upgrade,upgrade-all,ci-test-review}/`; read
  their SKILL.md as the spec for expected behavior.
- If Phase 3's PR-result surface differs from what `testme-on-pr.sh` polls (commit status vs comment),
  **reconcile them here** — either adjust the helper to read the real surface, or file a CI finding —
  and record the resolution in `DECISIONS.md`. (This is the most likely real gap to find.)

## 3. Guardrails
- **NEVER merge** any PR; **never weaken a test** to make a run pass.
- **Close verification PRs + tear down deploys** when done (V9) — leave no junk.
- **Single-writer:** cc-ci test PRs on dedicated branches + separate clones; never push `main` or
  touch the loops' working clones; shared Swarm is stateful — serialize + tear down.
- **Bounded:** this phase VERIFIES the flow; it does not redesign the skills. A real defect → fix the
  skill/helper (small) or file it; a bigger idea → `IDEAS.md`.