Files
cc-ci-orchestrator/.claude/skills/recipe-upgrade/SKILL.md
T
autonomic-botandClaude Opus 4.8 65a96453fc fix(recipe-upgrade): reconcile mirror from TRUE coopcloud upstream, not from the mirror itself
The reconcile that's supposed to make the mirror main == upstream main was fetching origin/main —
but origin is the cc-ci MIRROR, so it synced the mirror to itself (a no-op) and never pulled real
upstream. Fix: fetch coopcloud explicitly (git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/<recipe>, default branch
main OR master) via an 'upstream' remote and force-sync the mirror main + tags from it. Every recipe
has a coopcloud correspondent; none are forked. Also reorder the skill so the reconcile runs BEFORE
the upgrade check, so the check sees the real current recipe. Verified by divergence test (diverged a
mirror, reconcile snapped it back to coopcloud HEAD).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-05 01:44:45 +00:00

209 lines
16 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
---
name: recipe-upgrade
description: Upgrade ONE Co-op Cloud recipe end-to-end and verify it on the cc-ci CI server. Researches available upstream upgrades — fetching each image's release notes via a persisted per-recipe registry (cc-ci-plan/upstream/<recipe>.md) + the recipe README — plans them (breaking changes, migrations, config), implements the bump (image tags + recipe version label + config), opens a recipe PR, and verifies it by posting `!testme` on the PR (real CI; results visible in the PR; iterates up to 3×). DEFAULT: recipe PR only, using existing tests — if a test fails because it is genuinely stale, it leaves an explanatory COMMENT on the PR for the operator (does NOT touch tests). With `--with-tests`: also opens + verifies a PR to update the stale cc-ci test. NEVER merges. The per-recipe worker behind /upgrade-all. Invoke as /recipe-upgrade <recipe> [--with-tests].
---
# recipe-upgrade
Autonomous, end-to-end upgrade of **one** recipe, **gated by the cc-ci CI server**. This is the
cc-ci analogue of recipe-maintainer's `/recipe-upgrade-full`, but the test gate is **cc-ci** (the real
recipe CI), and it inherits `ci-test-review`'s discipline: classify recipe-vs-CI, create + **verify**
fix PRs, **never merge**, never weaken a test.
It drives cc-ci over `ssh cc-ci` (cc-ci has abra, the recipe checkouts at `~/.abra/recipes/`, the
harness, and the bot token to push mirror branches). The Gitea PR API call uses the orchestrator's
`/srv/cc-ci/.testenv` creds. Plans/reports go to `/srv/cc-ci/.cc-ci-logs/upgrades/`.
**Boundaries (same as ci-test-review):** the test execution + PR verification are deterministic (the
cc-ci harness decides pass/fail). **Create + verify, NEVER merge** (operator merges). **Never weaken a
test** to make a PR green.
## Arguments
- `<recipe>` — the recipe to upgrade (required).
- `--with-tests` (optional) — **opt in to updating cc-ci tests.** Without it (the DEFAULT, and what the
weekly `/upgrade-all` cron uses), this skill **only ever opens a recipe PR using the existing tests**;
if a test fails and is diagnosed as genuinely stale, it **leaves a comment** on the recipe PR
explaining why and stops — it does **not** modify any test. With `--with-tests`, a stale-test failure
additionally gets a **verified cc-ci test-update PR** (step 5b). A real upgrade regression is fixed +
re-tested in **both** modes.
## Procedure
> ### ⚠️ Run abra over a pseudo-TTY (or it FATAs `inappropriate ioctl for device`)
> `abra` needs a TTY. Over plain `ssh cc-ci 'abra …'` there is none, so many abra commands die with
> **`FATA inappropriate ioctl for device`** / `the input device is not a TTY`. This is how the working
> harness avoids it (`runner/harness/abra.py`): wrap every abra call in a pseudo-TTY via util-linux
> `script`, and pass `-n` (`--no-input`) so it never prompts. **Always invoke abra like this:**
> ```
> ssh cc-ci 'script -qec "abra <args> -n" /dev/null'
> ```
> (`git`/other commands do NOT need the wrapper — only `abra`.) Do this for every abra command below.
### 1. Plan the upgrade (research — follow recipe-upgrade-plan methodology)
> ### ⚠️ Two gotchas that silently skip recipes — handle BOTH before the version check
> 1. **go-git auth to the private mirror.** Recipes hosted on `git.autonomic.zone` (custom-html(-tiny),
> discourse, ghost, immich, lasuite-docs, plausible, uptime-kuma) fail with
> **`FATA unable to fetch tags … authentication required: Unauthorized`** because abra's embedded
> go-git reads `remote.origin.url` from `.git/config` **literally** and **ignores `git url.insteadOf`
> / credential helpers**. Fix: bake the bot creds into the origin URL first (idempotent):
> `git -C ~/.abra/recipes/<r> remote set-url origin "https://$GITEA_USERNAME:$GITEA_PASSWORD@git.autonomic.zone/recipe-maintainers/<r>.git"` (only when origin is on git.autonomic.zone).
> 2. **Dirty worktree** is usually just the untracked cc-ci overlay (`compose.ccci.yml`) — don't skip on
> that. `git stash -u` before the checks and `stash pop` after.
**Sync the mirror from TRUE upstream FIRST, then check for upgrades against that** — so the check sees
the real current recipe, not a stale mirror.
- **(a) Reconcile the mirror from coopcloud (always — do this BEFORE the check).** Run:
```
set -a; . /srv/cc-ci/.testenv; set +a
ssh cc-ci "GITEA_USERNAME='$GITEA_USERNAME' GITEA_PASSWORD='$GITEA_PASSWORD' GITEA_URL='$GITEA_URL' bash -s <recipe> --reconcile-only" \
< /srv/cc-ci/.claude/skills/recipe-upgrade/open-recipe-pr.sh
```
This fetches **true upstream from coopcloud** (`git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/<recipe>`, default branch
main OR master — every recipe has a coopcloud correspondent and none are forked) and force-syncs the
`recipe-maintainers/<recipe>` mirror's `main` + tags to be **identical to it**. (The checkout's
`origin` is the mirror, so the reconcile fetches coopcloud *explicitly* via an `upstream` remote — it
does NOT sync the mirror to itself.) It also **closes any open mirror PR already in upstream main**.
- **(b) Refresh the local checkout + check for upgrades** (creds + stash per the box; each abra call
pty-wrapped) — the checkout pulls from the now-coopcloud-synced mirror:
```
ssh cc-ci 'export PATH=/run/current-system/sw/bin:$PATH; R=<recipe>; \
url=$(git -C ~/.abra/recipes/$R config --get remote.origin.url); \
case "$url" in https://git.autonomic.zone/*) \
git -C ~/.abra/recipes/$R remote set-url origin "https://'"$GITEA_USERNAME"':'"$GITEA_PASSWORD"'@${url#https://}";; esac; \
git -C ~/.abra/recipes/$R stash -u >/dev/null 2>&1 || true; \
script -qec "abra recipe fetch $R --force -n" /dev/null; \
git -C ~/.abra/recipes/$R fetch origin main; \
script -qec "abra recipe versions $R -m -n" /dev/null; \
script -qec "abra recipe upgrade $R -m -n" /dev/null; \
git -C ~/.abra/recipes/$R stash pop >/dev/null 2>&1 || true'
```
Skip a recipe as `SKIPPED — dirty-worktree` **only if it is still dirty with TRACKED changes after the
stash** (real local edits), not for the untracked overlay.
- **No upgrades available → stop** (status `SKIPPED — up-to-date`) — after the reconcile above.
- Check `git log HEAD..origin/main` and upstream PRs (`git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/<recipe>/pulls`)
— if someone already started the bump, **re-plan from the tip of `origin/main`**, not from scratch.
- **Release-notes registry (discover once, reuse — parity with recipe-maintainer's `upstream.md`).**
Read `cc-ci-plan/upstream/<recipe>.md` — a per-image map of source repo + releases/changelog URL. If
it's missing, or an image in `compose.yml` isn't covered (new/renamed service), discover the upstream
project + releases page for each uncovered image (WebSearch the image → its GitHub/source repo →
releases/changelog), **write/update** `cc-ci-plan/upstream/<recipe>.md` and commit it
(`git -C /srv/cc-ci-orch add cc-ci-plan/upstream/<recipe>.md && git -C /srv/cc-ci-orch commit -m "upstream(<recipe>): release-notes sources" && git -C /srv/cc-ci-orch push`).
Format + how it's used: `cc-ci-plan/upstream/README.md`.
- **For each service with an upgrade, fetch the release notes from the registry URLs** (WebFetch)
between current → target versions, and call out **breaking changes / required migrations / new-or-
renamed config / dependency version requirements** in an "Operator Action Required" section.
- **Read the recipe's README** (`~/.abra/recipes/<recipe>/README.md`, if present) for upgrade-specific
instructions, migration steps, or breaking-change notes shipped with the recipe itself.
- Write the plan to `/srv/cc-ci/.cc-ci-logs/upgrades/<recipe>-upgrade-<YYYY-MM-DD>.md`: goal, image
tag table (service / current → new), recipe version bump (+ semver reasoning), required compose/
config changes, risks. (No human review gate — proceed straight to implement.)
### 2. Implement the upgrade (follow recipe-upgrade-apply methodology, on cc-ci)
On cc-ci's `~/.abra/recipes/<recipe>` (wrap every abra call per the pseudo-TTY box above —
`ssh cc-ci 'script -qec "abra … -n" /dev/null'`):
- `script -qec "abra recipe upgrade <recipe> -n" /dev/null` for the tags it can bump; hand-edit
`compose.yml` for any tags it won't, plus the config/env/volume/label changes the plan calls for.
- Bump the `coop-cloud.${STACK_NAME}.version` label to the new version string from the plan.
- `script -qec "abra recipe lint <recipe> -C -n" /dev/null` — fix obvious lint errors; if unfixable,
record it and continue.
- Commit on a branch: `git commit -m "chore: upgrade to <new-version>"` (the commit message drives the
PR branch name `upgrade-<new-version>`). Do **not** push to upstream; do **not** tag-push.
### 3. Open the recipe PR (never merge)
```
set -a; . /srv/cc-ci/.testenv; set +a
ssh cc-ci "GITEA_USERNAME='$GITEA_USERNAME' GITEA_PASSWORD='$GITEA_PASSWORD' GITEA_URL='$GITEA_URL' bash -s <recipe>" \
< /srv/cc-ci/.claude/skills/recipe-upgrade/open-recipe-pr.sh
```
This (a) re-syncs mirror `main` to true upstream main, (b) **closes any open PR already merged
upstream** (merging it would be a no-op), then handles the upgrade PR: **if an open upgrade PR already
exists for this recipe (branch `upgrade-*`), the new work is pushed onto THAT PR's branch and the PR is
updated + re-tested** — one evolving upgrade PR per recipe, not a second parallel one. Only if none
exists is a fresh `upgrade-<version>` PR opened. Unrelated open PRs (e.g. a backup fix) are **NOT**
closed or touched — the operator decides on those. The PR's diff is exactly this upgrade against the
real current upstream main. Capture the `PR_URL`. Optionally export `RECIPE_PR_BODY` first (image-tag
table + the planned operator-action notes). Re-running with the same target version updates the
existing same-branch PR rather than duplicating it.
### 4. VERIFY by running `!testme` ON THE PR (results visible in the PR; iterate ≤3×)
Trigger the **real** CI on the recipe PR by posting `!testme` — the bridge runs the harness on cc-ci
and posts the run + its results back to the PR, so the operator sees them in the PR. Use the PR index
from step 3's `PR_URL` (`.../pulls/<N>`):
```
/srv/cc-ci/.claude/skills/recipe-upgrade/testme-on-pr.sh <recipe> <pr-index> # POST=1: posts !testme + polls
# if it prints VERDICT=PENDING, poll again WITHOUT re-triggering:
POST=0 /srv/cc-ci/.claude/skills/recipe-upgrade/testme-on-pr.sh <recipe> <pr-index>
```
- **GREEN** → the recipe PR is verified on cc-ci, results in the PR, ready for operator merge. Done.
- **RED** → go to step 5. You get **up to 3 `!testme` runs total** on this PR (initial + 2 retries):
use them to fix and re-test a real upgrade regression (step 5a). Each retry is a fresh `!testme`
after you push a fix, so every attempt's result is recorded in the PR.
### 5. If `!testme` is RED → diagnose from the run (recipe regression vs stale cc-ci TEST)
Read the failing run (linked from the PR / the harness log on cc-ci) and classify:
**5a. The UPGRADE itself is broken** (real regression: bad tag, missing migration, config gap) — fix
it on the recipe branch, push, and re-run `!testme` (within the 3-run budget). The recipe PR is only
"working" once `!testme` is GREEN. If still red after 3 runs, leave the PR open (its red `!testme`
results stand as the evidence) and report `FAILED — upgrade not green after 3 !testme runs`.
**5b. The upgrade is correct but a cc-ci TEST is genuinely stale/wrong** for the new version (asserts
old behavior, an overlay needs updating, a readiness gate changed). `!testme` can't go green without a
test change, and a test change is **gated by `--with-tests`**:
- **DEFAULT (no `--with-tests`) — comment, don't touch tests.** Post a **comment on the recipe PR**
that: states the upgrade itself looks correct; identifies the specific test that failed and **why it
appears stale** (what the new version changed vs what the test asserts); and tells the operator they
can **re-run `/recipe-upgrade <recipe> --with-tests`** to also open + verify a cc-ci test-update PR.
Do **NOT** modify any test. Report `SUCCESS-PENDING-TESTS` (recipe PR open; `!testme` red on a
stale test; operator to decide).
- **`--with-tests` — open + verify a cc-ci test PR.** Make it the `ci-test-review` way:
1. Branch `recipe-maintainers/cc-ci` in a **separate clone** (single-writer: never push `main`,
never touch the build loops' `/cc-ci` `/cc-ci-adv` clones); update the test/overlay.
2. **Verify the recipe upgrade WITH the updated test applied.** `!testme` on the recipe PR uses the
*deployed/main* cc-ci tests, so it can't see the unmerged test change — verify this combo by
running the harness with the cc-ci branch checked out on cc-ci:
`RECIPE=<recipe> REF=upgrade-<new-version> /srv/cc-ci/.claude/skills/ci-test-review/verify-pr.sh`
(after checking out the cc-ci test branch on cc-ci + rebuilding if needed), plus a small
regression sample. Green ⇔ the upgrade passes under the corrected test.
3. Open the **cc-ci test PR** via the Gitea API. Note in BOTH PRs that they are a dependent pair
(the recipe PR's `!testme` goes green only once the test PR is merged). Report `SUCCESS+TESTPR`.
**FLAKY** (passes on a re-`!testme`) → note it; don't author a fix for a flake.
Never weaken a test to turn a red upgrade green.
### 6. Report — single parseable RESULT line + summary
Write the report to `/srv/cc-ci/.cc-ci-logs/upgrades/<recipe>-upgrade-<YYYY-MM-DD>.md` and print, as
the **last line**, one of these exact prefixes (so `/upgrade-all` can collect it):
- `RESULT: SUCCESS — <recipe> <old> → <new>, !testme GREEN, recipe PR: <url>`
- `RESULT: SUCCESS-PENDING-TESTS — <recipe> <old> → <new>, recipe PR: <url>; !testme RED on a stale test (commented; re-run --with-tests to update tests)`
- `RESULT: SUCCESS+TESTPR — <recipe> <old> → <new>; recipe PR: <url>; cc-ci test PR: <url> (verified with the test change; pair)`
- `RESULT: FAILED — <recipe> at <step>: <one-line reason>` (e.g. upgrade not green after 3 !testme runs)
- `RESULT: SKIPPED — <recipe>: <up-to-date | dirty-worktree | reason>`
Always state explicitly that **nothing was merged** — the PR(s) await operator review.
## Guardrails
- **cc-ci is the gate, via `!testme` on the PR** — the harness decides pass/fail and the results live
in the PR (operator-visible); AI plans, implements, diagnoses. Up to 3 `!testme` runs per PR.
- **Create + verify, NEVER merge.** Recipe PR (and any cc-ci test PR) are operator-merged after review.
- **Tests are opt-in.** Default = recipe PR only, existing tests; a stale-test failure gets an
explanatory PR **comment**, never a test edit. Only `--with-tests` opens a cc-ci test PR. The weekly
`/upgrade-all` cron always runs the **default** — it never auto-updates tests.
- **Mirror reflects reality.** Each run force-syncs the `recipe-maintainers/<recipe>` mirror `main` to
true upstream main and closes open PRs already merged upstream. It does NOT close superseded/unrelated
open PRs. **An existing open upgrade PR is extended (new work pushed onto its branch + re-tested)
rather than spawning a second upgrade PR** — one evolving upgrade PR per recipe.
- **Prefer a recipe-only PR.** Only open a cc-ci test PR (under `--with-tests`) when the upgrade is
correct but a test is genuinely stale — never to paper over a real upgrade regression.
- **Never weaken a test**; **bounded** changes (the upgrade + minimal test update, not rewrites).
- **Real abra path** throughout (`abra recipe upgrade` / `abra app deploy` via the harness).
- **Single-writer / coordination:** dedicated branches + separate clones; never push `main` or disturb
the build loops' clones; the shared Swarm is stateful — tear down what you deploy; run when you have
effectively-exclusive use of the host (or serialize). See `ci-test-review` for the shared rules.