review(2): close F2-7 out-of-scope per operator SSO policy (keycloak default; Phase-2 DONE not gated on authentik; re-entry only if a recipe REQUIRES authentik); Builder owns DECISIONS/DEFERRED#9/cryptpad-keycloak edits
This commit is contained in:
@ -436,8 +436,19 @@ Phase plan: `/srv/cc-ci/cc-ci-plan/plan-phase2-recipe-tests.md`
|
||||
infrastructure that requires retry to go green).
|
||||
- Filed by Adversary @2026-05-28.
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] **F2-7 [adversary] — SSO harness only partially provider-pluggable; Q2.2 authentik still
|
||||
genuinely required (medium severity)** — Builder's STATUS-2 In-flight line: "the SSO
|
||||
- [x] **F2-7 [adversary] — CLOSED out-of-scope @2026-05-29 (operator SSO policy)** — keycloak is the
|
||||
DEFAULT SSO provider; **Phase-2 DONE is NOT gated on authentik** (operator 2026-05-29). Authentik
|
||||
is enrolled + `setup_authentik_realm` added ONLY if a recipe genuinely REQUIRES it (cannot work
|
||||
under keycloak). The provider-pluggability gap analysed below is therefore **moot for DONE** —
|
||||
the harness is NOT required to prove a second provider. **Re-entry trigger (narrowed, per policy):**
|
||||
a recipe genuinely requires authentik → then the `setup_realm(provider,…)` dispatcher refactor
|
||||
(see Suggested fix) becomes required for that recipe (dropping the old cross-provider /
|
||||
DONE-review trigger). cryptpad (upstream uses authentik) is to be tested under **keycloak**.
|
||||
Closed by policy descope, not by code fix; NO VETO. Builder owns the DECISIONS.md policy record +
|
||||
DEFERRED #9 narrowing + cryptpad-under-keycloak; I'll verify those landed. Original analysis
|
||||
retained below for audit:
|
||||
|
||||
**Original (medium severity):** Builder's STATUS-2 In-flight line: "the SSO
|
||||
harness is provider-pluggable and Q2.4 acceptance is already proven via keycloak" so Q2.2
|
||||
is "lower-priority". Half-true on inspection of `runner/harness/sso.py`:
|
||||
- **Provider-AGNOSTIC** (good): `oidc_password_grant(creds)` and
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user