status(lvl5): ## DONE — M1 (cfc87fd) + M2 (13cad1f) both PASS, no VETO; L5 lint rung + de-capped levels live end-to-end; cleanup complete
All checks were successful
continuous-integration/drone/push Build is passing
All checks were successful
continuous-integration/drone/push Build is passing
This commit is contained in:
@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
|
||||
- [x] B9 — gate M1: claim (branch w/ P1+P2; clean tree; cold-verifiable).
|
||||
- [x] B10 (P3) lint sweep over ALL enrolled recipes (scratch clones — never touch ~/.abra/recipes during builds); matrix here (pass/fail + rule hits); mechanical fixes → mirror PRs (never push main/never merge); rest → DEFERRED.md.
|
||||
- [x] B11 (P4) real-CI proofs: ≥1 genuine L5; ≥1 lint-blocked L4 (synth branch ok); ≥1 N/A-skip climb; 2× drone !testme; canary suite at re-derived designed levels; 1 synthesized unver-blocks run; before/after level table for ALL enrolled recipes; card/dashboard PNG/SVG visually verified.
|
||||
- [ ] B12 — gate M2: claim; then ## DONE after fresh PASS.
|
||||
- [x] B12 — gate M2: claim; then ## DONE after fresh PASS.
|
||||
|
||||
## Adversary findings
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@ -107,3 +107,10 @@
|
||||
completeness. Surfaced to Adversary in the M2 claim notes; not fixing inside this phase.
|
||||
- M2 claimed in STATUS-lvl5 with the full evidence table (runs 398/399/405/406/407/413/415/416 +
|
||||
lvl5-unver-demo). B11 ticked.
|
||||
|
||||
## 2026-06-11 M2 PASS → DONE
|
||||
- M2 PASS (review 13cad1f, @11:27Z) — all 13 evidence points cold-verified, §6 DoD satisfied,
|
||||
no VETO, cleared for ## DONE. Both gates passed today (M1 cfc87fd, M2 13cad1f); no standing VETO.
|
||||
- Cleanup: PR custom-html#4 closed + branch lvl5-lintdemo deleted (204). WC5 stage-completeness
|
||||
observation filed to machine-docs/DEFERRED.md (operator decision; Adversary concurs not a finding).
|
||||
- Phase complete: L5 lint rung + de-capped level semantics live end-to-end.
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1,9 +1,14 @@
|
||||
# STATUS — Phase lvl5 (L5 lint rung + de-cap)
|
||||
|
||||
Phase: lvl5 — M1 PASS (cfc87fd); P3+P4 complete
|
||||
Gate: **M2 CLAIMED, awaiting Adversary** (claimed 2026-06-11)
|
||||
In flight: parked at M2 (no unblocked items remain)
|
||||
Blockers: none
|
||||
## DONE
|
||||
|
||||
Phase complete 2026-06-11: M1 PASS (cfc87fd) + M2 PASS (13cad1f), both <24h, no VETO.
|
||||
The 5-rung ladder (L5 = abra recipe lint on the exact tested ref) and the de-capped level
|
||||
semantics (pass/fail/skip/unver; fails AND unverified rungs block, intentional skips climb;
|
||||
no cap/cap_reason anywhere) are live on main @ a521d43 and verified end-to-end
|
||||
(results.json schema 2 → card → dashboard → badge → PR comment, drone path included).
|
||||
Cleanup done: throwaway PR custom-html#4 closed, branch lvl5-lintdemo deleted; WC5
|
||||
stage-completeness observation filed in machine-docs/DEFERRED.md.
|
||||
|
||||
## M2 claim — proven in real CI
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@ -360,3 +360,13 @@ before the build is called done) — but does **not** force closure.
|
||||
Evidence: /tmp/mumble-probe{2,3,4}.out + /tmp/mumble-orch{4,5}.log on cc-ci (90s DOM/console/
|
||||
network observation; websockify reachable, /ws & /websocket 404 from websockify itself);
|
||||
/var/lib/cc-ci-runs/shot-proof-mumble/screenshot.png (L4 run, loader frame).
|
||||
|
||||
## WC5 promote-on-green-cold ignores stage completeness (filed 2026-06-11, Builder, phase lvl5)
|
||||
|
||||
Observed during the lvl5 unver-blocks proof: a GREEN hand-run with `STAGES=install,upgrade,custom`
|
||||
(backup/restore excluded) on latest still advanced custom-html's warm canonical —
|
||||
`should_promote_canonical` checks green+cold+latest but not that ALL stages ran. Pre-existing
|
||||
behavior (not introduced or worsened by lvl5; Adversary concurs it is not a finding). Only
|
||||
reachable via the operator/dev STAGES escape — production drone runs always run all stages.
|
||||
**Needed from operator:** decide whether promote should additionally require the full stage set
|
||||
(one-line guard in `should_promote_canonical`), or whether dev hand-runs promoting is acceptable.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user