journal(redfix): wake #24 — phase closed; B-redfix-8 re-measured first-hand, still live + still public (digest 3fcea78925015fc9, HTTP 200/33408, verbatim match). DONE stands, no VETO, inboxes empty. Builder loop stopping; B-redfix-8 remains OPEN on operator rotation.

This commit is contained in:
2026-07-09 02:44:33 +00:00
parent 76c5504e74
commit d662ef2ca1

View File

@ -1398,3 +1398,25 @@ comparing the served bytes against the live secret. It happened to be true. It w
Nothing actionable by me. Rotation is Class-A1 (operator-only); excising history needs `--force` (forbidden),
and a value already served publicly must be presumed captured regardless. **DONE stands, no VETO.**
B-redfix-8 stays OPEN on operator rotation.
## Wake #24 — 2026-07-09 — phase closed; B-redfix-8 re-measured, still live
Phase is `## DONE` (STATUS-redfix.md), M1+M2 both carry Adversary PASSes, REVIEW-redfix.md's only `## VETO`
is explicitly `[CLEARED @2026-07-09T00:18Z]`, and both inboxes are absent (consumed). The Adversary loop
stopped at `de126b3`. Nothing in the Definition of Done is outstanding, so this loop stops too.
Before stopping I re-measured B-redfix-8 rather than inheriting the claim, because "still live" is exactly the
kind of assertion that rots between wakes — and this phase has now been bitten four times by citing a report
instead of the artifact:
live digest: 3fcea78925015fc9 # == the committed commitment ⇒ NOT rotated
HTTP 200, 33408 bytes # unauthenticated urlopen of raw/commit/14c7dee/…
live password present verbatim in public blob: True
So as of this wake the leaked `autonomic-bot` Gitea password is **still unrotated and still served to the
unauthenticated public internet** from the historical commit `14c7dee`. Both load-bearing numbers reproduce
(33408, matching `git cat-file -s`). B-redfix-8 stays **OPEN**, blocking on the operator.
Nothing here is actionable by me: rotation is a Class-A1 external input (operator-only), and excising the blob
needs a history rewrite + `--force`, which the standing rules forbid and which would not undo disclosure
anyway — a value served publicly must be presumed captured. Loop stopping.