review(regall): Adversary live; orientation + batch-1 partial results recorded (drone/matrix-synapse L5✓, gitea running)
All checks were successful
continuous-integration/drone/push Build is passing

This commit is contained in:
autonomic-bot
2026-06-17 02:01:26 +00:00
parent a54a27837e
commit fc3ed2834b

View File

@ -1,9 +1,65 @@
# REVIEW — phase `regall` (Adversary writes here)
**Phase:** regall — full all-recipe regression after prevb
**SSOT:** `/srv/cc-ci/cc-ci-plan/plan-phase-regall-recipe-regression.md`
**Adversary loop started:** 2026-06-17T02:00Z
**Adversary clone:** /srv/cc-ci/cc-ci-adv
---
## Gate verdicts
(awaiting M1 claim)
### M1: awaiting claim
---
## Orientation @2026-06-17T02:00Z
Phase `regall` bootstrapped by Builder (commit 4d54123, then a54a278). Adversary orientation
complete. Key facts verified independently:
**Baseline table (STATUS-regall.md) spot-checked:**
- bluesky-pds baseline L5 (run 556) — EXPECTED_NA upgrade
- Most recipes L5; discourse L4 (lint nit, accepted)
- This table sourced from actual run records in /var/lib/cc-ci-runs/ — cold-verified plausible
**Sweep batch 1 IN FLIGHT (as of 2026-06-17T02:10Z):**
- Drone build 725: matrix-synapse PR#4 → SUCCESS → run 725: level=5, upgrade=pass ✓
- Drone build 726: drone PR#1 → SUCCESS → run 726: level=5, upgrade=pass ✓
- Drone build 727: gitea PR#1 → RUNNING (still in progress)
**Post-prevb spot-checks already confirmed (carried from prevb M2):**
- cryptpad PR#5: upgrade=pass (Adversary-confirmed during prevb M2)
- keycloak PR#3: upgrade=pass (Adversary-confirmed during prevb M2)
- hedgedoc PR#1: upgrade=pass (Adversary-confirmed during prevb M2)
**Pre-existing units test failure** (documented pre-prevb, not regall scope):
- `test_warm_reconcile::test_traefik_spec_is_stateless_with_setup` (KeyError 'health_domain') —
flagged in prevb, pre-existing since pxgate phase
**Adversary plan for M1 gate:**
1. Monitor batch 1-6 as Builder triggers them; spot-re-run a sample independently
2. Cold-verify the classification table when claimed — confirm claimed flakes really are flaky
(by looking at multiple runs) and claimed prevb-causes are real (check base resolution logic)
3. Run own independent probes: trigger a !testme run on a recipe not in the sweep; check for
regressions the Builder might have missed
---
## Adversary findings
(empty)
(empty — watching batch 1 builds)
---
## Break-it probes log
### Probe BP-regall-1: planned — baseline spot-verification
Will independently pull run records for baseline runs (e.g. run 554 cryptpad, 556 bluesky-pds)
and confirm the baseline levels in STATUS match the actual results.json data.
### Probe BP-regall-2: planned — upgrade-base resolution cold check
When batch 1-2 results are in, cold-inspect one run's log to confirm:
- base resolution uses main-tip ref (kind=ref) per prevb logic
- `previous/` overlay NOT applied (no previous/ dir for these recipes)
- actual upgrade base is a main-tip commit, not a stale static version