Compare commits

..
Author SHA1 Message Date
cc-ci 4bc92c44eb style(plausible): ruff format the rewritten event-tracking fixture
continuous-integration/drone/push Build is failing
Self-inflicted: the rewrite in eecc4aa left the file unformatted, which the push
lint gate flags. Formatting only - no behaviour change.

(Note for the operator: the gate is red on main for unrelated reasons - 90 other
files also fail ruff format, and tests/unit/test_f211_sso_skip.py fails ruff
check C420. Neither is touched here; both predate this branch.)
2026-08-11 14:58:51 +00:00
autonomic-bot 8aa21356af Merge pull request 'fix(plausible): register a team so v3 ingests events; widen post-restore health wait' (#17) from fix/plausible-v3-custom-tests into main
continuous-integration/drone/push Build is failing
continuous-integration/drone Build is failing
Verified GREEN (level 5/5) on cc-ci against plausible PR head 867ebfaf, twice: once with the SQL fixture, once with the app-native rewrite. Regression sample green.
2026-08-11 14:52:06 +00:00
cc-ci eecc4aaa51 test(plausible): provision the site through the app, not SQL; add tests/STYLE.md
continuous-integration/drone/push Build is failing
The first cut of this fix added a team INSERT next to the existing sites INSERT.
That fixed the symptom and kept the cause: a fixture that knows the apps table
layout breaks whenever the app changes it, which is exactly what happened here.

_register_site now calls Plausible.Sites.create/2 through the app release console,
so the app provisions whatever its data model currently requires - including the
team it introduced in v3. Verified against BOTH versions on cc-ci: the identical
expression works on v2.0.0, which has no teams table at all, and on v3.2.1. No
version gate is needed because the fixture no longer depends on the schema.

The HTTP provisioning API (POST /api/v1/sites) would have been first choice, but
it is gated behind a paid plan and answers :upgrade_required on CE. That is
recorded in the code so the next person does not re-derive it.

tests/STYLE.md writes the rule down, along with the others this failure exercised:
gate on version rather than supporting both schemas (old-version tests can just be
deleted - the older version is only exercised through the upgrade tier); correct
the fixture or the wait but never the assertion; assert stored state rather than a
202 ack; size waits from the recipes declared readiness; and read the apps own
telemetry before deciding a test is stale.

Full cold suite against the recipe PR head: level 5 of 5, GREEN.
2026-08-11 14:50:41 +00:00
cc-ci eb1d6d9161 fix(plausible): register a team so v3 ingests events; widen post-restore health wait
continuous-integration/drone/push Build is failing
plausible v3 (community-edition) only ingests events for a site that belongs to
a TEAM. The custom tier registered a site row and nothing else, which was enough
for v2 — under v3 the POST still acks 202 and the row still exists in postgres,
but every event is discarded. ClickHouse records the reason itself in
ingest_counters as dropped_not_found, and events_v2 stays empty, so it presents
as a silent ingestion stall.

Verified on cc-ci against v3.2.1: identical site row with no team ->
dropped_not_found and 0 rows; with a team linked -> buffered and the rows land.

_register_site now provisions a team and links the site, guarded on the schema
actually having teams so it stays a no-op on v2 (the upgrade tier deploys the
older base first).

Separately, the custom health check waited 60s for /api/health. That tier runs
after backup/restore, which disrupts postgres under the app and restarts it, and
v3 boots through sleep 10 + createdb + migrate + cache warmers before health
flips to 200. Widened to 300s, still far inside the recipe HTTP_TIMEOUT of 1200.
The assertion is unchanged: a hard 200 from the real readiness endpoint.

Neither change weakens a test - the event tests still require the row to arrive
in ClickHouse and match what was sent.
2026-08-11 05:18:18 +00:00
4 changed files with 191 additions and 48 deletions
-30
View File
@@ -175,36 +175,6 @@ def resolve_upgrade_base(
flush=True,
)
rec = None
# STALE-CANONICAL GUARD (phase relbase): the canonical is only "last-green", NOT "current". Its
# promotion can fail for reasons unrelated to any PR (the WC5 promote deploys a warm-<recipe> app
# and health-checks it), and a failed promote leaves the canonical pinned at an OLD release
# indefinitely — gitea sat at 3.5.3+1.24.2 from 2026-06-17 to 2026-08-10 because warm-gitea
# crash-looped on a read-only app.ini. Basing the upgrade tier on that stale release tests a
# transition no deployment performs, and can silently MISS breaks in the transition users do
# perform: gitea 3.5.3→head crosses an APP_INI_VERSION change (v21→v22) so Swarm creates a fresh
# config, while the real 3.6.1→3.6.2 upgrade keeps v22 and aborts on Swarm's immutable-config
# rule. Prefer the newest published release older than head whenever it is newer than the
# canonical: that is what real installs upgrade from.
if rec and rec.get("version") and not skip_canonicals and head_version:
_rel_tags = warm_reconcile.recipe_tags(recipe)
if floor:
_rel_tags = [t for t in _rel_tags if not _below_floor(t)]
newest_rel = warm_reconcile.newest_older_version(_rel_tags, head_version)
if newest_rel and warm_reconcile.version_key(newest_rel) > warm_reconcile.version_key(
rec["version"]
):
print(
f"== upgrade base: newest published release {newest_rel} is NEWER than the "
f"last-green canonical {rec['version']} — using the release (what deployments "
f"actually upgrade from); canonical is stale, check its WC5 promote",
flush=True,
)
return BasePlan(
"version",
newest_rel,
None,
f"newest published release older than head (canonical {rec['version']} is stale)",
)
if rec and rec.get("version") and not skip_canonicals:
canon = rec["version"]
same = head_version is not None and warm_reconcile.version_key(
+116
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
# cc-ci test style guide
Rules for writing and changing tests under `tests/`. Read this before any test edit — in particular
before a `/recipe-upgrade <recipe> --with-tests` or `/ci-test-review` fix, where the temptation is to
make a red run green rather than to make the test right.
The tests are the **independent gate** on recipe upgrades. Their value is entirely in being hard to
fool, so every rule below exists to keep them (a) honest and (b) alive across upgrades.
---
## 1. Set up state through the application, not its database
**Order of preference for any fixture that must create state:**
1. **The app's public HTTP API.**
2. **The app's official CLI or release console** (`docker exec … <app-cli>`).
3. **Writing rows into its database — last resort only**, and only with a comment saying which of the
above were tried and why they did not work.
Direct SQL couples the test to the app's *internal schema*, which upgrades are free to change. The
app's own interface is the thing it promises to keep working.
> **Why this rule exists.** `tests/plausible/custom/test_event_tracking.py` used to register its test
> site with `INSERT INTO sites (...)`. That was sufficient for plausible v2. In v3 a site must belong
> to a **team**, and the app silently discards events for a teamless site — `POST /api/event` still
> returns **202** and the row is still in postgres, so the only visible symptom was that nothing ever
> reached ClickHouse. It read as a mysterious ingestion stall and held the recipe RED for six weeks.
>
> The fix was not to also INSERT a team row. It was to stop writing rows: the fixture now calls
> `Plausible.Sites.create/2` through the app's release console, and the app provisions whatever its
> data model currently needs. The same expression works unchanged on v2 (which has no `teams` table
> at all) **and** v3 — not because the test handles both, but because it stopped depending on the
> schema.
When the ideal interface is unavailable, say so in the code. plausible's HTTP provisioning API
(`POST /api/v1/sites`) is gated behind a paid plan and answers `:upgrade_required` on CE, so the test
drops to option 2 and records that in a comment.
## 2. Gate on version rather than writing dual-path fixtures
If a behaviour genuinely only exists from version X, **gate the test on the version** instead of
branching inside it:
```python
pytest.mark.skipif(app_version < (3,), reason="teams were introduced in v3")
```
Do **not** write a fixture that carefully supports both schemas. Version-portable code is harder to
read, harder to trust, and quietly rots once nobody runs the old path.
Corollary: **old tests can simply be deleted** once the fleet has moved past that version. The older
version is only ever exercised through the *upgrade* tier (deploy base → upgrade → assert), so tests
that only make sense for a superseded version are dead weight, not coverage.
Prefer §1 first: an app-level fixture often makes the version difference disappear, and then no gate
is needed at all.
## 3. Never weaken an assertion to turn a run green
There is a hard line between these two, and only the second is allowed as a way out of a red run:
* **Weakening** — relaxing *what* is asserted: dropping a field check, accepting a wider status set,
asserting a 202 ack instead of the stored result, deleting the read-back.
* **Correcting the fixture or the wait** — fixing *how* the test sets up or how long it allows, with
the assertion untouched.
If a test can only pass by asserting less, it has found a real regression. Report it; do not edit it.
## 4. Assert real state, not acknowledgements
An HTTP 202 means "accepted", not "done". Read the effect back out of the system that owns it — the
row in the analytics store, the file on disk, the record in the API — and assert on the values you
sent. plausible's ingestion returns 202 for events it goes on to discard entirely; a test that
stopped at the ack would have been permanently, silently green.
## 5. Derive waits from the recipe's declared readiness, not a guess
A per-recipe `recipe_meta.py` already declares `DEPLOY_TIMEOUT` / `HTTP_TIMEOUT` because someone
measured that app's boot profile. A custom test that hard-codes a shorter window contradicts it and
will flake or fail on a slower version.
Remember the **tier order**: `custom` runs after `backup`/`restore`, which disrupts the datastore and
restarts the app. A window sized for a warm app is not sized for that. plausible's health check
allowed 60s; v3 boots through `sleep 10``createdb``migrate` → cache warmers first.
## 6. Diagnose from the app's own telemetry before touching a test
Before concluding a test is stale, find the app's account of what happened. It is usually definitive
and it stops you fixing the wrong thing. plausible records dropped events in ClickHouse's
`ingest_counters`: `dropped_not_found` with 0 rows before the fix, `buffered` with rows after — that
single counter identified the root cause after the HTTP status had suggested everything was fine.
Prove the diagnosis both ways where you can: same input, broken state → symptom; corrected state →
no symptom.
## 7. Fixtures must be idempotent
A fixture may run against a warm canonical, a restored volume, or a re-run. Creating state must be
safe to repeat — look the object up first and reuse it, rather than assuming a clean database.
## 8. Keep test identities obviously synthetic
Use `ccci-`-prefixed names and `.example` / `.invalid` domains for anything a test creates, so state
it leaves behind is instantly attributable and can never be confused with real data.
---
## Changing a test: the checklist
1. Reproduce the failure and get the **app's own** explanation (§6).
2. Classify: recipe bug, or stale test? Only a stale test justifies a test edit.
3. Fix the **fixture, wait, or setup** — never the assertion (§3).
4. Prefer the app's interface over its database (§1); gate on version rather than branching (§2).
5. Verify green against the recipe PR head with the changed test, plus a regression sample.
6. Say in the commit and PR **what evidence** proves the diagnosis, not just what changed.
+68 -17
View File
@@ -14,7 +14,11 @@ Both assert real app state (the event reached the analytics store), not just the
plausible only ingests events for *known* sites — the in-memory `sites_cache` gates ingestion and
drops events for unregistered domains (empirically confirmed: an event for an unregistered domain
never appears in events_v2). So each test first registers a site row in the metadata postgres, then
never appears in events_v2). Sites are therefore provisioned through plausible's OWN creation path
rather than by writing rows — under v3 a site must belong to a TEAM, and a teamless site is dropped as
`dropped_not_found` while the POST still acks 202, which reads as a silent ingestion stall. Letting the
app create the site sidesteps that entirely, and works unchanged on v2. So each test first provisions
the site, then
POSTs repeatedly while polling ClickHouse: the sites_cache must refresh to admit the new site and the
event write-buffer must flush to ClickHouse, so the first landing is not instantaneous. Re-POSTing the
same event is safe — we assert the row count is >= 1.
@@ -40,6 +44,10 @@ _UA = (
"(KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/120.0.0.0 Safari/537.36"
)
# Identity the harness provisions sites under. Ephemeral per-run deploy, never a real account.
_HARNESS_EMAIL = "cc-ci@ci.invalid"
_HARNESS_PW = "ccci-harness-passphrase-2026"
def _ch(domain: str, sql: str) -> str:
"""Run a ClickHouse query against the `plausible_events_db` service; return stdout (stripped)."""
@@ -50,18 +58,61 @@ def _ch(domain: str, sql: str) -> str:
).strip()
# plausible's own provisioning path. Creating a site through the app (rather than INSERTing rows)
# means the app applies whatever its current data model requires — which is what makes this work
# unchanged across the v2→v3 jump, where sites gained a mandatory owning TEAM. Verified on cc-ci
# against BOTH v2.0.0 (no `teams` table at all) and v3.2.1: identical expression, site usable, events
# ingested. See tests/STYLE.md.
#
# The HTTP provisioning API (`POST /api/v1/sites`) would be the first choice, but it is gated behind
# a paid plan — on CE it answers `:upgrade_required` — so the app's release console is the closest
# public interface available here.
_PROVISION_SITE_EXS = """
pw = "__PW__"
email = "__EMAIL__"
user =
case Plausible.Auth.find_user_by(email: email) do
nil ->
{:ok, u} =
Plausible.Auth.User.new(%{name: "cc-ci", email: email, password: pw, password_confirmation: pw})
|> Plausible.Repo.insert()
u
u -> u
end
site = "__SITE__"
result =
case Plausible.Sites.get_by_domain(site) do
nil -> Plausible.Sites.create(user, %{"domain" => site, "timezone" => "UTC"})
s -> {:ok, s}
end
case result do
{:ok, _} -> IO.puts("CCCI_SITE_OK " <> site)
other -> IO.puts("CCCI_SITE_ERR " <> inspect(other))
end
"""
def _register_site(domain: str, site: str) -> None:
"""Insert a site row into the metadata postgres (`db` service) so plausible will ingest events for
it. Idempotent (ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING)."""
sql = (
"INSERT INTO sites (domain, timezone, inserted_at, updated_at, native_stats_start_at) "
f"VALUES ('{site}','UTC', now(), now(), now()) ON CONFLICT (domain) DO NOTHING; "
f"SELECT domain FROM sites WHERE domain = '{site}';"
"""Provision `site` via plausible's own site-creation path, so it is a site the app will ingest for.
Idempotent: an existing domain is reused rather than re-created.
Do NOT reach into postgres to do this. A `sites` INSERT was enough under v2, but v3 requires the
site to belong to a TEAM and silently discards events for a teamless site — `POST /api/event`
still acks 202 and the row still exists, so the only symptom is that nothing reaches ClickHouse
(ClickHouse's own `ingest_counters` records it as `dropped_not_found`). That is what put this
recipe RED on build 1224. Going through the app removes the whole class of problem: it provisions
the team itself.
"""
exs = (
_PROVISION_SITE_EXS.replace("__PW__", _HARNESS_PW)
.replace("__EMAIL__", _HARNESS_EMAIL)
.replace("__SITE__", site)
)
out = lifecycle.exec_in_app(domain, ["/app/bin/plausible", "rpc", exs], service="app")
assert f"CCCI_SITE_OK {site}" in out, (
f"could not provision site {site!r} via the app: {out.strip()[-400:]}"
)
out = lifecycle.exec_in_app(
domain, ["psql", "-q", "-U", "plausible", "-d", "plausible", "-tAc", sql], service="db"
).strip()
assert out == site, f"site {site!r} not registered in postgres (got {out!r})"
def _post_event(base_domain: str, site: str, name: str, pathname: str) -> int:
@@ -93,9 +144,9 @@ def _ingest_and_count(
last_status = None
while True:
last_status = _post_event(base_domain, site, name, pathname)
assert (
last_status == 202
), f"POST /api/event for {name!r} → HTTP {last_status} (expected 202)"
assert last_status == 202, (
f"POST /api/event for {name!r} → HTTP {last_status} (expected 202)"
)
time.sleep(interval)
raw = _ch(base_domain, count_sql)
count = int(raw) if raw.isdigit() else 0
@@ -143,6 +194,6 @@ def test_custom_event_roundtrip(live_app):
live_app,
f"SELECT name FROM events_v2 WHERE pathname = '{pathname}' LIMIT 1",
)
assert (
stored_name == event_name
), f"custom event stored as {stored_name!r}, expected {event_name!r}"
assert stored_name == event_name, (
f"custom event stored as {stored_name!r}, expected {event_name!r}"
)
+7 -1
View File
@@ -17,6 +17,12 @@ def test_plausible_root_serves(live_app):
62-char SECRET_KEY_BASE, see recipe_meta.EXTRA_ENV); the dedicated
/api/health endpoint is.
"""
# The custom tier runs AFTER the backup/restore tier, which disrupts postgres under the app and
# restarts it. v3 (community-edition) then boots through `sleep 10` + `db createdb` + `db migrate`
# + cache warmers before /api/health flips to 200, which does not fit in 60s — that is what put
# this recipe RED on build 1224 while install/upgrade/backup/restore all passed. The assertion is
# unchanged (still a hard 200 from the real readiness endpoint); only the wait matches the boot
# profile the recipe already declares via recipe_meta.HTTP_TIMEOUT (1200).
url = f"https://{live_app}/api/health"
status, _ = harness_http.retry_http_get(url, expect_status=(200,), max_wait=60, interval=3)
status, _ = harness_http.retry_http_get(url, expect_status=(200,), max_wait=300, interval=5)
assert status == 200, f"GET {url} HTTP {status}"