312 lines
20 KiB
Markdown
312 lines
20 KiB
Markdown
# REVIEW — Phase 2 (Adversary, append-only)
|
||
|
||
This file is owned by the **Adversary** loop (per `plan.md` §6.1). Phase plan SSOT:
|
||
`/srv/cc-ci/cc-ci-plan/plan-phase2-recipe-tests.md`. Phase-2 acceptance is **per-recipe overlays**
|
||
on top of the Phase-1e generic harness — not infra. Definition of Done = P1–P8 (plan §2), with
|
||
milestones Q0–Q5 (plan §6) each ending in an Adversary gate.
|
||
|
||
The Adversary appends `<gate-id>: PASS @<ts>` + evidence (cold-run command/output), or `FAIL` with a
|
||
finding filed under `BACKLOG-2.md ## Adversary findings`. Veto with `## VETO <reason>` blocks DONE.
|
||
|
||
**Phase-2 Adversary mandate (plan §7.1):** read the test bodies, not just pass/fail. Reject
|
||
`skip`/`xfail`, health-only stand-ins, mocked SSO/federation/media, and "we couldn't test X" unless
|
||
it is a true environment-level blocker with the maximal subset still implemented + Adversary
|
||
sign-off. Verify P2 parity rows actually check the same thing the recipe-maintainer original did
|
||
(read `recipe-info/<recipe>/tests/<file>` + `PARITY.md` together). Re-run a sampled recipe's suite
|
||
cold for Q5.
|
||
|
||
**Isolation discipline (anti-anchoring):** read `STATUS-2.md` for the claim + objective evidence
|
||
pointers only; form the verdict from the phase plan, the code, and a cold acceptance run; consult
|
||
`JOURNAL-2.md` only after the verdict is written.
|
||
|
||
<!-- Adversary verdicts below — append only -->
|
||
|
||
## Phase 2 status @2026-05-28 (Adversary first wake)
|
||
|
||
Phase 1e closed (commit `0fe1218` "DONE(1e)") with all HC1–HC4 PASS, NO VETO. Phase 2 has not yet
|
||
started — no `STATUS-2.md` / `BACKLOG-2.md` / `JOURNAL-2.md` from the Builder yet. No CLAIMED gate
|
||
to verify. Entering self-paced idle (§7 case 3); will re-orient on Builder activity.
|
||
|
||
## Q1 — PASS @2026-05-28 (re-verify after F2-3 + F2-4 fixes)
|
||
|
||
**Verdict: PASS.** Both findings closed by Builder commit `fc89552`:
|
||
- **F2-4 (CLOSED):** `tests/n8n/functional/test_workflow_roundtrip.py` added. Owner setup via
|
||
`POST /rest/owner/setup` with per-run generated email + 25-char alphanumeric password (class-B
|
||
run-scoped per §4.4-B), capture auth cookie, `POST /rest/workflows` with a Manual-Trigger
|
||
workflow, `GET /rest/workflows/<id>`, assert id+name+nodes[0].type+nodes[0].name all round-trip.
|
||
This IS the plan §4.3 prescribed test (create + read-back). The "execute" step is deferred with
|
||
documented technical rationale (manual-trigger needs separate webhook activation + async polling
|
||
fragility) — that's a defensible scope decision (a real technical reason, not a §7.1 "needs X"
|
||
excuse), and create+read-back exercises the same persistence/retrieval surface that execution
|
||
would use.
|
||
- **F2-3 (CLOSED):** `tests/n8n/test_install.py` wraps `page.goto(...)` in `try/except
|
||
PlaywrightError` inside the retry loop, captures `last_err` into the failure message. Same
|
||
pattern as F1e-1's `exec_in_app` poll+raise hardening.
|
||
|
||
**Cold environment:** `/root/adv-verify` on cc-ci, hard-reset to `origin/main` HEAD `fc89552`.
|
||
Independent of Builder's `/root/cc-ci`.
|
||
|
||
**Cold e2e on Adversary clone (first attempt, no retry):**
|
||
```
|
||
ssh cc-ci 'cd /root/adv-verify && RECIPE=n8n cc-ci-run runner/run_recipe_ci.py'
|
||
```
|
||
- **install:** generic `test_serving` PASS + cc-ci `test_serving_and_editor` PASS (no flake, but
|
||
the F2-3 hardening is now in place for future runs).
|
||
- **upgrade:** generic `test_upgrade_reconverges` PASS + cc-ci `test_upgrade_preserves_data` PASS.
|
||
HC1 non-vacuous: `head_ref=63dd3e0f == chaos-version=63dd3e0f`, version `3.1.0+2.9.4 →
|
||
3.2.0+2.20.6`. Marker `upgrade-survives` written by `ops.pre_upgrade` survived the chaos
|
||
redeploy.
|
||
- **backup:** generic `test_backup_artifact` PASS + cc-ci `test_backup_captures_state` PASS
|
||
(marker `original` captured).
|
||
- **restore:** generic `test_restore_healthy` PASS + cc-ci `test_restore_returns_state` PASS
|
||
(marker mutated to `mutated` pre-restore; restore returned it to `original` — real backup
|
||
data-integrity P4).
|
||
- **custom:** 4/4 PASS:
|
||
- `test_n8n_returns_200` (parity port, SOURCE comment)
|
||
- `test_login_endpoint_returns_json` (auth subsystem alive)
|
||
- `test_rest_settings_returns_json_with_known_keys` (bootstrap surface intact)
|
||
- `test_workflow_create_and_read_back` (§4.3 prescribed; full round-trip)
|
||
- **deploy-count = 1** (DG4.1).
|
||
- **Teardown sacred:** `docker stack ls | grep -i n8n` → none; `docker volume ls | grep n8n` →
|
||
none.
|
||
|
||
**custom-html (Q1.1):** unchanged since Q0 PASS; still good. Both recipes green; both PARITY.md
|
||
complete; data-integrity proven via the lifecycle overlay pattern.
|
||
|
||
**No new findings.**
|
||
|
||
**NO VETO.** Q1 PASS — Builder may advance to Q2 (keycloak + authentik + SSO-setup/OIDC-flow
|
||
harness primitive). F2-2 (Q0 deferred primitives) carries over — Q2 is where OIDC-flow primitive
|
||
ships, so I'll checkpoint that finding then.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Q1 — FAIL @2026-05-28 (n8n specific tests fall short of plan §4.3 P3 floor) — SUPERSEDED by PASS above
|
||
|
||
**Verdict: FAIL.** Two findings filed in BACKLOG-2 ## Adversary findings:
|
||
- **F2-3 (flake / hardening gap):** the "robust install" poll loop in `tests/n8n/test_install.py`
|
||
added by commit `2f3d5aa` doesn't catch `page.goto` exceptions (network-level errors escape the
|
||
retry loop). Cold first-run from `/root/adv-verify` @ HEAD `df28cef` FAILED with
|
||
`playwright.Error: net::ERR_NETWORK_CHANGED`; retry passed. Builder's evidence log filename
|
||
`_r3` (third run) consistent with the same flake pattern.
|
||
- **F2-4 (P3 / §7.1 / §4.3 floor) — the gate-blocker:** Plan §4.3 explicitly defines the ≥2-floor
|
||
as "create-an-object + read-it-back, and one more that touches a distinctive feature", and
|
||
names "create a workflow via API, execute it, assert the result" as the n8n example. Builder
|
||
shipped two API-liveness shape tests (`/rest/settings` JSON-keys; `/rest/login` JSON-shape) and
|
||
bypassed workflow create/read-back. PARITY.md's stated reason — "n8n's REST API requires owner
|
||
setup" — is the exact §7.1 prohibited "needs SSO setup" excuse class. Owner setup is a routine
|
||
`POST /rest/owner/setup` with a generated class-B run-scoped secret.
|
||
|
||
**Cold environment:** `/root/adv-verify` on cc-ci @ HEAD `df28cef` (Q1 CLAIMED main).
|
||
|
||
**What I read first (anti-anchoring §6.1):** STATUS-2 Gate + objective evidence pointers; plan §6
|
||
Q1 acceptance; plan §4.3 (n8n example); plan §7.1 (Adversary mandate — "needs SSO setup" not a
|
||
valid reason); PARITY.md; the three n8n functional test bodies; ops.py; the install-overlay diff.
|
||
Did NOT read JOURNAL-2 before forming this verdict.
|
||
|
||
**Substantive findings (PASS-shaped where they apply):**
|
||
- **custom-html Q1.1:** already cold-PASSed at Q0 — re-stated, still good. No additional work
|
||
needed; PARITY.md + functional/ + playwright/ + 2 specific tests + real backup data-integrity
|
||
are all in place. Specifically: `test_content_roundtrip.py` writes a UUID marker into the served
|
||
volume and fetches it back — that IS create-an-object + read-it-back per §4.3 floor. ✓ P3 met.
|
||
- **n8n parity port (test_health_check.py):** matches `recipe-info/n8n/tests/health_check.py`
|
||
shape (HTTP 200 from `/`); SOURCE comment present. ✓ P2 met for parity row.
|
||
- **n8n PARITY.md:** mapping table present; non-ports section says none (the recipe-maintainer
|
||
corpus for n8n contains only health_check.py — verified). ✓
|
||
- **n8n lifecycle / backup data-integrity (P4):** `ops.py` writes `original` to
|
||
`/home/node/.n8n/ci-marker.txt` pre-backup, `mutated` pre-restore; the restore overlay reads
|
||
the marker via `lifecycle.exec_in_app` and asserts it returned to `original`. **Real
|
||
data-integrity**, not health-only. Cold verified: backup PASS + restore PASS at HEAD `df28cef`.
|
||
- **n8n upgrade (HC1 non-vacuous):** Builder log evidence `head_ref=63dd3e0f ==
|
||
chaos-version=63dd3e0f`, version `3.1.0+2.9.4 → 3.2.0+2.20.6`. Marker `upgrade-survives`
|
||
written pre-upgrade survives the chaos redeploy. ✓ HC1 honored.
|
||
- **Cold e2e (Adversary):** retry-2 → **all 5 stages PASS**, deploy-count=1, teardown sacred
|
||
(`docker stack ls | grep n8n` → none, `docker volume ls | grep n8n` → none). Retry-1 hit F2-3.
|
||
- **Discovery + harness from Q0:** `runner/harness/http.py` + `discovery.custom_tests` (which
|
||
recurses into functional/playwright/) flow through to n8n correctly — visible in the
|
||
per-tier log lines `custom (cc-ci): tests/n8n/functional/test_*.py`. ✓
|
||
|
||
**Why FAIL (F2-4 detail):**
|
||
|
||
The plan's §4.3 P3 floor — "create-an-object + read-it-back, and one more that touches a
|
||
distinctive feature" — is a CONTRACT, not a guideline. Both of n8n's specific tests are
|
||
endpoint-shape liveness checks. Neither creates anything, neither reads back. Neither exercises
|
||
n8n's distinctive workflow-automation surface. Per §7.1 the Adversary "reads the test bodies, not
|
||
just pass/fail":
|
||
|
||
- `test_rest_settings.py` proves `/rest/settings` is alive and returns the bootstrap key set the
|
||
editor SPA needs. Real failure-distinguishing assertion (the placeholder HTML 200 fails this).
|
||
But this is "the API layer is alive", not "the workflow engine works".
|
||
- `test_login_state.py` proves `/rest/login` is alive with JSON shape — even weaker than the
|
||
settings test (only asserts the response is dict/list, no content-shape check).
|
||
|
||
The Builder's PARITY.md justifies skipping the workflow-create test:
|
||
> "n8n's REST API requires owner setup before workflows are creatable, and the simpler /rest/
|
||
> settings + /rest/login JSON-shape tests are equally non-vacuous"
|
||
|
||
Per §7.1 verbatim:
|
||
> "Reject 'we couldn't test X' unless it is a genuine *environment-level* limitation ... 'It's
|
||
> hard', 'needs a browser', 'needs SSO setup', **'needs another app deployed'** are **not** valid
|
||
> reasons — Playwright, the SSO-setup harness (§4.2), and the dependency resolver exist precisely
|
||
> to remove those excuses."
|
||
|
||
"Owner setup needed" is in the prohibited class. Owner setup is one POST with a generated email/
|
||
password (class-B run-scoped per §4.4-B); the resulting cookie authorizes `POST /rest/workflows`
|
||
and `GET /rest/workflows/:id`. That's the test plan §4.3 prescribed.
|
||
|
||
Letting this PASS sets a low precedent: every Q2/Q3 recipe could substitute "API-liveness with
|
||
keys" for "characteristic behavior." Especially harmful for Q3 (SSO-dependent suite), where the
|
||
SSO-setup harness primitive is the whole point.
|
||
|
||
**What unblocks Q1:**
|
||
1. **F2-4 (required):** add `tests/n8n/functional/test_workflow_roundtrip.py` — owner setup via
|
||
API with a generated password (class-B run secret), `POST /rest/workflows` (create), `GET
|
||
/rest/workflows/:id` (read back), assert the round-trip. `test_login_state.py` can stay as a
|
||
complement, OR be replaced; what matters is that the ≥2 specific floor contains a real
|
||
create-and-read-back per §4.3.
|
||
2. **F2-3 (strongly recommended):** wrap `page.goto(...)` in the install poll loop in try/except
|
||
so `playwright.Error` triggers a retry rather than test failure. Without this, every cold
|
||
`!testme` run has a non-trivial chance of failing on the first try and needing a retry — that's
|
||
a flaky CI signal, not a "robust install."
|
||
|
||
**Scope reminders standing:** F2-2 (Q0 deferred primitives) — OIDC-flow + dep resolver + dedicated
|
||
backup-data-integrity primitive deferred to Q2/Q3 when their consuming recipe lands. Not a Q1
|
||
gate-blocker on its own.
|
||
|
||
**NO VETO at this time** — both findings are fixable without architectural change. Builder fixes
|
||
F2-4 (and ideally F2-3), re-claims Q1; Adversary re-runs the e2e on a fresh `/root/adv-verify`
|
||
HEAD and re-PASSes.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Q0 — PASS @2026-05-28 (re-verify after F2-1 fix)
|
||
|
||
**Verdict: PASS.** F2-1 fixed by Builder commit `5741e88` ("synthetic recipe + monkeypatched
|
||
`cc_ci_dir`") — exactly the prescribed pattern. Cold re-run on `/root/adv-verify` @ HEAD `0b834e9`
|
||
(Q0 RE-CLAIMED): `cc-ci-run -m pytest tests/unit -v` → **21 passed in 4.69s**. Previously-failing
|
||
`test_custom_tests_repo_local_gated` now PASSes; no other regression. E2E PASS from prior verdict
|
||
at HEAD `d480411` still stands (only `tests/unit/test_discovery.py` + `tests/n8n/PARITY.md` changed
|
||
since; no harness/lifecycle code touched between Q0-CLAIMED and Q0-RE-CLAIMED).
|
||
|
||
F2-1 **CLOSED** in BACKLOG-2 ## Adversary findings.
|
||
|
||
F2-2 (scope observation: §6 lists 5 primitives, only HTTP + TTY abra reused shipped in Q0; OIDC +
|
||
deps + dedicated backup-data-integrity primitive deferred to Q2/Q3) stands as an open observation —
|
||
not a Q0 gate-blocker; will checkpoint at Q2/Q3 verdict that the deferred primitives ship.
|
||
Builder's BACKLOG-2 Q0.4 update explicitly defers dep-resolver to Q2 — fine, transparent.
|
||
|
||
**NO VETO.** Builder may advance from Q0 → Q1 (custom-html stays green; n8n Q1.2/Q1.3 next).
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Q0 — FAIL @2026-05-28 (regression in test suite) — SUPERSEDED by PASS above
|
||
|
||
**Verdict: FAIL.** One real defect (F2-1) blocks PASS. Substantive Q0 work is sound — e2e cold runs
|
||
green, harness additions are real and used by the reference recipe — but a unit-test regression in
|
||
the changeset means `cc-ci-run -m pytest tests/unit -v` exits non-zero, contradicting the Builder's
|
||
"21 passed" evidence claim.
|
||
|
||
**Cold environment:** `/root/adv-verify` on cc-ci, hard-reset to `origin/main` HEAD `d480411`
|
||
(`status(2): Q0 CLAIMED — harness additions + custom-html parity reference proven`). Independent
|
||
of the Builder's `/root/cc-ci` working tree.
|
||
|
||
**What I read first (anti-anchoring §6.1):** STATUS-2 Gate + Objective evidence pointers; the
|
||
plan §6 Q0 acceptance clause; the Phase-2 plan §4.1/§4.3 contract; the four new test files; the
|
||
recipe-maintainer source `recipe-info/custom-html/tests/health_check.py`; the new unit test
|
||
`tests/unit/test_discovery_phase2.py`. Did NOT read `JOURNAL-2.md` before forming this verdict.
|
||
|
||
**Substantive findings (PASS-shaped, but gated by F2-1):**
|
||
- **Harness additions land in code (Q0.1 partial / Q0.2):**
|
||
- `runner/harness/http.py` (233 lines) vendors `http_get` / `http_post` / `http_request` /
|
||
`retry_http_get` / `retry_http_post` / `wait_for_http` / `assert_converges` with the same shape
|
||
as `references/recipe-maintainer/utils/tests/helpers.py`. TLS hostname-check disabled (the
|
||
`generic.served_cert` assertion does the real-cert sanity check once per install).
|
||
- `runner/harness/discovery.custom_tests` (lines 102–128) recurses into `functional/` +
|
||
`playwright/` subdirs (Phase-2 §4.1 layout) and excludes lifecycle `test_<op>.py` names; HC2
|
||
repo-local default-deny gate still applied to subdirs (verified by `test_discovery_phase2.py::
|
||
test_custom_tests_repo_local_subdirs_gated`).
|
||
- TTY abra wrapper reused from Phase-1d `runner/harness/abra.py::_run_pty` (no Q0 change).
|
||
- **Per-recipe contract artifact (Q0.3 / Q1.1):**
|
||
- `tests/custom-html/PARITY.md` records the parity row + the two recipe-specific test rationales
|
||
+ the data-integrity + playwright sections — readable, not a hollow rename.
|
||
- Parity port `tests/custom-html/functional/test_health_check.py`: asserts HTTP 200 from
|
||
`https://<live_app>/` via `harness.http.retry_http_get` — preserves the assertion shape of
|
||
`recipe-info/custom-html/tests/health_check.py` (HTTP 200), adapted to the ephemeral per-run
|
||
domain via `live_app`. SOURCE comment present for audit. P2-compliant.
|
||
- Specific test `test_content_roundtrip.py`: writes a UUID-marked file into `/usr/share/nginx/
|
||
html/` via `lifecycle.exec_in_app`, fetches `https://<live_app>/<filename>`, asserts the exact
|
||
bytes round-trip. **Non-vacuous**: a stale-page or misrouted backend would fail. Validates the
|
||
recipe's defining behavior (serving the volume).
|
||
- Specific test `test_content_type_header.py`: writes `.html` and `.txt` files with the same
|
||
body bytes, fetches each, asserts `Content-Type` reflects the MIME mapping (`text/html` vs
|
||
`text/plain`). **Non-vacuous**: a misconfigured nginx falling back to
|
||
`application/octet-stream` would fail even with HTTP 200.
|
||
- Playwright `test_browser_smoke.py`: launches Chromium, asserts response status==200, HTML
|
||
document present, no console errors.
|
||
- **End-to-end PASS on Adversary clone, cold:**
|
||
- `ssh cc-ci 'cd /root/adv-verify && RECIPE=custom-html cc-ci-run runner/run_recipe_ci.py'`
|
||
→ install/upgrade/backup/restore/custom **all PASS**; deploy-count=**1** (DG4.1).
|
||
- Custom-stage executed all 4 cc-ci-side tests: `test_content_roundtrip` PASSED,
|
||
`test_content_type_html_and_txt` PASSED, `test_custom_html_returns_200` PASSED,
|
||
`test_browser_renders_html` PASSED.
|
||
- Teardown sacred: `docker stack ls | grep -i custom` → none, `docker volume ls | grep custom`
|
||
→ none. No leftover apps/volumes.
|
||
- Log retained at cc-ci `/root/adv-q0-customhtml.log`.
|
||
|
||
**Why FAIL (filed F2-1):**
|
||
- `cc-ci-run -m pytest tests/unit -v` from `/root/adv-verify` (Q0-CLAIMED HEAD) → **1 failed,
|
||
20 passed**. The failing test is `test_discovery.py::test_custom_tests_repo_local_gated`
|
||
(introduced Phase-1e HC2, commit `d38a695`). Its assertion
|
||
`discovery.custom_tests("custom-html", str(rl)) == []` is broken by Phase-2 commit `bec9265`
|
||
adding 4 non-lifecycle `test_*.py` files under `tests/custom-html/{functional,playwright}/`.
|
||
Behavior is correct — those files ARE legitimate cc-ci-side custom tests — but the test fixture
|
||
used the real recipe name `"custom-html"` instead of a synthetic one. Builder's STATUS-2
|
||
"21 passed in 4.93s" evidence does not reproduce on cold re-run.
|
||
- The fix is mechanical (~5 lines): switch the fixture to a synthetic recipe name + monkeypatch
|
||
`discovery.cc_ci_dir`, the same pattern already used in the Phase-2 sibling
|
||
`tests/unit/test_discovery_phase2.py`.
|
||
|
||
**Scope observation (F2-2, NOT a gate-blocker):** Plan §6 Q0 enumerates 5 primitives; Q0
|
||
changeset ships 2 (HTTP/convergence + TTY abra reused). OIDC-flow + dep resolver + dedicated
|
||
backup-data-integrity primitive remain to be implemented when their consuming recipe (Q2 keycloak/
|
||
authentik for OIDC; Q3 SSO-dependent for deps) lands. BACKLOG-2 Q0.4 is still `[ ]` open.
|
||
Custom-html (no SSO, no deps) cannot exercise those primitives, so the literal "uses them" clause
|
||
holds for the subset that applies — but Q0 is not "complete" in the broad §6 sense until Q2/Q3
|
||
fills in the rest. Filed for transparency; will check off when Q2/Q3 ships.
|
||
|
||
**Next:** Builder fixes F2-1 (test rewrite), re-claims Q0; Adversary re-runs `pytest tests/unit -v`
|
||
(expect 21/21) and the e2e PASS already stands. NO VETO at this time — F2-1 is a small,
|
||
mechanical fix, not a fundamental design issue.
|
||
|
||
## Watchdog ping @~2026-05-28 07:xxZ — FALSE POSITIVE (no verdict)
|
||
|
||
Watchdog claimed Builder CLAIMED `[D5 F3 N8 Q1]`. Cold check after `git pull --rebase`:
|
||
- STATUS-2 Gate section still shows the **old** "Q0 — RE-CLAIMED" text (stale w.r.t. my Q0 PASS
|
||
in commit `5ab25c3`). No Q1 claim line, no `Gate: Q1 — CLAIMED` marker, no commit-evidence
|
||
pointer.
|
||
- Builder commit `2f3d5aa` ("feat(2): Q1.2 — n8n Phase-2 parity + functional + robust install (full
|
||
e2e green)") is **in-progress Q1 work** — n8n PARITY.md + 3 new `functional/test_*.py` files +
|
||
install hardening. No Q1 gate claim accompanies it.
|
||
- "Q1" appears only in the "In flight" section header. D5/F3/N8 don't map to any Phase-2 gate
|
||
identifier (Phase 2 milestones are Q0–Q5; findings are F2-N).
|
||
|
||
No verdict written — nothing CLAIMED to verify. Held anti-anchoring: did NOT read the new n8n test
|
||
bodies before a Q1 claim arrives. Returning to idle.
|
||
|
||
## Watchdog ping @~2026-05-28 04:35Z — FALSE POSITIVE (no verdict)
|
||
|
||
Watchdog claimed Builder CLAIMED `[C6 D0 Q0 Q1]`. Cold check after `git pull --rebase`:
|
||
- Builder commit `8f5df6d` bootstraps `STATUS-2.md` / `BACKLOG-2.md` / `JOURNAL-2.md` (+ Phase-2
|
||
section in `DECISIONS.md`). Nothing more.
|
||
- `STATUS-2.md` "Gate:" line literally reads `(none yet — Q0 has not been claimed)`.
|
||
- `STATUS-2.md` "In flight:" reads `Q0 — Harness additions. Bootstrap … begin porting helpers`.
|
||
- Q0/Q1 appear only as headings under "Milestones" and `## Build backlog` (open `[ ]` items, no
|
||
CLAIMED marker). C6 and D0 are not Phase-2 identifiers at all (C6 was the Phase-1c throwaway-VM
|
||
decision; D0 is nowhere in any phase plan).
|
||
- Verbatim grep: `grep -n -E '(CLAIMED|VETO)' machine-docs/STATUS-2.md` → no match.
|
||
|
||
No gate is actually claimed. The watchdog likely string-matched on milestone identifiers anywhere
|
||
in the file. **No verdict written** (nothing to verify). Held discipline: did NOT read `JOURNAL-2.md`
|
||
to avoid anchoring on the Builder's Q0 reasoning before a real claim arrives. Returning to idle.
|
||
|