Q0.1 harness.http canonical Phase-2 recipe-test HTTP API. Q0.2 discovery recurses into functional/+playwright/ subdirs. Q0.3 custom-html PARITY.md + parity-port functional/health_check. Q1.1 +2 recipe-specific functional + playwright smoke. Acceptance cold-verifiable on cc-ci: cc-ci-run -m pytest tests/unit -v # 21 PASS RECIPE=custom-html cc-ci-run runner/run_recipe_ci.py # all 5 stages PASS, deploy-count=1 head_ref=8a026066 == chaos-version=8a026066 (HC1 non-vacuous) Q0.4 (dep resolver) deferred to Q2 (no Q1 recipe needs deps). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
7.3 KiB
STATUS — Phase 2 (per-recipe test authoring)
Phase plan (SSOT): /srv/cc-ci/cc-ci-plan/plan-phase2-recipe-tests.md
Loop state for THIS phase: STATUS-2 / BACKLOG-2 / REVIEW-2 / JOURNAL-2 (DECISIONS.md shared).
Phase 1/1b/1c/1d/1e STATUS/BACKLOG/REVIEW files are HISTORY (all DONE) — not this phase's state.
Phase
Phase 2 authors per-recipe test content on top of the corrected Phase 1/1d/1e shared harness.
Per the plan, for every maintained Co-op Cloud recipe (§5 target set), the cc-ci tests/<recipe>/
tree must carry:
- Phase-1d/1e lifecycle overlays (assertion-only, additive) —
test_install.py,test_upgrade.py,test_backup.py,test_restore.py+ops.pypre-op seeds. - Parity-ported tests from
references/recipe-maintainer/recipe-info/<recipe>/tests/*.py, one-to-one (P2), with aPARITY.mdmapping table. - ≥2 NEW recipe-specific functional tests (P3) — characteristic behavior, not just
status==200. - Real backup data-integrity (P4): seed → backup → mutate → restore → assert seeded data survived.
- Dependency resolution (P5): recipes that need other apps (SSO providers, DBs) deploy them in-run.
- Playwright (P6) where the app's core UX is a UI flow.
- Docs (P8):
docs/enroll-recipe.mdupdated with the per-recipe test contract + worked example.
Definition of Done (Phase 2) — P1–P8, each Adversary cold-verified in REVIEW-2
- P1 — Coverage. Every recipe in §5 target set has a
tests/<recipe>/suite enrolled and a full green!testmerun (install + upgrade + backup-restore). - P2 — Parity port. Every
recipe-info/<recipe>/tests/*.pyhas a comparable cc-ci test;tests/<recipe>/PARITY.mdrecords the mapping; non-ports documented in DECISIONS.md. - P3 — Recipe-specific depth. Each recipe has ≥2 new functional tests beyond parity (characteristic behavior, real assertions on app state/responses).
- P4 — Backup data-integrity is real. Seed → backup → mutate → restore → assert seeded data survived (recipe-aware, not health-only). Pattern already proven in Phase 1e on custom-html.
- P5 — Dependencies handled. Recipes with deps declare them; harness deploys deps within the
run (respecting
MAX_TESTS); SSO setup runs automatically. - P6 — Browser flows where they matter (D3). UI-centric recipes have a Playwright test of the core flow (login, create-an-object, etc.).
- P7 — No weakened tests, no corners cut. Every assertion is real; nothing skip/xfail'd, mocked, or health-only stand-in. Any "untestable" claim is a true env-level blocker with Adversary sign-off.
- P8 — Docs.
docs/enroll-recipe.mdupdated with the per-recipe test contract (§4.1) and a worked example; a new engineer can add a recipe's full suite from the docs.
Milestones (plan §6)
- Q0 — Harness additions (HTTP/convergence, OIDC-flow, dep resolver, backup data-integrity, TTY
abra). Reference recipe (custom-html) uses them for full parity+specific suite, green via
!testme. - Q1 — Pattern proof (custom-html + n8n): full parity + ≥2 specific + real backup data-integrity.
- Q2 — SSO providers (keycloak + authentik); reusable SSO-setup/OIDC-flow harness e2e.
- Q3 — SSO-dependent suite (lasuite-docs, lasuite-drive, lasuite-meet, cryptpad, immich); deps auto-deployed, SSO setup automated, parity + specific.
- Q4 — Remaining recipes (matrix-synapse, mumble, bluesky-pds, ghost, mattermost-lts, discourse, plausible, uptime-kuma, mailu, drone).
- Q5 — Completeness + docs; flip
## DONE.
In flight
Q1 — Pattern proof. custom-html overlay + parity + ≥2 specific tests proven green end-to-end
on cc-ci (see Q0 evidence). Next: n8n (Q1.2) — port recipe-info/n8n/tests/health_check.py + add
≥2 specific (workflow create/execute + survives upgrade) + real backup data-integrity (Q1.3).
Gate
Gate: Q0 — CLAIMED, awaiting Adversary @2026-05-28 (commits 0d0fc6c Q0.1/Q0.2 + Q0.3/Q1.1 in
HEAD). Acceptance evidence (per plan §6 Q0): a reference recipe (custom-html) uses the new harness
additions for a full parity + specific suite, green via the existing run path.
Objective evidence pointers (Q0):
- Harness additions landed
runner/harness/http.py— canonical Phase-2 recipe-test HTTP API (vendored fromreferences/recipe-maintainer/utils/tests/helpers.py):http_get,http_post,http_request,retry_http_get,retry_http_post,wait_for_http,assert_converges. JSON + form bodies, transport-failure → status=0.runner/harness/discovery.custom_testsrecurses intotests/<recipe>/functional/andtests/<recipe>/playwright/(Phase 2 §4.1 layout) while excluding lifecycletest_<op>.pynames; HC2 repo-local gate continues to apply.- TTY abra wrapper already present in
runner/harness/abra.py::_run_pty(Phase 1d) — reused.
- Unit-test proof (deterministic, cc-ci)
cc-ci-run -m pytest tests/unit -v→ 21 passed in 4.93s:- 8× pre-existing
tests/unit/test_discovery.py(overlay + HC2 gate, regressed). - 2× new
tests/unit/test_discovery_phase2.py(functional/+playwright/ recursion + HC2 gate still applies to subdirs). - 11× new
tests/unit/test_http.py(in-process http.server fixture — JSON parsing, 4xx-with-body, non-JSON body, transport-failure=0, headers, JSON+form POST, retry convergence, retry timeout, wait_for_http, assert_converges return value).
- 8× pre-existing
- End-to-end proof (custom-html on cc-ci, the reference recipe)
RECIPE=custom-html cc-ci-run runner/run_recipe_ci.py(log/root/ccci-q0-customhtml-full.log):- install/upgrade/backup/restore/custom all PASS, deploy-count=1.
- HC1 PR-head proof:
head_ref=8a026066 == chaos-version=8a026066, version1.10.0→1.11.0. - 5 lifecycle assertions (generic + cc-ci overlay across 4 ops) + 4 custom-stage assertions
(3 functional + 1 playwright). Reference command for Adversary cold re-run:
RECIPE=custom-html cc-ci-run runner/run_recipe_ci.py.
- Per-recipe contract artifact landed
tests/custom-html/PARITY.md— parity row forhealth_check.py, rationale for the 2 recipe-specific tests + the data-integrity + playwright sections.tests/custom-html/functional/{test_health_check.py,test_content_roundtrip.py,test_content_type_header.py}— parity port + 2 NEW recipe-specific tests; each parity file carries theSOURCE: recipe-info/custom-html/tests/<file>comment for audit.tests/custom-html/playwright/test_browser_smoke.py— Phase-2 P6 home.
Reference command for Adversary (cold, on cc-ci):
ssh cc-ci 'cd /root/cc-ci && cc-ci-run -m pytest tests/unit -v && RECIPE=custom-html cc-ci-run runner/run_recipe_ci.py'
Blocked
(none) — bootstrap access re-verified @2026-05-28: ssh cc-ci ok (root, NixOS 24.11), Gitea API
HTTP 200, wildcard DNS resolves to gateway 143.244.213.108.
Carryover from Phase 1e (not blockers for Phase 2)
- F1e-2 [adversary] — concurrent same-recipe
abra recipe fetchrace inrunner/run_recipe_ci.py::fetch_recipe. Pre-existing in Phase 1d; not a 1e regression. Drone capsMAX_TESTS=1today, so practical impact bounded. Tracked for Phase-2 breadth-ramp if concurrent recipe runs become routine.