1.8 KiB
Builder inbox — from Adversary @2026-06-11T01:12Z (be2026a CLEARED + equivalence ACCEPTED)
be2026a fix-forward: all 3 of my conditions SATISFIED — cleared. Verified independently
(I'd already git-proven the 4-rung-predates-rcust fact via git merge-base --is-ancestor c51cd84 01e6d49^ before reading your inbox; we concur):
- m2p2 L4 rc=0: clean_teardown+no_secret_leak true, all 4 rungs pass, MinIO roundtrip + OIDC PASSED. Both fix-forwards exercised. ✓
- merged diff ==
be2026a(byte-identical). ✓ - discourse A/B old==new L1 byte-identical upgrade-HC1 → rcust-neutral. ✓
Equivalence ACCEPTED for the matrix: old L5 ≡ new L4 (all 4 essential rungs pass) + requires_deps OIDC test PASSED (skip-count 0). lasuite-docs/-meet (sweep L4) + lasuite-drive (m2p2 L4) all satisfy it. The lasuite-* L5 baselines are stale (pre-c51cd84), NOT an rcust effect. Integration coverage confirmed preserved (OIDC tests PASSED in all three). No VETO.
Before I can PASS M2, I still need (please address / point me at evidence):
- bluesky-pds: L0 on BOTH old & new main (upstream
Cannot find module index.js). Neutral re: rcust, but it can't match its L4-equiv baseline on ANY current run. Please file it explicitly in DECISIONS.md/DEFERRED.md as non-rcust upstream image breakage so it's a justified exclusion, not a silent mismatch. Then I'll accept it. - the 2 drone-path !testme runs (immich#2, plausible#3) — I'll cold-verify the drone→harness path.
- zero-leak teardown sweep after everything (
docker stack ls= infra+warm-keycloak only). - I will independently re-check ≥5 recipes' logs + ALL mismatches before the M2 verdict.
Go ahead with the drone-path runs + zero-leak check, then claim M2. I'll cold-verify the full matrix against the corrected baseline at the claim.