5.8 KiB
Phase 5 — BACKLOG
SSOT: /srv/cc-ci/cc-ci-plan/plan-phase5-verify-upgrade-flow.md. DoD = V1–V9.
Single-writer: ## Build backlog = Builder-only; ## Adversary findings = Adversary-only.
Build backlog
- Create phase 5 state files (STATUS-5.md, BACKLOG-5.md, JOURNAL-5.md)
- Fix A5-2: Add commit status posting to bridge.py (pending on trigger, success/failure on finish)
- Fix A5-1: Add custom-html-tiny to bridge POLL_REPOS; redeploy bridge (cc-ci-bridge:3761c4221042)
- V3: /recipe-upgrade custom-html-tiny end-to-end GREEN (!testme PASS; PR #2 open)
- V7: mirror reconciliation (PR #1 superseded, PR #4 merged-upstream, main force-synced)
- V1/V2: !testme trigger + testme-on-pr.sh reads verdict (GREEN on PR #2/#35; RED on PR #5/#34)
- Fix A5-3: make
POST=1 testme-on-pr.shignore stale prior status on same PR head - V4: 3-iteration regression loop (seed bad tag → RED → fix → GREEN in 2 runs)
- V5: stale-test DEFAULT = comment, no test edit
- V6: --with-tests opens + verifies cc-ci test PR (verify-pr.sh run)
- V8: /upgrade-all DEFAULT run (--dry-run list + small live run)
- V8a: cc-ci-upgrader agent (launch-upgrader.sh start/stop/status cycle)
- V9: cleanup all verification PRs + deploys; install weekly cron (Phase 5 §4)
Adversary findings
[adversary] A5-3 — POST=1 testme-on-pr.sh can return a stale prior GREEN on re-runs
Status: OPEN — found 2026-06-01T03:22:00Z.
The helper currently posts a fresh !testme, then polls the recipe PR head's combined commit status.
If that PR head SHA already has a previous successful cc-ci/testme status and the bridge has not yet
processed the new comment, the helper exits immediately with the old GREEN/build URL instead of a
fresh PENDING or the new run's URL.
This is a real Phase-5/V2 correctness bug because re-commenting !testme on the same PR head is a
supported path, and the helper is meant to report the verdict for the run it just triggered.
Cold repro:
- Use an open PR whose current head SHA already has
cc-ci/testme: successfrom an earlier run. - Record the PR comment count.
- Run:
POST=1 MAX_WAIT=40 INTERVAL=5 /srv/cc-ci/.claude/skills/recipe-upgrade/testme-on-pr.sh custom-html-tiny 5 - Observe:
- the PR comment count increases by exactly one (
3 -> 4in the reproducer), so one fresh!testmewas posted; - the helper returns
VERDICT=GREENwith the old build URLhttps://drone.ci.commoninternet.net/recipe-maintainers/cc-ci/37; - later, the live system shows a new run was actually triggered and reflected on the PR as build
#41(cc-ci/testme pending -> success, target URL/41).
- the PR comment count increases by exactly one (
Likely fix direction: after POST=1, do not trust a pre-existing terminal status on the same SHA.
Poll for evidence that belongs to the newly-triggered run (e.g. a newer status timestamp, a pending
status after the new comment, or a changed build URL/context generation marker) before returning.
[adversary] A5-2 — CRITICAL: testme-on-pr.sh cannot read verdicts (commit status vs comment mismatch)
Status: CLOSED — re-tested 2026-05-31T19:41:12Z; see REVIEW-5.md follow-up entry.
testme-on-pr.sh reads Gitea commit statuses on the recipe PR's head SHA. But the bridge NEVER
sets Gitea commit statuses on recipe repos — it only posts PR comments (the YunoHost card+badge).
Drone posts commit statuses on the cc-ci repo (its own repo), not on recipe repos.
Evidence:
GET /repos/recipe-maintainers/custom-html/commits/db9a95024e9d.../status→state:'', statuses:0POST=0 testme-on-pr.sh custom-html 2→VERDICT=PENDING BUILD=?(always, on any known-green PR)- Bridge source
bridge.py: no call toPOST /repos/{owner}/{recipe}/statuses/{sha}anywhere
Required fix (one of):
- (Preferred) Bridge: after triggering a Drone build, POST
state=pendingon the recipe PR's head SHA; on build completion, POSTstate=successorstate=failurewith the build URL astarget_url. This makestestme-on-pr.shwork unmodified, adds a native SCM status indicator. testme-on-pr.sh: scan the recipe PR's comments for the<!-- cc-ci:testme -->marker and parse the result from the comment body (fragile but avoids bridge changes).
Repro: POST=0 MAX_WAIT=60 INTERVAL=5 /srv/cc-ci/.claude/skills/recipe-upgrade/testme-on-pr.sh custom-html 2
→ always VERDICT=PENDING even after a green Drone build.
(Only Adversary closes this, after re-testing with a VERDICT=GREEN on a real green build.)
[adversary] A5-1 — custom-html-tiny not in bridge poll list
Status: CLOSED — re-tested 2026-05-31T19:41:12Z; see REVIEW-5.md follow-up entry.
The Phase 5 plan specifies using custom-html-tiny as the sandbox recipe for V3–V8 tests.
However the bridge's poll list (from live container logs) does NOT include recipe-maintainers/custom-html-tiny:
poller (primary) watching ['recipe-maintainers/cc-ci', 'recipe-maintainers/custom-html',
'recipe-maintainers/keycloak', 'recipe-maintainers/cryptpad', 'recipe-maintainers/matrix-synapse',
'recipe-maintainers/lasuite-docs', 'recipe-maintainers/n8n', 'recipe-maintainers/hedgedoc'] every 30s
This means !testme on a custom-html-tiny PR will NOT trigger a Drone build. Either:
- The builder must add
custom-html-tinyto the bridge's enrolled repos list (and enroll its tests), OR - Use
custom-html(which IS enrolled) as the sandbox recipe instead, OR - The plan's V3–V8 tests must first enroll the sandbox recipe as part of Phase 5 setup
Repro: docker logs ccci-bridge_app.1.<id> 2>&1 | head -3 on cc-ci shows the poll list.
Impact: V3, V4, V5, V8 tests using custom-html-tiny as sandbox will fail silently (the !testme
comment is posted but the bridge never sees it → VERDICT stays PENDING forever).
(Only Adversary closes this after re-test.)