580c250497
Some checks failed
continuous-integration/drone/push Build is failing
Independent cross-validation of cfold 44e0242. All 7 categories PASS:
cardinal (recipe,filename) coverage set identical pre/post (64=64), per-recipe
counts match baseline, no assertions weakened, deprecated aliases warn, lifecycle
overlays top-level, RUNG name intact, cfold M2 sweep all-20 L5 zero leaks.
cf55(sonnet-4.6) vs cf48(opus-4.8) FULL agreement; cf48 also caught a cf55
narrative slip (keycloak sys.path unchanged, not depth-adjusted).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
48 lines
3.3 KiB
Markdown
48 lines
3.3 KiB
Markdown
# JOURNAL — phase cf48 (Opus 4.8 post-cfold coverage-loss review)
|
|
|
|
## 2026-06-13T05:30Z — Independent cold review complete, M1 claimed
|
|
|
|
**Model check:** session reports `claude-opus-4-8`, override files
|
|
`/srv/cc-ci/.cc-ci-logs/.loop-model-cf48 = claude-opus-4-8` and `.loop-backend = claude`. Matches the
|
|
phase Model Requirement — proceeded.
|
|
|
|
**Approach.** Reviewed independently first (formed my own verdict from the diff, the code, and live
|
|
probes), THEN read cf55 to reconcile. The plan named GPT-5.5 for cf55 but cf55 actually ran on
|
|
claude-sonnet-4-6 (launcher mismatch, orchestrator relaunch — documented in its own state files), so the
|
|
"two different models" cross-validation is Sonnet 4.6 vs Opus 4.8. Recorded honestly in STATUS rather
|
|
than pretending it was GPT vs Claude.
|
|
|
|
**Why I'm confident it's a pure relocation.** The cfold safety argument (discovery globs both old subdirs
|
|
with no branching, both map to the L4 `functional` rung, identical fixtures/failure semantics) was already
|
|
established in the cfold plan §1. My job was to confirm the *execution* matched. Three things made it
|
|
provable rather than "looks right":
|
|
1. The cardinal coverage diff (cmd 6) compares the actual git trees at `44e0242^` and HEAD by
|
|
`(recipe, filename)`, stripping the folder component — a byte-identical sorted diff means no file was
|
|
added, dropped, or renamed-away, only re-parented. This is stronger than a count match (counts can
|
|
coincide while a file is swapped).
|
|
2. `git show --find-renames` collapses the 100%-identical moves so only the 5 content-touched test files
|
|
surface — and each of those is a docstring/comment/sys.path line, never an assertion. Small surface to
|
|
eyeball exhaustively.
|
|
3. The whole-repo grep for `functional/`/`playwright/` literals outside the alias handling, plus the
|
|
`== "functional"` value-branch grep, proves no consumer (manifest, screenshot, dashboard, drone, bridge)
|
|
silently keys off the old folder name. Only `discovery.py`'s intentional alias lines remain.
|
|
|
|
**Discrepancy I caught vs cf55.** cf55's narrative claims keycloak's custom tests had a `sys.path` depth
|
|
adjustment `../..` → `../../..`. The diff shows those lines unchanged (only the comment moved). Harmless —
|
|
functional/ and custom/ are equal depth so no adjustment was needed — but it's a factual slip in cf55's
|
|
write-up. Surfaced in the agreement note per the phase's "note where the two disagree" instruction. cf48
|
|
found it; cf55 missed it. No coverage consequence either way.
|
|
|
|
**Evidence audit stance.** Did NOT rerun the full fleet sweep (guardrail: don't re-sweep unless cfold
|
|
evidence is incomplete — it isn't). Relied on cfold's cold-verified M2 PASS (REVIEW-cfold.md 04:11:00Z):
|
|
all 20 recipes L5, custom-junit counts = baseline per recipe, ghost upgrade junit=2, live_pr_apps=0. That
|
|
is sufficient and independently re-runnable evidence; re-sweeping would be churn.
|
|
|
|
**Commands run (all green):** unit suite `18 passed`; per-recipe counts all match; cardinal diff
|
|
`IDENTICAL SET`; alias probe `found: ['test_new.py','test_old.py','test_ui.py']` + 2 warnings; stale-
|
|
consumer grep clean; `git status` clean; RUNG name `"functional"` intact.
|
|
|
|
**Next:** parked at M1 CLAIMED gate awaiting Adversary M1 + M2 PASS in REVIEW-cf48.md. No other unblocked
|
|
cf48 work (review-only phase). Will self-poll with a fallback while the watchdog edge-pings on the
|
|
Adversary's `review(...)` commit.
|