upstream(lasuite-docs): note minio Docker images stopped at 2025-09-07

The skill said to render a sourceless recipe as '?'. It now says how to stop it
being sourceless: declare an NVD CPE in the registry. That is what took the fleet
from two blind recipes to zero, and it is the first thing to try when the sweep
flags another.

.claude/skills/cc-ci-cleanup/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
+---
+name: cc-ci-cleanup
+description: Tidy the fleet's open recipe PRs. Reconciles every mirror from TRUE upstream first (which alone closes PRs upstream already merged), then surveys every open PR deterministically, CLOSES the ones that can no longer be merged or were never meant to be (CI sweep artifacts, obsolete bumps, superseded duplicates) with a reason, and reports prioritised action items for the ones that SHOULD merge — what specifically is blocking each. NEVER merges a recipe PR. Invoke as /cc-ci-cleanup [recipe ...] [--dry-run].
+---
+
+# cc-ci-cleanup
+
+Open recipe PRs accumulate and rot. Some were never meant to merge (CI sweep artifacts), some were
+overtaken (upstream merged the same change, or a newer PR supersedes them), and some genuinely should
+land but are quietly blocked. Left alone the list becomes noise, and a real CVE fix hides in it.
+
+This skill separates those three, acts on the first two, and hands you a short list for the third.
+
+**Boundaries.** It **CLOSES** irrelevant PRs and **NEVER MERGES** any recipe PR — those change what
+deploys on other people's infrastructure, so a human merges them (see AGENTS.md). Closing is the only
+write it performs, always with a comment saying why.
+
+## Arguments
+- `<recipe> …` — limit to these recipes (else every recipe in `cc-ci-plan/used-recipes.md`).
+- `--dry-run` — classify and report, close nothing.
+
+## Procedure
+
+### 1. Reconcile every mirror from TRUE upstream — MANDATORY, FIRST
+```
+cc-ci-plan/reconcile-upstream.sh --all        # or: reconcile-upstream.sh <recipe>...
+```
+**Do not skip this and do not reorder it.** Every signal in step 2 is measured against the mirror's
+`main`; against a stale mirror they are all wrong. This step also does a chunk of the cleanup by
+itself — it closes any PR whose changes upstream has already merged.
+
+> On the first real run (2026-08-11) this alone closed **three** PRs that looked pending and were
+> already merged upstream: discourse #6 (carrying **140 CVEs**), keycloak #6 (**12 CVEs**), n8n #5.
+> All three had been reported to the operator as outstanding work. mailu #6 went the same way earlier
+> the same day. Reconciling is not hygiene, it is how you avoid recommending work that is already done.
+
+### 2. Survey every open PR (deterministic — no judgement yet)
+```
+python3 cc-ci-plan/pr-survey.py [recipe ...]          # add --json for the raw facts
+```
+Per PR it measures: `behind_main`, `ahead`, `mergeable`, `diff_files`, the images it **adds**, which
+of those are **already in main**, `obsolete`, the newest `!testme` verdict + build, `branch_kind`,
+and age/idle days. It decides nothing — that is this skill's job.
+
+### 3. Classify
+
+**CLOSE — cannot merge, or was never meant to.** Each needs a *positive* reason, not an absence:
+
+| signal | why it is closeable |
+|---|---|
+| `branch_kind: ci-artifact` (`ci/*`) | regall/cfold sweeps and `!testme` probes — harness artifacts, never intended to merge |
+| `obsolete: true` | every image it adds is **already pinned in main** — it has nothing left to contribute |
+| superseded | a newer PR on the same recipe makes the same bump (name both numbers in the comment) |
+| `diff_files: 0` | genuinely empty diff — nothing to merge |
+
+**NEVER close on:**
+- `DIFF-UNREADABLE` — the diff could not be fetched, which is NOT an empty diff. gitea #4 reads that
+  way (force-pushed branch) while being a verified, green, needed fix.
+- any field that came back `null`/unknown.
+- a PR that carries a **CVE fix** and is the only thing carrying it, even if it looks stale — report it
+  instead. Losing a security fix to tidiness is far worse than a long PR list.
+- `--dry-run`.
+
+**NEEDS WORK — should merge, something blocks it.** Give the *specific* next action:
+| signal | action item |
+|---|---|
+| `mergeable: false` | conflicts — rebase the branch on `main` and re-run `!testme` |
+| `behind_main > 0` | out of date — rebase, then re-verify (a green from before main moved proves nothing) |
+| `ci: failed` | diagnose via `/ci-test-review`; classify recipe-bug vs stale test |
+| `ci: never-run` | run `!testme` |
+| blocked on the operator | say exactly what is needed (a secret, an upstream release, a decision) |
+
+**READY — green, current, no conflicts.** Action item is simply: review and merge.
+
+### 4. Close the CLOSE set (skip entirely under `--dry-run`)
+Comment first, then close. The comment must say **which signal** made it closeable and **what to do
+if that is wrong** ("reopen if …"), so a wrong call is cheap to undo. Never close silently.
+
+### 5. Report
+Order by what deserves attention, not by recipe name:
+
+1. **CVE-carrying PRs that should merge** — most severe first, with the CVE ids.
+2. Other **READY** PRs (green + current).
+3. **NEEDS WORK**, each with its one specific action.
+4. **CLOSED this run**, with the reason for each.
+5. Anything **deliberately left alone** despite looking stale, and why.
+
+End with a one-line summary: `N open → C closed, R ready to merge, W need work`.
+
+## Guardrails
+- **Never merge a recipe PR.** Create/verify/close only; the operator merges.
+- **Reconcile first, always.** Judging a PR against a stale mirror is how you close good work or
+  recommend work that is already done.
+- **Close only on a positive signal**, never on "looks old". Age alone is not a reason — several
+  60-day-old PRs here are green and mergeable.
+- **Never close a lone CVE fix.** Report it, however stale.
+- Every close gets a comment with its reason and a reopen hint.

.claude/skills/cc-ci-status/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+---
+name: cc-ci-status
+description: Comprehensive read-only status check of the whole cc-ci system - how the recent weekly upgrade runs went and whether their reports published, which recipes/tests are stale, how long since the server + orchestrator host flake updates, open recipe PRs (flagging CVE-carrying PRs that have been open too long), host health (failed units, disk, timers, bridge/!testme path), ending with a verdict (ALL HEALTHY or a findings list) and recommended next steps mapped to the skills to invoke. Never changes anything - it only reads and reports. Invoke as /cc-ci-status.
+---
+
+# cc-ci-status (thin wrapper)
+
+The canonical definition of this skill lives in the **opencode** position:
+
+**`.opencode/skills/cc-ci-status/SKILL.md`**
+
+Read that file for the full procedure. This `.claude/skills/` copy is kept as a
+thin pointer for Claude Code compatibility; opencode loads the canonical
+definition from `.opencode/skills/` directly.

.claude/skills/cctest-init-instance/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+---
+name: cctest-init-instance
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Deploy all maintained recipes to the active test instance from scratch (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /init-instance; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-init-instance.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-init-instance (thin wrapper)
+
+The canonical definition of this skill lives in the **opencode** position:
+
+**`.opencode/skills/cctest-init-instance/SKILL.md`**
+
+Read that file. It in turn wraps the ARM submodule skill
+`references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/init-instance/SKILL.md`.

.claude/skills/cctest-intro/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+---
+name: cctest-intro
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Explain what this project is and how to get started (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /intro; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-intro.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-intro (thin wrapper)
+
+The canonical definition of this skill lives in the **opencode** position:
+
+**`.opencode/skills/cctest-intro/SKILL.md`**
+
+Read that file. It in turn wraps the ARM submodule skill
+`references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/intro/SKILL.md`.

.claude/skills/cctest-new-recipe-guide/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+---
+name: cctest-new-recipe-guide
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Guide for developing a new Co-op Cloud recipe from scratch (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /new-recipe-guide; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-new-recipe-guide.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-new-recipe-guide (thin wrapper)
+
+The canonical definition of this skill lives in the **opencode** position:
+
+**`.opencode/skills/cctest-new-recipe-guide/SKILL.md`**
+
+Read that file. It in turn wraps the ARM submodule skill
+`references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/new-recipe-guide/SKILL.md`.

.claude/skills/cctest-opencode-sync/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+---
+name: cctest-opencode-sync
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Ensure every Claude skill has a corresponding OpenCode skill alias (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /opencode-sync; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-opencode-sync.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-opencode-sync (thin wrapper)
+
+The canonical definition of this skill lives in the **opencode** position:
+
+**`.opencode/skills/cctest-opencode-sync/SKILL.md`**
+
+Read that file. It in turn wraps the ARM submodule skill
+`references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/opencode-sync/SKILL.md`.

.claude/skills/cctest-recipe-check/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+---
+name: cctest-recipe-check
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Fetch a Co-op Cloud recipe and check for available upgrades (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /recipe-check; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-recipe-check.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-recipe-check (thin wrapper)
+
+The canonical definition of this skill lives in the **opencode** position:
+
+**`.opencode/skills/cctest-recipe-check/SKILL.md`**
+
+Read that file. It in turn wraps the ARM submodule skill
+`references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/recipe-check/SKILL.md`.

.claude/skills/cctest-recipe-create-pr/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+---
+name: cctest-recipe-create-pr
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Push local recipe commits to git.autonomic.zone and open a PR against an upstream-synced main branch (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /recipe-create-pr; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-recipe-create-pr.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-recipe-create-pr (thin wrapper)
+
+The canonical definition of this skill lives in the **opencode** position:
+
+**`.opencode/skills/cctest-recipe-create-pr/SKILL.md`**
+
+Read that file. It in turn wraps the ARM submodule skill
+`references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/recipe-create-pr/SKILL.md`.

.claude/skills/cctest-recipe-deploy/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+---
+name: cctest-recipe-deploy
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Deploy the local recipe checkout to the test instance (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /recipe-deploy; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-recipe-deploy.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-recipe-deploy (thin wrapper)
+
+The canonical definition of this skill lives in the **opencode** position:
+
+**`.opencode/skills/cctest-recipe-deploy/SKILL.md`**
+
+Read that file. It in turn wraps the ARM submodule skill
+`references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/recipe-deploy/SKILL.md`.

.claude/skills/cctest-recipe-guidelines/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+---
+name: cctest-recipe-guidelines
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Guidelines for all recipe operations including local change preservation, version format, and secrets (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /recipe-guidelines; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-recipe-guidelines.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-recipe-guidelines (thin wrapper)
+
+The canonical definition of this skill lives in the **opencode** position:
+
+**`.opencode/skills/cctest-recipe-guidelines/SKILL.md`**
+
+Read that file. It in turn wraps the ARM submodule skill
+`references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/recipe-guidelines/SKILL.md`.

.claude/skills/cctest-recipe-init/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+---
+name: cctest-recipe-init
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Create a new test instance and recipe-info for a recipe (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /recipe-init; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-recipe-init.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-recipe-init (thin wrapper)
+
+The canonical definition of this skill lives in the **opencode** position:
+
+**`.opencode/skills/cctest-recipe-init/SKILL.md`**
+
+Read that file. It in turn wraps the ARM submodule skill
+`references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/recipe-init/SKILL.md`.

.claude/skills/cctest-recipe-logging/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+---
+name: cctest-recipe-logging
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Logging instructions for maintaining detailed operation logs in the logs directory (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /recipe-logging; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-recipe-logging.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-recipe-logging (thin wrapper)
+
+The canonical definition of this skill lives in the **opencode** position:
+
+**`.opencode/skills/cctest-recipe-logging/SKILL.md`**
+
+Read that file. It in turn wraps the ARM submodule skill
+`references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/recipe-logging/SKILL.md`.

.claude/skills/cctest-recipe-new-tag/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+---
+name: cctest-recipe-new-tag
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Bump the recipe version and create an annotated git tag (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /recipe-new-tag; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-recipe-new-tag.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-recipe-new-tag (thin wrapper)
+
+The canonical definition of this skill lives in the **opencode** position:
+
+**`.opencode/skills/cctest-recipe-new-tag/SKILL.md`**
+
+Read that file. It in turn wraps the ARM submodule skill
+`references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/recipe-new-tag/SKILL.md`.

.claude/skills/cctest-recipe-overview/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+---
+name: cctest-recipe-overview
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Check all maintained recipes and recommend what to upgrade (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /recipe-overview; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-recipe-overview.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-recipe-overview (thin wrapper)
+
+The canonical definition of this skill lives in the **opencode** position:
+
+**`.opencode/skills/cctest-recipe-overview/SKILL.md`**
+
+Read that file. It in turn wraps the ARM submodule skill
+`references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/recipe-overview/SKILL.md`.

.claude/skills/cctest-recipe-review/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+---
+name: cctest-recipe-review
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Review a recipe for Co-op Cloud best practices (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /recipe-review; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-recipe-review.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-recipe-review (thin wrapper)
+
+The canonical definition of this skill lives in the **opencode** position:
+
+**`.opencode/skills/cctest-recipe-review/SKILL.md`**
+
+Read that file. It in turn wraps the ARM submodule skill
+`references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/recipe-review/SKILL.md`.

.claude/skills/cctest-recipe-test-all/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+---
+name: cctest-recipe-test-all
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Run tests for all maintained recipes, deploying each one at a time (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /recipe-test-all; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-recipe-test-all.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-recipe-test-all (thin wrapper)
+
+The canonical definition of this skill lives in the **opencode** position:
+
+**`.opencode/skills/cctest-recipe-test-all/SKILL.md`**
+
+Read that file. It in turn wraps the ARM submodule skill
+`references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/recipe-test-all/SKILL.md`.

.claude/skills/cctest-recipe-test-backup/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+---
+name: cctest-recipe-test-backup
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Test backing up and restoring a recipe's test instance (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /recipe-test-backup; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-recipe-test-backup.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-recipe-test-backup (thin wrapper)
+
+The canonical definition of this skill lives in the **opencode** position:
+
+**`.opencode/skills/cctest-recipe-test-backup/SKILL.md`**
+
+Read that file. It in turn wraps the ARM submodule skill
+`references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/recipe-test-backup/SKILL.md`.

.claude/skills/cctest-recipe-test-new/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+---
+name: cctest-recipe-test-new
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Test a recipe's first-time initialization from scratch (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /recipe-test-new; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-recipe-test-new.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-recipe-test-new (thin wrapper)
+
+The canonical definition of this skill lives in the **opencode** position:
+
+**`.opencode/skills/cctest-recipe-test-new/SKILL.md`**
+
+Read that file. It in turn wraps the ARM submodule skill
+`references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/recipe-test-new/SKILL.md`.

.claude/skills/cctest-recipe-test-update/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+---
+name: cctest-recipe-test-update
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Test upgrading a recipe's test instance using abra app deploy (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /recipe-test-update; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-recipe-test-update.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-recipe-test-update (thin wrapper)
+
+The canonical definition of this skill lives in the **opencode** position:
+
+**`.opencode/skills/cctest-recipe-test-update/SKILL.md`**
+
+Read that file. It in turn wraps the ARM submodule skill
+`references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/recipe-test-update/SKILL.md`.

.claude/skills/cctest-recipe-test/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+---
+name: cctest-recipe-test
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Run all tests for a Co-op Cloud recipe (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /recipe-test; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-recipe-test.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-recipe-test (thin wrapper)
+
+The canonical definition of this skill lives in the **opencode** position:
+
+**`.opencode/skills/cctest-recipe-test/SKILL.md`**
+
+Read that file. It in turn wraps the ARM submodule skill
+`references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/recipe-test/SKILL.md`.

.claude/skills/cctest-recipe-upgrade-apply/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+---
+name: cctest-recipe-upgrade-apply
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Execute a planned recipe upgrade — apply changes, deploy, test, commit/tag (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /recipe-upgrade-apply; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-recipe-upgrade-apply.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-recipe-upgrade-apply (thin wrapper)
+
+The canonical definition of this skill lives in the **opencode** position:
+
+**`.opencode/skills/cctest-recipe-upgrade-apply/SKILL.md`**
+
+Read that file. It in turn wraps the ARM submodule skill
+`references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/recipe-upgrade-apply/SKILL.md`.

.claude/skills/cctest-recipe-upgrade-cron-all/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+---
+name: cctest-recipe-upgrade-cron-all
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Autonomous weekly upgrade run — overview all recipes, upgrade each end-to-end (sequentially by default, parallel with --parallel), open PRs (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /recipe-upgrade-cron-all; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-recipe-upgrade-cron-all.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-recipe-upgrade-cron-all (thin wrapper)
+
+The canonical definition of this skill lives in the **opencode** position:
+
+**`.opencode/skills/cctest-recipe-upgrade-cron-all/SKILL.md`**
+
+Read that file. It in turn wraps the ARM submodule skill
+`references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/recipe-upgrade-cron-all/SKILL.md`.

.claude/skills/cctest-recipe-upgrade-full/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+---
+name: cctest-recipe-upgrade-full
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Plan and apply a recipe upgrade end-to-end, no human review in the middle (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /recipe-upgrade-full; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-recipe-upgrade-full.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-recipe-upgrade-full (thin wrapper)
+
+The canonical definition of this skill lives in the **opencode** position:
+
+**`.opencode/skills/cctest-recipe-upgrade-full/SKILL.md`**
+
+Read that file. It in turn wraps the ARM submodule skill
+`references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/recipe-upgrade-full/SKILL.md`.

.claude/skills/cctest-recipe-upgrade-plan/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+---
+name: cctest-recipe-upgrade-plan
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Create a detailed upgrade plan for a recipe (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /recipe-upgrade-plan; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-recipe-upgrade-plan.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-recipe-upgrade-plan (thin wrapper)
+
+The canonical definition of this skill lives in the **opencode** position:
+
+**`.opencode/skills/cctest-recipe-upgrade-plan/SKILL.md`**
+
+Read that file. It in turn wraps the ARM submodule skill
+`references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/recipe-upgrade-plan/SKILL.md`.

.claude/skills/cctest-recipe-upstream/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+---
+name: cctest-recipe-upstream
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] From a git.autonomic.zone review-PR URL, fetch the branch + tag locally and emit the commands to open the upstream PR on git.coopcloud.tech (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /recipe-upstream; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-recipe-upstream.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-recipe-upstream (thin wrapper)
+
+The canonical definition of this skill lives in the **opencode** position:
+
+**`.opencode/skills/cctest-recipe-upstream/SKILL.md`**
+
+Read that file. It in turn wraps the ARM submodule skill
+`references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/recipe-upstream/SKILL.md`.

.claude/skills/cctest-setup-sandbox/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+---
+name: cctest-setup-sandbox
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Guide for setting up a sandboxed environment to run the agent with recipe-maintainer (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /setup-sandbox; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-setup-sandbox.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-setup-sandbox (thin wrapper)
+
+The canonical definition of this skill lives in the **opencode** position:
+
+**`.opencode/skills/cctest-setup-sandbox/SKILL.md`**
+
+Read that file. It in turn wraps the ARM submodule skill
+`references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/setup-sandbox/SKILL.md`.

.claude/skills/cctest-switch-default-instance/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+---
+name: cctest-switch-default-instance
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Switch the default test instance (b1cc or t1cc) for all recipe operations (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /switch-default-instance; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-switch-default-instance.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-switch-default-instance (thin wrapper)
+
+The canonical definition of this skill lives in the **opencode** position:
+
+**`.opencode/skills/cctest-switch-default-instance/SKILL.md`**
+
+Read that file. It in turn wraps the ARM submodule skill
+`references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/switch-default-instance/SKILL.md`.

.claude/skills/cctest-sync-secrets/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+---
+name: cctest-sync-secrets
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Sync Docker secrets from the test server into recipe-info/testsecrets/ (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /sync-secrets; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-sync-secrets.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-sync-secrets (thin wrapper)
+
+The canonical definition of this skill lives in the **opencode** position:
+
+**`.opencode/skills/cctest-sync-secrets/SKILL.md`**
+
+Read that file. It in turn wraps the ARM submodule skill
+`references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/sync-secrets/SKILL.md`.

.claude/skills/cctest-t1cc-start/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+---
+name: cctest-t1cc-start
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Provision the t1cc DigitalOcean test server and deploy Traefik (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /t1cc-start; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-t1cc-start.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-t1cc-start (thin wrapper)
+
+The canonical definition of this skill lives in the **opencode** position:
+
+**`.opencode/skills/cctest-t1cc-start/SKILL.md`**
+
+Read that file. It in turn wraps the ARM submodule skill
+`references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/t1cc-start/SKILL.md`.

.claude/skills/cctest-t1cc-stop/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+---
+name: cctest-t1cc-stop
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Destroy the t1cc DigitalOcean test server via terraform (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /t1cc-stop; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-t1cc-stop.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-t1cc-stop (thin wrapper)
+
+The canonical definition of this skill lives in the **opencode** position:
+
+**`.opencode/skills/cctest-t1cc-stop/SKILL.md`**
+
+Read that file. It in turn wraps the ARM submodule skill
+`references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/t1cc-stop/SKILL.md`.

.claude/skills/cctest-test-context-reset/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+---
+name: cctest-test-context-reset
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Undeploy all apps from the test server except traefik (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /test-context-reset; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-test-context-reset.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-test-context-reset (thin wrapper)
+
+The canonical definition of this skill lives in the **opencode** position:
+
+**`.opencode/skills/cctest-test-context-reset/SKILL.md`**
+
+Read that file. It in turn wraps the ARM submodule skill
+`references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/test-context-reset/SKILL.md`.

.claude/skills/cctest-test-setup/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+---
+name: cctest-test-setup
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Verify the test environment is configured correctly (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /test-setup; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-test-setup.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-test-setup (thin wrapper)
+
+The canonical definition of this skill lives in the **opencode** position:
+
+**`.opencode/skills/cctest-test-setup/SKILL.md`**
+
+Read that file. It in turn wraps the ARM submodule skill
+`references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/test-setup/SKILL.md`.

.claude/skills/ci-test-review/SKILL.md

@@ -79,12 +79,29 @@ For each real (non-flaky) finding, write the actual fix and open a PR. **Never m
   it handles the mirror to `git.autonomic.zone/recipe-maintainers/<recipe>` (upstream
   `git.coopcloud.tech`). Keep the change **bounded** to the diagnosed root cause; don't rewrite the
   recipe.
+- **Before editing any test, read `tests/STYLE.md` in the cc-ci repo.** It encodes the rules a test
+  change must satisfy — set state up through the app's interface rather than its database, gate on
+  version instead of branching, correct the fixture/wait but NEVER the assertion, and diagnose from
+  the app's own telemetry before concluding a test is stale.
 - **CI-server-side fix → cc-ci PR.** Branch the cc-ci product repo
   (`recipe-maintainers/cc-ci`), apply the fix, and open the PR via the Gitea API (use the
   `GITEA_*` creds from `/srv/cc-ci/.testenv`). **Single-writer discipline:** work on a dedicated
   branch in a SEPARATE clone — **never push `main`, never touch the build loops' working clones**
   (`/cc-ci`, `/cc-ci-adv`) or their in-flight state.
 
+> ### ⚠️ RECONCILE FROM UPSTREAM FIRST — always, before any PR work or upgrade check
+> ```
+> cc-ci-plan/reconcile-upstream.sh <recipe>...   # or --all
+> ```
+> Deterministic, idempotent, and safe (recipe work lives in branches, never on mirror `main`). It
+> force-syncs each mirror to coopcloud's **default branch — resolved from the API, `main` OR
+> `master`** — and closes any mirror PR whose changes upstream already merged. Skipping it has cost
+> us three distinct ways: mailu #6 was reported as the fix for two internet-facing CVEs while
+> upstream had already merged AND released it; a stale mirror makes a survey report "no upgrades
+> available" so the recipe drops out of the weekly run; and reading the wrong branch on a recipe with
+> a stale `main` beside a live `master` (gitea) manufactures a false "three releases behind, missing
+> two CVSS-9.8 RCEs" finding.
+
 ### 5. VERIFY each PR on the CI server (deterministic; still never merge)
 A PR is only "working" once **cc-ci verifies it green** (operator rule) — dogfood the CI that found
 the bug. Verification is deterministic (the harness), not an AI judgement.

.claude/skills/cve-check-and-upgrade/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
+---
+name: cve-check-and-upgrade
+description: Security-driven upgrade run. Does a full /cve-check sweep first (per-image advisory scan of every recipe's available upgrade, with adjudication), then runs /recipe-upgrade ONLY on the recipes whose upgrade fixes at least one CVE — worst severity first — opening a verified recipe PR for each, and finally publishes one report covering both the sweep and the PRs. Recipes with no CVEs are left alone; that is the point. NEVER merges. Invoke as /cve-check-and-upgrade [recipe ...] [--min-severity high] [--capacity N] [--dry-run].
+---
+
+# cve-check-and-upgrade
+
+`/upgrade-all` upgrades everything that *has* an upgrade. **This upgrades what has a reason.** It runs
+the `/cve-check` sweep, then spends CI time only on the recipes where an upgrade actually closes a
+vulnerability, handling the worst first.
+
+Use it when you want to act on security rather than churn the whole fleet: after a vendor announcement,
+when CI capacity is short, or between weekly runs. When you only want to *know*, use `/cve-check`. When
+you want everything current regardless of CVEs, use `/upgrade-all`.
+
+**Creates PRs. Never merges.** Every PR is verified green on cc-ci and left for a human.
+
+## Arguments
+- `<recipe> …` — restrict the whole run to these recipes.
+- `--min-severity critical|high|medium|low` — only upgrade recipes whose fixed CVEs reach this
+  severity. Default **`low`** (any CVE at all justifies the upgrade). `--min-severity high` is the
+  useful "just the urgent ones" setting.
+- `--capacity N` — subagent pool size; defaults to the live `DRONE_RUNNER_CAPACITY` (the drone
+  runner's slots), matching `/upgrade-all`'s rolling-pool behaviour.
+- `--dry-run` — do the whole sweep and print exactly which recipes *would* be upgraded and why, then
+  stop without spawning a single upgrade. **Publishes no report and opens no PR.**
+
+## Procedure
+
+### 1. Sweep — run `/cve-check` in full
+Follow `.claude/skills/cve-check/SKILL.md` steps 1–5 exactly: candidate list, per-image upgrade windows,
+the advisory scan per recipe, pass-2 adjudication of anything undecided, and the severity classification.
+**Do not publish its report** — this run produces one combined report at the end instead.
+
+Keep, per recipe: the windows scanned, the CVE count, the CVE ids with severities, and whether the count
+is a floor (undetermined advisories remain) or unknown.
+
+### 2. Decide what to upgrade
+`RECIPES_TO_UPGRADE` = recipes where **the scan found ≥1 CVE** at or above `--min-severity`.
+
+Deliberate exclusions, each recorded in the report with its reason:
+- **0 CVEs** — an upgrade may exist, but nothing security-relevant. Left alone; that is the point of
+  this skill. `/upgrade-all` is what sweeps those up.
+- **`external` tier** — swept for visibility, **never upgraded here**; someone else maintains it. Flag
+  it loudly in the report if it has a critical, since the action is to tell them, not to open a PR.
+- **`UPTODATE`** — nothing available.
+- **count `?` / UNKNOWN** — do **not** upgrade blind, and do **not** treat it as clean. Put it in the
+  Addendum as needing a look. An unknown is a gap in our knowledge, not evidence of safety.
+
+Order the queue by **worst severity first** (critical → high → …), count breaking ties. If `--dry-run`,
+print this queue with each recipe's CVE ids and severities, and STOP here.
+
+### 3. Upgrade each one — via `/recipe-upgrade` subagents
+Run `/recipe-upgrade <recipe>` per queued recipe as a **subagent**, in the queue order above, as a
+**rolling pool** keeping `--capacity` (default `DRONE_RUNNER_CAPACITY`) running at once and starting the
+next as each finishes — the same concurrency discipline as `/upgrade-all` §3, and safe for the same
+reason (per-run recipe trees + app-domain locks).
+
+Each subagent does the full job: plan, implement the bump, verify green on cc-ci with `!testme`, and
+open a recipe PR. **Default mode — no `--with-tests`**: a genuinely stale test gets an explanatory PR
+comment, not a test edit.
+
+**Tell each subagent which CVEs justify its upgrade**, with ids and severities, so the PR description
+says why it exists. That is most of this skill's value to a reviewer: a PR that names the CVSS-9.8 RCE
+it closes gets merged today, an unexplained version bump waits a fortnight.
+
+Collect per recipe: PR url + number, the `!testme` verdict and build number, and any failure.
+
+### 4. Report — one page covering sweep AND PRs
+Write `/tmp/cve-spec-<DATE>.json` per `/cve-check` step 6, with these differences:
+- Rows for upgraded recipes carry the real `ci` (`build N ✓` / `RED N · <stage>`) + `ci_url`, and
+  `pr`/`pr_url`. `status` is the CI verdict (`GREEN`/`FAILED`/`STALE`); the live PR-status column
+  derives itself from `recipe` + `pr`.
+- Rows for swept-but-not-upgraded recipes keep `PENDING`/`UPTODATE` with empty `ci`/`pr`, and a
+  `notes` reason (`0 CVEs — not upgraded`, `external — maintained elsewhere`, `below --min-severity`).
+- Include `changes[]` — one entry per recipe that got a PR, describing what the upgrade changes **and
+  the CVEs it closes**.
+- Keep `"kind": "cve"`: it titles the page "The Recipe Report — CVE check" and files it as
+  `cve-<DATE>.html`, alongside the weekly editions in the same archive index.
+
+Then render + publish exactly as `/cve-check` step 7, and verify as its step 8. Print the report URL,
+`N swept · M upgraded · K PRs green · J failed`, and `CVE CHECK AND UPGRADE COMPLETE`.
+
+## Guardrails
+- **NEVER merge.** Create and verify; a human merges. Never push to true upstream.
+- **Never weaken a test** to make a PR green, and never edit a test without `--with-tests`.
+- **Never upgrade a recipe whose CVE count is unknown** on the assumption it is fine — surface it.
+- **Never upgrade an `external` recipe** here, even with a critical; report it instead.
+- **Public-safe report only** — no secrets, tokens, internal hostnames, raw logs, or spend figures.
+- If the sweep finds **nothing** at or above `--min-severity`, that is a good outcome: publish the
+  report saying so and open no PRs. Do not manufacture work.

.claude/skills/cve-check/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,204 @@
+---
+name: cve-check
+description: Fleet-wide CVE sweep WITHOUT upgrading anything. For every recipe cc-ci deploys, works out what upgrade is available (current pinned tag → newest supported tag, per image including sidecars), runs the deterministic advisory scan over that window, adjudicates whatever the scan could not decide, and publishes a CVE report to report.ci.commoninternet.net as cve-<DATE>.html. READ-ONLY — opens no PRs, edits no recipes, runs no CI, merges nothing. Answers "what are we exposed to that an upgrade would fix?" in minutes rather than the hours a full upgrade run takes. Invoke as /cve-check [recipe ...] [--weekly-only].
+---
+
+# cve-check
+
+A **security sweep, not an upgrade run.** It answers one question for every recipe cc-ci deploys:
+
+> If we upgraded this recipe today, how many CVEs would that fix, and how bad are they?
+
+It is the cheap, safe half of `/upgrade-all`: the same version research and the same advisory scan,
+with **no implementation, no CI, and no PRs**. Use it when you want the security picture now — after a
+vendor announcement, before deciding what to prioritise, or between weekly runs. When you want the PRs
+too, use **`/cve-check-and-upgrade`**.
+
+**Read-only, absolutely.** Never edit a recipe, never open or comment on a PR, never merge, never
+deploy. The only thing it writes is its own log and the published report page.
+
+## Arguments
+- `<recipe> …` — sweep only these recipes (else every recipe in `cc-ci-plan/used-recipes.md`).
+- `--weekly-only` — skip rows tagged `external`. **Off by default on purpose**: an `external` recipe is
+  still deployed and still exposes us, so a security sweep that silently skipped it would misreport the
+  fleet's exposure. Externals are swept and clearly marked "maintained elsewhere" in the report.
+
+## Procedure
+
+> ### ⚠️ Run abra over a pseudo-TTY (or it FATAs `inappropriate ioctl for device`)
+> `abra` needs a TTY. Wrap every abra call: `ssh cc-ci 'script -qec "abra <args> -n" /dev/null'`.
+> (`git` and other commands do NOT need the wrapper.)
+
+### 1. Build the candidate list
+Read `cc-ci-plan/used-recipes.md` — the canonical inventory. Take every row (both tiers), recording the
+tier per recipe; with `--weekly-only`, drop the `external` rows. An explicit recipe argument overrides
+any skip.
+
+### 2. Per recipe — establish the upgrade window WITHOUT upgrading
+
+This is `/recipe-upgrade` step 1's research, stopping before it implements anything.
+
+> ⚠️ **The same four things that silently skip recipes apply here — handle ALL FOUR:**
+> 1. **pseudo-TTY** — per the box above.
+> 2. **go-git auth to git.autonomic.zone** — recipes on the private mirror FATA
+>    `authentication required: Unauthorized`. Bake creds into origin first (idempotent, only when
+>    origin is on git.autonomic.zone):
+>    `git -C ~/.abra/recipes/<r> remote set-url origin "https://$GITEA_USERNAME:$GITEA_PASSWORD@git.autonomic.zone/recipe-maintainers/<r>.git"`
+> 3. **dirty worktree** — usually just the untracked cc-ci overlay; `git stash -u` before, `stash pop`
+>    after. Only a genuinely dirty TRACKED tree is a skip.
+> 4. **tag+digest pins abra cannot parse** — abra FATAs and aborts the WHOLE recipe (immich). Do not
+>    hand-check the registry; run the resolver, which is abra-independent and covers every image:
+>    ```
+>    python3 /srv/cc-ci/cc-ci-plan/resolve-images.py <recipe> --ssh cc-ci --table
+>    ```
+>    It reports, per image, `newest_within_major` (the compatibility-safe pick) and
+>    `newest_same_shape` (the newest of that tag's form). **Use `newest_within_major` unless you have
+>    checked the app supports the major jump** — immich's postgres tag encodes the pg major plus the
+>    vectorchord/pgvectors versions immich-server is built against, so taking the newest would break
+>    the deploy. `all_resolved: false` means an image could NOT be resolved — that is a `?`, never a 0.
+
+**Reconcile the mirror from true upstream FIRST — ALWAYS, no exceptions** — one command,
+`cc-ci-plan/reconcile-upstream.sh <recipe>... | --all`. This is the same reconcile
+`/upgrade-all` does. Do not skip it in the name of keeping the sweep read-only: skipping it makes you
+research a stale checkout, and on the first real run that produced **two recipes with no survey output
+at all**, which is indistinguishable from "no upgrades" unless you check. It is safe — recipe work
+lives in **branches**, never directly on `main`, so a force-sync of `main` to upstream discards
+nothing; it also auto-closes mirror PRs whose changes upstream has already merged.
+
+> ### ⚠️ The default branch may be `master`, not `main` — check, do not assume
+> Several coopcloud recipes keep a **stale `main` alongside the real default `master`**. gitea is one:
+> `main` sits at 1.24.2-rootless while `master` has 1.27.1-rootless plus the merged PRs and the 3.6.3
+> release. Reading `main` there tells you the recipe is three releases behind and missing two CVSS-9.8
+> RCE fixes — a false alarm that reads exactly like a real one. Resolve the default branch from the
+> API (`/api/v1/repos/coop-cloud/<recipe>` → `default_branch`) before reading any file, and never
+> `git reset --hard origin/main` on a checkout that tracks `master`.
+
+**Cross-check abra with the resolver.** abra is the primary source, but it silently contributes
+nothing for images it cannot parse, and it reported "no new versions" for images that did have them
+(mumble v1.6.870-0 → -4). Run `resolve-images.py` for every recipe and take the UNION of the two: on
+the first real sweep the resolver found upgrades abra missed entirely in five recipes, one of which
+(plausible's clickhouse) carried four CVEs.
+
+Then read versions:
+```
+set -a; . /srv/cc-ci/.testenv; set +a
+ssh cc-ci "GITEA_USERNAME='$GITEA_USERNAME' GITEA_PASSWORD='$GITEA_PASSWORD' GITEA_URL='$GITEA_URL' bash -s <recipe> --reconcile-only" \
+   < /srv/cc-ci/.claude/skills/recipe-upgrade/open-recipe-pr.sh
+ssh cc-ci 'export PATH=/run/current-system/sw/bin:$PATH; R=<recipe>; \
+  git -C ~/.abra/recipes/$R stash -u >/dev/null 2>&1 || true; \
+  script -qec "abra recipe fetch $R --force -n" /dev/null; \
+  script -qec "abra recipe upgrade $R -m -n" /dev/null; \
+  git -C ~/.abra/recipes/$R stash pop >/dev/null 2>&1 || true'
+```
+
+For each recipe produce **one window per image**: `current pinned tag → newest supported tag`. You need
+the sidecars (redis, postgres, nginx …), not just the app — a sidecar bump is where discourse's only
+CRITICAL came from, and an image with no window is not counted at all.
+
+- **No upgrade available** → the recipe is `UPTODATE`; its CVE count is **`0`**, not `?`. There is
+  nothing an upgrade could fix. Record it and move on.
+- **No output at all is NOT "no upgrade".** An abra call that times out, FATAs, or prints nothing
+  leaves the recipe **unverified** — treat it as a distinct outcome, never fold it into up-to-date.
+  Re-run it, and if it still yields nothing, resolve the versions by direct registry check (box item 4).
+  Only report `?` once BOTH the abra check and the direct check have failed. On the first real run this
+  distinction was the difference between two false zeros and the truth (both recipes turned out fine,
+  but nothing in the survey said so).
+
+### 2c. Know which recipes CANNOT see CVEs at all
+```
+python3 cc-ci-plan/audit-sources.py --security-sources
+```
+A recipe whose sources yield **no CVE data at all** cannot produce a meaningful `0` — nothing was
+measured, the same way a missing registry file cannot. Render those as **`?`**, not `0`.
+
+**The fleet is currently at zero such recipes.** The last two — `mattermost-lts` (empty advisory
+feed, client-side-rendered bulletins) and `mumble` (nothing published anywhere) — were fixed by
+declaring an NVD CPE in their registry:
+```
+- nvd-cpe: mattermost-team-edition = cpe:2.3:a:mattermost:mattermost_server:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
+```
+**If this sweep ever reports a blind recipe again, that is the fix**: find the product's CPE at
+nvd.nist.gov and add the line. Prefer a real advisory feed or an attributable changelog when one
+exists — NVD lags the vendor — but a lagging source beats no source, and it turns a `?` into a
+number.
+
+An *unparseable page* is NOT the same thing: it is harmless when the same project also publishes an
+advisory feed (redis, gitea, minio, clickhouse all do). Only "no usable source for this image" counts.
+
+### 3. Run the advisory scan over that window
+```
+python3 /srv/cc-ci/cc-ci-plan/advisory-scan.py <recipe> --from <old-app> --to <new-app> \
+        [--image <name>=<old>:<new>]...
+```
+**One call per recipe with every image in it** — the count is a union across images, and the
+UNKNOWN guarantee only holds when a single run sees them all. Paste the markdown block verbatim into
+the per-recipe log at `/srv/cc-ci/.cc-ci-logs/cve-check/<DATE>/<recipe>.md`.
+
+### 4. Adjudicate what the scan could not decide (pass 2)
+If the block reports advisories it **could NOT judge**, or the count is **UNKNOWN**, re-run with
+`--adjudicate` and decide each open case yourself:
+
+```
+python3 /srv/cc-ci/cc-ci-plan/advisory-scan.py <recipe> … --adjudicate
+```
+
+Answer **FIXED / NOT-FIXED / STILL-UNKNOWN** per case, each with a one-line reason **citing the
+evidence shown** — never from memory of the project, which is the exact failure that let two CVSS-9.8
+gitea RCEs be published as "none". Every FIXED is added to the count; pass 1's number is a floor. The
+block also lists what pass 1 already decided — if a verdict looks wrong given its evidence, say so.
+Record your verdicts in the per-recipe log so the number is auditable.
+
+### 5. Classify severity and priority
+For each recipe collect the CVE ids with **severities** (the scan gives them, with GHSA ids). Sort the
+report rows by what an operator should deal with first:
+1. recipes with a **critical**, then **high**, then anything else with CVEs (more CVEs higher within a band);
+2. then `?` (a count that could not be established — investigate, do not ignore);
+3. then recipes with an upgrade available but **0** CVEs;
+4. then `UPTODATE`.
+
+Severity outranks raw count: 2 CVSS-9.8 RCEs matter more than 120 medium plugin advisories.
+
+### 6. Write the report spec
+`/tmp/cve-spec-<DATE>.json`, same shape as `/recipe-report` (see `recipe-report.py`'s header), with:
+- **`"kind": "cve"`** — titles the page "The Recipe Report — CVE check" and files it as
+  `cve-<DATE>.html`. It appears in the SAME archive index as the weekly editions, suffixed
+  "— CVE check" so the two are told apart at a glance. Without this field you would overwrite that
+  date's weekly edition.
+- `date`, `subtitle` "CVE check <human date>",
+- `lead` — **one short paragraph**: fleet exposure in a sentence and what to do first.
+- `table[]` — every recipe swept. `recipe`; `change` = the window you scanned, e.g.
+  `1.27.0 → 1.27.1 · redis 7.4 → 8.10`; `status` = `UPTODATE` when nothing is available, else
+  `PENDING` (an upgrade exists and is not yet taken); **`cve`** = the count (integer, `?` only per the
+  rules below); `notes` = severity mix, whether the number is a floor, and `maintained elsewhere` for
+  `external` rows. **Leave `ci`/`pr` empty — nothing was built and no PR exists.**
+- `addendum[]` — real anomalies only: registry URLs that failed, recipes whose window could not be
+  established, a scan whose count is a floor with many undetermined advisories.
+- `security[]` — one entry per **critical/high** finding: recipe · CVE id(s) + severity · what it fixes
+  · **which image** it is in. Name the image: `CVE-2025-49844` is a redis flaw, and an operator reading
+  "discourse" needs to know that.
+- `changes[]` — **omit** (nothing changed; there are no PRs).
+
+**`?` must stay RARE.** Use it only when a scan ran and reported genuinely failed sources, or the count
+came back UNKNOWN and adjudication could not settle it. Never `none` for an unknown — a blank reads as
+clean. A recipe with no upgrade available is `0`, not `?`. Many `?` is a bug for the Addendum.
+
+### 7. Render and publish — via the script only
+```
+python3 /srv/cc-ci/cc-ci-plan/recipe-report.py render /tmp/cve-spec-<DATE>.json /tmp/cve-<DATE>.html
+python3 /srv/cc-ci/cc-ci-plan/recipe-report.py publish /tmp/cve-<DATE>.html <DATE> cve
+```
+All layout is owned by `recipe-report.py`. Never hand-write or post-process HTML; if `render` errors,
+fix the spec JSON and re-render. **Public page — no secrets, tokens, internal hostnames, raw logs, or
+any billing/spend figures.**
+
+### 8. Verify and stop
+`curl -fsS https://report.ci.commoninternet.net/cve-<DATE>.html` renders and the index lists it. Print
+the URL, a one-line summary (`N recipes swept · M with CVEs · K critical`), and `CVE CHECK COMPLETE`,
+then go idle. One-shot — do not loop, and do not start upgrading anything.
+
+## Guardrails
+- **Read-only.** No PRs, no edits, no merges, no deploys, no CI runs. If a recipe looks urgent, say so
+  in the report — do not act on it. `/cve-check-and-upgrade` is the skill that acts.
+- **Never report `0` for something you could not scan.** `0` means checked-and-clean; unknown is `?`.
+- A count with undetermined advisories is a **floor** — say so in the notes rather than rounding away.
+- **Public-safe output only.**

.claude/skills/help/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+---
+name: help
+description: Operator orientation - lists every skill available on this orchestrator with what it does and when to reach for it, grouped by purpose (status, weekly maintenance, host updates, tests, enrollment, recovery, reporting), plus a "what do you want to do?" guide for common situations. Read-only. Invoke as /help.
+---
+
+# help (thin wrapper)
+
+The canonical definition of this skill lives in the **opencode** position:
+
+**`.opencode/skills/help/SKILL.md`**
+
+Read that file for the full content. This `.claude/skills/` copy is kept as a
+thin pointer for Claude Code compatibility; opencode loads the canonical
+definition from `.opencode/skills/` directly.

.claude/skills/hetzner-server-recovery/SKILL.md

@@ -57,60 +57,33 @@ tailscale ping -c 3 <host-alias>
 
 If the host still does not come back, continue.
 
-## 3. Request the Hetzner console
+## 3. Use the repo recovery tools (permanent home — do NOT rebuild these in /tmp)
 
-Request a remote console session:
+The API and console tooling live in **`scripts/recovery/`** (see its README for the condensed
+10-minute drill, proven 2026-08-03):
 
 ```bash
-curl -s -X POST \
-  -H "Authorization: Bearer ${HCLOUD_TOKEN}" \
-  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-  "https://api.hetzner.cloud/v1/servers/<SERVER_ID>/actions/request_console"
+# API: status / actions / reboot / reset / poweroff / poweron / rescue-on / rescue-off / console
+python3 /srv/cc-ci-orch/scripts/recovery/hetzner.py cc-ci status
+python3 /srv/cc-ci-orch/scripts/recovery/hetzner.py cc-ci actions 10
+
+# Shell-only console access (fresh console session + websocat bridge + vncdotool,
+# venv auto-bootstrapped at ~/.cache/hetzner-console-venv):
+bash /srv/cc-ci-orch/scripts/recovery/hetzner-console.sh cc-ci screenshot /tmp/console.png
+bash /srv/cc-ci-orch/scripts/recovery/hetzner-console.sh cc-ci key Down Down Return
 ```
 
-The API returns:
+Known server names: `cc-ci` (134485294), `orchestrator` (134487234). Token: `HCLOUD_TOKEN`
+env or `/srv/cc-ci/.hcloud-token` (0600, not in git; prefer per-incident revocable tokens,
+and never paste tokens into a chat transcript).
 
-- `wss_url`
-- `password`
-
-If you have a browser, use the Hetzner console directly.
-
-If you only have shell access, you can still drive it locally because the console is **raw VNC over
-websocket**.
-
-## 4. Shell-only console access (websocket VNC bridge)
-
-Install temporary tools:
-
-```bash
-nix shell nixpkgs#websocat -c websocat --version
-python3 -m venv /tmp/opencode/hetzner-console-venv
-/tmp/opencode/hetzner-console-venv/bin/pip install --disable-pip-version-check pillow websocket-client vncdotool
-```
-
-Bridge the websocket console to a local VNC TCP port:
-
-```bash
-nohup nix shell nixpkgs#websocat -c \
-  websocat -b -E tcp-l:127.0.0.1:5905 '<WSS_URL>' \
-  >/tmp/opencode/hetzner-websockify.log 2>&1 &
-```
-
-Validate the RFB banner:
-
-```bash
-python3 - <<'PY'
-import socket
-s=socket.socket(); s.settimeout(5); s.connect(('127.0.0.1',5905))
-print(repr(s.recv(32)))
-PY
-```
-
-Expected:
-
-```text
-b'RFB 003.008\n'
-```
+Notes that used to cost time:
+- Each console command requests a **fresh** console session — old sessions die on hard reset,
+  and the websocat bridge is single-connection anyway.
+- A GRUB one-shot/default for a NixOS generation needs the **submenu id `1>N`** (top level:
+  0 = default entry, 1 = the "All configurations" submenu). A bare index silently falls back
+  to the default entry. Clear any grubenv override after the next `switch` regenerates
+  grub.cfg — indices shift.
 
 Capture a screenshot from the console:
 

.claude/skills/recipe-enroll/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+---
+name: recipe-enroll
+description: Add a NEW recipe to cc-ci's maintained set, end to end — create + sync the recipe-maintainers mirror from coopcloud upstream, author a real test suite (health floor + non-vacuous recipe-specific tests incl. a create-an-object round-trip), enroll it in the !testme bridge (POLL_REPOS) and the weekly /upgrade-all inventory (used-recipes.md weekly row + upstream registry), then VERIFY the whole thing: full harness suite green with the new tests, bridge deployed (test-before-switch) and healthy. Opens the cc-ci PR for visibility and merges it directly once verification is green (the skill invocation is the authorization); the report lists merged PR links + what changed. Invoke as /recipe-enroll <recipe>.
+---
+
+# recipe-enroll (thin wrapper)
+
+The canonical definition of this skill lives in the **opencode** position:
+
+**`.opencode/skills/recipe-enroll/SKILL.md`**
+
+Read that file for the full procedure. This `.claude/skills/` copy is kept as a
+thin pointer for Claude Code compatibility; opencode loads the canonical
+definition from `.opencode/skills/` directly.

.claude/skills/recipe-report/SKILL.md

@@ -37,6 +37,35 @@ keeps every weekly edition looking the same regardless of which model writes the
    - **Security analysis.** Scan the per-recipe `upgrade_notes_md` + the summary (and use your own
      knowledge of the version bumps) for upgrades that fix **CVEs / security issues**. For each recipe,
      **count the CVEs** the PR fixes — this drives both the table's `cve` column and the priority sort.
+     - **ADDITIONALLY, and never instead:** each per-recipe log carries an `### Advisory scan
+       (deterministic pre-step)` block (from `cc-ci-plan/advisory-scan.py` — GitHub Security
+       Advisories + vendor security pages + OSV, with severities and fixed-in versions). Treat its
+       CVE list as a **further source** and report the **UNION** of it and what you found by reading.
+       Its entries are machine-derived with advisory IDs, so prefer them for CVE ids / severities /
+       fixed-in versions, and cite the GHSA where present in the Security Bulletin. If the block
+       lists **failed sources**, the count is **not** authoritative: render the cve cell as `?`
+       (unknown), never `none` — a blank that reads as "clean" is exactly how two CVSS-9.8 gitea
+       RCEs were reported as "none" on 2026-08-07.
+     - **`?` must stay RARE — it means "we tried and could not tell", not "we didn't look".** Use it
+       ONLY when a scan ran and reported genuinely failed sources, **or when the scan block says
+       COUNT UNKNOWN**. In that case the scan's `0` means *not determined*: publish `?` and say so in
+       the notes; publishing `0` would assert a clean bill of health nothing supports. Note a
+       **version-scheme change is no longer a reason for `?`** — the scan resolves semver→calver jumps
+       (discourse 3.5.3 → 2026.7.1) by falling back to advisory publish dates and reports a real number.
+     - **A count with undetermined advisories is a FLOOR.** If the scan block says N advisories
+       "could NOT be judged", report the number but say in the notes that it is a floor — those
+       advisories are neither fixed nor safe, they are unmeasured. Never round them away.
+     - **Counts span every image, each judged by its own window.** A scan block lists one line per
+       image with its version range and classification method; the headline is their union. So a
+       recipe's count legitimately includes **sidecar** CVEs (discourse's 128 = 123 app + 5 redis).
+       When a sidecar contributes a critical/high, name the image in the bulletin — CVE-2025-49844 is
+       a redis flaw, not a discourse one, and an operator reading "discourse" needs to know that.
+       (The scan headline itself now says `UNKNOWN` rather than a number in that case.)
+       In particular: a recipe with **no upgrade this run** (up-to-date/skipped) has nothing an
+       upgrade could have fixed — report `0`, not `?`. A recipe with a clean scan reports its number (including `0`). Benign notes in a scan
+       block (`no-advisories-published`, `skipped: template URL`) are NOT failures and must not
+       trigger `?`. If you find yourself rendering `?` for many recipes, that is a bug to report in
+       the Addendum, not a normal outcome.
      Anything **critical/high** also gets a `security` bulletin entry (recipe · CVE id(s) + severity ·
      what it fixes · PR link); be specific about severity and what's exposed if not merged.
    - **Lead — ONE short paragraph.** A tight, concrete opener in opus's voice: fleet state in a sentence

.claude/skills/recipe-upgrade/SKILL.md

@@ -157,6 +157,56 @@ On cc-ci's `~/.abra/recipes/<recipe>` (wrap every abra call per the pseudo-TTY b
   `open-recipe-pr.sh`). Do **not** push to upstream; the version bump + tag + publish are the operator's
   final `abra recipe release` step.
 
+### 2a. Advisory scan (deterministic; ADDITIVE — run it, never skip it)
+
+Run the deterministic scanner for the exact upgrade window and **paste its markdown block verbatim
+into the per-recipe log**:
+
+```
+python3 /srv/cc-ci/cc-ci-plan/advisory-scan.py <recipe> --from <old-app-version> --to <new-app-version> \
+        [--image <name>=<old>:<new>]...
+```
+
+**Pass an `--image` for EVERY sidecar you upgraded** (redis, postgres, nginx …), not just the app —
+each image is judged by its own versions, and an image you don't name is not counted at all. Repeat
+the flag for each one and pass them **all in a single call** (the count is a union across images).
+e.g. discourse moving app 3.5.3→2026.7.1 *and* redis 7.4→8.10:
+
+```
+... --from 3.5.3 --to 2026.7.1 --image redis=7.4:8.10
+```
+
+→ 140 CVEs (123 app + 17 redis), where the redis seventeen include a **critical** (CVE-2025-49844)
+that is invisible if the sidecar is left out. `<name>` is substring-matched against source repo names,
+so make it specific enough to hit exactly one.
+
+**If the scan reports advisories it could NOT judge, re-run it with `--adjudicate`.** That is a second
+pass: it collects each open case's full evidence (advisory prose, references, affected ranges, every
+release naming the CVE) and asks YOU to decide FIXED / NOT-FIXED / STILL-UNKNOWN with a reason citing
+that evidence. The deterministic number is a **floor** — add every FIXED to the count. Say
+STILL-UNKNOWN rather than inferring from memory, and never record an undecided CVE as unaffected.
+It also shows what pass 1 already decided; if a verdict looks wrong given its evidence, say so.
+
+It queries, per recipe: the **GitHub Security Advisories API** for every source repo in
+`cc-ci-plan/upstream/<recipe>.md` (CVE + GHSA + severity + vulnerable/patched ranges, so
+"fixed by THIS upgrade" is computed, not guessed), every **vendor release/security URL** in that
+registry (fetched + regex-scanned for CVE ids), and **OSV** where a package mapping exists.
+
+**This does NOT replace your own release-note reading — it is an ADDITIONAL evidence source.** Do
+exactly what you did before, then union the two: the CVE count you report is the union of the CVEs
+you found in the notes and the CVEs the scan found. Never let the scan lower a count you established
+by reading.
+
+Why it exists: gitea 1.27.1 fixed CVE-2026-60004 and CVE-2026-59774 (both CVSS 9.8). Both are named
+only in the vendor's blog security section — the GitHub *release notes* mention neither — so the
+release-note read found one unrelated minor item and the weekly report printed a CVE count of "1",
+then "none". Advisory databases lagged too (OSV 404'd on both; NVD's API had neither by CPE, id, or
+keyword), which is why the GitHub advisory API and the vendor pages lead.
+
+If the scanner reports **failed sources**, say so in the log — an incomplete scan must not read as
+a clean one. If a vendor publishes security notes at a URL the registry lacks (gitea's
+`blog.gitea.com`), **add it to `cc-ci-plan/upstream/<recipe>.md`** so the next scan sees it.
+
 ### 2b. Direct deploy + inspect on cc-ci — live feedback BEFORE CI (recipe-maintainer style)
 Before opening the PR / running `!testme`, deploy the WIP recipe **directly** on the cc-ci server and
 watch it converge — the way recipe-maintainer tests on `cctest`. This gives you **live logs +
@@ -262,6 +312,12 @@ test change, and a test change is **gated by `--with-tests`**:
   Do **NOT** modify any test. Report `SUCCESS-PENDING-TESTS` (recipe PR open; `!testme` red on a
   stale test; operator to decide).
 - **`--with-tests` — open + verify a cc-ci test PR.** Make it the `ci-test-review` way:
+  0. **READ `tests/STYLE.md` in the cc-ci repo FIRST.** It is the rulebook for changing a test, and
+     it is written against the failures this pipeline has actually produced. The two that matter most
+     here: **set state up through the app's own interface, never its database** (a plausible fixture
+     that INSERTed rows passed on v2 and silently broke on v3, holding the recipe RED for six weeks),
+     and **gate on version rather than writing a fixture that supports both** — old-version tests can
+     simply be deleted, since the older version is only exercised through the upgrade tier.
   1. Branch `recipe-maintainers/cc-ci` in a **separate clone** (single-writer: never push `main`,
      never touch the build loops' `/cc-ci` `/cc-ci-adv` clones); update the test/overlay.
   2. **Verify the recipe upgrade WITH the updated test applied.** `!testme` on the recipe PR uses the

.claude/skills/recipe-upgrade/open-recipe-pr.sh

@@ -102,6 +102,27 @@ if [ "${MODE}" != "--reconcile-only" ]; then
   DIVERGED=$(git log --oneline origin/main..HEAD 2>/dev/null || true)
   [ -n "${DIVERGED}" ] || { echo "ERROR: HEAD has no commits beyond origin/main. Nothing to PR."; exit 1; }
   LATEST_MSG=$(git log -1 --pretty=%s HEAD)
+
+  # --- Keep the LOCAL work current with the freshly-synced upstream main (anti-drift) ---
+  # The push path below grafts `HEAD^{tree}` WHOLESALE onto the PR branch. If this checkout is not
+  # based on the upstream main we just synced, every upstream change made since the branch was cut
+  # is silently ABSENT from the pushed tree — the PR (and the CI that verifies it) then describes a
+  # tree that will never deploy. Observed on gitea PR #5 (2026-08-10): its base predated upstream's
+  # "BREAKING CHANGE: remove forgejo", so `!testme` verified a forgejo-bearing tree while main had
+  # dropped it. Merge upstream in FIRST, and fail loudly rather than paper over a conflict.
+  if ! git merge-base --is-ancestor "${NEW_MAIN_SHA}" HEAD; then
+    echo "→ Local work predates upstream main (${NEW_MAIN_SHA:0:8}) — merging upstream in first..."
+    if ! GIT_AUTHOR_NAME="${GITEA_USERNAME}" GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL="${GITEA_USERNAME}@git.autonomic.zone" \
+         GIT_COMMITTER_NAME="${GITEA_USERNAME}" GIT_COMMITTER_EMAIL="${GITEA_USERNAME}@git.autonomic.zone" \
+         git merge --no-edit "${NEW_MAIN_SHA}" >/dev/null 2>&1; then
+      git merge --abort 2>/dev/null || true
+      echo "ERROR: cannot auto-merge upstream main (${NEW_MAIN_SHA:0:8}) into the local ${RECIPE} work."
+      echo "       Upstream changed files this upgrade also touches. Resolve by hand in"
+      echo "       ${RECIPE_DIR}, then re-run. Refusing to push a tree that omits upstream changes."
+      exit 1
+    fi
+    echo "  ✓ upstream merged into the local work"
+  fi
 fi
 
 # --- Reconcile open PRs against the freshly-synced upstream main ---
@@ -165,9 +186,19 @@ if git rev-parse --verify --quiet "refs/remotes/gitea/${BRANCH}" >/dev/null; the
   if [ "$(git rev-parse 'HEAD^{tree}')" = "$(git rev-parse "${EXIST_TIP}^{tree}")" ]; then
     echo "→ '${BRANCH}' already has this exact tree — nothing new to push (will still re-test)."
   else
+    # Parent the new commit on the branch tip AND (when the branch predates it) on upstream main, so
+    # the recorded HISTORY matches the tree we are pushing. Without the second parent the merge-base
+    # stays stale: git would later treat upstream's post-branch changes as "removed by this PR" and a
+    # merge could revert them (the gitea #5 / forgejo-removal drift, 2026-08-10). No force-push: this
+    # is still a fast-forward from the branch tip.
+    EXTRA_PARENT=()
+    if ! git merge-base --is-ancestor "${NEW_MAIN_SHA}" "${EXIST_TIP}"; then
+      EXTRA_PARENT=(-p "${NEW_MAIN_SHA}")
+      echo "  (also parenting on upstream main ${NEW_MAIN_SHA:0:8} — branch predated it)"
+    fi
     ONTOP=$(GIT_AUTHOR_NAME="${GITEA_USERNAME}" GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL="${GITEA_USERNAME}@git.autonomic.zone" \
             GIT_COMMITTER_NAME="${GITEA_USERNAME}" GIT_COMMITTER_EMAIL="${GITEA_USERNAME}@git.autonomic.zone" \
-            git commit-tree "$(git rev-parse 'HEAD^{tree}')" -p "${EXIST_TIP}" -m "${LATEST_MSG}")
+            git commit-tree "$(git rev-parse 'HEAD^{tree}')" -p "${EXIST_TIP}" "${EXTRA_PARENT[@]}" -m "${LATEST_MSG}")
     echo "→ Adding the new work on top of '${BRANCH}' (fast-forward, no force-push)..."
     git push gitea "${ONTOP}:refs/heads/${BRANCH}"
   fi

.claude/skills/upgrade-all/sweep-orphans.sh

@@ -73,6 +73,29 @@ done
 # 5) Stray exited containers (debug one-shots) — best-effort prune.
 docker container prune -f >/dev/null 2>&1 || true
 
+# 6) Unused IMAGES — the one that actually took CI down. Every run pulls each recipe's images and
+#    nothing ever removed the old ones: on 2026-08-11 they had grown to 72GB (63GB of it unused),
+#    the root filesystem hit 100% under two concurrent runs, and the harness died at startup with
+#    `OSError: [Errno 28] No space left on device: '/var/lib/cc-ci-runs/<build>'`. Every !testme
+#    from build 1236 to 1242 failed that way — with no results.json, so the PR badges just read
+#    "failure" and looked like recipe regressions.
+#
+#    Only prune above a threshold, so a healthy host keeps its layer cache and runs stay fast.
+#    `image prune -a` removes only images no container references, so anything deployed (infra +
+#    warm-* canonicals) is untouched; anything else is re-pulled on demand.
+#
+#    Volumes are deliberately NOT pruned here — see the KEEP_RE guard in (3): warm-* canonicals are
+#    data-warm and their volumes are legitimately dangling between runs.
+DISK_PRUNE_PCT="${DISK_PRUNE_PCT:-60}"
+used_pct="$(df --output=pcent / 2>/dev/null | tail -1 | tr -dc '0-9')"
+if [ -n "$used_pct" ] && [ "$used_pct" -ge "$DISK_PRUNE_PCT" ]; then
+  echo "  disk ${used_pct}% >= ${DISK_PRUNE_PCT}% -> pruning unused images"
+  freed="$(docker image prune -af 2>/dev/null | awk '/Total reclaimed space/ {print $4, $5}')"
+  echo "  reclaimed: ${freed:-0B}; disk now $(df -h / | tail -1 | awk '{print $5" used, "$4" free"}')"
+else
+  echo "  disk ${used_pct:-?}% < ${DISK_PRUNE_PCT}% -> keeping image cache"
+fi
+
 if [ "$removed" -eq 0 ]; then
   echo "== orphan sweep: clean (nothing to remove) =="
 else

.gitignore

@@ -28,3 +28,7 @@ master-age.txt
 # Python bytecode cache
 __pycache__/
 *.pyc
+
+# Local API tokens — never committed (advisory-scan / hetzner recovery)
+.github-token
+.hcloud-token

.gitmodules

@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
 [submodule "references/recipe-maintainer"]
 	path = references/recipe-maintainer
-	url = https://git.autonomic.zone/recipe-maintainers/recipe-maintainer
+	url = ssh://git@git.autonomic.zone:2222/recipe-maintainers/autonomic-recipe-maintainer.git

.opencode/skills/cc-ci-status/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
+---
+name: cc-ci-status
+description: Comprehensive read-only status check of the whole cc-ci system - how the recent weekly upgrade runs went and whether their reports published, which recipes/tests are stale, how long since the server + orchestrator host flake updates, open recipe PRs (flagging CVE-carrying PRs that have been open too long), host health (failed units, disk, timers, bridge/!testme path), ending with a verdict (ALL HEALTHY or a findings list) and recommended next steps mapped to the skills to invoke. Never changes anything - it only reads and reports. Invoke as /cc-ci-status.
+---
+
+# cc-ci-status
+
+One comprehensive, **read-only** status pass over the cc-ci system. Output ends with either
+**`ALL HEALTHY`** or a prioritized findings list, each finding paired with the skill to invoke.
+Nothing here mutates state — no restarts, no deploys, no merges.
+
+## Checks (run all; collect findings, don't stop at the first)
+
+### 1. Weekly upgrade runs — recency + outcome
+
+```
+ls -t /srv/cc-ci/.cc-ci-logs/upgrades/upgrade-all-*.md | head -3
+head -20 <latest>            # the Summary block: Considered/green/stale/Failed/Skipped
+systemctl list-timers cc-ci-upgrade-all.timer --no-pager | head -3
+```
+- **Overdue** if the newest report is >8 days old, or the timer is inactive/missing → recommend
+  `systemctl start cc-ci-upgrade-all.service` (or investigate the timer) / `/upgrade-all`.
+- **Failed entries** in the latest report → recommend `/recipe-upgrade <recipe>` per entry (or
+  `/ci-test-review` if the failure is harness-side).
+- A run currently in flight (tmux `cc-ci-upgrader` session live) is NOT a finding — report it as
+  in-progress and skip staleness checks that depend on its output.
+
+### 2. Report publishing — report.ci.commoninternet.net
+
+```
+curl -s -o /dev/null -w '%{http_code}' https://report.ci.commoninternet.net/
+ls -t /var/lib/cc-ci-reports/week-*.html | head -2      # via ssh cc-ci
+```
+- Index must be 200 and there must be a `week-*.html` at least as new as the last **completed**
+  upgrade run (a completed run without a matching page = report generation broke → recommend
+  `/recipe-report` / inspect `launch-report.py`).
+
+### 3. Stale recipes / stale tests
+
+- Latest report's "PRs where a test looks stale" section + carry-over notes.
+- Any entries → recommend `/cc-ci-tests-update` (fleet) or `/recipe-upgrade <recipe>
+  --with-tests` (single).
+- Also check `/srv/cc-ci/.cc-ci-logs/tests-update-*.md` recency — if stale tests were reported
+  weeks ago and no tests-update run since, say so.
+
+### 4. Open recipe PRs — especially CVE-carrying ones that linger
+
+Enumerate open PRs across `recipe-maintainers/*` (Gitea API, creds in `/srv/cc-ci/.testenv`):
+```
+GET /repos/recipe-maintainers/<repo>/pulls?state=open   # repos = the used-recipes.md inventory + cc-ci
+```
+For each open PR: age (now − created_at), and whether the PR title/body/report row mentions
+**CVE** / security patch.
+- **CVE-carrying PR open >14 days** → HIGH-priority finding: name the PR, the CVE context, and
+  the blocker (commonly a stale test — check the report row) → recommend the unblocking skill
+  (`/cc-ci-tests-update`) plus "operator: review + merge <PR>".
+- Non-CVE PRs open >30 days → low-priority note ("operator review backlog: N PRs").
+- Verified-green PRs awaiting operator merge are normal — list them as "ready to merge", not
+  as failures.
+
+### 5. Server + orchestrator host update recency
+
+For BOTH hosts:
+```
+# cc-ci server:      ssh cc-ci 'nixos-version; cd /root/cc-ci-deploy && nix flake metadata --json' (or builder-clone)
+# orchestrator:      nixos-version; cd /srv/cc-ci-orch && nix flake metadata --json
+git ls-remote https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs <channel>   # current tip
+ls -t /srv/cc-ci-orch/.cc-ci-logs/server-update-*.md /srv/cc-ci-orch/.cc-ci-logs/orchestrator-update-*.md | head -2
+```
+- Report: days since last update log + how far the running nixpkgs rev lags the channel tip.
+- **Lagging >30 days** (or a NixOS release behind) → recommend `/cc-ci-server-update` /
+  `/cc-ci-orchestrator-update`.
+
+### 6. Host + service health (both machines)
+
+```
+ssh cc-ci 'systemctl --failed --no-legend; df -h / | tail -1; docker service ls --format "{{.Name}} {{.Replicas}}"'
+systemctl --failed --no-legend; df -h / | tail -1; tmux ls
+```
+- Failed units, core swarm services not 1/1 (warm-* spares flapping is a known benign pattern —
+  note, don't page), disk **>65% (server)** / >85% (orchestrator) → findings. Server unreachable →
+  HIGH: recommend `hetzner-server-recovery`.
+  > **65%, not 80%, on the server — it is not a steady-state measure.** Two concurrent recipe runs
+  > pull images and write volumes worth tens of GB, so a host sitting at 73% still hits 100% mid-run.
+  > That is exactly what happened on 2026-08-11: 63GB of unused images had accumulated (nothing ever
+  > pruned them), the filesystem filled during a run, and the harness died at startup with
+  > `OSError: [Errno 28] No space left on device`. Remedy: `docker image prune -af` on cc-ci — it
+  > spares anything a container references, so infra and warm-* canonicals are untouched. Do NOT
+  > `docker volume prune`: warm-* canonical volumes are data-warm and legitimately dangling.
+- **!testme actually produces results** (the check that would have caught the above days earlier):
+  the newest few `/var/lib/cc-ci-runs/<build>/` dirs must each contain `results.json`. A build that
+  dies before the harness writes one leaves an EMPTY dir — and the PR badge still says "failure", so
+  it reads as a recipe regression rather than a sick host. Builds 1236–1242 all failed that way.
+  Finding: *"N recent builds produced no results.json — the harness is dying at startup, check disk
+  and the drone step log"*. The step log lives in drone's sqlite
+  (`/var/lib/docker/volumes/drone_ci_commoninternet_net_data/_data/database.sqlite`) — copy it and
+  read `logs.log_data` for the failing `steps.step_id`; the bridge's drone token is not extractable
+  (distroless container, swarm secret).
+  > **If the error is ENOSPC but the disk is fine**, it is not disk. Seen 2026-08-11: builds 1244-1249
+  > died on `mkdir /var/lib/cc-ci-runs/<build>` with **110GB free and 16% inodes**, while the identical
+  > mkdir succeeded as root over ssh, inside the runner's own mount namespace, and 61/61 times in a
+  > stress loop — and the same harness run by hand with a numeric run id worked fine. Restarting
+  > `drone-runner-exec` did NOT help, and neither did recreating the runs directory with a fresh
+  > inode (it recurred afterwards — that apparent fix was coincidence).
+  >
+  > **It is INTERMITTENT and tracks concurrent activity**, which is the useful signal: every failure
+  > landed while a second run or a manual deploy was in flight (1252 was triggered while 1251 was
+  > still finishing), and every build on a quiet host succeeded (1243, 1250, 1251, 1253). Free space
+  > never moved during a failing build. So on ENOSPC-with-free-disk: **wait for the host to go quiet
+  > and re-trigger** before treating it as a recipe failure. Root cause is still NOT established;
+  > `DRONE_RUNNER_CAPACITY=2` allows the overlap, so lowering it to 1 is the obvious next experiment
+  > if it becomes disruptive.
+- **Bridge / !testme path**: `docker service ls` shows `ccci-bridge_app 1/1` AND the bridge log
+  has no auth errors (`docker service logs --since 24h ccci-bridge_app 2>&1 | grep -ci "401\|user does not exist"` == 0).
+  A silently-401ing bridge drops `!testme` (seen 2026-08-03, stale rotated Gitea secret) →
+  recommend refreshing the bridge secret + redeploy (test-before-switch).
+
+### 7. Maintained-set consistency (quick)
+
+- Every `weekly` row in `used-recipes.md` has `tests/<recipe>/` on cc-ci AND a
+  `recipe-maintainers/<recipe>` mirror AND is in bridge `POLL_REPOS`; mismatches → recommend
+  finishing enrollment (`/recipe-enroll <recipe>` covers all touchpoints).
+
+## Output format
+
+```
+# cc-ci status — <date>
+## Verdict: ALL HEALTHY | N findings (M high-priority)
+## Weekly upgrades: <last run date + one-line outcome; next timer firing>
+## Report site: <ok/broken + latest page>
+## Stale tests: <none | list>
+## Open PRs: <count; CVE-carrying + age flagged FIRST; ready-to-merge list>
+## Host updates: server <rev, N days behind tip> · orchestrator <rev, N days>
+## Health: server <failed/disk/services> · orchestrator <failed/disk/sessions> · bridge <ok/401s>
+## Recommended next steps
+1. <finding> → /<skill> (or operator action)
+…
+```
+When a finding is that the fleet's **security exposure is unknown** — the last weekly run failed or
+is stale, so nobody has scanned for CVEs recently — the recommended step is **`/cve-check`** (read-only,
+minutes, no PRs). If it is instead that a known CVE is sitting unpatched, recommend
+**`/cve-check-and-upgrade`** (add `--min-severity high` when only the urgent ones matter). Prefer
+`/cve-check` over waiting for the next weekly run whenever the question is "are we exposed?".
+
+`ALL HEALTHY` requires: recent successful weekly run + published report, no stale tests, no
+CVE PR open >14 days, both hosts <30 days behind their channel, zero failed units, recent builds all
+producing results.json, disk under
+thresholds, bridge clean, maintained-set consistent. Anything else is a finding — even minor
+ones get a recommended next step. Order findings by priority (CVE/unreachable-host first).
+
+## Guardrails
+
+- **Read-only.** This skill diagnoses and recommends; it invokes nothing and changes nothing.
+- Use the pseudo-TTY wrap for any abra call; plain ssh for everything else.
+- Don't double-count: a finding that explains another (bridge 401 → !testme "failures") gets
+  reported once, at the root cause.

.opencode/skills/cc-ci-tests-update/SKILL.md

@@ -83,8 +83,29 @@ failure (AI — this is the `ci-test-review` step-3 diagnosis):
   changed upstream, what the test currently asserts.
 - **FLAKY** → re-run once or twice; if it passes, drop it (not stale, just flaky).
 
+> ### ⚠️ RECONCILE FROM UPSTREAM FIRST — always, before any PR work or upgrade check
+> ```
+> cc-ci-plan/reconcile-upstream.sh <recipe>...   # or --all
+> ```
+> Deterministic, idempotent, and safe (recipe work lives in branches, never on mirror `main`). It
+> force-syncs each mirror to coopcloud's **default branch — resolved from the API, `main` OR
+> `master`** — and closes any mirror PR whose changes upstream already merged. Skipping it has cost
+> us three distinct ways: mailu #6 was reported as the fix for two internet-facing CVEs while
+> upstream had already merged AND released it; a stale mirror makes a survey report "no upgrades
+> available" so the recipe drops out of the weekly run; and reading the wrong branch on a recipe with
+> a stale `main` beside a live `master` (gitea) manufactures a false "three releases behind, missing
+> two CVSS-9.8 RCEs" finding.
+
 ### 2. For each stale test — author the minimal test update (AI; never weaken)
 
+> **Read `tests/STYLE.md` in the cc-ci repo before writing the update.** It is the rulebook for test
+> changes, written from failures this pipeline actually produced. Most load-bearing: set state up
+> through the app's **own interface, never its database** (a plausible fixture that INSERTed rows
+> passed on v2 and silently broke on v3 — 202 acks, rows in postgres, nothing ingested — and held the
+> recipe RED for six weeks), **gate on version rather than supporting both** (old-version tests can be
+> deleted; the older version is only exercised via the upgrade tier), and correct the fixture or the
+> wait but **never the assertion**.
+
 Work on **one recipe at a time** (serialize — each verification deploys a recipe on the shared
 Swarm). For each `STALE_TESTS` entry:
 

.opencode/skills/cctest-init-instance/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+---
+name: cctest-init-instance
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Deploy all maintained recipes to the active test instance from scratch (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /init-instance; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-init-instance.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-init-instance (cctest wrapper)
+
+**Canonical procedure:** `references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/init-instance/SKILL.md`
+— read it and follow it. This wrapper only sets context + policy.
+
+**Context:** this is an **autonomic-recipe-maintainer (ARM)** skill. It operates on the
+recipe-maintainer **cctest** test server / local abra sandbox — NOT on the cc-ci CI server or
+its shared swarm. Execute with the submodule as your working directory:
+`cd /srv/cc-ci-orch/references/recipe-maintainer`. If the ARM environment is not yet
+configured on this host (`settings.toml` from `settings.toml.example`, sandbox/test instances),
+run `/cctest-intro` / `/cctest-setup-sandbox` first.
+
+**Unified policy (same as cc-ci — no differences):**
+- **Recipe PRs are NEVER merged by an agent.** Every flow ends at an open PR; the operator
+  reviews and merges. This is ARM's own rule too ("PRs are reviewed and merged manually by a
+  human afterwards — never pushes to upstream or merges anything"); ARM's "no human review in
+  the middle" wording refers only to skipping the mid-run plan confirmation, not to merging.
+- Never touch cc-ci infrastructure (the CI server, its swarm, `/root/*` clones, the weekly
+  timers) from an ARM skill — cc-ci work goes through the cc-ci skills.
+- The submodule is **pinned**: don't commit into it from here; upstream ARM changes arrive via
+  a deliberate submodule bump + `scripts/gen-cctest-skills.py` regeneration.

.opencode/skills/cctest-intro/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+---
+name: cctest-intro
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Explain what this project is and how to get started (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /intro; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-intro.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-intro (cctest wrapper)
+
+**Canonical procedure:** `references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/intro/SKILL.md`
+— read it and follow it. This wrapper only sets context + policy.
+
+**Context:** this is an **autonomic-recipe-maintainer (ARM)** skill. It operates on the
+recipe-maintainer **cctest** test server / local abra sandbox — NOT on the cc-ci CI server or
+its shared swarm. Execute with the submodule as your working directory:
+`cd /srv/cc-ci-orch/references/recipe-maintainer`. If the ARM environment is not yet
+configured on this host (`settings.toml` from `settings.toml.example`, sandbox/test instances),
+run `/cctest-intro` / `/cctest-setup-sandbox` first.
+
+**Unified policy (same as cc-ci — no differences):**
+- **Recipe PRs are NEVER merged by an agent.** Every flow ends at an open PR; the operator
+  reviews and merges. This is ARM's own rule too ("PRs are reviewed and merged manually by a
+  human afterwards — never pushes to upstream or merges anything"); ARM's "no human review in
+  the middle" wording refers only to skipping the mid-run plan confirmation, not to merging.
+- Never touch cc-ci infrastructure (the CI server, its swarm, `/root/*` clones, the weekly
+  timers) from an ARM skill — cc-ci work goes through the cc-ci skills.
+- The submodule is **pinned**: don't commit into it from here; upstream ARM changes arrive via
+  a deliberate submodule bump + `scripts/gen-cctest-skills.py` regeneration.

.opencode/skills/cctest-new-recipe-guide/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+---
+name: cctest-new-recipe-guide
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Guide for developing a new Co-op Cloud recipe from scratch (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /new-recipe-guide; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-new-recipe-guide.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-new-recipe-guide (cctest wrapper)
+
+**Canonical procedure:** `references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/new-recipe-guide/SKILL.md`
+— read it and follow it. This wrapper only sets context + policy.
+
+**Context:** this is an **autonomic-recipe-maintainer (ARM)** skill. It operates on the
+recipe-maintainer **cctest** test server / local abra sandbox — NOT on the cc-ci CI server or
+its shared swarm. Execute with the submodule as your working directory:
+`cd /srv/cc-ci-orch/references/recipe-maintainer`. If the ARM environment is not yet
+configured on this host (`settings.toml` from `settings.toml.example`, sandbox/test instances),
+run `/cctest-intro` / `/cctest-setup-sandbox` first.
+
+**Unified policy (same as cc-ci — no differences):**
+- **Recipe PRs are NEVER merged by an agent.** Every flow ends at an open PR; the operator
+  reviews and merges. This is ARM's own rule too ("PRs are reviewed and merged manually by a
+  human afterwards — never pushes to upstream or merges anything"); ARM's "no human review in
+  the middle" wording refers only to skipping the mid-run plan confirmation, not to merging.
+- Never touch cc-ci infrastructure (the CI server, its swarm, `/root/*` clones, the weekly
+  timers) from an ARM skill — cc-ci work goes through the cc-ci skills.
+- The submodule is **pinned**: don't commit into it from here; upstream ARM changes arrive via
+  a deliberate submodule bump + `scripts/gen-cctest-skills.py` regeneration.

.opencode/skills/cctest-opencode-sync/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+---
+name: cctest-opencode-sync
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Ensure every Claude skill has a corresponding OpenCode skill alias (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /opencode-sync; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-opencode-sync.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-opencode-sync (cctest wrapper)
+
+**Canonical procedure:** `references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/opencode-sync/SKILL.md`
+— read it and follow it. This wrapper only sets context + policy.
+
+**Context:** this is an **autonomic-recipe-maintainer (ARM)** skill. It operates on the
+recipe-maintainer **cctest** test server / local abra sandbox — NOT on the cc-ci CI server or
+its shared swarm. Execute with the submodule as your working directory:
+`cd /srv/cc-ci-orch/references/recipe-maintainer`. If the ARM environment is not yet
+configured on this host (`settings.toml` from `settings.toml.example`, sandbox/test instances),
+run `/cctest-intro` / `/cctest-setup-sandbox` first.
+
+**Unified policy (same as cc-ci — no differences):**
+- **Recipe PRs are NEVER merged by an agent.** Every flow ends at an open PR; the operator
+  reviews and merges. This is ARM's own rule too ("PRs are reviewed and merged manually by a
+  human afterwards — never pushes to upstream or merges anything"); ARM's "no human review in
+  the middle" wording refers only to skipping the mid-run plan confirmation, not to merging.
+- Never touch cc-ci infrastructure (the CI server, its swarm, `/root/*` clones, the weekly
+  timers) from an ARM skill — cc-ci work goes through the cc-ci skills.
+- The submodule is **pinned**: don't commit into it from here; upstream ARM changes arrive via
+  a deliberate submodule bump + `scripts/gen-cctest-skills.py` regeneration.

.opencode/skills/cctest-recipe-check/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+---
+name: cctest-recipe-check
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Fetch a Co-op Cloud recipe and check for available upgrades (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /recipe-check; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-recipe-check.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-recipe-check (cctest wrapper)
+
+**Canonical procedure:** `references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/recipe-check/SKILL.md`
+— read it and follow it. This wrapper only sets context + policy.
+
+**Context:** this is an **autonomic-recipe-maintainer (ARM)** skill. It operates on the
+recipe-maintainer **cctest** test server / local abra sandbox — NOT on the cc-ci CI server or
+its shared swarm. Execute with the submodule as your working directory:
+`cd /srv/cc-ci-orch/references/recipe-maintainer`. If the ARM environment is not yet
+configured on this host (`settings.toml` from `settings.toml.example`, sandbox/test instances),
+run `/cctest-intro` / `/cctest-setup-sandbox` first.
+
+**Unified policy (same as cc-ci — no differences):**
+- **Recipe PRs are NEVER merged by an agent.** Every flow ends at an open PR; the operator
+  reviews and merges. This is ARM's own rule too ("PRs are reviewed and merged manually by a
+  human afterwards — never pushes to upstream or merges anything"); ARM's "no human review in
+  the middle" wording refers only to skipping the mid-run plan confirmation, not to merging.
+- Never touch cc-ci infrastructure (the CI server, its swarm, `/root/*` clones, the weekly
+  timers) from an ARM skill — cc-ci work goes through the cc-ci skills.
+- The submodule is **pinned**: don't commit into it from here; upstream ARM changes arrive via
+  a deliberate submodule bump + `scripts/gen-cctest-skills.py` regeneration.

.opencode/skills/cctest-recipe-create-pr/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+---
+name: cctest-recipe-create-pr
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Push local recipe commits to git.autonomic.zone and open a PR against an upstream-synced main branch (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /recipe-create-pr; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-recipe-create-pr.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-recipe-create-pr (cctest wrapper)
+
+**Canonical procedure:** `references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/recipe-create-pr/SKILL.md`
+— read it and follow it. This wrapper only sets context + policy.
+
+**Context:** this is an **autonomic-recipe-maintainer (ARM)** skill. It operates on the
+recipe-maintainer **cctest** test server / local abra sandbox — NOT on the cc-ci CI server or
+its shared swarm. Execute with the submodule as your working directory:
+`cd /srv/cc-ci-orch/references/recipe-maintainer`. If the ARM environment is not yet
+configured on this host (`settings.toml` from `settings.toml.example`, sandbox/test instances),
+run `/cctest-intro` / `/cctest-setup-sandbox` first.
+
+**Unified policy (same as cc-ci — no differences):**
+- **Recipe PRs are NEVER merged by an agent.** Every flow ends at an open PR; the operator
+  reviews and merges. This is ARM's own rule too ("PRs are reviewed and merged manually by a
+  human afterwards — never pushes to upstream or merges anything"); ARM's "no human review in
+  the middle" wording refers only to skipping the mid-run plan confirmation, not to merging.
+- Never touch cc-ci infrastructure (the CI server, its swarm, `/root/*` clones, the weekly
+  timers) from an ARM skill — cc-ci work goes through the cc-ci skills.
+- The submodule is **pinned**: don't commit into it from here; upstream ARM changes arrive via
+  a deliberate submodule bump + `scripts/gen-cctest-skills.py` regeneration.

.opencode/skills/cctest-recipe-deploy/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+---
+name: cctest-recipe-deploy
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Deploy the local recipe checkout to the test instance (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /recipe-deploy; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-recipe-deploy.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-recipe-deploy (cctest wrapper)
+
+**Canonical procedure:** `references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/recipe-deploy/SKILL.md`
+— read it and follow it. This wrapper only sets context + policy.
+
+**Context:** this is an **autonomic-recipe-maintainer (ARM)** skill. It operates on the
+recipe-maintainer **cctest** test server / local abra sandbox — NOT on the cc-ci CI server or
+its shared swarm. Execute with the submodule as your working directory:
+`cd /srv/cc-ci-orch/references/recipe-maintainer`. If the ARM environment is not yet
+configured on this host (`settings.toml` from `settings.toml.example`, sandbox/test instances),
+run `/cctest-intro` / `/cctest-setup-sandbox` first.
+
+**Unified policy (same as cc-ci — no differences):**
+- **Recipe PRs are NEVER merged by an agent.** Every flow ends at an open PR; the operator
+  reviews and merges. This is ARM's own rule too ("PRs are reviewed and merged manually by a
+  human afterwards — never pushes to upstream or merges anything"); ARM's "no human review in
+  the middle" wording refers only to skipping the mid-run plan confirmation, not to merging.
+- Never touch cc-ci infrastructure (the CI server, its swarm, `/root/*` clones, the weekly
+  timers) from an ARM skill — cc-ci work goes through the cc-ci skills.
+- The submodule is **pinned**: don't commit into it from here; upstream ARM changes arrive via
+  a deliberate submodule bump + `scripts/gen-cctest-skills.py` regeneration.

.opencode/skills/cctest-recipe-guidelines/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+---
+name: cctest-recipe-guidelines
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Guidelines for all recipe operations including local change preservation, version format, and secrets (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /recipe-guidelines; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-recipe-guidelines.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-recipe-guidelines (cctest wrapper)
+
+**Canonical procedure:** `references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/recipe-guidelines/SKILL.md`
+— read it and follow it. This wrapper only sets context + policy.
+
+**Context:** this is an **autonomic-recipe-maintainer (ARM)** skill. It operates on the
+recipe-maintainer **cctest** test server / local abra sandbox — NOT on the cc-ci CI server or
+its shared swarm. Execute with the submodule as your working directory:
+`cd /srv/cc-ci-orch/references/recipe-maintainer`. If the ARM environment is not yet
+configured on this host (`settings.toml` from `settings.toml.example`, sandbox/test instances),
+run `/cctest-intro` / `/cctest-setup-sandbox` first.
+
+**Unified policy (same as cc-ci — no differences):**
+- **Recipe PRs are NEVER merged by an agent.** Every flow ends at an open PR; the operator
+  reviews and merges. This is ARM's own rule too ("PRs are reviewed and merged manually by a
+  human afterwards — never pushes to upstream or merges anything"); ARM's "no human review in
+  the middle" wording refers only to skipping the mid-run plan confirmation, not to merging.
+- Never touch cc-ci infrastructure (the CI server, its swarm, `/root/*` clones, the weekly
+  timers) from an ARM skill — cc-ci work goes through the cc-ci skills.
+- The submodule is **pinned**: don't commit into it from here; upstream ARM changes arrive via
+  a deliberate submodule bump + `scripts/gen-cctest-skills.py` regeneration.

.opencode/skills/cctest-recipe-init/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+---
+name: cctest-recipe-init
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Create a new test instance and recipe-info for a recipe (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /recipe-init; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-recipe-init.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-recipe-init (cctest wrapper)
+
+**Canonical procedure:** `references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/recipe-init/SKILL.md`
+— read it and follow it. This wrapper only sets context + policy.
+
+**Context:** this is an **autonomic-recipe-maintainer (ARM)** skill. It operates on the
+recipe-maintainer **cctest** test server / local abra sandbox — NOT on the cc-ci CI server or
+its shared swarm. Execute with the submodule as your working directory:
+`cd /srv/cc-ci-orch/references/recipe-maintainer`. If the ARM environment is not yet
+configured on this host (`settings.toml` from `settings.toml.example`, sandbox/test instances),
+run `/cctest-intro` / `/cctest-setup-sandbox` first.
+
+**Unified policy (same as cc-ci — no differences):**
+- **Recipe PRs are NEVER merged by an agent.** Every flow ends at an open PR; the operator
+  reviews and merges. This is ARM's own rule too ("PRs are reviewed and merged manually by a
+  human afterwards — never pushes to upstream or merges anything"); ARM's "no human review in
+  the middle" wording refers only to skipping the mid-run plan confirmation, not to merging.
+- Never touch cc-ci infrastructure (the CI server, its swarm, `/root/*` clones, the weekly
+  timers) from an ARM skill — cc-ci work goes through the cc-ci skills.
+- The submodule is **pinned**: don't commit into it from here; upstream ARM changes arrive via
+  a deliberate submodule bump + `scripts/gen-cctest-skills.py` regeneration.

.opencode/skills/cctest-recipe-logging/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+---
+name: cctest-recipe-logging
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Logging instructions for maintaining detailed operation logs in the logs directory (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /recipe-logging; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-recipe-logging.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-recipe-logging (cctest wrapper)
+
+**Canonical procedure:** `references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/recipe-logging/SKILL.md`
+— read it and follow it. This wrapper only sets context + policy.
+
+**Context:** this is an **autonomic-recipe-maintainer (ARM)** skill. It operates on the
+recipe-maintainer **cctest** test server / local abra sandbox — NOT on the cc-ci CI server or
+its shared swarm. Execute with the submodule as your working directory:
+`cd /srv/cc-ci-orch/references/recipe-maintainer`. If the ARM environment is not yet
+configured on this host (`settings.toml` from `settings.toml.example`, sandbox/test instances),
+run `/cctest-intro` / `/cctest-setup-sandbox` first.
+
+**Unified policy (same as cc-ci — no differences):**
+- **Recipe PRs are NEVER merged by an agent.** Every flow ends at an open PR; the operator
+  reviews and merges. This is ARM's own rule too ("PRs are reviewed and merged manually by a
+  human afterwards — never pushes to upstream or merges anything"); ARM's "no human review in
+  the middle" wording refers only to skipping the mid-run plan confirmation, not to merging.
+- Never touch cc-ci infrastructure (the CI server, its swarm, `/root/*` clones, the weekly
+  timers) from an ARM skill — cc-ci work goes through the cc-ci skills.
+- The submodule is **pinned**: don't commit into it from here; upstream ARM changes arrive via
+  a deliberate submodule bump + `scripts/gen-cctest-skills.py` regeneration.

.opencode/skills/cctest-recipe-new-tag/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+---
+name: cctest-recipe-new-tag
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Bump the recipe version and create an annotated git tag (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /recipe-new-tag; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-recipe-new-tag.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-recipe-new-tag (cctest wrapper)
+
+**Canonical procedure:** `references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/recipe-new-tag/SKILL.md`
+— read it and follow it. This wrapper only sets context + policy.
+
+**Context:** this is an **autonomic-recipe-maintainer (ARM)** skill. It operates on the
+recipe-maintainer **cctest** test server / local abra sandbox — NOT on the cc-ci CI server or
+its shared swarm. Execute with the submodule as your working directory:
+`cd /srv/cc-ci-orch/references/recipe-maintainer`. If the ARM environment is not yet
+configured on this host (`settings.toml` from `settings.toml.example`, sandbox/test instances),
+run `/cctest-intro` / `/cctest-setup-sandbox` first.
+
+**Unified policy (same as cc-ci — no differences):**
+- **Recipe PRs are NEVER merged by an agent.** Every flow ends at an open PR; the operator
+  reviews and merges. This is ARM's own rule too ("PRs are reviewed and merged manually by a
+  human afterwards — never pushes to upstream or merges anything"); ARM's "no human review in
+  the middle" wording refers only to skipping the mid-run plan confirmation, not to merging.
+- Never touch cc-ci infrastructure (the CI server, its swarm, `/root/*` clones, the weekly
+  timers) from an ARM skill — cc-ci work goes through the cc-ci skills.
+- The submodule is **pinned**: don't commit into it from here; upstream ARM changes arrive via
+  a deliberate submodule bump + `scripts/gen-cctest-skills.py` regeneration.

.opencode/skills/cctest-recipe-overview/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+---
+name: cctest-recipe-overview
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Check all maintained recipes and recommend what to upgrade (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /recipe-overview; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-recipe-overview.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-recipe-overview (cctest wrapper)
+
+**Canonical procedure:** `references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/recipe-overview/SKILL.md`
+— read it and follow it. This wrapper only sets context + policy.
+
+**Context:** this is an **autonomic-recipe-maintainer (ARM)** skill. It operates on the
+recipe-maintainer **cctest** test server / local abra sandbox — NOT on the cc-ci CI server or
+its shared swarm. Execute with the submodule as your working directory:
+`cd /srv/cc-ci-orch/references/recipe-maintainer`. If the ARM environment is not yet
+configured on this host (`settings.toml` from `settings.toml.example`, sandbox/test instances),
+run `/cctest-intro` / `/cctest-setup-sandbox` first.
+
+**Unified policy (same as cc-ci — no differences):**
+- **Recipe PRs are NEVER merged by an agent.** Every flow ends at an open PR; the operator
+  reviews and merges. This is ARM's own rule too ("PRs are reviewed and merged manually by a
+  human afterwards — never pushes to upstream or merges anything"); ARM's "no human review in
+  the middle" wording refers only to skipping the mid-run plan confirmation, not to merging.
+- Never touch cc-ci infrastructure (the CI server, its swarm, `/root/*` clones, the weekly
+  timers) from an ARM skill — cc-ci work goes through the cc-ci skills.
+- The submodule is **pinned**: don't commit into it from here; upstream ARM changes arrive via
+  a deliberate submodule bump + `scripts/gen-cctest-skills.py` regeneration.

.opencode/skills/cctest-recipe-review/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+---
+name: cctest-recipe-review
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Review a recipe for Co-op Cloud best practices (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /recipe-review; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-recipe-review.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-recipe-review (cctest wrapper)
+
+**Canonical procedure:** `references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/recipe-review/SKILL.md`
+— read it and follow it. This wrapper only sets context + policy.
+
+**Context:** this is an **autonomic-recipe-maintainer (ARM)** skill. It operates on the
+recipe-maintainer **cctest** test server / local abra sandbox — NOT on the cc-ci CI server or
+its shared swarm. Execute with the submodule as your working directory:
+`cd /srv/cc-ci-orch/references/recipe-maintainer`. If the ARM environment is not yet
+configured on this host (`settings.toml` from `settings.toml.example`, sandbox/test instances),
+run `/cctest-intro` / `/cctest-setup-sandbox` first.
+
+**Unified policy (same as cc-ci — no differences):**
+- **Recipe PRs are NEVER merged by an agent.** Every flow ends at an open PR; the operator
+  reviews and merges. This is ARM's own rule too ("PRs are reviewed and merged manually by a
+  human afterwards — never pushes to upstream or merges anything"); ARM's "no human review in
+  the middle" wording refers only to skipping the mid-run plan confirmation, not to merging.
+- Never touch cc-ci infrastructure (the CI server, its swarm, `/root/*` clones, the weekly
+  timers) from an ARM skill — cc-ci work goes through the cc-ci skills.
+- The submodule is **pinned**: don't commit into it from here; upstream ARM changes arrive via
+  a deliberate submodule bump + `scripts/gen-cctest-skills.py` regeneration.

.opencode/skills/cctest-recipe-test-all/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+---
+name: cctest-recipe-test-all
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Run tests for all maintained recipes, deploying each one at a time (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /recipe-test-all; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-recipe-test-all.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-recipe-test-all (cctest wrapper)
+
+**Canonical procedure:** `references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/recipe-test-all/SKILL.md`
+— read it and follow it. This wrapper only sets context + policy.
+
+**Context:** this is an **autonomic-recipe-maintainer (ARM)** skill. It operates on the
+recipe-maintainer **cctest** test server / local abra sandbox — NOT on the cc-ci CI server or
+its shared swarm. Execute with the submodule as your working directory:
+`cd /srv/cc-ci-orch/references/recipe-maintainer`. If the ARM environment is not yet
+configured on this host (`settings.toml` from `settings.toml.example`, sandbox/test instances),
+run `/cctest-intro` / `/cctest-setup-sandbox` first.
+
+**Unified policy (same as cc-ci — no differences):**
+- **Recipe PRs are NEVER merged by an agent.** Every flow ends at an open PR; the operator
+  reviews and merges. This is ARM's own rule too ("PRs are reviewed and merged manually by a
+  human afterwards — never pushes to upstream or merges anything"); ARM's "no human review in
+  the middle" wording refers only to skipping the mid-run plan confirmation, not to merging.
+- Never touch cc-ci infrastructure (the CI server, its swarm, `/root/*` clones, the weekly
+  timers) from an ARM skill — cc-ci work goes through the cc-ci skills.
+- The submodule is **pinned**: don't commit into it from here; upstream ARM changes arrive via
+  a deliberate submodule bump + `scripts/gen-cctest-skills.py` regeneration.

.opencode/skills/cctest-recipe-test-backup/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+---
+name: cctest-recipe-test-backup
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Test backing up and restoring a recipe's test instance (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /recipe-test-backup; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-recipe-test-backup.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-recipe-test-backup (cctest wrapper)
+
+**Canonical procedure:** `references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/recipe-test-backup/SKILL.md`
+— read it and follow it. This wrapper only sets context + policy.
+
+**Context:** this is an **autonomic-recipe-maintainer (ARM)** skill. It operates on the
+recipe-maintainer **cctest** test server / local abra sandbox — NOT on the cc-ci CI server or
+its shared swarm. Execute with the submodule as your working directory:
+`cd /srv/cc-ci-orch/references/recipe-maintainer`. If the ARM environment is not yet
+configured on this host (`settings.toml` from `settings.toml.example`, sandbox/test instances),
+run `/cctest-intro` / `/cctest-setup-sandbox` first.
+
+**Unified policy (same as cc-ci — no differences):**
+- **Recipe PRs are NEVER merged by an agent.** Every flow ends at an open PR; the operator
+  reviews and merges. This is ARM's own rule too ("PRs are reviewed and merged manually by a
+  human afterwards — never pushes to upstream or merges anything"); ARM's "no human review in
+  the middle" wording refers only to skipping the mid-run plan confirmation, not to merging.
+- Never touch cc-ci infrastructure (the CI server, its swarm, `/root/*` clones, the weekly
+  timers) from an ARM skill — cc-ci work goes through the cc-ci skills.
+- The submodule is **pinned**: don't commit into it from here; upstream ARM changes arrive via
+  a deliberate submodule bump + `scripts/gen-cctest-skills.py` regeneration.

.opencode/skills/cctest-recipe-test-new/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+---
+name: cctest-recipe-test-new
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Test a recipe's first-time initialization from scratch (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /recipe-test-new; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-recipe-test-new.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-recipe-test-new (cctest wrapper)
+
+**Canonical procedure:** `references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/recipe-test-new/SKILL.md`
+— read it and follow it. This wrapper only sets context + policy.
+
+**Context:** this is an **autonomic-recipe-maintainer (ARM)** skill. It operates on the
+recipe-maintainer **cctest** test server / local abra sandbox — NOT on the cc-ci CI server or
+its shared swarm. Execute with the submodule as your working directory:
+`cd /srv/cc-ci-orch/references/recipe-maintainer`. If the ARM environment is not yet
+configured on this host (`settings.toml` from `settings.toml.example`, sandbox/test instances),
+run `/cctest-intro` / `/cctest-setup-sandbox` first.
+
+**Unified policy (same as cc-ci — no differences):**
+- **Recipe PRs are NEVER merged by an agent.** Every flow ends at an open PR; the operator
+  reviews and merges. This is ARM's own rule too ("PRs are reviewed and merged manually by a
+  human afterwards — never pushes to upstream or merges anything"); ARM's "no human review in
+  the middle" wording refers only to skipping the mid-run plan confirmation, not to merging.
+- Never touch cc-ci infrastructure (the CI server, its swarm, `/root/*` clones, the weekly
+  timers) from an ARM skill — cc-ci work goes through the cc-ci skills.
+- The submodule is **pinned**: don't commit into it from here; upstream ARM changes arrive via
+  a deliberate submodule bump + `scripts/gen-cctest-skills.py` regeneration.

.opencode/skills/cctest-recipe-test-update/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+---
+name: cctest-recipe-test-update
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Test upgrading a recipe's test instance using abra app deploy (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /recipe-test-update; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-recipe-test-update.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-recipe-test-update (cctest wrapper)
+
+**Canonical procedure:** `references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/recipe-test-update/SKILL.md`
+— read it and follow it. This wrapper only sets context + policy.
+
+**Context:** this is an **autonomic-recipe-maintainer (ARM)** skill. It operates on the
+recipe-maintainer **cctest** test server / local abra sandbox — NOT on the cc-ci CI server or
+its shared swarm. Execute with the submodule as your working directory:
+`cd /srv/cc-ci-orch/references/recipe-maintainer`. If the ARM environment is not yet
+configured on this host (`settings.toml` from `settings.toml.example`, sandbox/test instances),
+run `/cctest-intro` / `/cctest-setup-sandbox` first.
+
+**Unified policy (same as cc-ci — no differences):**
+- **Recipe PRs are NEVER merged by an agent.** Every flow ends at an open PR; the operator
+  reviews and merges. This is ARM's own rule too ("PRs are reviewed and merged manually by a
+  human afterwards — never pushes to upstream or merges anything"); ARM's "no human review in
+  the middle" wording refers only to skipping the mid-run plan confirmation, not to merging.
+- Never touch cc-ci infrastructure (the CI server, its swarm, `/root/*` clones, the weekly
+  timers) from an ARM skill — cc-ci work goes through the cc-ci skills.
+- The submodule is **pinned**: don't commit into it from here; upstream ARM changes arrive via
+  a deliberate submodule bump + `scripts/gen-cctest-skills.py` regeneration.

.opencode/skills/cctest-recipe-test/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+---
+name: cctest-recipe-test
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Run all tests for a Co-op Cloud recipe (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /recipe-test; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-recipe-test.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-recipe-test (cctest wrapper)
+
+**Canonical procedure:** `references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/recipe-test/SKILL.md`
+— read it and follow it. This wrapper only sets context + policy.
+
+**Context:** this is an **autonomic-recipe-maintainer (ARM)** skill. It operates on the
+recipe-maintainer **cctest** test server / local abra sandbox — NOT on the cc-ci CI server or
+its shared swarm. Execute with the submodule as your working directory:
+`cd /srv/cc-ci-orch/references/recipe-maintainer`. If the ARM environment is not yet
+configured on this host (`settings.toml` from `settings.toml.example`, sandbox/test instances),
+run `/cctest-intro` / `/cctest-setup-sandbox` first.
+
+**Unified policy (same as cc-ci — no differences):**
+- **Recipe PRs are NEVER merged by an agent.** Every flow ends at an open PR; the operator
+  reviews and merges. This is ARM's own rule too ("PRs are reviewed and merged manually by a
+  human afterwards — never pushes to upstream or merges anything"); ARM's "no human review in
+  the middle" wording refers only to skipping the mid-run plan confirmation, not to merging.
+- Never touch cc-ci infrastructure (the CI server, its swarm, `/root/*` clones, the weekly
+  timers) from an ARM skill — cc-ci work goes through the cc-ci skills.
+- The submodule is **pinned**: don't commit into it from here; upstream ARM changes arrive via
+  a deliberate submodule bump + `scripts/gen-cctest-skills.py` regeneration.

.opencode/skills/cctest-recipe-upgrade-apply/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+---
+name: cctest-recipe-upgrade-apply
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Execute a planned recipe upgrade — apply changes, deploy, test, commit/tag (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /recipe-upgrade-apply; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-recipe-upgrade-apply.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-recipe-upgrade-apply (cctest wrapper)
+
+**Canonical procedure:** `references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/recipe-upgrade-apply/SKILL.md`
+— read it and follow it. This wrapper only sets context + policy.
+
+**Context:** this is an **autonomic-recipe-maintainer (ARM)** skill. It operates on the
+recipe-maintainer **cctest** test server / local abra sandbox — NOT on the cc-ci CI server or
+its shared swarm. Execute with the submodule as your working directory:
+`cd /srv/cc-ci-orch/references/recipe-maintainer`. If the ARM environment is not yet
+configured on this host (`settings.toml` from `settings.toml.example`, sandbox/test instances),
+run `/cctest-intro` / `/cctest-setup-sandbox` first.
+
+**Unified policy (same as cc-ci — no differences):**
+- **Recipe PRs are NEVER merged by an agent.** Every flow ends at an open PR; the operator
+  reviews and merges. This is ARM's own rule too ("PRs are reviewed and merged manually by a
+  human afterwards — never pushes to upstream or merges anything"); ARM's "no human review in
+  the middle" wording refers only to skipping the mid-run plan confirmation, not to merging.
+- Never touch cc-ci infrastructure (the CI server, its swarm, `/root/*` clones, the weekly
+  timers) from an ARM skill — cc-ci work goes through the cc-ci skills.
+- The submodule is **pinned**: don't commit into it from here; upstream ARM changes arrive via
+  a deliberate submodule bump + `scripts/gen-cctest-skills.py` regeneration.

.opencode/skills/cctest-recipe-upgrade-cron-all/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+---
+name: cctest-recipe-upgrade-cron-all
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Autonomous weekly upgrade run — overview all recipes, upgrade each end-to-end (sequentially by default, parallel with --parallel), open PRs (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /recipe-upgrade-cron-all; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-recipe-upgrade-cron-all.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-recipe-upgrade-cron-all (cctest wrapper)
+
+**Canonical procedure:** `references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/recipe-upgrade-cron-all/SKILL.md`
+— read it and follow it. This wrapper only sets context + policy.
+
+**Context:** this is an **autonomic-recipe-maintainer (ARM)** skill. It operates on the
+recipe-maintainer **cctest** test server / local abra sandbox — NOT on the cc-ci CI server or
+its shared swarm. Execute with the submodule as your working directory:
+`cd /srv/cc-ci-orch/references/recipe-maintainer`. If the ARM environment is not yet
+configured on this host (`settings.toml` from `settings.toml.example`, sandbox/test instances),
+run `/cctest-intro` / `/cctest-setup-sandbox` first.
+
+**Unified policy (same as cc-ci — no differences):**
+- **Recipe PRs are NEVER merged by an agent.** Every flow ends at an open PR; the operator
+  reviews and merges. This is ARM's own rule too ("PRs are reviewed and merged manually by a
+  human afterwards — never pushes to upstream or merges anything"); ARM's "no human review in
+  the middle" wording refers only to skipping the mid-run plan confirmation, not to merging.
+- Never touch cc-ci infrastructure (the CI server, its swarm, `/root/*` clones, the weekly
+  timers) from an ARM skill — cc-ci work goes through the cc-ci skills.
+- The submodule is **pinned**: don't commit into it from here; upstream ARM changes arrive via
+  a deliberate submodule bump + `scripts/gen-cctest-skills.py` regeneration.

.opencode/skills/cctest-recipe-upgrade-full/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+---
+name: cctest-recipe-upgrade-full
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Plan and apply a recipe upgrade end-to-end, no human review in the middle (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /recipe-upgrade-full; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-recipe-upgrade-full.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-recipe-upgrade-full (cctest wrapper)
+
+**Canonical procedure:** `references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/recipe-upgrade-full/SKILL.md`
+— read it and follow it. This wrapper only sets context + policy.
+
+**Context:** this is an **autonomic-recipe-maintainer (ARM)** skill. It operates on the
+recipe-maintainer **cctest** test server / local abra sandbox — NOT on the cc-ci CI server or
+its shared swarm. Execute with the submodule as your working directory:
+`cd /srv/cc-ci-orch/references/recipe-maintainer`. If the ARM environment is not yet
+configured on this host (`settings.toml` from `settings.toml.example`, sandbox/test instances),
+run `/cctest-intro` / `/cctest-setup-sandbox` first.
+
+**Unified policy (same as cc-ci — no differences):**
+- **Recipe PRs are NEVER merged by an agent.** Every flow ends at an open PR; the operator
+  reviews and merges. This is ARM's own rule too ("PRs are reviewed and merged manually by a
+  human afterwards — never pushes to upstream or merges anything"); ARM's "no human review in
+  the middle" wording refers only to skipping the mid-run plan confirmation, not to merging.
+- Never touch cc-ci infrastructure (the CI server, its swarm, `/root/*` clones, the weekly
+  timers) from an ARM skill — cc-ci work goes through the cc-ci skills.
+- The submodule is **pinned**: don't commit into it from here; upstream ARM changes arrive via
+  a deliberate submodule bump + `scripts/gen-cctest-skills.py` regeneration.

.opencode/skills/cctest-recipe-upgrade-plan/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+---
+name: cctest-recipe-upgrade-plan
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Create a detailed upgrade plan for a recipe (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /recipe-upgrade-plan; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-recipe-upgrade-plan.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-recipe-upgrade-plan (cctest wrapper)
+
+**Canonical procedure:** `references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/recipe-upgrade-plan/SKILL.md`
+— read it and follow it. This wrapper only sets context + policy.
+
+**Context:** this is an **autonomic-recipe-maintainer (ARM)** skill. It operates on the
+recipe-maintainer **cctest** test server / local abra sandbox — NOT on the cc-ci CI server or
+its shared swarm. Execute with the submodule as your working directory:
+`cd /srv/cc-ci-orch/references/recipe-maintainer`. If the ARM environment is not yet
+configured on this host (`settings.toml` from `settings.toml.example`, sandbox/test instances),
+run `/cctest-intro` / `/cctest-setup-sandbox` first.
+
+**Unified policy (same as cc-ci — no differences):**
+- **Recipe PRs are NEVER merged by an agent.** Every flow ends at an open PR; the operator
+  reviews and merges. This is ARM's own rule too ("PRs are reviewed and merged manually by a
+  human afterwards — never pushes to upstream or merges anything"); ARM's "no human review in
+  the middle" wording refers only to skipping the mid-run plan confirmation, not to merging.
+- Never touch cc-ci infrastructure (the CI server, its swarm, `/root/*` clones, the weekly
+  timers) from an ARM skill — cc-ci work goes through the cc-ci skills.
+- The submodule is **pinned**: don't commit into it from here; upstream ARM changes arrive via
+  a deliberate submodule bump + `scripts/gen-cctest-skills.py` regeneration.

.opencode/skills/cctest-recipe-upstream/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+---
+name: cctest-recipe-upstream
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] From a git.autonomic.zone review-PR URL, fetch the branch + tag locally and emit the commands to open the upstream PR on git.coopcloud.tech (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /recipe-upstream; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-recipe-upstream.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-recipe-upstream (cctest wrapper)
+
+**Canonical procedure:** `references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/recipe-upstream/SKILL.md`
+— read it and follow it. This wrapper only sets context + policy.
+
+**Context:** this is an **autonomic-recipe-maintainer (ARM)** skill. It operates on the
+recipe-maintainer **cctest** test server / local abra sandbox — NOT on the cc-ci CI server or
+its shared swarm. Execute with the submodule as your working directory:
+`cd /srv/cc-ci-orch/references/recipe-maintainer`. If the ARM environment is not yet
+configured on this host (`settings.toml` from `settings.toml.example`, sandbox/test instances),
+run `/cctest-intro` / `/cctest-setup-sandbox` first.
+
+**Unified policy (same as cc-ci — no differences):**
+- **Recipe PRs are NEVER merged by an agent.** Every flow ends at an open PR; the operator
+  reviews and merges. This is ARM's own rule too ("PRs are reviewed and merged manually by a
+  human afterwards — never pushes to upstream or merges anything"); ARM's "no human review in
+  the middle" wording refers only to skipping the mid-run plan confirmation, not to merging.
+- Never touch cc-ci infrastructure (the CI server, its swarm, `/root/*` clones, the weekly
+  timers) from an ARM skill — cc-ci work goes through the cc-ci skills.
+- The submodule is **pinned**: don't commit into it from here; upstream ARM changes arrive via
+  a deliberate submodule bump + `scripts/gen-cctest-skills.py` regeneration.

.opencode/skills/cctest-setup-sandbox/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+---
+name: cctest-setup-sandbox
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Guide for setting up a sandboxed environment to run the agent with recipe-maintainer (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /setup-sandbox; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-setup-sandbox.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-setup-sandbox (cctest wrapper)
+
+**Canonical procedure:** `references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/setup-sandbox/SKILL.md`
+— read it and follow it. This wrapper only sets context + policy.
+
+**Context:** this is an **autonomic-recipe-maintainer (ARM)** skill. It operates on the
+recipe-maintainer **cctest** test server / local abra sandbox — NOT on the cc-ci CI server or
+its shared swarm. Execute with the submodule as your working directory:
+`cd /srv/cc-ci-orch/references/recipe-maintainer`. If the ARM environment is not yet
+configured on this host (`settings.toml` from `settings.toml.example`, sandbox/test instances),
+run `/cctest-intro` / `/cctest-setup-sandbox` first.
+
+**Unified policy (same as cc-ci — no differences):**
+- **Recipe PRs are NEVER merged by an agent.** Every flow ends at an open PR; the operator
+  reviews and merges. This is ARM's own rule too ("PRs are reviewed and merged manually by a
+  human afterwards — never pushes to upstream or merges anything"); ARM's "no human review in
+  the middle" wording refers only to skipping the mid-run plan confirmation, not to merging.
+- Never touch cc-ci infrastructure (the CI server, its swarm, `/root/*` clones, the weekly
+  timers) from an ARM skill — cc-ci work goes through the cc-ci skills.
+- The submodule is **pinned**: don't commit into it from here; upstream ARM changes arrive via
+  a deliberate submodule bump + `scripts/gen-cctest-skills.py` regeneration.

.opencode/skills/cctest-switch-default-instance/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+---
+name: cctest-switch-default-instance
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Switch the default test instance (b1cc or t1cc) for all recipe operations (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /switch-default-instance; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-switch-default-instance.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-switch-default-instance (cctest wrapper)
+
+**Canonical procedure:** `references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/switch-default-instance/SKILL.md`
+— read it and follow it. This wrapper only sets context + policy.
+
+**Context:** this is an **autonomic-recipe-maintainer (ARM)** skill. It operates on the
+recipe-maintainer **cctest** test server / local abra sandbox — NOT on the cc-ci CI server or
+its shared swarm. Execute with the submodule as your working directory:
+`cd /srv/cc-ci-orch/references/recipe-maintainer`. If the ARM environment is not yet
+configured on this host (`settings.toml` from `settings.toml.example`, sandbox/test instances),
+run `/cctest-intro` / `/cctest-setup-sandbox` first.
+
+**Unified policy (same as cc-ci — no differences):**
+- **Recipe PRs are NEVER merged by an agent.** Every flow ends at an open PR; the operator
+  reviews and merges. This is ARM's own rule too ("PRs are reviewed and merged manually by a
+  human afterwards — never pushes to upstream or merges anything"); ARM's "no human review in
+  the middle" wording refers only to skipping the mid-run plan confirmation, not to merging.
+- Never touch cc-ci infrastructure (the CI server, its swarm, `/root/*` clones, the weekly
+  timers) from an ARM skill — cc-ci work goes through the cc-ci skills.
+- The submodule is **pinned**: don't commit into it from here; upstream ARM changes arrive via
+  a deliberate submodule bump + `scripts/gen-cctest-skills.py` regeneration.

.opencode/skills/cctest-sync-secrets/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+---
+name: cctest-sync-secrets
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Sync Docker secrets from the test server into recipe-info/testsecrets/ (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /sync-secrets; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-sync-secrets.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-sync-secrets (cctest wrapper)
+
+**Canonical procedure:** `references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/sync-secrets/SKILL.md`
+— read it and follow it. This wrapper only sets context + policy.
+
+**Context:** this is an **autonomic-recipe-maintainer (ARM)** skill. It operates on the
+recipe-maintainer **cctest** test server / local abra sandbox — NOT on the cc-ci CI server or
+its shared swarm. Execute with the submodule as your working directory:
+`cd /srv/cc-ci-orch/references/recipe-maintainer`. If the ARM environment is not yet
+configured on this host (`settings.toml` from `settings.toml.example`, sandbox/test instances),
+run `/cctest-intro` / `/cctest-setup-sandbox` first.
+
+**Unified policy (same as cc-ci — no differences):**
+- **Recipe PRs are NEVER merged by an agent.** Every flow ends at an open PR; the operator
+  reviews and merges. This is ARM's own rule too ("PRs are reviewed and merged manually by a
+  human afterwards — never pushes to upstream or merges anything"); ARM's "no human review in
+  the middle" wording refers only to skipping the mid-run plan confirmation, not to merging.
+- Never touch cc-ci infrastructure (the CI server, its swarm, `/root/*` clones, the weekly
+  timers) from an ARM skill — cc-ci work goes through the cc-ci skills.
+- The submodule is **pinned**: don't commit into it from here; upstream ARM changes arrive via
+  a deliberate submodule bump + `scripts/gen-cctest-skills.py` regeneration.

.opencode/skills/cctest-t1cc-start/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+---
+name: cctest-t1cc-start
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Provision the t1cc DigitalOcean test server and deploy Traefik (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /t1cc-start; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-t1cc-start.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-t1cc-start (cctest wrapper)
+
+**Canonical procedure:** `references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/t1cc-start/SKILL.md`
+— read it and follow it. This wrapper only sets context + policy.
+
+**Context:** this is an **autonomic-recipe-maintainer (ARM)** skill. It operates on the
+recipe-maintainer **cctest** test server / local abra sandbox — NOT on the cc-ci CI server or
+its shared swarm. Execute with the submodule as your working directory:
+`cd /srv/cc-ci-orch/references/recipe-maintainer`. If the ARM environment is not yet
+configured on this host (`settings.toml` from `settings.toml.example`, sandbox/test instances),
+run `/cctest-intro` / `/cctest-setup-sandbox` first.
+
+**Unified policy (same as cc-ci — no differences):**
+- **Recipe PRs are NEVER merged by an agent.** Every flow ends at an open PR; the operator
+  reviews and merges. This is ARM's own rule too ("PRs are reviewed and merged manually by a
+  human afterwards — never pushes to upstream or merges anything"); ARM's "no human review in
+  the middle" wording refers only to skipping the mid-run plan confirmation, not to merging.
+- Never touch cc-ci infrastructure (the CI server, its swarm, `/root/*` clones, the weekly
+  timers) from an ARM skill — cc-ci work goes through the cc-ci skills.
+- The submodule is **pinned**: don't commit into it from here; upstream ARM changes arrive via
+  a deliberate submodule bump + `scripts/gen-cctest-skills.py` regeneration.

.opencode/skills/cctest-t1cc-stop/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+---
+name: cctest-t1cc-stop
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Destroy the t1cc DigitalOcean test server via terraform (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /t1cc-stop; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-t1cc-stop.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-t1cc-stop (cctest wrapper)
+
+**Canonical procedure:** `references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/t1cc-stop/SKILL.md`
+— read it and follow it. This wrapper only sets context + policy.
+
+**Context:** this is an **autonomic-recipe-maintainer (ARM)** skill. It operates on the
+recipe-maintainer **cctest** test server / local abra sandbox — NOT on the cc-ci CI server or
+its shared swarm. Execute with the submodule as your working directory:
+`cd /srv/cc-ci-orch/references/recipe-maintainer`. If the ARM environment is not yet
+configured on this host (`settings.toml` from `settings.toml.example`, sandbox/test instances),
+run `/cctest-intro` / `/cctest-setup-sandbox` first.
+
+**Unified policy (same as cc-ci — no differences):**
+- **Recipe PRs are NEVER merged by an agent.** Every flow ends at an open PR; the operator
+  reviews and merges. This is ARM's own rule too ("PRs are reviewed and merged manually by a
+  human afterwards — never pushes to upstream or merges anything"); ARM's "no human review in
+  the middle" wording refers only to skipping the mid-run plan confirmation, not to merging.
+- Never touch cc-ci infrastructure (the CI server, its swarm, `/root/*` clones, the weekly
+  timers) from an ARM skill — cc-ci work goes through the cc-ci skills.
+- The submodule is **pinned**: don't commit into it from here; upstream ARM changes arrive via
+  a deliberate submodule bump + `scripts/gen-cctest-skills.py` regeneration.

.opencode/skills/cctest-test-context-reset/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+---
+name: cctest-test-context-reset
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Undeploy all apps from the test server except traefik (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /test-context-reset; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-test-context-reset.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-test-context-reset (cctest wrapper)
+
+**Canonical procedure:** `references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/test-context-reset/SKILL.md`
+— read it and follow it. This wrapper only sets context + policy.
+
+**Context:** this is an **autonomic-recipe-maintainer (ARM)** skill. It operates on the
+recipe-maintainer **cctest** test server / local abra sandbox — NOT on the cc-ci CI server or
+its shared swarm. Execute with the submodule as your working directory:
+`cd /srv/cc-ci-orch/references/recipe-maintainer`. If the ARM environment is not yet
+configured on this host (`settings.toml` from `settings.toml.example`, sandbox/test instances),
+run `/cctest-intro` / `/cctest-setup-sandbox` first.
+
+**Unified policy (same as cc-ci — no differences):**
+- **Recipe PRs are NEVER merged by an agent.** Every flow ends at an open PR; the operator
+  reviews and merges. This is ARM's own rule too ("PRs are reviewed and merged manually by a
+  human afterwards — never pushes to upstream or merges anything"); ARM's "no human review in
+  the middle" wording refers only to skipping the mid-run plan confirmation, not to merging.
+- Never touch cc-ci infrastructure (the CI server, its swarm, `/root/*` clones, the weekly
+  timers) from an ARM skill — cc-ci work goes through the cc-ci skills.
+- The submodule is **pinned**: don't commit into it from here; upstream ARM changes arrive via
+  a deliberate submodule bump + `scripts/gen-cctest-skills.py` regeneration.

.opencode/skills/cctest-test-setup/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+---
+name: cctest-test-setup
+description: "[recipe-maintainer/cctest] Verify the test environment is configured correctly (Wraps the autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill /test-setup; runs against the cctest test server + ARM sandbox, not cc-ci. Invoke as /cctest-test-setup.)"
+---
+
+# cctest-test-setup (cctest wrapper)
+
+**Canonical procedure:** `references/recipe-maintainer/.opencode/skills/test-setup/SKILL.md`
+— read it and follow it. This wrapper only sets context + policy.
+
+**Context:** this is an **autonomic-recipe-maintainer (ARM)** skill. It operates on the
+recipe-maintainer **cctest** test server / local abra sandbox — NOT on the cc-ci CI server or
+its shared swarm. Execute with the submodule as your working directory:
+`cd /srv/cc-ci-orch/references/recipe-maintainer`. If the ARM environment is not yet
+configured on this host (`settings.toml` from `settings.toml.example`, sandbox/test instances),
+run `/cctest-intro` / `/cctest-setup-sandbox` first.
+
+**Unified policy (same as cc-ci — no differences):**
+- **Recipe PRs are NEVER merged by an agent.** Every flow ends at an open PR; the operator
+  reviews and merges. This is ARM's own rule too ("PRs are reviewed and merged manually by a
+  human afterwards — never pushes to upstream or merges anything"); ARM's "no human review in
+  the middle" wording refers only to skipping the mid-run plan confirmation, not to merging.
+- Never touch cc-ci infrastructure (the CI server, its swarm, `/root/*` clones, the weekly
+  timers) from an ARM skill — cc-ci work goes through the cc-ci skills.
+- The submodule is **pinned**: don't commit into it from here; upstream ARM changes arrive via
+  a deliberate submodule bump + `scripts/gen-cctest-skills.py` regeneration.

.opencode/skills/help/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
+---
+name: help
+description: Operator orientation - lists every skill available on this orchestrator with what it does and when to reach for it, grouped by purpose (status, weekly maintenance, host updates, tests, enrollment, recovery, reporting), plus a "what do you want to do?" guide for common situations. Read-only. Invoke as /help.
+---
+
+# help
+
+Orient the operator: what this orchestrator can do, via which skill, and what's sensible next.
+
+**First, enumerate the live roster** (skills get added — don't trust this file's list blindly):
+```
+ls /srv/cc-ci-orch/.opencode/skills/    # canonical definitions (one dir per skill)
+```
+For any skill not described below, read its `SKILL.md` frontmatter description and include it.
+Then present the roster grouped as follows, and close with the situation guide.
+
+## The roster (curated descriptions — merge with the live listing)
+
+**Status & orientation**
+- **/cc-ci-status** — the comprehensive read-only health/status check: weekly-run outcomes,
+  report publishing, stale tests, CVE-PR aging, host update recency, service health, bridge
+  `!testme` path. Ends `ALL HEALTHY` or prioritized findings each mapped to a skill. **Start
+  here when unsure.**
+- **/help** — this orientation.
+
+**Weekly maintenance (recipes)**
+- **/upgrade-all** — the weekly sweep: survey every `weekly` recipe, open verified upgrade PRs,
+  write the summary + report. Runs on a timer (`cc-ci-upgrade-all.timer`, Fri 02:00 UTC);
+  invoke manually to run it now.
+- **/recipe-upgrade <recipe>** — the same pipeline for ONE recipe (plan → bump → verify green →
+  PR). `--with-tests` also fixes that recipe's stale test.
+- **/recipe-report** — (re)generate the weekly report page for report.ci.commoninternet.net.
+
+**Keeping the PR list honest**
+- **/cc-ci-cleanup** — reconciles every mirror from true upstream (which alone closes PRs upstream
+  already merged), then closes the open recipe PRs that can no longer merge or were never meant to
+  (CI sweep artifacts, obsolete bumps, superseded duplicates) and reports what is actually blocking
+  the ones that should land. Never merges.
+
+**Security (CVEs)**
+- **/cve-check** — fleet-wide CVE sweep with **no upgrading**: for every recipe, work out what
+  upgrade is available (per image, sidecars included), scan it for CVEs, and publish a CVE report.
+  Read-only and quick — the "what are we exposed to?" answer without an upgrade run.
+- **/cve-check-and-upgrade** — the same sweep, then open verified PRs **only** for the recipes whose
+  upgrade actually fixes a CVE, worst severity first. `--min-severity high` for just the urgent ones.
+  Never merges.
+
+**Tests**
+- **/cc-ci-tests-update** — fleet-wide stale-test cleanup: find tests broken by legitimate
+  upstream changes, fix without weakening, verify, merge the test PRs.
+- **/ci-test-review** — diagnose a specific red CI run: classify recipe bug vs stale test vs
+  CI-server bug, then fix on the right side.
+
+**cc-ci itself**
+- **/cc-ci-server-update** — bump the CI **server** host's nixpkgs/sops-nix, deploy with
+  build → `nixos-rebuild test` → switch + health gate, PR merged on green.
+- **/cc-ci-orchestrator-update** — same for **this** orchestrator host (self-update caveats).
+- **/cc-ci-update** — both of the above plus /cc-ci-tests-update in one pass.
+- **/ci-dev-workflow** — harness/CI-server development discipline (changing cc-ci itself).
+
+**Enrollment**
+- **/recipe-enroll <recipe>** — add a NEW recipe to the maintained set end-to-end: mirror,
+  test suite, bridge + inventory enrollment, full-suite-green verification, bridge deploy.
+
+**Recovery**
+- **hetzner-server-recovery** — when a Hetzner host is unreachable over SSH/tailscale: API
+  reboot, rescue mode, GRUB generation selection (submenu ids are `1>N`), console access.
+
+**Recipe-maintainer toolkit (`/cctest-*` — the ARM sandbox + cctest test server, NOT cc-ci)**
+The full autonomic-recipe-maintainer skill set, vendored as a pinned submodule
+(`references/recipe-maintainer`) and exposed with the `cctest-` prefix — ~30 skills for
+hands-on recipe work against the recipe-maintainer **cctest** test server and local abra
+sandbox: `/cctest-intro` (start here), `/cctest-recipe-overview`, `/cctest-recipe-init`,
+`/cctest-recipe-deploy`, `/cctest-recipe-test*`, `/cctest-recipe-upgrade-plan|apply|full`,
+`/cctest-new-recipe-guide`, sandbox/instance management (`/cctest-setup-sandbox`,
+`/cctest-t1cc-start|stop`), and more — enumerate with `ls .opencode/skills | grep ^cctest-`.
+**Rule of thumb:** verifying/shipping against the CI pipeline → the cc-ci skills above;
+exploratory or hands-on recipe development on a test instance → `/cctest-*`. Policy is
+unified: recipe PRs are never agent-merged on either side (operator reviews + merges), and
+ARM skills never touch cc-ci infra. After a submodule bump run `scripts/gen-cctest-skills.py`.
+
+## "What do you want to do?"
+
+| Situation | Do this |
+|---|---|
+| "How is everything?" | `/cc-ci-status` |
+| "Run the weekly upgrades now" | `/upgrade-all` (or `systemctl start cc-ci-upgrade-all.service`) |
+| "Upgrade just <recipe>" | `/recipe-upgrade <recipe>` |
+| "The report site is stale/missing a week" | `/recipe-report` |
+| "The open PR list is a mess / what should I merge?" | `/cc-ci-cleanup` |
+| "What CVEs are we exposed to right now?" | `/cve-check` (read-only, no PRs) |
+| "A CVE just dropped — check and patch it" | `/cve-check-and-upgrade` (add `--min-severity high` to skip the noise) |
+| "Is <recipe> vulnerable?" | `/cve-check <recipe>` |
+| "Tests are red because upstream changed" | `/cc-ci-tests-update` (fleet) or `/recipe-upgrade <r> --with-tests` |
+| "A CI run failed and I don't know why" | `/ci-test-review` |
+| "Update the CI server OS/deps" | `/cc-ci-server-update` |
+| "Update this orchestrator's OS/deps" | `/cc-ci-orchestrator-update` |
+| "Add <recipe> to what we maintain" | `/recipe-enroll <recipe>` |
+| "A host is unreachable" | `hetzner-server-recovery` |
+| "Hack on / bootstrap a recipe in a sandbox" | `/cctest-recipe-init`, `/cctest-recipe-deploy`, `/cctest-recipe-test` |
+| "New to recipe work, where do I start?" | `/cctest-intro` |
+| "What needs my review?" | `/cc-ci-status` → its open-PR section lists CVE-urgent + ready-to-merge PRs |
+
+**Standing conventions** (all skills follow these): PRs are opened for visibility and merged
+directly once verified (invocation = authorization) — except recipe upgrade PRs, which stay
+operator-merged; `nixos-rebuild test` before any `switch`; never weaken a test; single-writer
+branches; serialize deploy-heavy work on the shared swarm.
+
+If several things need doing, run `/cc-ci-status` first — its findings come pre-prioritized
+with the skill to invoke for each.

.opencode/skills/recipe-enroll/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
+---
+name: recipe-enroll
+description: Add a NEW recipe to cc-ci's maintained set, end to end — create + sync the recipe-maintainers mirror from coopcloud upstream, author a real test suite (health floor + non-vacuous recipe-specific tests incl. a create-an-object round-trip), enroll it in the !testme bridge (POLL_REPOS) and the weekly /upgrade-all inventory (used-recipes.md weekly row + upstream registry), then VERIFY the whole thing: full harness suite green with the new tests, bridge deployed (test-before-switch) and healthy. Opens the cc-ci PR for visibility and merges it directly once verification is green (the skill invocation is the authorization); the report lists merged PR links + what changed. Invoke as /recipe-enroll <recipe>.
+---
+
+# recipe-enroll
+
+Enroll a coopcloud recipe as a **maintained** recipe: mirrored, test-covered, `!testme`-triggerable,
+and picked up by the weekly `/upgrade-all`. This is the full end-to-end path — worked example:
+the 2026-08-03 wordpress enrollment (cc-ci PR #14).
+
+**"Maintained" = ALL of:**
+1. Mirror `recipe-maintainers/<recipe>` exists, `main` = coopcloud upstream main, tags synced.
+2. `tests/<recipe>/` enrolled in the cc-ci repo (this is what `/upgrade-all` + `ci-test-review`
+   enumerate).
+3. `POLL_REPOS` in `nix/modules/bridge.nix` includes the mirror (the `!testme` bridge).
+4. `cc-ci-plan/used-recipes.md` has a `<recipe>  weekly` row (orchestrator repo — `/upgrade-all`
+   skips recipes without it or tagged `external`).
+5. `cc-ci-plan/upstream/<recipe>.md` registry entry (release-notes URLs + standing notes).
+
+## Preconditions
+
+- The recipe exists upstream: `ssh cc-ci 'script -qec "abra recipe fetch <recipe>" /dev/null'`
+  succeeds (every recipe must have a coop-cloud correspondent).
+- `GITEA_*` creds in `/srv/cc-ci/.testenv` (orchestrator side; the cc-ci host does NOT have this
+  file — inject creds over stdin when running helper scripts there, see step 2).
+- The shared Swarm is quiescent for step 6 (verification deploys the recipe) — do NOT verify
+  concurrent with `/upgrade-all` or other verify runs; author everything first, verify when clear.
+
+## Procedure
+
+### 1. Survey the recipe (read-only)
+
+On cc-ci, after `abra recipe fetch <recipe>`, read `~/.abra/recipes/<recipe>/`:
+- `compose.yml` — services + images (for the upstream registry), healthcheck (`start_period`
+  informs `DEPLOY_TIMEOUT`), traefik labels.
+- `.env.sample` — is the app self-initializing, or does a fresh deploy sit in a setup wizard
+  (e.g. wordpress without `POST_DEPLOY_CMDS core_install`)? The tests must handle the state a
+  fresh CI deploy actually lands in.
+- Auth model — how will a test create an object? (REST + token, session login, XML-RPC, …)
+  Check overlay configs (htaccess/nginx templates) for blocked endpoints before relying on one.
+
+### 2. Create + sync the mirror
+
+Create `recipe-maintainers/<recipe>` (Gitea API: `POST /orgs/recipe-maintainers/repos`,
+`{"name":…,"private":true,"default_branch":"main","auto_init":false}`), then force-sync from
+coopcloud with the existing helper **run on cc-ci with creds injected via stdin** (the host has
+no `.testenv`):
+```
+set -a; . /srv/cc-ci/.testenv; set +a
+{ printf 'export GITEA_USERNAME=%q GITEA_PASSWORD=%q GITEA_URL=%q\n' "$GITEA_USERNAME" "$GITEA_PASSWORD" "$GITEA_URL";
+  cat /srv/cc-ci-orch/.claude/skills/recipe-upgrade/open-recipe-pr.sh; } \
+  | ssh cc-ci 'bash -s -- <recipe> --reconcile-only'
+```
+Expect: repo created (or exists), `main` force-synced to upstream, published tags pushed.
+
+### 3. Author the test suite (dedicated cc-ci clone + branch)
+
+```
+git clone ssh://git@git.autonomic.zone:2222/recipe-maintainers/cc-ci.git /home/loops/work/cc-ci-tests-<recipe>
+cd … && git checkout -b test/<recipe>-enroll-$(date -u +%Y%m%d)
+```
+`tests/<recipe>/` contents (template: `tests/uptime-kuma/`, `tests/wordpress/`):
+- **`recipe_meta.py`** — `HEALTH_PATH` / `HEALTH_OK` (accept the fresh-deploy state, e.g. a
+  302 to a setup wizard), `DEPLOY_TIMEOUT` (recipe healthcheck `start_period` + DB init +
+  first-boot copy, be generous), `HTTP_TIMEOUT`, `WARM_CANONICAL = True` (canon §2.B — all
+  recipes enroll as data-warm canonicals, operator 2026-06-17).
+- **`custom/`** — the health floor + **≥2 recipe-specific, non-vacuous tests**, one of which is
+  the §4.3 **create-an-object + read-it-back** (write through the app's real API, read back via
+  a *different* path where possible — e.g. wordpress: XML-RPC write → REST read → permalink
+  HTML). If the app needs setup/auth, put it in a recipe-local `_<recipe>.py` helper
+  (idempotent `ensure_*` so test ordering doesn't matter; run-scoped class-B credentials —
+  the app is destroyed at teardown). Design assertions to name the broken layer (e.g. assert
+  both the rewrite-dependent and rewrite-independent API routes separately).
+- **`PARITY.md`** — table of tests × what's verified × why non-vacuous; note there's no
+  recipe-maintainer parity corpus if so.
+- Lint with the **repo dev-shell ruff**: `nix develop -c ruff check tests/<recipe>/ && nix
+  develop -c ruff format tests/<recipe>/` (pre-existing drift in other files is not yours).
+
+### 4. Bridge enrollment (same branch)
+
+`nix/modules/bridge.nix`: append `,recipe-maintainers/<recipe>` to the `POLL_REPOS=` CSV.
+
+### 5. Inventory + registry (orchestrator repo, direct to main)
+
+- `cc-ci-plan/used-recipes.md`: add `<recipe>  weekly` row (alphabetical).
+- `cc-ci-plan/upstream/<recipe>.md`: images table (source repo + releases/changelog links) +
+  standing notes (setup-wizard behavior, auth caveats, known upgrade traps).
+- Commit + push (doc commits go direct to main in this repo).
+
+### 6. Verify end-to-end — full suite GREEN with the new tests (swarm-serialized)
+
+Open the cc-ci PR first (visibility): `TITLE=… BODY_FILE=… bash
+/srv/cc-ci-orch/.claude/skills/ci-test-review/open-cc-ci-pr.sh`. The body: what's enrolled,
+the test design rationale, the verify + deploy plan.
+
+Then, when the swarm is clear:
+```
+ssh cc-ci 'rm -rf /root/cc-ci-test-verify && git clone --branch test/<recipe>-enroll-<date> \
+  ssh://git@git.autonomic.zone:2222/recipe-maintainers/cc-ci.git /root/cc-ci-test-verify && \
+  cd /root/cc-ci-test-verify && git submodule update --init secrets 2>/dev/null || true'
+RECIPE=<recipe> REMOTE_ROOT=/root/cc-ci-test-verify \
+  bash /srv/cc-ci-orch/.claude/skills/ci-test-review/verify-pr.sh     # no REF — recipe main
+```
+Required: **cold full-suite green** (install/upgrade/backup/restore/custom). Iterate the tests
+(bounded, ≤3 attempts) if red — fix the TESTS to match real app behavior, never weaken. Clean up
+`/root/cc-ci-test-verify` after.
+
+### 7. Deploy the bridge change to the cc-ci host (test-before-switch)
+
+The `POLL_REPOS` change only takes effect via a host rebuild. Per `/cc-ci-server-update` steps
+5a-e: stage the branch to `/root/cc-ci-deploy` (+ secrets copy), `nixos-rebuild build`, detached
+`nixos-rebuild test`, verify reachable + healthy, then `switch`. Confirm the bridge is polling
+the new repo: `ssh cc-ci 'docker service inspect ccci-bridge_app --format "{{json
+.Spec.TaskTemplate.ContainerSpec.Env}}"' | grep <recipe>` and the bridge task is 1/1 with no
+auth errors in its logs (a stale Gitea secret 401s silently — see the 2026-08-03 finding).
+
+### 8. Merge + report
+
+Merge the cc-ci PR (invocation = authorization; PR is the visible record — comment the
+verification evidence first). Report to the operator: merged PR link + change summary, the
+verify log path, and the note that the **next weekly `/upgrade-all` picks the recipe up
+automatically** (it enumerates `tests/<recipe>/` dirs × `weekly` rows).
+
+## Guardrails
+
+- **Full-suite green is the enrollment gate** — an enrolled-but-red recipe poisons every future
+  sweep. Don't merge on partial green.
+- **Never weaken**: the tests assert the app's real current behavior, incl. asserting removed
+  auth paths are rejected where that's the upstream intent.
+- **Single-writer**: dedicated clones/branches; never push `main` of cc-ci; never touch
+  `/root/builder-clone` or the loops' clones; `/root/cc-ci-test-verify` is yours — remove after.
+- **Serialize on the swarm**: authoring is free, verification + bridge deploy wait for
+  `/upgrade-all`/other runs to finish.
+- **abra over ssh needs the pseudo-TTY wrap**: `ssh cc-ci 'script -qec "abra …" /dev/null'`.
+- **PRs for visibility, merged directly once verified**; failed enrollment leaves the PR open
+  with an explanatory comment and the report says exactly what's missing.

AGENTS.md

@@ -115,3 +115,29 @@ When the orchestrator, Builder, or assistant makes intentional repository change
 promptly and push them to `git.autonomic.zone` in append-only fashion (never force-push). Match the
 existing commit author and message style in this repo. Do not bundle unrelated worktree changes you
 did not make; stage only the intended files.
+
+## Ship as PRs, merge them yourself, operator reviews retrospectively
+
+**This applies to the two INFRASTRUCTURE repos — `recipe-maintainers/cc-ci-orchestrator` (here) and
+`recipe-maintainers/cc-ci` (the CI product).** For work in either:
+
+1. Branch, don't commit straight to `main`.
+2. Open a PR with a description written to be read **after** the fact: what changed, why, and what
+   evidence says it works (test output, a verified run, a before/after number). The PR *is* the
+   review artifact and the historical record.
+3. **Merge it yourself once it is verified** — do not wait for review. The invocation is the
+   authorization; blocking on review would stall the pipeline these repos exist to run.
+4. The operator reviews **retrospectively**, from the PR.
+
+So the PR is not a gate — it is how the work stays legible. A PR that merely says "fix scanner" has
+failed at its only job.
+
+> ### This does NOT extend to RECIPE repos
+> Recipe PRs — any `coop-cloud/<recipe>` or its `recipe-maintainers/<recipe>` mirror — are
+> **created and verified but NEVER merged by an agent**. Those change what deploys on other people's
+> infrastructure, so a human merges them. The split is deliberate: agents own the tooling, the
+> operator owns the recipes.
+
+If work has already landed on `main` without a PR, do not rewrite published history to fix it.
+Create a branch pinned at the pre-work commit and open the PR against that, so the diff is still
+reviewable and merging only advances the pointer (see PRs #2-#5, 2026-08-11).

cc-ci-plan/JOURNAL.md

@@ -791,3 +791,82 @@ session cc-ci-orchestrator-stale can be killed; recipe-mirrors org still private
   deploys to the cc-ci server and the orchestrator host — `test` leaves the bootloader/profile
   untouched so a reboot always recovers. Codified in the cc-ci-server-update skill (step 5d) and
   AGENTS.md (orchestrator rebuild instructions).
+
+## 2026-08-03 ~21:20 UTC — /cc-ci-tests-update + first /cc-ci-orchestrator-update (backup orchestrator)
+- /cc-ci-tests-update: both carry-over stale tests fixed via new recipe-local OIDC session-login
+  helper, verified GREEN cold full-suite paired with their recipe PRs, MERGED: cc-ci PR #12
+  (lasuite-docs, impress v5.4.0 Bearer removal) + PR #13 (lasuite-meet, meet v1.22.0 hardening).
+  Comments left on recipe PRs #7/#8 (operator-owned; merging them ⇒ green — both carry the nginx
+  1.31.3 CVE batch). Fresh 20-recipe sweep skipped in favor of the immediately-following
+  /upgrade-all (recorded in .cc-ci-logs/tests-update-2026-08-03.md). discourse #6 remains an
+  operator migration decision (not stale-test).
+- /cc-ci-orchestrator-update (first run of the new skill): host bumped 5b4f72e→531670d
+  (26.05 tip), gen 34, test-before-switch honored, PR cc-ci-orchestrator#1 merged.
+  Log: .cc-ci-logs/orchestrator-update-2026-08-03.md
+- Next: kicking off the weekly /upgrade-all (opencode ZEN glm-5.2) and monitoring to completion
+  incl. report generation, per operator instruction.
+
+## 2026-08-04 ~17:15 UTC — weekly run COMPLETE + bridge fixed + wordpress live + session hygiene
+- Weekly /upgrade-all 2026-08-03 finished after 3 provider-billing interruptions (Go monthly wall
+  resets ~Aug 22; ZEN balance twice). Final: 20 considered, 15 PRs opened/extended, 12 GREEN,
+  3 pending (discourse stale test; keycloak+mailu RED on a HARNESS canonical-baseline-404
+  regression from the 2026-08-03 nixpkgs bump — open task), 0 failed. Public page
+  week-2026-08-03.html published + privacy-linted (billing wording neutralized — standing rule).
+- Model economics: subagents configured to opencode/deepseek-v4-pro (opencode.jsonc agent.general;
+  main sessions stay glm-5.2; report glm-5.2). NOTE: not yet confirmed live — the finish-run's
+  subagents still ran glm; verify on the next run that agent.general.model is honored.
+- ccci-bridge FIXED: gitea-token swarm secret _v1 was frozen pre-rotation (ensure_secret is
+  create-once); nix now pins _v3 minted from current sops at deploy. Zero 401s; !testme restored.
+- wordpress ENROLLED end-to-end and MERGED (cc-ci PR #14): suite verified GREEN cold full-suite,
+  bridge deployed via test-before-switch, POLL_REPOS includes wordpress. Joins next weekly survey.
+- launch-upgrader watchdog bug FIXED + CONFIRMED (pinned session id + direct-GET validation;
+  archive-rename at launch). Root cause: /session API rows carry no time fields — sort degraded
+  to list order and resumed the wrong (giant) session, killing healthy runs.
+- Session naming convention live + durable in all three launchers: exactly one canonical
+  cc-ci-upgrader / cc-ci-supervisor / cc-ci-report; ALL other top-level sessions renamed
+  archive-<title> (113 archived in the sweep; 33 restyled earlier).
+- OPEN: harness canonical-baseline 404 (keycloak/mailu re-verify after fix); confirm ds4-pro
+  subagent config on next run; mattermost-lts 11.9.0 is innovation-release (EOL 2026-10-15) —
+  operator decides ESR vs innovation.
+
+## 2026-08-04 ~18:00 UTC — all three pending weekly-run PRs unblocked (operator ask)
+- keycloak #5: harness canonical-baseline 404 NOT reproducible post re-activation; repro build
+  #1199 full green; cc-ci/testme=success reflected. mailu #6: re-verify #1200 hit a cold-pull
+  900s deploy timeout, retry #1202 green; reflected. (Missing-runs-dir anomaly = install-stage
+  failure artifact, not a runner bug.)
+- discourse #6: TWO stale-test roots fixed in cc-ci PR #15 (MERGED, verified level 5/5 paired
+  with the recipe PR head): (1) new UPGRADE_BASE_FLOOR recipe_meta key + resolver support —
+  excludes structurally-invalid upgrade bases (0.8.x bitnami family) while resolution stays
+  dynamic; declared skip when nothing ≥ floor; (2) the upgrade faithfulness test's hardcoded
+  discourse/discourse:3.5.3 pin → version-agnostic official-family assertion. Never-weaken held.
+- Debug gitea tokens minted for the drone triggers all deleted (ids 55-57); the two 401s during
+  verification were transient git.autonomic.zone blips (sops bridge token verified valid, 200).
+- Operator review queue: keycloak #5, mailu #6, discourse #6 all green + reflected.
+
+## 2026-08-10 — 2026-08-07 weekly run FINISHED + three real bugs fixed
+- The 2026-08-07 run did all 18 per-recipe upgrades then died at the summary step on the provider's
+  monthly cap (05:26 UTC) — and then sat unfinished and UNREPORTED for 3 days. Operator raised the
+  cap; a finish-run wrote upgrade-all-2026-08-07.md and published week-2026-08-07.html
+  (privacy-linted; only false positive is Ghost's own "billing search" changelog text).
+  Result: 17 surveyed, 14 GREEN, 0 new failures, 2 up-to-date, 1 long-standing cross-major hold.
+- BUG 1 (3-day silence) — supervisor progress gate. _run_pids() substring-matched the WHOLE cmdline
+  for the session name, and an agent's kickoff PROMPT is an argv element: the supervisor's own
+  billing-hung agent contained "cc-ci-upgrader" and matched as a live upgrader run. It read its own
+  corpse as health ~60 times. Now matches FLAG VALUES (--title/-s) only, AND progress requires the
+  SESSION TREE to have advanced — a live-but-idle proc is not progress (that proc spun 3 days
+  emitting nothing). Billing-walled runs are REPORTED, never killed (operator policy): they may
+  resume when the wall lifts. Commit d441c6c.
+- BUG 2 (my regression from the 2026-08-04 pinning work) — launch-report.py never cleared/re-pinned
+  its session id, so the shared watchdog resolved a PREVIOUS report session that already carried
+  RECIPE REPORT COMPLETE, declared "run completed" and exited in 3 min, leaving the live report
+  unwatched. start() now archives titles, clears the pin, and re-pins after launch (same contract
+  as the upgrader). Commit 242a6d9.
+- BUG 3 — the deepseek subagent config never bound; the entire 2026-08-07 run billed as glm (17/17
+  subagents). Root cause is PLACEMENT, not the .jsonc extension (that parsed fine): launcher-started
+  sessions pass no --dir so they inherit the opencode SERVE process's project
+  (/srv/cc-ci-orch/cc-ci), and task-tool subagents inherit their parent session's directory. The
+  config now lives in the cc-ci repo at that path. VERIFIED end-to-end with the launcher's exact
+  invocation: parent=glm-5.2, subagent=deepseek-v4-pro read back from the session DB.
+  LESSON: `opencode debug config` proves resolution, NOT binding — only a live subagent's recorded
+  modelID proves binding. First attempt was a false pass because the probe passed --dir (unlike the
+  real launcher) and landed in a different project.

cc-ci-plan/advisory-scan.SPEC.md

@@ -0,0 +1,386 @@
+# Advisory scan — specification
+
+What `cc-ci-plan/advisory-scan.py` does, step by step, and why each step exists. This documents the
+implementation as it stands (2026-08-11); if you change the code, change this file in the same commit.
+`cc-ci-plan/test-advisory-scan.py` is the executable half of this spec — every rule below is asserted
+there.
+
+**Role.** A per-recipe CVE detector run as a **pre-step of `/recipe-upgrade`** (step 2a). It is
+**strictly additive**: it never replaces the release-note reading the upgrade agent already does. The
+CVE count reported for a recipe is the **union** of what the agent read and what this scan found; the
+scan may never *lower* a count established by reading.
+
+**Why it exists.** gitea 1.27.1 fixed CVE-2026-60004 and CVE-2026-59774 (both CVSS 9.8). The weekly
+report printed gitea's CVE count as `1`, then `none`. The upgrade agent had read the GitHub *release
+notes*, which name neither — both were announced only in the vendor's blog security section — and the
+report then derived security content from those notes plus model knowledge, which predates the CVEs.
+Nothing in the pipeline queried an advisory source. This scan closes that hole.
+
+---
+
+## Two passes
+
+| | Pass 1 — measure | Pass 2 — judge (`--adjudicate`) |
+|---|---|---|
+| Who | Pure Python, no model | The calling agent, a model |
+| Does | Collects evidence and decides every case it can by arithmetic | Weighs the collected evidence on cases arithmetic cannot settle |
+| Output | A count, or `UNKNOWN` | FIXED / NOT-FIXED / STILL-UNKNOWN per open case |
+| Rule | Deterministic and reproducible | May only **raise** the count, never lower it |
+
+**Prefer pass 1.** Every case pass 1 decides is one that reproduces identically next week. Pass 2 exists
+for evidence that is prose rather than data — a fallback, not a co-equal stage. When a class of case
+keeps landing in pass 2, the fix is a new deterministic method in pass 1. §4c is exactly that: it moved
+12 redis advisories out of pass 2 and into arithmetic.
+
+---
+
+## Inputs
+
+```
+advisory-scan.py <recipe> [--from <version>] [--to <version>]
+                          [--image <name>=<from>:<to>]... [--adjudicate] [--json] [--registry DIR]
+
+advisory-scan.py <recipe> --compose-to <URL> [--compose-from <URL>]   # windows derived, not typed
+```
+
+| Input | Meaning |
+|---|---|
+| `<recipe>` | Recipe name; selects `cc-ci-plan/upstream/<recipe>.md` (the per-recipe URL registry) |
+| `--from` / `--to` | The **primary app image's** version window being upgraded across |
+| `--image NAME=FROM:TO` | A **sidecar image and the versions it moved between** (repeatable, all in ONE call). `NAME` is substring-matched against source repo names. Malformed values warn on stderr and are skipped. Without it that image's advisories stay unclassified. |
+| `--compose-to URL` | **Derive every window by diffing this compose against its baseline**, instead of typing `--from/--to/--image`. Point it at a PR's `compose.yml`. |
+| `--compose-from URL` | Baseline for the above. Default: the same repo's **default branch, resolved from the API** — never assumed to be `main`. |
+| `--adjudicate` | Run pass 2: append the evidence dossier for judgement |
+| `--registry` | Registry dir; also `CCCI_UPSTREAM_REGISTRY` |
+| `GITHUB_TOKEN` / `GITHUB_TOKEN_FILE` | Read-only token; **rate limit only** (60/hr anonymous → 5000/hr). Default file `/srv/cc-ci/.github-token`, mode 600. Public advisories need **no scopes**. |
+
+Exit code is always 0 — this is informational. Failures are *reported*, never raised.
+
+---
+
+# Pass 1 — deterministic
+
+## Step 1 — Collect source URLs from the registry
+
+Read `cc-ci-plan/upstream/<recipe>.md` and extract every `http(s)://…` URL.
+
+**Trailing markdown punctuation is stripped** (`` ` `` `'` `"` `*` `.` `,` `;` `:` `>` `)`). The registry
+is markdown, so URLs appear inside backticks and quotes; capturing the punctuation produced fetches of
+`https://docs.n8n.io/release-notes/\`` which 404, and made immich and n8n render `?` for no real reason.
+
+> **Registry hygiene matters.** The scan can only look where the registry points. Two classes of defect
+> have been found and fixed by running it: a **wrong URL** (`pgautoupgrade/pgautoupgrade`, which 404s —
+> the repo is `pgautoupgrade/docker-pgautoupgrade`) and a **missing** one (gitea's CVEs are announced at
+> `blog.gitea.com`, which the registry didn't list). When a vendor publishes security notes somewhere
+> the registry lacks, add it.
+
+## Step 2 — Query the sources
+
+Three source classes, each recording **its own status** so *"checked, none found"* is never confused
+with *"not checked"*.
+
+### 2a. GitHub Security Advisories — PRIMARY
+
+For every `github.com/<owner>/<repo>` URL in the registry:
+`GET /repos/<owner>/<repo>/security-advisories`.
+
+Captured per advisory: `cve_id`, `ghsa_id`, `severity`, `summary`, **`description`**, `published_at`,
+and **all** `vulnerabilities[]` entries' `vulnerable_version_range` + `patched_versions` (joined `;`).
+
+- **All entries, not just the first.** An advisory carries one entry **per patched release line** —
+  n8n patches three (1.123.32, 2.17.4, 2.18.1). Reading only `vulnerabilities[0]` silently dropped the
+  line a deployment was actually on, and misclassified CVE-2026-42231/42232 as out-of-window.
+- **Pagination via the `Link rel="next"` cursor**, to exhaustion (cap 20 hops). This endpoint returns
+  at most 100 rows **and ignores `?page=`** — it re-returns the same rows, which silently truncates busy
+  projects. discourse has 286 advisories; a single page cannot even cover one upgrade window.
+- **The description is kept from this response.** It is already present here, and pass 2 needs the
+  prose; re-fetching it per advisory would cost one request each.
+- **HTTP 404 ⇒ `no-advisories-published`** — a benign absence (many sidecar images publish none), **not**
+  a failure. Conflating the two pushed nearly every recipe to `?` and destroyed the signal.
+
+### 2b. Vendor release / security pages
+
+Every other registry URL is fetched, HTML-stripped, and scanned for `CVE-\d{4}-\d{4,7}`, keeping ±160
+characters of context per hit.
+
+URLs containing `<`, `>`, `{`, `}`, `VERSION`, or `vX.Y.Z` are **skipped as templates** — they are
+human documentation (`…/changelog/v<VERSION>/`), not fetchable, and counting them as failures is wrong.
+
+This is the source that would have caught gitea: the vendor blog names both CVEs, the GitHub release
+page names neither.
+
+**When the page is a changelog organised by release, each CVE is attributed to the release heading it
+appears under** (`Changes with nginx 1.31.3`, `## v1.31.3`, …) and that becomes its fixed-in version.
+Without this, a project that publishes no advisory feed can never contribute a CVE:
+
+> **nginx publishes NO GitHub security advisories.** Every nginx CVE we can see comes from
+> `nginx.org/en/CHANGES`. Scraping ids out of it without attributing them to a release left them with
+> no patched version, so they were never classifiable — and every nginx bump in the fleet reported
+> **0** forever. nginx is a sidecar in most recipes. Measured: `1.31.1 → 1.31.3` fixes **six** CVEs
+> (three in .2, three in .3); lasuite-docs#7 went 0 → 6 and lasuite-drive#6 went 0 → 3 on this alone.
+
+A changelog CVE is tied to a window by the **image name appearing in the page URL** (window `nginx` ↔
+`nginx.org/...`). A CVE found on a vendor page with no attributable release still has no version data,
+so pass 1 cannot place it — it goes to pass 2 (§6).
+
+### 2c. NVD by CPE — the fallback for projects that publish nothing
+
+Declared per recipe in the registry as `nvd-cpe: <image-key> = <cpe:2.3:...>`.
+
+> **Why it exists.** Two recipes could not see CVEs *at all*: `mattermost-lts` (empty GitHub advisory
+> feed, security bulletins rendered client-side so a text sweep finds nothing) and `mumble` (nothing
+> published anywhere the registry points). Their scans returned `?` — nothing measured. NVD is
+> CPE-indexed and carries structured ranges, so it answers where the vendor does not: mattermost
+> 10.5.0 → 10.12.4 now scores **165**, and mumble finds `CVE-2025-71264` (fixed 1.6.870).
+
+Two range forms, both used:
+
+| NVD field | meaning | how it is judged |
+|---|---|---|
+| `versionEndExcluding X` | fixed in X exactly | a normal patched version (§4a) |
+| `versionEndIncluding X` | affected **up to and including** X; fix version unpublished | fixed when the upgrade crosses X, i.e. `from ≤ X < to` |
+
+**NVD lags the vendor** — it had neither gitea CVSS-9.8 RCE at publication — so this is a fallback,
+never a replacement for 2a/2b. Unauthenticated calls are rate-limited (~5/30s), hence the retry.
+
+### 2d. OSV.dev — supplementary
+
+Only when the recipe has an entry in `OSV_PACKAGES` (ecosystem + package) and a version is given.
+
+> **Measured, not assumed.** For the two gitea CVEs, OSV **404'd on both** and returned only Go
+> *dependency* advisories for the package; NVD's API had them by neither CPE, CVE id, nor keyword.
+> **Advisory databases lag the vendor**, which is why 2a and 2b lead and this is supplementary.
+
+## Step 3 — Union
+
+All findings merge into one CVE map: id → `{sources[], severity, ghsa, vulnerable_range, patched,
+description, published_at, url, cvss, context}`. A CVE seen by several sources keeps them all.
+
+## Step 4 — Classify against the upgrade window
+
+Two invariants govern this step, both learned from a wrong answer in production.
+
+> **A. Every image is judged by its OWN versions.** The app repo uses `--from/--to`; each sidecar uses
+> its own `--image NAME=FROM:TO`. **Pass them all in ONE invocation** — the count is a union across
+> images, and the UNKNOWN guarantee in B only holds when a single run sees every one. An image with no
+> window is **not** classified; its advisories are listed as unclassified so they stay visible without
+> inflating the count. Each window is classified independently, so one may use version ranges while
+> another falls back to dates.
+> *Why:* discourse once reported **133**, of which **34 were redis CVEs** — including
+> `CVE-2021-21309`, patched in redis 6.0.11 in 2021 — counted purely because 6.0.11 sits numerically
+> inside discourse's `3.5.3 → 2026.7.1` range. The fix is not to ignore sidecars but to give each one
+> the versions it actually moved through: with `--image redis=7.4:8.10`, discourse scores
+> **140 = 123 (app, by date) + 17 (redis)**, and the redis seventeen include `CVE-2025-49844`,
+> **critical**, invisible while sidecars went uncounted.
+>
+> **B. Never emit a number you cannot justify.** If no method can order a window, the count is
+> `null` / `UNKNOWN`, never `0`. A `0` in a security column asserts safety. Equally, an advisory that
+> cannot be judged is **indeterminate** (§4d) — never silently counted as "not fixed".
+
+### 3b. Deriving the windows from a compose diff (`--compose-to`)
+
+Typing `--from/--to/--image` by hand means someone has to remember that the recipe also bumped its
+redis. That is how sidecar CVEs went uncounted for months. This mode reads the windows off the diff:
+
+1. Fetch both compose files (baseline = the repo's **default branch from the API**, since several
+   recipes keep a stale `main` beside a live `master`).
+2. Parse `{service: (image-repo, tag)}` — keyed by **service, not image repo**, because an upgrade
+   may change the repo itself (plausible moved `plausible/analytics` →
+   `ghcr.io/plausible/community-edition`; keyed by repo that reads as one image vanishing and an
+   unrelated one appearing, losing the app window entirely).
+3. Every service whose tag or repo changed becomes a window. The `app` service drives `--from/--to`
+   (coop-cloud convention: it is the recipe's primary image); the rest become `--image` windows.
+   Unchanged images produce no window — inventing one would be a false count.
+4. The derived windows are printed to stderr before the scan, so the inputs are auditable.
+
+Image names are matched against advisory sources **both ways** — an image name is often longer than
+its source repo (`clickhouse/clickhouse-server` vs `ClickHouse/ClickHouse`) and sometimes shorter
+(`redis` vs `redis/redis`).
+
+Verified on plausible PR #5: from the compose URL alone it derives `v2.0.0 → v3.2.1` plus
+`clickhouse-server 23.4.2.11-alpine → 24.12-alpine`, and reports **6** — identical to the
+hand-specified args.
+
+`--from/--to/--image` remain available for finer-grained checks (scanning a window that is not a
+literal compose diff, e.g. "what would the compatibility-safe target fix?").
+
+### 4a. By patched version (preferred — exact)
+
+**A fix on the line you are upgrading FROM was already yours.** Projects that maintain several lines
+patch them all at once: mattermost fixed `CVE-2025-11794` in 10.11.4, 10.12.1 *and* 10.5.12. An
+upgrade 10.11.22 → 10.12.4 crosses 10.12.1, so a naive window test counts it — but 10.11.22 is
+already past 10.11.4, so the deployment had the fix before the upgrade. Counting it credits the
+upgrade with work it did not do. This check is **skipped for placeholder versions** (`7.4.X` parses
+to a bare `7.4`, which would read as "already fixed at 7.4" and silently drop a real fix — exactly
+how redis `CVE-2024-46981` was lost when the rule was first added).
+
+
+`patched_versions` is a **range expression** (`">= 2.18.1"`), possibly several joined by `;`. Extract
+every version-looking token; the advisory is **fixed-by-this-upgrade** if **any** patched version `p`
+satisfies `from < p <= to` — exclusive lower (a fix already in the version you were on is not this
+upgrade's doing), inclusive upper.
+
+**Comparison is zero-padded to equal length**, so `18` == `18.0` == `18.0.0` as semver means it.
+Without padding, plain tuple order makes `(18,) < (18,0)`, i.e. a fix in 18.0 falls *outside* a window
+ending at 18 — and bare major tags are the norm for sidecars (`postgres:18`, `redis:8-alpine`). Padding
+is permissive at the lower bound and conservative at the upper: with `to = 18`, a fix in `18.5` is
+**not** counted, because nothing proves which 18.x a floating tag resolved to.
+
+### 4b. By advisory publish date (fallback — temporal)
+
+Used **only** when 4a cannot be trusted: a **version-scheme change**, detected as the leading version
+component jumping by ≥ `SCHEME_JUMP` (100) — e.g. semver `3.5.3` → calver `2026.7.1`.
+
+Version strings are unorderable across such a jump (`2025.12.2` compares "newer" than `3.5.3` while
+shipping earlier), but **release dates always order**. So:
+
+1. Resolve `--from` and `--to` to **git tag dates** on that source (tries `v<version>` then
+   `<version>`; annotated tag → tagger date, else commit date).
+2. An advisory counts as fixed when `date_from < published_at <= date_to` — the same exclusive/inclusive
+   boundaries as 4a, so the two methods agree at the edges.
+
+This reproduces, automatically, the hand count that established discourse `3.5.3` (2025-12-30) →
+`2026.7.1` (2026-07-31) = **123 CVEs**.
+
+*Assumption:* the vendor publishes advisories at fix time (true for discourse). The count includes
+**first-party plugin advisories** where the vendor files them on the same repo — which is why a
+plugin-rich project scores far higher than a monolith, not a statement about relative security.
+
+### 4c. By release notes naming the CVE (rescue — for advisories with no fix version)
+
+Applied to advisories 4a/4b could not decide, **before** giving up on them. Fetch the source repo's
+GitHub **releases** (cached per repo, 4 pages) and find every tag whose notes **name the CVE id**. If
+any such tag falls inside the window by 4a's rule, the advisory is fixed by this upgrade, and the
+naming tags are recorded in `fix_versions_from_release_notes` as the citation.
+
+> **Why this is not optional.** Vendors routinely publish an advisory with `patched_versions: "TBD"`
+> and then name the CVE in the release notes of every branch that got the fix. **All 12** redis
+> advisories crossed by discourse's redis bump are exactly this shape — `TBD`, or a placeholder like
+> `7.4.X`, with an open-ended `vulnerable_version_range` (`All`, `>= 7.0.0`) — yet each is named in
+> concrete releases (`CVE-2025-32023` → 6.2.19, 7.2.10, 7.4.5, 8.0.3, 8.2.0). Without this method
+> discourse's redis contribution reads 5; with it, 17. Six of the twelve are high severity.
+
+### 4d. Otherwise — indeterminate, not excluded
+
+An advisory from a **windowed** source that none of 4a–4c could decide — no usable `patched_versions`,
+an open-ended vulnerable range, and no release note naming it — is recorded as **indeterminate**. It is:
+
+- **not** added to the count (nothing justifies counting it), and
+- **not** treated as unaffected (nothing justifies dismissing it either).
+
+It is listed prominently, the headline reads *"(at least — see undetermined below)"*, and it becomes an
+input to pass 2. Silently excluding these is the same defect class as printing `0` for an unscanned
+recipe, one level down.
+
+### 4e. Unorderable window
+
+If neither 4a nor 4b can order a window at all, `count_known = false`, `cve_count_fixed = null`, and the
+headline reads **"CVEs fixed by this upgrade: UNKNOWN — the scan could NOT determine a count"** with an
+explicit *"This is NOT zero"*. If **any** requested window is unorderable the whole count is suppressed;
+a partial number would understate a security figure.
+
+## Step 5 — Output
+
+Markdown (default) for pasting into the per-recipe upgrade log, or `--json`.
+
+| Field | Meaning |
+|---|---|
+| `cve_count_fixed` | Union across all windows, or **`null`** if any window was unorderable |
+| `count_known` | Distinguishes "counted zero" from "could not count" |
+| `cve_count_indeterminate` / `indeterminate[]` | Judged by nothing; a **floor marker** on the count |
+| `resolved_by_release_notes` | CVE → the tags that named it (4c citations) |
+| `windows` | Every source classified, with its from/to |
+| `classified_by` | **Per source**: which method decided it |
+| `date_window` | **Per source**, when 4b was used |
+| `fixed_by_this_upgrade[]` | CVE ids, with severity / GHSA / fixed-in per id |
+| `unclassified[]` | Seen but not attributable (other images, or vendor-page-only) |
+| `sources[]` / `sources_failed[]` / `sources_benign[]` | Per-source status; only genuine failures in `failed` |
+
+---
+
+# Pass 2 — adjudication (`--adjudicate`)
+
+## Step 6 — What gets judged
+
+Two kinds of open case, both real gaps rather than noise:
+
+1. **Indeterminate** (§4d) — from an image *with* a window, but no fix version is knowable anywhere.
+2. **Vendor-page-only** — a CVE seen only on a vendor security page, with no structured advisory
+   behind it. **gitea's two CVSS-9.8 RCEs are this shape.** They carry no version data, so no
+   arithmetic can place them, but the page prose usually states the fixed release.
+
+## Step 7 — The evidence dossier
+
+Pass 1 collects; pass 2 judges. Nothing in the dossier interprets — it assembles what was *measured*,
+so the judgement is made against evidence rather than recollection. That distinction is the whole
+point: the original failure was a report leaning on model knowledge that predated the CVEs, with no
+source queried at all.
+
+Per open case: severity, CVSS, sources, its window, why it is undecided, `patched_versions` and
+`vulnerable_version_range` **as published**, summary, full description, references, affected ranges
+with `first_patched_version`, and **every release tag naming the CVE** — whether or not in window, since
+the model may reason about branch lines the arithmetic deliberately will not.
+
+**Pass 2 also sees every decision pass 1 made** — a compact table of counted and excluded advisories
+with the evidence behind each verdict. A deterministic verdict can still be wrong (a mis-parsed range,
+a release note that mentions a CVE without fixing it), and only a reader with the evidence in front of
+it can catch that. Silence means agreement.
+
+## Step 8 — The verdict contract
+
+For each open case: **FIXED** / **NOT-FIXED** / **STILL-UNKNOWN**, each with a one-line reason
+**citing the evidence shown**. Every FIXED is added to the recipe's count — pass 1's number is a floor,
+not a total. If the evidence does not settle it, **STILL-UNKNOWN**: do not infer from memory of the
+project, and never record an undecided CVE as unaffected.
+
+**No silent caps.** `MAX_ADJUDICATE` (25) and `MAX_REVIEW_ROWS` (400) bound the output; whenever either
+truncates, the block says how many were dropped and that the unshown remain undetermined.
+
+---
+
+## How consumers must read it
+
+`/recipe-report` renders the `cve` column from the **union** of this scan and the agent's own reading:
+
+- a clean scan → its number, **including `0`**;
+- **failed sources**, or `UNKNOWN` → **`?`**, never `none` — a blank reads as "clean", which is exactly
+  how two CVSS-9.8 gitea RCEs were published as `none`;
+- **no upgrade this run** → `0`, not `?` — nothing an upgrade could have fixed;
+- a count with **indeterminate advisories** → the number is a floor; say so in the notes;
+- benign notes → never `?`.
+
+`?` must stay **rare**: it means *we tried and could not tell*, not *we did not look*. A rash of `?` is
+a bug to raise in the report's Addendum, not a normal outcome — every instance so far traced to a defect
+in this tool or stale registry data.
+
+## Testing
+
+`test-advisory-scan.py` — 58 offline tests (fixtures, no network) plus 6 live regressions against the
+counts published in week-2026-08-07. **The offline tier covers pass 1 only, by design**: pass 2's
+judgement is a model's and cannot be asserted deterministically. What *is* tested about pass 2 is the
+part that stays deterministic — which cases it selects, and that truncation is always announced.
+
+```
+python3 test-advisory-scan.py          # offline
+python3 test-advisory-scan.py --live   # + historic report numbers
+```
+
+`audit-advisory-scan.py` re-derives the counts with a **separate** semver implementation and its own
+release fetch, then diffs against the scanner. Run it after changing classification; it is what caught
+the 12 undercounted redis CVEs.
+
+## Known limits
+
+1. **Versions must be supplied per image.** An image with no `--image` is not counted — the scan will
+   not guess a version range it was not given. `/recipe-upgrade` passes one per image it bumped.
+2. **Date-based counts are temporal**, not exact — they assume publish-at-fix-time.
+3. **Registry-bound.** Unlisted vendor security pages are invisible; the scan cannot know what it was
+   never pointed at.
+4. **`NAME` matching is substring-against-source-name**, so a short or generic name can attach to more
+   than one repo (`postgres` matches `discourse/discourse-postgres`). The primary source is claimed
+   first and cannot be stolen. A name matching **nothing** is silently ignored — a typo costs coverage
+   without warning.
+5. **Release-note rescue (4c) trusts that naming implies fixing.** A release note that merely mentions a
+   CVE would be read as fixing it. Pass 2's review table exists partly to catch this.
+6. **Rate limit** without a token is 60/hr — a full weekly sweep will exhaust it and degrade to failed
+   sources (visibly, but degraded).

cc-ci-plan/audit-advisory-scan.py

@@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env python3
+"""Independent audit of advisory-scan's counts.
+
+Deliberately does NOT reuse the scanner's classifier. Re-parses patched versions with a separate
+semver implementation and re-derives membership, then diffs against what the scanner concluded.
+Anything the two disagree on is a miscategorization in one of them.
+"""
+import importlib.util, json, re, sys
+
+spec = importlib.util.spec_from_file_location("A", "/srv/cc-ci-orch/cc-ci-plan/advisory-scan.py")
+A = importlib.util.module_from_spec(spec); spec.loader.exec_module(A)
+REG = "/srv/cc-ci-orch/cc-ci-plan/upstream"
+
+
+def sv(s):
+    """Independent semver parse: strict 3-tuple, missing parts are 0."""
+    m = re.match(r"^\s*v?(\d+)(?:\.(\d+))?(?:\.(\d+))?", s or "")
+    if not m:
+        return None
+    return tuple(int(x) if x else 0 for x in m.groups())
+
+
+def in_window(f, t, patched_expr):
+    """Independent membership: any patched token strictly above f and at most t."""
+    kf, kt = sv(f), sv(t)
+    for tok in re.findall(r"\d+(?:\.\d+)*", patched_expr or ""):
+        c = sv(tok)
+        if c and kf and kt and kf < c <= kt:
+            return True
+    return False
+
+
+_RELS = {}
+
+
+def fetch_releases(owner_repo):
+    """Independent releases fetch — deliberately NOT the scanner's cache or pagination helper."""
+    if owner_repo in _RELS:
+        return _RELS[owner_repo]
+    import urllib.request
+    tok = None
+    try:
+        tok = open("/srv/cc-ci/.github-token").read().strip()
+    except OSError:
+        pass
+    h = {"User-Agent": "audit", "Accept": "application/vnd.github+json"}
+    if tok:
+        h["Authorization"] = f"Bearer {tok}"
+    out, url, pages = [], f"https://api.github.com/repos/{owner_repo}/releases?per_page=100", 0
+    while url and pages < 4:
+        req = urllib.request.Request(url, headers=h)
+        with urllib.request.urlopen(req, timeout=45) as r:
+            rows = json.load(r)
+            link = r.headers.get("Link", "") or ""
+        out += [(x.get("tag_name") or "", (x.get("body") or "") + " " + (x.get("name") or ""))
+                for x in rows]
+        url = None
+        for part in link.split(","):
+            if 'rel="next"' in part:
+                url = part.split(";")[0].strip().strip("<>")
+        pages += 1
+    _RELS[owner_repo] = out
+    return out
+
+
+def audit(recipe, vf, vt, images=None, label=""):
+    rep = A.scan(recipe, vf, vt, REG, images)
+    print(f"\n{'='*78}\n{recipe} {vf} → {vt} {label}\n{'='*78}")
+    print(f"scanner count = {rep['cve_count_fixed']}  known={rep['count_known']}  "
+          f"failed_sources={rep['sources_failed']}")
+    counted = set(rep["fixed_by_this_upgrade"])
+
+    by_src = {}
+    for cve, e in rep["cves"].items():
+        by_src.setdefault(e["sources"][0], []).append((cve, e))
+
+    windows = rep["windows"]
+    total_mismatch = 0
+    for src, win in windows.items():
+        f, t = win["from"], win["to"]
+        method = rep["classified_by"][src]
+        rows = by_src.get(src, [])
+        scanner_here = {c for c, e in rows if c in counted}
+        print(f"\n  ── {src}  ({f} → {t})  method={method}  advisories={len(rows)}")
+        if "publish date" in method:
+            dw = rep["date_window"][src]
+            indep = {c for c, e in rows
+                     if e.get("published_at") and dw["from"] < e["published_at"] <= dw["to"]}
+            print(f"     date window {dw['from'][:10]} → {dw['to'][:10]}")
+        else:
+            indep = {c for c, e in rows if in_window(f, t, e.get("patched"))}
+            # Independently redo the release-note method: fetch the repo's releases ourselves and
+            # confirm a tag NAMING the CVE really does fall inside (f, t].
+            kf, kt = sv(f), sv(t)
+            owner_repo = src.split(":", 1)[1]
+            rels = fetch_releases(owner_repo)
+            for c, e in rows:
+                if c in indep:
+                    continue
+                naming = [tag for tag, body in rels if c in body]
+                if any(kf < sv(tag) <= kt for tag in naming if sv(tag)):
+                    indep.add(c)
+        missed = indep - scanner_here
+        extra = scanner_here - indep
+        print(f"     scanner counted {len(scanner_here)} | independent {len(indep)}"
+              f" | missed_by_scanner {len(missed)} | over_counted {len(extra)}")
+        if missed:
+            print(f"     !! MISSED: {sorted(missed)}")
+            for c in sorted(missed):
+                print(f"        {c} patched={dict(rows)[c].get('patched')!r}")
+        if extra:
+            print(f"     !! OVER-COUNTED: {sorted(extra)}")
+            for c in sorted(extra):
+                print(f"        {c} patched={dict(rows)[c].get('patched')!r}")
+        total_mismatch += len(missed) + len(extra)
+
+    # Anything counted that belongs to NO window would be a leak.
+    leaked = {c for c in counted if not any(s in rep["cves"][c]["sources"] for s in windows)}
+    if leaked:
+        print(f"\n  !! COUNTED BUT OUTSIDE EVERY WINDOW: {sorted(leaked)}")
+        total_mismatch += len(leaked)
+
+    # Unclassified entries that belong to a WINDOWED source would mean a judged CVE was dropped.
+    dropped = [c for c in rep["unclassified"]
+               if any(s in rep["cves"][c]["sources"] for s in windows)]
+    if dropped:
+        print(f"\n  !! UNCLASSIFIED DESPITE HAVING A WINDOW: {sorted(dropped)[:10]}")
+        total_mismatch += len(dropped)
+
+    unwindowed = {}
+    for cve in rep["unclassified"]:
+        unwindowed.setdefault(rep["cves"][cve]["sources"][0], []).append(cve)
+    if unwindowed:
+        print("\n  unclassified by source (expected: images with no --image given):")
+        for s, cs in sorted(unwindowed.items()):
+            print(f"     {len(cs):4d}  {s}")
+
+    print(f"\n  VERDICT: {'CLEAN' if total_mismatch == 0 else f'{total_mismatch} DISAGREEMENTS'}")
+    return total_mismatch, rep
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    bad = 0
+    bad += audit("gitea", "1.27.0", "1.27.1")[0]
+    bad += audit("discourse", "3.5.3", "2026.7.1")[0]
+    bad += audit("discourse", "3.5.3", "2026.7.1", [("redis", "7.4", "8.10")], "+redis sidecar")[0]
+    bad += audit("keycloak", "26.7.0", "26.7.1")[0]
+    bad += audit("mailu", "2024.06.55", "2024.06.57", [("redis", "8.8.0", "8.10.0")], "+redis")[0]
+    bad += audit("n8n", "1.123.0", "2.18.1")[0]
+    print(f"\n\n{'#'*78}\nOVERALL: {'CLEAN — no disagreements' if bad == 0 else f'{bad} DISAGREEMENTS'}")
+    sys.exit(1 if bad else 0)

cc-ci-plan/audit-sources.py

@@ -0,0 +1,314 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env python3
+"""audit-sources — are we still looking in the right place for each recipe's updates?
+
+A recipe tracks an image repo and a set of registry URLs. Upstreams move: they rename the image,
+switch registry, archive the GitHub repo, or split a community edition out of the original. When that
+happens nothing errors — the old repo simply stops receiving tags, and the recipe looks "up to date"
+forever while real releases happen somewhere else.
+
+plausible is the worked example. It tracked `plausible/analytics` on Docker Hub; upstream moved to
+`ghcr.io/plausible/community-edition`. The old repo still exists and still serves v2.0.0, so every
+survey said "no upgrades available" while v3 shipped elsewhere.
+
+This reports the signals that catch that, per image and per registry URL:
+
+  * IMAGE GONE QUIET     — newest tag is older than --quiet-days (default 365). The single strongest
+                           signal that releases moved somewhere else.
+  * DEPRECATION WORDING  — the registry description says deprecated / moved / no longer maintained.
+  * GITHUB REPO ARCHIVED — upstream archived it.
+  * GITHUB REPO RENAMED  — the API redirects to a different owner/name than we ask for.
+  * GITHUB REPO GONE     — 404.
+
+Everything is a SIGNAL, not a verdict: a genuinely stable image (mumble, custom-html) can be quiet
+for good reason. The output is for a human to judge, so each finding says what was measured.
+
+    audit-sources.py [recipe ...] [--ssh HOST] [--quiet-days N] [--json]
+"""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import argparse
+import importlib.util
+import json
+import os
+import re
+import sys
+import urllib.error
+import urllib.request
+from datetime import datetime, timezone
+
+HERE = os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__))
+_spec = importlib.util.spec_from_file_location("resolve_images", os.path.join(HERE, "resolve-images.py"))
+RI = importlib.util.module_from_spec(_spec)
+_spec.loader.exec_module(RI)
+
+# advisory-scan supplies the source-fetching + changelog-attribution used by --security-sources
+_aspec = importlib.util.spec_from_file_location("advisory_scan", os.path.join(HERE, "advisory-scan.py"))
+A = importlib.util.module_from_spec(_aspec)
+_aspec.loader.exec_module(A)
+
+REGISTRY_DIR = os.environ.get("CCCI_UPSTREAM_REGISTRY", os.path.join(HERE, "upstream"))
+USED_RECIPES = os.path.join(HERE, "used-recipes.md")
+DEPRECATION_RE = re.compile(
+    r"\b(deprecat|no longer maintain|unmaintained|superseded|moved to|migrated to|"
+    r"has moved|discontinued|end.of.life|archived)\b", re.I)
+
+
+def _days_since(iso: str | None) -> int | None:
+    if not iso:
+        return None
+    try:
+        d = datetime.fromisoformat(iso.replace("Z", "+00:00"))
+    except ValueError:
+        return None
+    return (datetime.now(timezone.utc) - d).days
+
+
+def hub_repo_meta(repo: str) -> dict:
+    """Docker Hub repo metadata: when it was last pushed to, and how it describes itself."""
+    try:
+        d = RI._json(f"https://hub.docker.com/v2/repositories/{repo}", RI._hub_auth())
+    except urllib.error.HTTPError as e:
+        return {"status": f"HTTP {e.code}"}
+    except Exception as e:  # noqa: BLE001
+        return {"status": f"{type(e).__name__}"}
+    text = f"{d.get('description') or ''}\n{d.get('full_description') or ''}"
+    m = DEPRECATION_RE.search(text)
+    return {"status": "ok", "last_updated": d.get("last_updated"),
+            "deprecation_hint": (m.group(0) if m else None),
+            "archived": bool(d.get("is_archived") or d.get("status") == "inactive")}
+
+
+def github_repo_meta(owner: str, repo: str) -> dict:
+    """GitHub repo state — archived, renamed (the API answers with the CURRENT full_name), or gone."""
+    hdrs = {"Accept": "application/vnd.github+json"}
+    tok = RI._gh_token()
+    if tok:
+        hdrs["Authorization"] = f"Bearer {tok}"
+    try:
+        d = RI._json(f"https://api.github.com/repos/{owner}/{repo}", hdrs)
+    except urllib.error.HTTPError as e:
+        return {"status": f"HTTP {e.code}"}
+    except Exception as e:  # noqa: BLE001
+        return {"status": f"{type(e).__name__}"}
+    asked, got = f"{owner}/{repo}".lower(), (d.get("full_name") or "").lower()
+    return {"status": "ok", "archived": bool(d.get("archived")), "pushed_at": d.get("pushed_at"),
+            "renamed_to": (d.get("full_name") if got and got != asked else None),
+            "description": d.get("description") or ""}
+
+
+def newest_tag_date(registry: str, repo: str, tag: str) -> str | None:
+    """When was the repo's newest same-shape tag pushed? Docker Hub only (it dates its tags)."""
+    if registry not in ("docker.io", "registry-1.docker.io"):
+        return None
+    try:
+        d = RI._json(f"https://hub.docker.com/v2/repositories/{repo}/tags"
+                     f"?page_size=100&ordering=last_updated", RI._hub_auth())
+    except Exception:  # noqa: BLE001
+        return None
+    want = RI.shape(tag)
+    for row in d.get("results", []):
+        if RI.shape(row.get("name") or "") == want:
+            return row.get("last_updated")
+    return (d.get("results") or [{}])[0].get("last_updated")
+
+
+def security_source_audit(recipe: str) -> list[dict]:
+    """Per source: are its CVEs USABLE, or merely visible?
+
+    The nginx lesson. nginx publishes no GitHub advisories; all its CVEs live in nginx.org/en/CHANGES.
+    The scan saw them and could do nothing with them, because nothing said which release fixed which
+    CVE — so every nginx bump in the fleet reported 0. Attribution (advisory-scan §2b) fixed that for
+    changelogs organised by release, but a page that lists CVEs with NO release structure is still a
+    blind spot: visible, uncountable. This finds those.
+
+    Per source: `advisory-feed` (structured, best), `changelog` (CVEs attributable to a release),
+    `unattributable` (CVEs present but no release structure — BLIND), or `no-cve-data`.
+    """
+    urls, _ = _registry_urls(recipe)
+    out = []
+    # NVD CPE entries are a first-class source: for projects publishing nothing machine-readable
+    # (mattermost, mumble) they are the ONLY structured source, and omitting them here made two
+    # recipes look permanently blind after they had been fixed.
+    for key, cpe in A.registry_cpes(recipe, REGISTRY_DIR):
+        e = A.nvd_advisories(cpe, key)
+        n = len(e.get("advisories") or [])
+        out.append({"source": e["source"] + f"  ({cpe.split(':')[4]}/{cpe.split(':')[3]})",
+                    "kind": "advisory-feed" if n else "no-cve-data",
+                    "status": e["status"], "cves": n, "usable": n})
+    for entry in A.github_advisories(urls):
+        out.append({"source": entry["source"], "kind": "advisory-feed",
+                    "status": entry["status"], "cves": len(entry.get("advisories") or []),
+                    "usable": len(entry.get("advisories") or [])})
+    for entry in A.vendor_pages(urls):
+        if entry["status"].startswith("skipped"):
+            continue
+        n = len(entry.get("cves") or [])
+        attributed = len(entry.get("fixed_in") or {})
+        kind = ("no-cve-data" if n == 0 else
+                "changelog" if attributed else "unattributable")
+        out.append({"source": entry["source"], "kind": kind, "status": entry["status"],
+                    "cves": n, "usable": attributed})
+    return out
+
+
+def audit_recipe(recipe: str, ssh: str | None, quiet_days: int) -> dict:
+    out = {"recipe": recipe, "findings": [], "images": [], "sources": []}
+    try:
+        refs = (RI.compose_images_ssh(recipe, ssh, "~/.abra/recipes") if ssh
+                else RI.compose_images(recipe, RI.RECIPE_DIR))
+    except Exception as e:  # noqa: BLE001
+        out["findings"].append({"level": "error", "what": f"could not read compose: {e}"})
+        return out
+
+    for ref in refs:
+        if "${" in ref:
+            continue
+        info = RI.parse_ref(ref)
+        row = {"ref": ref, "registry": info["registry"], "repo": info["repo"], "tag": info["tag"]}
+        if info["registry"] in ("docker.io", "registry-1.docker.io"):
+            meta = hub_repo_meta(info["repo"])
+            row.update(meta)
+            newest = newest_tag_date(info["registry"], info["repo"], info["tag"])
+            row["newest_tag_pushed"] = newest
+            age = _days_since(newest)
+            row["newest_tag_age_days"] = age
+            if age is not None and age > quiet_days:
+                out["findings"].append({
+                    "level": "warn", "what": "image has gone quiet",
+                    "detail": f"{info['repo']}: newest {RI.shape(info['tag'])}-shaped tag pushed "
+                              f"{age} days ago — releases may have moved elsewhere"})
+            if meta.get("deprecation_hint"):
+                out["findings"].append({
+                    "level": "warn", "what": "registry text suggests deprecation",
+                    "detail": f"{info['repo']}: says {meta['deprecation_hint']!r}"})
+            if meta.get("archived"):
+                out["findings"].append({"level": "warn", "what": "registry repo archived/inactive",
+                                        "detail": info["repo"]})
+        out["images"].append(row)
+
+    urls, reg_path = ([], None)
+    try:
+        urls, reg_path = _registry_urls(recipe)
+    except Exception:  # noqa: BLE001
+        pass
+    if reg_path is None:
+        out["findings"].append({"level": "warn", "what": "no upstream registry file",
+                                "detail": f"cc-ci-plan/upstream/{recipe}.md is missing — the advisory "
+                                          f"scan has nowhere to look"})
+    seen = set()
+    for u in urls:
+        m = re.match(r"https?://github\.com/([^/]+)/([^/#?]+)", u)
+        if not m:
+            continue
+        owner, repo = m.group(1), m.group(2).removesuffix(".git")
+        if (owner, repo) in seen:
+            continue
+        seen.add((owner, repo))
+        meta = github_repo_meta(owner, repo)
+        row = {"repo": f"{owner}/{repo}", **meta}
+        age = _days_since(meta.get("pushed_at"))
+        row["pushed_age_days"] = age
+        out["sources"].append(row)
+        if meta.get("status") != "ok":
+            out["findings"].append({"level": "warn", "what": "registry source unreachable",
+                                    "detail": f"{owner}/{repo}: {meta['status']}"})
+            continue
+        if meta.get("renamed_to"):
+            out["findings"].append({"level": "alert", "what": "GitHub repo has MOVED",
+                                    "detail": f"{owner}/{repo} now answers as {meta['renamed_to']}"})
+        if meta.get("archived"):
+            out["findings"].append({"level": "alert", "what": "GitHub repo is ARCHIVED",
+                                    "detail": f"{owner}/{repo} — upstream development has stopped here"})
+        if age is not None and age > quiet_days:
+            out["findings"].append({"level": "warn", "what": "GitHub repo quiet",
+                                    "detail": f"{owner}/{repo}: last push {age} days ago"})
+    return out
+
+
+def _registry_urls(recipe: str):
+    path = os.path.join(REGISTRY_DIR, f"{recipe}.md")
+    if not os.path.exists(path):
+        return [], None
+    text = open(path).read()
+    urls = []
+    for u in re.findall(r"https?://[^\s)|\]]+", text):
+        u = u.rstrip("`'\"*.,;:>)")
+        if u and u not in urls:
+            urls.append(u)
+    return urls, path
+
+
+def all_recipes() -> list[str]:
+    out = []
+    for ln in open(USED_RECIPES):
+        ln = ln.strip()
+        if not ln or ln.startswith("#") or ln.startswith("`"):
+            continue
+        parts = ln.split()
+        if len(parts) >= 2 and parts[1] in ("weekly", "external"):
+            out.append(parts[0])
+    return out
+
+
+def main() -> int:
+    ap = argparse.ArgumentParser(description=__doc__,
+                                 formatter_class=argparse.RawDescriptionHelpFormatter)
+    ap.add_argument("recipes", nargs="*")
+    ap.add_argument("--ssh", default=None)
+    ap.add_argument("--quiet-days", type=int, default=365)
+    ap.add_argument("--json", action="store_true")
+    ap.add_argument("--security-sources", action="store_true",
+                    help="audit whether each recipe's CVE sources are USABLE (structured advisory "
+                         "feed / release-attributable changelog) or merely visible")
+    a = ap.parse_args()
+
+    recipes = a.recipes or all_recipes()
+    if a.security_sources:
+        # What matters is whether the RECIPE can see CVEs at all — not whether some individual page
+        # is unparseable. A page with no release structure is harmless when the same project also
+        # publishes an advisory feed (redis, gitea, minio, clickhouse all do); it is only a blind
+        # spot when nothing else covers that project.
+        blind_recipes, noisy = [], 0
+        for r in recipes:
+            rows = security_source_audit(r)
+            feeds = [x for x in rows if x["kind"] == "advisory-feed" and x["cves"] > 0]
+            logs = [x for x in rows if x["kind"] == "changelog"]
+            unattr = [x for x in rows if x["kind"] == "unattributable"]
+            noisy += len(unattr)
+            usable = len(feeds) + len(logs)
+            if usable == 0:
+                blind_recipes.append(r)
+                print(f"!! {r}: NO USABLE CVE SOURCE — {len(unattr)} unparseable page(s), "
+                      f"0 advisory feeds, 0 attributable changelogs")
+                for x in rows:
+                    print(f"      {x['kind']:15} {x['source'][:64]} ({x['cves']} CVEs)")
+            else:
+                print(f"OK {r}: {len(feeds)} advisory-feed(s), {len(logs)} changelog(s)"
+                      + (f", {len(unattr)} unparseable page(s) (redundant — covered by a feed)"
+                         if unattr else ""))
+                for x in logs:
+                    print(f"      changelog  {x['source'][:62]} ({x['usable']}/{x['cves']})")
+        print(f"\n{len(recipes)} recipes · {len(blind_recipes)} with NO usable CVE source"
+              + (f": {', '.join(blind_recipes)}" if blind_recipes else "")
+              + f" · {noisy} unparseable page(s) elsewhere (harmless where a feed covers them)")
+        return 0
+    reports = [audit_recipe(r, a.ssh, a.quiet_days) for r in recipes]
+    if a.json:
+        print(json.dumps(reports, indent=2))
+        return 0
+    alerts = 0
+    for rep in reports:
+        fs = rep["findings"]
+        mark = "OK " if not fs else ("!! " if any(f["level"] == "alert" for f in fs) else " ? ")
+        print(f"{mark} {rep['recipe']}")
+        for f in fs:
+            alerts += f["level"] == "alert"
+            print(f"      [{f['level']}] {f['what']}: {f.get('detail','')}")
+    print(f"\n{len(reports)} recipes audited · "
+          f"{sum(len(r['findings']) for r in reports)} findings · {alerts} alerts")
+    return 0
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    sys.exit(main())

cc-ci-plan/launch-report.py

@@ -70,6 +70,34 @@ def start(mode, date):
             log(f"{SESSION} busy with a report — leaving it"); return
         log(f"{SESSION} exists (idle/leftover) — killing first"); kill_session(); time.sleep(1)
 
+    # Unique-name invariant (same as upgrader/supervisor): archive-rename every older session
+    # titled SESSION so the one this launch creates is the ONLY 'cc-ci-report' in the web UI.
+    # Archived names start with 'archive-' (operator convention 2026-08-04).
+    #
+    # AND clear the stale session PIN. The pin file is what the shared watchdog resolves via
+    # lu._session_id(); if a PREVIOUS run's pin survives, the watchdog inspects that old (already
+    # DONE_MARKER-bearing) session, declares "run completed" and exits within one poll — leaving
+    # the new run unwatched. That regression silently un-watchdogged the 2026-08-07 finish-run's
+    # report step (pin dated 2026-08-04). The pin is re-established after launch, below.
+    _lu = None
+    _prev_ids = set()
+    try:
+        os.environ["UPGRADER_SESSION"] = SESSION  # scope the shared helpers to THIS session name
+        import importlib.util as _ilu
+        _spec = _ilu.spec_from_file_location(
+            "launch_upgrader", os.path.join(os.path.dirname(os.path.realpath(__file__)), "launch-upgrader.py"))
+        _lu = _ilu.module_from_spec(_spec); _spec.loader.exec_module(_lu)
+        _lu._archive_stale_titles(SESSION)
+        _rows = _lu._server_get("/session") or []
+        _rows = _rows if isinstance(_rows, list) else _rows.get("data", [])
+        _prev_ids = {s.get("id") for s in _rows}
+        try:
+            _lu.STATE_SID_FILE.unlink()
+        except OSError:
+            pass
+    except Exception as e:
+        log(f"  (archive-rename/pin-clear skipped: {e})")
+
     kf = Path(LOG_DIR) / f".kickoff-{SESSION}.txt"
     kf.write_text(build_kickoff(date))
     model_flag = f"--model '{MODEL}'" if MODEL else ""
@@ -90,6 +118,10 @@ def start(mode, date):
     log(f"starting {SESSION} (backend={BACKEND}, tier={TIER}, model={MODEL}, date={date or 'today'})")
     subprocess.run(["tmux", "new-session", "-d", "-s", SESSION, "-c", cwd, cmd])
     subprocess.run(["tmux", "pipe-pane", "-o", "-t", SESSION, f"cat >> '{LOG_DIR}/{SESSION}.log'"])
+    if BACKEND == "opencode" and _lu is not None:
+        # Re-establish the pin on THIS run's session, so the watchdog (spawned below) resolves the
+        # new session rather than falling back to a title lookup or a stale pin.
+        _lu._pin_new_session(_prev_ids)
     if BACKEND == "opencode":
         if OPENCODE_SHARE:
             log(f"  attached to {OPENCODE_SERVER} → http://oc.commoninternet.net  +public --share link")

cc-ci-plan/launch-supervisor.py

@@ -98,6 +98,12 @@ def spawn_supervisor(sid, reason):
     Path(LOG_DIR).mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
     if _sup_alive():
         _sup_kill(); time.sleep(1)
+    # Unique-name invariant (same as the upgrader): archive-rename every older session titled
+    # SUP_SESSION so the one this launch creates is the ONLY 'cc-ci-supervisor' in the web UI.
+    try:
+        lu._archive_stale_titles(SUP_SESSION)
+    except Exception:
+        pass
     kf = Path(LOG_DIR) / f".kickoff-{SUP_SESSION}.txt"
     kf.write_text(build_kickoff(sid, reason))
     share = "--share" if OPENCODE_SHARE else ""
@@ -137,9 +143,24 @@ def _gate():
     # a live `opencode run … -s <sid> --attach` proc, or a log touched within the stall window.
     pids = lu._run_pids(sid)
     idle = lu._session_idle_min()
-    if pids or (idle is not None and idle < lu.STALL_MIN):
-        via = f"{len(pids)} live run proc(s)" if pids else f"log idle {idle:.0f}m < {lu.STALL_MIN:.0f}m"
-        return False, sid, f"upgrader run progressing ({via}) — leaving it"
+    advancing = idle is not None and idle < lu.STALL_MIN
+    # PROGRESS REQUIRES THE SESSION TO BE ADVANCING — a live proc alone is not enough. A run walled
+    # by the provider keeps its process alive and spinning while emitting nothing (2026-08-07: 3
+    # days, zero output). Treating "proc exists" as progress is what deadlocked the gate.
+    if advancing:
+        return False, sid, f"upgrader run progressing (session advanced {idle:.0f}m ago) — leaving it"
+    if pids and lu._billing_blocked():
+        # NEVER kill it: it may resume when the wall lifts, and its context is the run's state.
+        # Surface it loudly instead — this is an operator-actionable condition, not self-healing.
+        return False, sid, (
+            f"run BLOCKED on a provider billing/usage wall ({len(pids)} proc(s) alive, session idle "
+            f"{idle:.0f}m) — NOT killing (resumable once the wall lifts); operator action required"
+        )
+    if pids:
+        log(
+            f"note: {len(pids)} live run proc(s) but session idle {idle:.0f}m ≥ "
+            f"{lu.STALL_MIN:.0f}m — treating as stalled, not progressing"
+        )
     # The per-run watchdog owns PROMPT recovery (resume on proc-death/stall) and is the single writer
     # while it lives. Defer to it — it gives up (exits its tmux) only after MAX_RESUMES fail, i.e. the
     # run is stuck in a way a bare resume can't fix (e.g. disk-full). THEN the supervisor takes over.

cc-ci-plan/launch-upgrader.py

@@ -184,6 +184,18 @@ def start(mode="use-or-create"):
     if SESSION == "cc-ci-upgrader":
         prereclaim_cc_ci()
 
+    # Unique-name invariant: the run we are about to launch becomes THE 'cc-ci-upgrader' in the
+    # web UI; every older run gets an archive title. Also snapshot existing ids so the new
+    # session can be pinned unambiguously after launch.
+    _archive_stale_titles()
+    _prev_rows = _server_get("/session") or []
+    _prev_rows = _prev_rows if isinstance(_prev_rows, list) else _prev_rows.get("data", [])
+    _prev_ids = {s.get("id") for s in _prev_rows}
+    try:
+        STATE_SID_FILE.unlink()
+    except OSError:
+        pass
+
     kf = Path(LOG_DIR) / f".kickoff-{SESSION}.txt"
     kf.write_text(build_kickoff())
 
@@ -217,6 +229,8 @@ def start(mode="use-or-create"):
     subprocess.run(["tmux", "pipe-pane", "-o", "-t", SESSION,
                     f"cat >> '{LOG_DIR}/{SESSION}.log'"])
     log(f"started. attach: tmux attach -t {SESSION}  log: {LOG_DIR}/{SESSION}.log")
+    if BACKEND == "opencode":
+        _pin_new_session(_prev_ids)
     # For the opencode backend, spawn a watchdog that auto-resumes the run if the opencode
     # usage-limit (429) stalls it mid-run (it does NOT self-resume). See watchdog().
     if BACKEND == "opencode" and os.environ.get("UPGRADER_WATCHDOG", "1") == "1":
@@ -246,13 +260,95 @@ def _server_get(path):
     except Exception:
         return None
 
+STATE_SID_FILE = Path(LOG_DIR) / f".{SESSION}-session-id"
+
+def _server_patch(path, body):
+    req = _ureq.Request(OPENCODE_SERVER + path, method="PATCH",
+                        headers={"Content-Type": "application/json"},
+                        data=_json.dumps(body).encode())
+    try:
+        with _ureq.urlopen(req, timeout=15) as r:
+            return r.status
+    except Exception:
+        return None
+
+def _db_created_ms(sid):
+    """Session creation time from the opencode sqlite DB — the /session API rows carry NO
+    time fields, which is exactly how the 2026-08-04 watchdog resumed the WRONG (old, giant)
+    session: sorting on a missing key degraded to server list order."""
+    try:
+        import sqlite3
+        db = sqlite3.connect("file:" + os.path.expanduser(
+            "~/.local/share/opencode/opencode.db") + "?mode=ro", uri=True)
+        row = db.execute("SELECT time_created FROM session WHERE id=?", (sid,)).fetchone()
+        db.close()
+        return row[0] if row else 0
+    except Exception:
+        return 0
+
+def _archive_stale_titles(title=None, label=None):
+    """Rename every existing top-level session with the given canonical title to a dated
+    archive title, so EXACTLY ONE session ever carries the canonical name (the one the next
+    launch creates). Keeps the run trivially findable in the opencode web UI and makes the
+    title lookup in _session_id() unambiguous. Old runs stay browsable under
+    '<label> — <date>'. Also used by launch-supervisor.py for its own session name."""
+    title = title or SESSION
+    # Archive names always start with 'archive-' (operator convention 2026-08-04) so they
+    # sort/filter together in the web UI: 'archive-<original-title> — <date>'.
+    label = label or f"archive-{title} —"
+    rows = _server_get("/session") or []
+    rows = rows if isinstance(rows, list) else rows.get("data", [])
+    for s in rows:
+        if s.get("title") == title and not (s.get("parentID") or s.get("parentId")):
+            created = _db_created_ms(s["id"])
+            d = datetime.fromtimestamp(created / 1000).strftime("%Y-%m-%d") if created else "unknown-date"
+            _server_patch(f"/session/{s['id']}", {"title": f"{label} {d}"})
+            log(f"  archived old session {s['id'][:20]} → '{label} {d}'")
+
 def _session_id():
-    """Newest top-level opencode session titled like SESSION (the run we manage)."""
+    """The opencode session this launcher manages. Prefers the pinned id recorded at launch
+    (LOG_DIR/.{SESSION}-session-id) — title lookup is only the fallback, and thanks to
+    _archive_stale_titles() at most one top-level session carries the title. Never trust
+    server list order (see _db_created_ms)."""
+    try:
+        pinned = STATE_SID_FILE.read_text().strip()
+        # Validate directly — the /session LIST is paginated (~100 rows), so membership
+        # scans miss older/newer sessions; a direct GET is authoritative.
+        if pinned and (_server_get(f"/session/{pinned}") or {}).get("id") == pinned:
+            return pinned
+    except OSError:
+        pass
     rows = _server_get("/session") or []
     rows = rows if isinstance(rows, list) else rows.get("data", [])
     cands = [s for s in rows if s.get("title") == SESSION and not (s.get("parentID") or s.get("parentId"))]
-    cands.sort(key=lambda s: (s.get("time") or {}).get("created") or 0, reverse=True)
-    return cands[0]["id"] if cands else None
+    cands.sort(key=lambda s: _db_created_ms(s.get("id")), reverse=True)
+    if cands:
+        try:
+            STATE_SID_FILE.write_text(cands[0]["id"])
+        except OSError:
+            pass
+        return cands[0]["id"]
+    return None
+
+def _pin_new_session(prev_ids, wait_sec=45):
+    """After launching a fresh run, discover the NEW top-level SESSION-titled session (one not
+    in prev_ids) and pin its id to the state file, so the watchdog can never grab an old one."""
+    deadline = _time.time() + wait_sec
+    while _time.time() < deadline:
+        rows = _server_get("/session") or []
+        rows = rows if isinstance(rows, list) else rows.get("data", [])
+        for s in rows:
+            if (s.get("title") == SESSION and not (s.get("parentID") or s.get("parentId"))
+                    and s.get("id") not in prev_ids):
+                try:
+                    STATE_SID_FILE.write_text(s["id"])
+                except OSError:
+                    pass
+                log(f"  pinned managed session id {s['id'][:20]} → {STATE_SID_FILE.name}")
+                return s["id"]
+        _time.sleep(3)
+    log("  WARNING: could not discover the new session id to pin (title lookup remains the fallback)")
+    return None
 
 def _session_idle_min():
     """Minutes since the managed run last ADVANCED — measured across the whole session TREE (the
@@ -321,25 +417,55 @@ def _limit_retry_after():
         return 0
 
 def _run_pids(sid=None):
-    """PIDs of live `opencode run` procs for THIS session (via /proc scan — never matches self)."""
+    """PIDs of live `opencode run` procs for THIS session (via /proc scan — never matches self).
+
+    Matches on FLAG VALUES (`--title <SESSION>` / `-s|--session <sid>`), never a substring of the
+    whole cmdline. The substring form caused the 2026-08-07 three-day deadlock: an agent's kickoff
+    PROMPT is passed as an argv element, and the supervisor's prompt text contains the literal
+    "cc-ci-upgrader", so the supervisor's own (billing-hung) agent matched as a live upgrader run —
+    the hourly gate then read its own corpse as "run progressing" and no-opped ~60 times."""
     me, out = os.getpid(), []
     for p in os.listdir("/proc"):
         if not p.isdigit() or int(p) == me:
             continue
         try:
-            cl = open(f"/proc/{p}/cmdline", "rb").read().split(b"\0")
+            cl = [c for c in open(f"/proc/{p}/cmdline", "rb").read().split(b"\0") if c]
         except Exception:
             continue
-        joined = b" ".join(cl)
-        if not (b"opencode" in joined and b"run" in cl and b"--attach" in cl):
+        if not cl or b"opencode" not in cl[0] or b"run" not in cl or b"--attach" not in cl:
             continue
-        # Scope to THIS managed session only: a fresh run carries `--title <SESSION>`, a resumed
-        # run carries `-s <sid>`. Without this, the report watchdog would kill the idle upgrader
-        # run (and vice-versa) since both are `opencode run … --attach`.
-        if SESSION.encode() in joined or (sid and sid.encode() in joined):
+
+        def _flag(names):
+            for i, a in enumerate(cl[:-1]):
+                if a in names:
+                    return cl[i + 1]
+            return None
+
+        title = _flag((b"--title",))
+        s_val = _flag((b"-s", b"--session"))
+        if title == SESSION.encode() or (sid and s_val == sid.encode()):
             out.append(int(p))
     return out
 
+
+def _billing_blocked(window_bytes=4000):
+    """True when the tail of this run's log shows a provider billing/usage wall.
+
+    Such a process must NEVER be killed: it may resume when the wall lifts, and killing it can
+    lose in-flight work. It is also NOT progress — it can spin for days emitting nothing (observed
+    2026-08-07..10), so the gate reports it as BLOCKED and leaves recovery to the operator."""
+    try:
+        with open(LOG_FILE, "rb") as f:
+            f.seek(0, os.SEEK_END)
+            f.seek(max(0, f.tell() - window_bytes))
+            tail = f.read().decode(errors="replace").lower()
+    except OSError:
+        return False
+    return any(
+        s in tail
+        for s in ("spending limit", "insufficient balance", "usage limit", "usagelimiterror")
+    )
+
 def _completed():
     # Done only when the MODEL signs off with DONE_MARKER as its FINAL word: the marker in the LAST
     # assistant TEXT (prose) message. This guards THREE false-positives that each abandoned a run:
@@ -399,6 +525,10 @@ def resume(reason="manual"):
            f"--model '{MODEL}' {share} --attach '{OPENCODE_SERVER}' --dir '{WORKDIR}' \"$(cat '{kf}')\"")
     subprocess.run(["tmux", "new-session", "-d", "-s", SESSION, "-c", WORKDIR, cmd])
     subprocess.run(["tmux", "pipe-pane", "-o", "-t", SESSION, f"cat >> '{LOG_FILE}'"])
+    try:
+        STATE_SID_FILE.write_text(sid)   # a resume continues the SAME session — keep it pinned
+    except OSError:
+        pass
     log(f"resume: relaunched {SESSION} (session {sid})")
     # Every resume must be self-healing: ensure a watchdog is watching this run. Skip if one is
     # already alive — notably when the watchdog ITSELF called resume (it lives in {SESSION}-watchdog),

cc-ci-plan/pr-survey.py

@@ -0,0 +1,231 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env python3
+"""pr-survey — deterministic facts about every open recipe PR, for /cc-ci-cleanup to judge.
+
+Open recipe PRs rot in specific, detectable ways. This gathers the evidence; it does NOT decide
+anything — closing a PR is a judgement the skill makes, with these facts in hand.
+
+RUN `reconcile-upstream.sh --all` FIRST. Every signal below is measured against the mirror's `main`,
+and an unreconciled mirror makes all of them wrong: on 2026-08-11 three PRs (discourse #6 carrying
+140 CVEs, keycloak #6 carrying 12, n8n #5) looked pending against a stale mirror while upstream had
+already merged them. This tool refuses to guess about that — see `reconciled_recently`.
+
+Per PR:
+  behind_main      commits on main not in the branch — the "out of date" measure
+  ahead            commits on the branch not on main
+  mergeable        gitea's own verdict (false = conflicts, needs a rebase)
+  diff_files       files the PR touches (0 = nothing left to merge)
+  adds_images      the `+ image:` lines it introduces
+  already_in_main  those `+ image:` lines ALREADY present in main -> the bump landed another way
+  obsolete         true when every image it adds is already in main (nothing to contribute)
+  ci               newest `!testme` verdict + build number parsed from the PR comments
+  branch_kind      upgrade / fix / ci-artifact (`ci/*` sweep + probe branches) / other
+  age_days, stale_days (since last update)
+
+    pr-survey.py [recipe ...] [--json]
+"""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import argparse
+import base64
+import json
+import os
+import re
+import sys
+import urllib.error
+import urllib.parse
+import urllib.request
+from datetime import datetime, timezone
+
+HERE = os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__))
+USED_RECIPES = os.path.join(HERE, "used-recipes.md")
+TESTENV = os.environ.get("CCCI_TESTENV", "/srv/cc-ci/.testenv")
+NS = "recipe-maintainers"
+
+
+def _env() -> dict:
+    e = {}
+    try:
+        for ln in open(TESTENV):
+            ln = ln.strip()
+            if "=" in ln and not ln.startswith("#"):
+                k, v = ln.split("=", 1)
+                e[k] = v.strip().strip('"').strip("'")
+    except OSError:
+        pass
+    return e
+
+
+ENV = _env()
+GITEA = os.environ.get("GITEA_URL") or ENV.get("GITEA_URL", "git.autonomic.zone")
+_AUTH = base64.b64encode(
+    f"{os.environ.get('GITEA_USERNAME') or ENV.get('GITEA_USERNAME','')}:"
+    f"{os.environ.get('GITEA_PASSWORD') or ENV.get('GITEA_PASSWORD','')}".encode()
+).decode()
+
+
+def _get(path: str, raw: bool = False):
+    req = urllib.request.Request(
+        f"https://{GITEA}{path}",
+        headers={"Authorization": f"Basic {_AUTH}", "User-Agent": "cc-ci-pr-survey"},
+    )
+    with urllib.request.urlopen(req, timeout=60) as r:
+        body = r.read()
+    return body.decode(errors="replace") if raw else json.loads(body)
+
+
+def _days(iso: str | None) -> int | None:
+    if not iso:
+        return None
+    try:
+        d = datetime.fromisoformat(iso.replace("Z", "+00:00"))
+    except ValueError:
+        return None
+    return (datetime.now(timezone.utc) - d).days
+
+
+def _branch_kind(ref: str) -> str:
+    if ref.startswith("ci/"):
+        return "ci-artifact"          # regall/cfold sweeps + testme probes; never meant to merge
+    if ref.startswith("upgrade"):
+        return "upgrade"
+    if re.match(r"^(fix|feat|chore|revert)", ref):
+        return "fix"
+    return "other"
+
+
+def _main_images(recipe: str) -> set[str]:
+    """Image refs pinned on the mirror's main — the baseline a PR is judged against."""
+    out = set()
+    for f in ("compose.yml",):
+        try:
+            txt = _get(f"/{NS}/{recipe}/raw/branch/main/{f}", raw=True)
+        except Exception:  # noqa: BLE001
+            continue
+        for m in re.finditer(r"^\s*image:\s*[\"']?([^\"'\s]+)", txt, re.M):
+            out.add(m.group(1))
+    return out
+
+
+def _ci_verdict(recipe: str, number: int) -> dict:
+    """Newest cc-ci !testme outcome recorded on the PR."""
+    try:
+        cs = _get(f"/api/v1/repos/{NS}/{recipe}/issues/{number}/comments?limit=100")
+    except Exception:  # noqa: BLE001
+        return {"verdict": "unknown", "build": None}
+    for c in reversed(cs):
+        b = c.get("body") or ""
+        if "cc-ci:testme" not in b:
+            continue
+        m = re.search(r"/cc-ci/(\d+)", b)
+        if "✅" in b or "passed" in b:
+            return {"verdict": "passed", "build": m.group(1) if m else None}
+        if "❌" in b or "failure" in b:
+            return {"verdict": "failed", "build": m.group(1) if m else None}
+        if "⏳" in b or "in progress" in b:
+            return {"verdict": "running", "build": m.group(1) if m else None}
+    return {"verdict": "never-run", "build": None}
+
+
+def survey_pr(recipe: str, pr: dict, main_images: set[str]) -> dict:
+    n = pr["number"]
+    head = pr["head"]["ref"]
+    row = {
+        "recipe": recipe, "number": n, "title": pr.get("title", ""), "head": head,
+        "url": pr.get("html_url"), "branch_kind": _branch_kind(head),
+        "age_days": _days(pr.get("created_at")), "stale_days": _days(pr.get("updated_at")),
+        "mergeable": pr.get("mergeable"),
+    }
+    try:
+        row["behind_main"] = _get(
+            f"/api/v1/repos/{NS}/{recipe}/compare/{urllib.parse.quote(head, safe='')}...main"
+        ).get("total_commits", 0)
+        row["ahead"] = _get(
+            f"/api/v1/repos/{NS}/{recipe}/compare/main...{urllib.parse.quote(head, safe='')}"
+        ).get("total_commits", 0)
+    except Exception:  # noqa: BLE001
+        row["behind_main"], row["ahead"] = None, None
+    # A FAILED diff fetch must never look like an empty diff: gitea#4 404s on .diff (force-pushed
+    # branch) and would otherwise be flagged EMPTY-DIFF and closed — while being a verified, green,
+    # needed fix. Unknown is its own state.
+    diff = None
+    try:
+        body = _get(f"/{NS}/{recipe}/pulls/{n}.diff", raw=True)
+        if body.lstrip().startswith(("diff --git", "From ")) or not body.strip():
+            diff = body
+    except Exception:  # noqa: BLE001
+        diff = None
+    row["diff_files"] = None if diff is None else len(re.findall(r"^diff --git ", diff, re.M))
+    adds = re.findall(r"^\+\s*image:\s*[\"']?([^\"'\s]+)", diff or "", re.M)
+    row["adds_images"] = sorted(set(adds))
+    row["already_in_main"] = sorted({i for i in set(adds) if i in main_images})
+    # Nothing left to contribute: it touches files but every image it introduces is already pinned.
+    # Only claim obsolete when the diff was actually READ. No diff, no verdict.
+    row["obsolete"] = diff is not None and bool(adds) and set(adds).issubset(main_images)
+    row["ci"] = _ci_verdict(recipe, n)
+    return row
+
+
+def all_recipes() -> list[str]:
+    out = []
+    for ln in open(USED_RECIPES):
+        p = ln.split()
+        if len(p) >= 2 and not ln.startswith(("#", "`")) and p[1] in ("weekly", "external"):
+            out.append(p[0])
+    return out
+
+
+def main() -> int:
+    ap = argparse.ArgumentParser(description=__doc__,
+                                 formatter_class=argparse.RawDescriptionHelpFormatter)
+    ap.add_argument("recipes", nargs="*")
+    ap.add_argument("--json", action="store_true")
+    a = ap.parse_args()
+
+    rows = []
+    for r in (a.recipes or all_recipes()):
+        try:
+            prs = _get(f"/api/v1/repos/{NS}/{r}/pulls?state=open&limit=50")
+        except urllib.error.HTTPError as e:
+            rows.append({"recipe": r, "error": f"HTTP {e.code}"})
+            continue
+        if not prs:
+            continue
+        mi = _main_images(r)
+        for pr in prs:
+            rows.append(survey_pr(r, pr, mi))
+
+    if a.json:
+        print(json.dumps(rows, indent=2))
+        return 0
+
+    print(f"{len(rows)} open PR(s)\n")
+    for x in sorted(rows, key=lambda z: (z.get("recipe", ""), z.get("number", 0))):
+        if x.get("error"):
+            print(f"  {x['recipe']}: {x['error']}")
+            continue
+        flags = []
+        if x["obsolete"]:
+            flags.append("OBSOLETE(images already in main)")
+        if x["branch_kind"] == "ci-artifact":
+            flags.append("CI-ARTIFACT")
+        if x["diff_files"] == 0:
+            flags.append("EMPTY-DIFF")
+        if x["diff_files"] is None:
+            flags.append("DIFF-UNREADABLE(do not close on this)")
+        if x["mergeable"] is False:
+            flags.append("CONFLICTS")
+        if (x["behind_main"] or 0) > 0:
+            flags.append(f"BEHIND-{x['behind_main']}")
+        print(f"  {x['recipe']}#{x['number']:<3} {x['title'][:52]}")
+        print(f"      {x['branch_kind']:12} age={x['age_days']}d idle={x['stale_days']}d "
+              f"ci={x['ci']['verdict']}({x['ci']['build'] or '-'}) files={x['diff_files'] if x['diff_files'] is not None else '?'}")
+        if x["adds_images"]:
+            print(f"      adds: {', '.join(i.split('/')[-1] for i in x['adds_images'][:4])}")
+        if flags:
+            print(f"      >> {' | '.join(flags)}")
+    return 0
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    sys.exit(main())

cc-ci-plan/recipe-report.py

@@ -9,7 +9,11 @@ Subcommands (the /recipe-report agent runs them around its own review/classifica
   survey [DATE]            JSON of the run + every recipe's open PRs + CI verdict + per-recipe upgrade
                            notes (breaking-change/CVE analysis), and the /upgrade-all summary.
   render SPEC.json OUT.html   render the agent's report spec -> a self-contained newspaper HTML page
-  publish OUT.html DATE    copy to cc-ci:/var/lib/cc-ci-reports/week-DATE.html and regen the archive index
+  publish OUT.html DATE [KIND]  copy to cc-ci:/var/lib/cc-ci-reports/<KIND>-DATE.html and regen the
+                           archive index. KIND is `week` (default, the weekly /recipe-report) or `cve`
+                           (a /cve-check advisory sweep). BOTH kinds appear in the SAME archive index,
+                           newest first, each row suffixed "full" or "CVE check"; the distinct
+                           filename prefix just stops a sweep overwriting a weekly edition.
 
 Page order: short lead → the full wire table (priority-sorted, CVEs column) → Addendum → Security
 Bulletin → per-recipe "What changed".
@@ -44,6 +48,10 @@ LOGDIR = "/srv/cc-ci/.cc-ci-logs"
 TESTENV = "/srv/cc-ci/.testenv"
 INFRA = {"cc-ci", "cc-ci-orchestrator", "cc-ci-secrets"}
 HOST_REPORTS = "/var/lib/cc-ci-reports"
+# Both kinds live in ONE archive, distinguished by a suffix on a common title.
+# prefix -> (page title, index label)
+KINDS = {"week": ("The Recipe Report", "Week of {d} — full"),
+         "cve":  ("The Recipe Report — CVE check", "{d} — CVE check")}
 
 
 def _env():
@@ -215,8 +223,16 @@ def _table(rows, repo_url=None):
         if repo_url and r.get("recipe") in repo_url:
             name = f'<a href="{repo_url[r["recipe"]]}">{name}</a>'
         cve = r.get("cve")
-        cve_cell = (f'<span class="cve">{int(cve)}</span>' if isinstance(cve, (int, float)) and cve
-                    else '<span class="muted">none</span>')
+        # "?" = advisory scan absent or had failed sources → count NOT authoritative. Per the
+        # /recipe-report guardrail this must NEVER render as "none" (a blank-that-reads-clean is
+        # exactly how two CVSS-9.8 gitea RCEs were misreported as "none" on 2026-08-07). A positive
+        # int is the confirmed CVE count; 0/omit is a confirmed-clean scan.
+        if isinstance(cve, str) and cve.strip() == "?":
+            cve_cell = '<span class="muted" title="advisory scan incomplete or absent — CVE count unknown">?</span>'
+        elif isinstance(cve, (int, float)) and cve:
+            cve_cell = f'<span class="cve">{int(cve)}</span>'
+        else:
+            cve_cell = '<span class="muted">none</span>'
         ci = _esc(r.get("ci"))
         if r.get("ci_url"):
             ci = f'<a href="{_esc(r["ci_url"])}">{ci}</a>'
@@ -270,8 +286,10 @@ def _mast():
 
 def render(spec_path, out_path):
     s = json.load(open(spec_path))
+    kind = s.get("kind", "week")
+    title = KINDS.get(kind, KINDS["week"])[0]
     gen = datetime.now(timezone.utc).strftime("%Y-%m-%d %H:%M UTC")
-    sub = s.get("subtitle", "Week of " + s["date"])
+    sub = s.get("subtitle", ("Week of " if kind == "week" else "CVE check ") + s["date"])
     lead = s.get("lead", "") or ""
     # Auto-link recipe-name mentions in the lead to their mirror repos.
     gitea = _env().get("GITEA_URL", "git.autonomic.zone")
@@ -285,7 +303,9 @@ def render(spec_path, out_path):
             f'<span>report.ci.commoninternet.net</span><span>{gen}</span></div>'
             f'<div class="lead">{lead}</div>')
     # 1) the full wire — every recipe, in the agent's recommended priority order (CVEs first); CVEs column.
-    body += f'<h2>The full wire — every recipe, in priority order</h2>{_table(s.get("table"), repo_url)}'
+    wire = ("The full wire — every recipe, in priority order" if kind == "week"
+            else "Advisory sweep — every recipe, worst first")
+    body += f'<h2>{wire}</h2>{_table(s.get("table"), repo_url)}'
     # 2) addendum — special issues to look into (normal-size header); omitted entirely if there are none.
     add = [a for a in (s.get("addendum") or []) if str(a).strip()]
     if add:
@@ -298,19 +318,30 @@ def render(spec_path, out_path):
     # 4) what changed — a short section per recipe that has a PR
     if s.get("changes"):
         body += f'<h2>What changed</h2>{_changes(s.get("changes"), repo_url)}'
-    body += (f'<footer>The Recipe Report · generated {gen} · '
+    body += (f'<footer>{title} · generated {gen} · '
              f'<a href="https://ci.commoninternet.net/">dashboard</a> · <a href="./">archive</a></footer>')
-    open(out_path, "w").write(_page("The Recipe Report — " + s["date"], body))
+    open(out_path, "w").write(_page(f"{title} · " + s["date"], body))
     print("wrote", out_path)
 
 
-def publish(html_path, date):
-    page = f"week-{date}.html"
+def publish(html_path, date, kind="week"):
+    if kind not in KINDS:
+        print(f"unknown kind {kind!r}; expected one of {', '.join(KINDS)}"); sys.exit(2)
+    page = f"{kind}-{date}.html"
     subprocess.run(["ssh", "cc-ci", f"cat > {HOST_REPORTS}/{page}"], input=open(html_path, "rb").read(), check=True)
-    listing = subprocess.run(["ssh", "cc-ci", f"ls -1 {HOST_REPORTS}/week-*.html 2>/dev/null"],
-                             capture_output=True, text=True).stdout.split()
-    dates = sorted({os.path.basename(p)[5:-5] for p in listing}, reverse=True)
-    lis = "\n".join(f'<li><a href="week-{d}.html">Week of {d}</a><span class="d">{d}</span></li>' for d in dates)
+    # One index over BOTH families, newest first, each row labelled by its kind — an operator looking
+    # for "the latest security picture" should not have to know which skill produced which page.
+    entries = []
+    for k in KINDS:
+        listing = subprocess.run(["ssh", "cc-ci", f"ls -1 {HOST_REPORTS}/{k}-*.html 2>/dev/null"],
+                                 capture_output=True, text=True).stdout.split()
+        for pth in listing:
+            d = os.path.basename(pth)[len(k) + 1:-5]
+            if re.fullmatch(r"\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}", d):
+                entries.append((d, k))
+    lis = "\n".join(
+        f'<li><a href="{k}-{d}.html">{KINDS[k][1].format(d=d)}</a><span class="d">{d}</span></li>'
+        for d, k in sorted(set(entries), reverse=True))
     idx = _page("The Recipe Report — Archive", _mast() +
                 '<div class="dateline"><span>Weekly review of Co-op Cloud recipe upgrades &amp; CI</span>'
                 '<span>report.ci.commoninternet.net</span></div>'
@@ -328,7 +359,7 @@ def main():
     elif cmd == "render":
         render(a[1], a[2])
     elif cmd == "publish":
-        publish(a[1], a[2])
+        publish(a[1], a[2], a[3] if len(a) > 3 else "week")
     else:
         print(__doc__); sys.exit(2)
 

cc-ci-plan/reconcile-upstream.sh

@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env bash
+# reconcile-upstream — sync recipe mirrors from TRUE upstream. Run this FIRST, always.
+# ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Every recipe we maintain is a MIRROR of a coopcloud recipe. Work done against a stale
+# mirror is wasted or wrong, in three ways we have actually hit:
+#
+#   1. A PR whose changes upstream ALREADY MERGED. mailu #6 (2024.06.57 + redis 8.10,
+#      two internet-facing Roundcube CVEs) sat open and was reported as the fix for
+#      those CVEs — while upstream had merged and released it as 3.1.3+2024.06.57. The
+#      work was done; only our mirror was behind.
+#   2. A survey that reads the stale mirror and reports "no upgrades available", so a
+#      recipe silently drops out of the weekly run.
+#   3. Reading the WRONG BRANCH. Several coopcloud recipes keep a stale `main` beside
+#      the real default `master` — gitea's `main` is at 1.24.2-rootless while `master`
+#      has 1.27.1-rootless plus the merged PRs. Reading `main` there says the recipe is
+#      three releases behind and missing two CVSS-9.8 RCE fixes, which reads exactly
+#      like a real finding. open-recipe-pr.sh resolves the default branch itself
+#      (main OR master) — never hand-pick one.
+#
+# This is deterministic: it force-syncs each mirror's `main` to upstream's default
+# branch and closes any mirror PR whose changes are already upstream. No AI judgement.
+#
+#   reconcile-upstream.sh <recipe>...     # specific recipes
+#   reconcile-upstream.sh --all           # every recipe in used-recipes.md
+#
+# Safe to run repeatedly; a mirror already in sync is a no-op. Recipe work lives in
+# BRANCHES, never on mirror `main`, so force-syncing `main` discards nothing.
+set -o errexit -o nounset -o pipefail
+
+HERE="$(cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")" && pwd)"
+ORCH="$(dirname "$HERE")"
+SSH="${SSH:-cc-ci}"
+TESTENV="${TESTENV:-/srv/cc-ci/.testenv}"
+RECONCILE="${RECONCILE:-$ORCH/.claude/skills/recipe-upgrade/open-recipe-pr.sh}"
+USED_RECIPES="${USED_RECIPES:-$HERE/used-recipes.md}"
+
+[ -f "$RECONCILE" ] || { echo "ERROR: reconcile helper not found: $RECONCILE" >&2; exit 1; }
+set -a; . "$TESTENV"; set +a
+: "${GITEA_USERNAME:?}"; : "${GITEA_PASSWORD:?}"; : "${GITEA_URL:?}"
+
+if [ "${1:-}" = "--all" ]; then
+  mapfile -t RECIPES < <(awk '!/^[[:space:]]*#/ && ($2=="weekly" || $2=="external") {print $1}' "$USED_RECIPES")
+else
+  [ "$#" -gt 0 ] || { echo "usage: reconcile-upstream.sh <recipe>... | --all" >&2; exit 2; }
+  RECIPES=("$@")
+fi
+
+synced=0; closed=0; failed=0
+for r in "${RECIPES[@]}"; do
+  echo "── $r"
+  if out="$(ssh "$SSH" "GITEA_USERNAME='$GITEA_USERNAME' GITEA_PASSWORD='$GITEA_PASSWORD' GITEA_URL='$GITEA_URL' bash -s $r --reconcile-only" < "$RECONCILE" 2>&1)"; then
+    printf '%s\n' "$out" | grep -E "Force-syncing|already in sync|closed PR|still open|✓" | sed 's/^/   /' || true
+    synced=$((synced + 1))
+    closed=$((closed + $(printf '%s' "$out" | grep -c "closed PR" || true)))
+  else
+    printf '%s\n' "$out" | tail -3 | sed 's/^/   /'
+    echo "   ✗ FAILED — do NOT proceed against this mirror until it reconciles"
+    failed=$((failed + 1))
+  fi
+done
+
+echo
+echo "reconcile-upstream: ${synced} mirror(s) synced, ${closed} already-upstream PR(s) closed, ${failed} failed"
+[ "$failed" -eq 0 ]

cc-ci-plan/resolve-images.py

@@ -0,0 +1,459 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env python3
+"""resolve-images — what version is each of a recipe's images on, and what is newest?
+
+An abra-independent version resolver. `abra recipe upgrade` is the normal path, but it has a hard
+failure mode: an image pinned with BOTH a tag and a digest makes it FATA and abandon the WHOLE
+recipe — even images it already parsed. immich pins two that way:
+
+    ghcr.io/immich-app/postgres:14-vectorchord0.4.3-pgvectors0.2.0@sha256:bcf6…
+    docker.io/valkey/valkey:9@sha256:3acc…
+
+so immich contributes NO version data at all and silently drops out of every survey. That is
+indistinguishable from "up to date" unless a human notices the missing row — which is exactly how it
+kept getting skipped, and why a CVE sweep reported it as unknown.
+
+This reads the compose files directly and queries the registries itself, so a digest pin is just a
+digest pin. Output is JSON (default) or a table.
+
+    resolve-images.py <recipe> [--ssh HOST] [--recipe-dir DIR] [--table] [--only IMAGE]
+
+The cc-ci host has no python3, so `--ssh cc-ci` reads the compose files from that host's checkout
+over ssh and does the resolving locally. That keeps the source of truth the SAME tree abra and CI
+use, rather than a second copy that can drift.
+
+TAG SHAPES. Registries mix wildly different tag conventions in one repo, so "newest" is meaningless
+without a shape. Each tag is reduced to a signature by replacing digit runs with '#':
+
+    v3.1.0                              -> v#.#.#
+    1.27.1-rootless                     -> #.#.#-rootless
+    8.10-alpine                         -> #.#-alpine
+    14-vectorchord0.4.3-pgvectors0.2.0  -> #-vectorchord#.#.#-pgvectors#.#.#
+
+Only tags sharing the CURRENT pin's shape are candidates. That keeps `-alpine` on `-alpine`, and
+stops a `latest`/`release`/`sha-…` tag from ever being proposed as an upgrade.
+
+TWO ANSWERS, NOT ONE. It reports `newest_same_shape` AND `newest_within_major` (same leading number).
+For a plain app image they usually agree. For a compatibility-pinned sidecar they do not, and taking
+the max would be wrong: immich's postgres tag encodes the pg major plus the vectorchord/pgvectors
+versions that immich-server is built against, so jumping pg major because a newer tag exists breaks
+the deployment. The caller picks; this tool refuses to guess and shows both.
+"""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import argparse
+import glob
+import shlex
+import subprocess
+import gzip
+import json
+import os
+import re
+import sys
+import time
+import urllib.error
+import urllib.parse
+import urllib.request
+
+UA = "cc-ci-resolve-images (+https://git.autonomic.zone/recipe-maintainers/cc-ci)"
+TIMEOUT = int(os.environ.get("RESOLVE_IMAGES_TIMEOUT", "45"))
+RECIPE_DIR = os.environ.get("ABRA_RECIPE_DIR", os.path.expanduser("~/.abra/recipes"))
+MAX_TAG_PAGES = int(os.environ.get("RESOLVE_IMAGES_MAX_PAGES", "40"))
+
+IMAGE_RE = re.compile(r"""^\s*image:\s*["']?([^"'\s]+)["']?\s*$""", re.M)
+
+
+RETRIES = int(os.environ.get("RESOLVE_IMAGES_RETRIES", "4"))
+
+
+def _fetch(url: str, headers: dict | None = None) -> bytes:
+    """GET with backoff on rate limits.
+
+    Docker Hub throttles anonymous clients hard, and a sweep re-reads the same popular repos
+    (nginx, redis, postgres) for recipe after recipe. A 429 mid-sweep used to surface as
+    'unresolved', which is indistinguishable from a real lookup failure — so retry, and let the
+    per-repo cache below remove most of the requests entirely."""
+    h = {"User-Agent": UA, "Accept-Encoding": "gzip"}
+    h.update(headers or {})
+    delay = 2.0
+    for attempt in range(RETRIES):
+        try:
+            with urllib.request.urlopen(urllib.request.Request(url, headers=h), timeout=TIMEOUT) as r:
+                raw = r.read()
+                if r.headers.get("Content-Encoding") == "gzip":
+                    raw = gzip.decompress(raw)
+                return raw
+        except urllib.error.HTTPError as e:
+            if e.code in (429, 503) and attempt < RETRIES - 1:
+                time.sleep(delay)
+                delay *= 2
+                continue
+            raise
+    raise RuntimeError("unreachable")
+
+
+_HUB_JWT: list = []
+
+
+def _hub_auth() -> dict:
+    """Authenticated Docker Hub calls get a far higher rate limit than anonymous ones.
+
+    Credentials come from /srv/cc-ci/.testenv (DOCKERHUB_USERNAME / DOCKERHUB_TOKEN), the same pair
+    the CI host already uses. Absent creds are fine — the sweep just runs anonymous and slower."""
+    if _HUB_JWT:
+        return _HUB_JWT[0]
+    env = {}
+    try:
+        for ln in open(os.environ.get("CCCI_TESTENV", "/srv/cc-ci/.testenv")):
+            if "=" in ln and not ln.strip().startswith("#"):
+                k, v = ln.strip().split("=", 1)
+                env[k] = v.strip().strip("\"'")
+    except OSError:
+        pass
+    u = os.environ.get("DOCKERHUB_USERNAME") or env.get("DOCKERHUB_USERNAME")
+    t = os.environ.get("DOCKERHUB_TOKEN") or env.get("DOCKERHUB_TOKEN")
+    hdrs = {}
+    if u and t:
+        try:
+            body = json.dumps({"username": u, "password": t}).encode()
+            req = urllib.request.Request("https://hub.docker.com/v2/users/login",
+                                         data=body, method="POST",
+                                         headers={"Content-Type": "application/json", "User-Agent": UA})
+            with urllib.request.urlopen(req, timeout=TIMEOUT) as r:
+                tokj = json.load(r).get("token")
+            if tokj:
+                hdrs = {"Authorization": f"JWT {tokj}"}
+        except Exception:  # noqa: BLE001 — anonymous is a valid fallback
+            hdrs = {}
+    _HUB_JWT.append(hdrs)
+    return hdrs
+
+
+def _json(url: str, headers: dict | None = None):
+    return json.loads(_fetch(url, headers))
+
+
+def shape(tag: str) -> str:
+    """Signature of a tag with every digit run replaced by '#'. See module docstring."""
+    return re.sub(r"\d+", "#", tag)
+
+
+def vkey(tag: str) -> tuple:
+    """Ordering key: every number in the tag, in order. '1.27.10' > '1.27.9'; text ignored."""
+    return tuple(int(x) for x in re.findall(r"\d+", tag))
+
+
+def parse_ref(ref: str) -> dict:
+    """Split an image reference into registry / repo / tag / digest."""
+    digest = None
+    if "@" in ref:
+        ref, _, digest = ref.partition("@")
+    host, repo, tag = "docker.io", ref, "latest"
+    # A leading component is a REGISTRY only when there is a path after it. Without the slash test,
+    # a bare `postgres:15.18` looks like host "postgres:15.18" because of the tag's colon — which
+    # silently sent every library image to a nonexistent registry.
+    if "/" in ref:
+        first = ref.split("/")[0]
+        if "." in first or ":" in first or first == "localhost":
+            host, _, repo = ref.partition("/")
+    if ":" in repo.split("/")[-1]:
+        repo, _, tag = repo.rpartition(":")
+    if host == "docker.io" and "/" not in repo:
+        repo = f"library/{repo}"          # bare `redis` is really `library/redis`
+    return {"registry": host, "repo": repo, "tag": tag, "digest": digest}
+
+
+HUB_RECENT_PAGES = int(os.environ.get("RESOLVE_IMAGES_HUB_PAGES", "10"))
+
+
+def _hub_tag_exists(repo: str, tag: str) -> bool:
+    try:
+        _json(f"https://hub.docker.com/v2/repositories/{repo}/tags/{tag}", _hub_auth())
+        return True
+    except Exception:  # noqa: BLE001
+        return False
+
+
+def _hub_tags(repo: str) -> list[str]:
+    """Recently-pushed tags, newest first.
+
+    Popular Docker Hub repos carry many thousands of tags, so a full enumeration is impractical —
+    but it is also unnecessary: a tag NEWER than the one we run must have been pushed AFTER it, so
+    ordering by last_updated and reading a bounded recent window is sufficient to find any upgrade.
+    (ghcr offers no ordering, which is why that path needs a different strategy.)
+    """
+    tags, url = [], (f"https://hub.docker.com/v2/repositories/{repo}/tags"
+                     f"?page_size=100&ordering=last_updated")
+    auth = _hub_auth()
+    for _ in range(HUB_RECENT_PAGES):
+        d = _json(url, auth)
+        tags += [r["name"] for r in d.get("results", [])]
+        url = d.get("next")
+        if not url:
+            break
+    return tags
+
+
+def _oci_bearer(host: str, repo: str) -> dict:
+    """Token for an OCI registry, discovered from its own auth challenge.
+
+    Registries do NOT share a token endpoint. ghcr answers at /token?scope=…&service=ghcr.io, but
+    lscr.io and dock.mau.dev advertise different realms, and assuming ghcr's shape made both 401 —
+    which then read as "could not resolve" rather than "asked the wrong URL". The registry tells us
+    where to go in its WWW-Authenticate header; use that."""
+    try:
+        urllib.request.urlopen(
+            urllib.request.Request(f"https://{host}/v2/{repo}/tags/list?n=1",
+                                   headers={"User-Agent": UA}), timeout=TIMEOUT)
+        return {}                                     # no auth needed
+    except urllib.error.HTTPError as e:
+        if e.code != 401:
+            return {}
+        chal = e.headers.get("WWW-Authenticate", "") or ""
+    except Exception:  # noqa: BLE001
+        return {}
+    if not chal.lower().startswith("bearer"):
+        return {}
+    parts = dict(re.findall(r'(\w+)="([^"]*)"', chal))
+    realm = parts.get("realm")
+    if not realm:
+        return {}
+    q = {"service": parts.get("service", host), "scope": parts.get("scope", f"repository:{repo}:pull")}
+    url = realm + ("&" if "?" in realm else "?") + urllib.parse.urlencode(q)
+    try:
+        tok = (_json(url) or {}).get("token") or (_json(url) or {}).get("access_token")
+        return {"Authorization": f"Bearer {tok}"} if tok else {}
+    except Exception:  # noqa: BLE001
+        return {}
+
+
+def _oci_tags(host: str, repo: str) -> list[str]:
+    """Tags from any OCI/v2 registry, with challenge-derived auth and Link pagination.
+
+    ghcr paginates hard — immich-server has >40,000 tags — and a truncated listing silently hides
+    the newest release line, so follow the cursor and let the caller's integrity check catch a read
+    that never reached the current pin."""
+    hdrs = _oci_bearer(host, repo)
+    tags, url = [], f"https://{host}/v2/{repo}/tags/list?n=1000"
+    for _ in range(MAX_TAG_PAGES):
+        req = urllib.request.Request(url, headers={"User-Agent": UA, **hdrs})
+        with urllib.request.urlopen(req, timeout=TIMEOUT) as r:
+            tags += (json.load(r) or {}).get("tags") or []
+            link = r.headers.get("Link", "") or ""
+        m = re.search(r'<([^>]+)>;\s*rel="next"', link)
+        if not m:
+            break
+        nxt = m.group(1)
+        url = f"https://{host}{nxt}" if nxt.startswith("/") else nxt
+    return tags
+
+
+def _gh_token() -> str | None:
+    tok = os.environ.get("GITHUB_TOKEN")
+    if tok:
+        return tok.strip()
+    try:
+        return open(os.environ.get("GITHUB_TOKEN_FILE", "/srv/cc-ci/.github-token")).read().strip() or None
+    except OSError:
+        return None
+
+
+def github_release_tags(owner: str, repo: str, max_pages: int = 4) -> list[str]:
+    """Release tag names for a GitHub repo, newest first.
+
+    FALLBACK for registries whose tag listing cannot be enumerated. ghcr has no ordering and no
+    server-side filter, and immich-machine-learning carries >40,000 tags — a full read is impractical
+    and a partial read silently hides the newest release line. The project's RELEASES are ordered,
+    small, and authoritative: container tags track them. (The GitHub Packages API would answer this
+    directly but needs a scoped token; this scan's token deliberately has none.)
+    """
+    hdrs = {"Accept": "application/vnd.github+json"}
+    tok = _gh_token()
+    if tok:
+        hdrs["Authorization"] = f"Bearer {tok}"
+    out = []
+    for page in range(1, max_pages + 1):
+        try:
+            rows = _json(f"https://api.github.com/repos/{owner}/{repo}/releases"
+                         f"?per_page=100&page={page}", hdrs)
+        except Exception:  # noqa: BLE001
+            break
+        if not rows:
+            break
+        out += [r.get("tag_name") or "" for r in rows]
+    return [t for t in out if t]
+
+
+def _release_fallback_repos(registry: str, repo: str) -> list[tuple[str, str]]:
+    """Candidate GitHub repos whose releases track this image's tags."""
+    if "ghcr.io" not in registry:
+        return []
+    parts = repo.split("/")
+    if len(parts) < 2:
+        return []
+    owner, name = parts[0], parts[-1]
+    cands = [(owner, name)]
+    # ghcr.io/immich-app/immich-machine-learning is built from immich-app/immich.
+    if name.startswith(owner.split("-")[0]):
+        cands.append((owner, owner.split("-")[0]))
+    return cands
+
+
+_TAG_CACHE: dict[tuple[str, str], tuple[list[str], str | None]] = {}
+
+
+def list_tags(registry: str, repo: str) -> tuple[list[str], str | None]:
+    if (registry, repo) in _TAG_CACHE:
+        return _TAG_CACHE[(registry, repo)]
+    res = _list_tags_uncached(registry, repo)
+    _TAG_CACHE[(registry, repo)] = res
+    return res
+
+
+def _list_tags_uncached(registry: str, repo: str) -> tuple[list[str], str | None]:
+    try:
+        return (_hub_tags(repo) if registry in ("docker.io", "registry-1.docker.io")
+                else _oci_tags(registry, repo)), None
+    except urllib.error.HTTPError as e:
+        return [], f"HTTP {e.code}"
+    except Exception as e:  # noqa: BLE001
+        return [], f"{type(e).__name__}: {e}"
+
+
+def resolve(ref: str) -> dict:
+    """Current pin -> newest same-shape tag, and newest within the current major."""
+    if "${" in ref or "$(" in ref:
+        # The tag is a compose variable (ghost pins `ghost:${IMAGE_VERSION}-alpine`). Its real value
+        # lives in .env, not here. Report it as skipped, never as a failed lookup.
+        return {**parse_ref(ref), "ref": ref, "shape": None, "candidates": 0,
+                "newest_same_shape": None, "newest_within_major": None,
+                "upgrade_available": False,
+                "status": "skipped: templated ref (tag comes from a compose variable)"}
+    info = parse_ref(ref)
+    out = {**info, "ref": ref, "shape": shape(info["tag"]), "status": "ok",
+           "newest_same_shape": None, "newest_within_major": None, "candidates": 0,
+           "upgrade_available": False}
+    tags, err = list_tags(info["registry"], info["repo"])
+    if err:
+        out["status"] = f"error: {err}"
+        return out
+    out["tags_seen"] = len(set(tags))
+    # INTEGRITY CHECK: the tag we are currently running MUST appear in the listing. If it does not,
+    # the listing is incomplete and any "newest" derived from it is a guess — ghcr paginates to tens
+    # of thousands of tags and a truncated read silently hides whole release lines. immich's
+    # machine-learning image is pinned v3.1.0, which EXISTS, yet a short read reported v1.134.0 as
+    # newest; without this check that becomes a confident, wrong answer.
+    if info["tag"] not in set(tags):
+        # Docker Hub: the window is recency-ordered, so the pin being outside it just means the pin
+        # is old — which is fine, because anything NEWER is necessarily inside the window. Confirm
+        # the pin genuinely exists (so a typo is still caught) and carry on.
+        if info["registry"] in ("docker.io", "registry-1.docker.io") and _hub_tag_exists(info["repo"], info["tag"]):
+            out["source"] = f"docker-hub:recent-{HUB_RECENT_PAGES * 100}"
+            tags = list(tags) + [info["tag"]]
+        else:
+            for owner, name in _release_fallback_repos(info["registry"], info["repo"]):
+                rel = github_release_tags(owner, name)
+                if info["tag"] in rel:
+                    tags = rel
+                    out["source"] = f"github-releases:{owner}/{name}"
+                    out["tags_seen"] = len(set(rel))
+                    break
+            else:
+                out["status"] = ("error: tag listing incomplete — the current pin "
+                                 f"{info['tag']!r} is absent from {len(set(tags))} registry tags "
+                                 f"and from the project's GitHub releases")
+                return out
+    want, cur = out["shape"], vkey(info["tag"])
+    same = [t for t in set(tags) if shape(t) == want and vkey(t)]
+    out["candidates"] = len(same)
+    if not same:
+        # Not a failure: digest-only pins and `latest`/`stable` have no comparable siblings.
+        out["status"] = "no comparable tags (shape has no numeric siblings)"
+        return out
+    newest = max(same, key=vkey)
+    out["newest_same_shape"] = newest
+    if cur:
+        within = [t for t in same if vkey(t)[:1] == cur[:1]]
+        if within:
+            out["newest_within_major"] = max(within, key=vkey)
+    out["upgrade_available"] = bool(cur and vkey(newest) > cur)
+    return out
+
+
+def compose_images_ssh(recipe: str, host: str, recipe_dir: str) -> list[str]:
+    """Same as compose_images, but the recipe tree lives on another host (cc-ci has no python3)."""
+    # NB: no shell-quoting of the directory — it may legitimately start with ~ or $HOME, and
+    # quoting it stops the remote shell expanding it, which yields an empty (and silent) result.
+    d = f"{recipe_dir}/{shlex.quote(recipe)}".replace("~", "$HOME")
+    cmd = (f'for f in {d}/compose*.yml; do case "$f" in *compose.ccci.yml) continue;; esac; '
+           f'[ -f "$f" ] && {{ cat "$f"; echo; }}; done; exit 0')
+    out = subprocess.run(["ssh", host, cmd], capture_output=True, text=True, timeout=120)
+    if out.returncode != 0:
+        raise RuntimeError(f"ssh {host}: {(out.stderr.strip() or 'no output')[:200]}")
+    if not out.stdout.strip():
+        raise RuntimeError(f"ssh {host}: no compose files found under {d}")
+    refs = []
+    for m in IMAGE_RE.finditer(out.stdout):
+        if m.group(1) not in refs:
+            refs.append(m.group(1))
+    return refs
+
+
+def compose_images(recipe: str, recipe_dir: str) -> list[str]:
+    """Every `image:` ref in the recipe's own compose files (the cc-ci overlay is NOT the recipe)."""
+    refs, base = [], os.path.join(recipe_dir, recipe)
+    for path in sorted(glob.glob(os.path.join(base, "compose*.yml"))):
+        if os.path.basename(path) == "compose.ccci.yml":
+            continue
+        try:
+            for m in IMAGE_RE.finditer(open(path).read()):
+                if m.group(1) not in refs:
+                    refs.append(m.group(1))
+        except OSError:
+            continue
+    return refs
+
+
+def main() -> int:
+    ap = argparse.ArgumentParser(description=__doc__,
+                                 formatter_class=argparse.RawDescriptionHelpFormatter)
+    ap.add_argument("recipe")
+    ap.add_argument("--ssh", default=None, metavar="HOST",
+                    help="read the recipe's compose files from HOST over ssh (e.g. --ssh cc-ci); "
+                         "resolving still happens locally")
+    ap.add_argument("--recipe-dir", default=RECIPE_DIR)
+    ap.add_argument("--table", action="store_true", help="human-readable table instead of JSON")
+    ap.add_argument("--only", default=None, help="resolve just the images whose ref contains this")
+    a = ap.parse_args()
+
+    rdir = a.recipe_dir if a.recipe_dir != RECIPE_DIR or not a.ssh else "~/.abra/recipes"
+    refs = (compose_images_ssh(a.recipe, a.ssh, rdir) if a.ssh
+            else compose_images(a.recipe, a.recipe_dir))
+    if a.only:
+        refs = [r for r in refs if a.only in r]
+    results = [resolve(r) for r in refs]
+    report = {
+        "recipe": a.recipe,
+        "images": results,
+        "upgrades_available": [r["ref"] for r in results if r["upgrade_available"]],
+        "unresolved": [r["ref"] for r in results if r["status"].startswith("error")],
+        # The whole point: distinguish "checked, current" from "could not check".
+        "all_resolved": not any(r["status"].startswith("error") for r in results),
+    }
+    if not a.table:
+        print(json.dumps(report, indent=2))
+        return 0
+    print(f"{a.recipe} — {len(results)} images")
+    for r in results:
+        flag = "UPGRADE" if r["upgrade_available"] else ("ERROR" if r["status"].startswith("error") else "current")
+        print(f"  [{flag:7}] {r['repo']}:{r['tag']}" + ("  (digest-pinned)" if r["digest"] else ""))
+        print(f"            shape={r['shape']}  candidates={r['candidates']}"
+              f"  newest_same_shape={r['newest_same_shape']}"
+              f"  newest_within_major={r['newest_within_major']}")
+        if r["status"] != "ok":
+            print(f"            status: {r['status']}")
+    return 0
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    sys.exit(main())

cc-ci-plan/test-advisory-scan.py

@@ -0,0 +1,843 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env python3
+"""Tests for advisory-scan.py.
+
+Two tiers:
+
+  OFFLINE (default) — pure logic, fixtures injected in place of the network. Fast, deterministic,
+  no token, no rate limit. These encode every classification rule and every guarantee the CVE count
+  makes, including the specific production defects that motivated them.
+
+  LIVE (--live) — re-derives the CVE counts published in the week-2026-08-07 report against the real
+  advisory APIs. Slow, needs network + ideally a GitHub token. Run before changing classification.
+
+Usage:
+  python3 test-advisory-scan.py            # offline only
+  python3 test-advisory-scan.py --live     # offline + historic report regressions
+"""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import importlib.util
+import io
+import json
+import os
+import pathlib
+import sys
+import unittest
+import unittest.mock
+
+HERE = pathlib.Path(__file__).resolve().parent
+_spec = importlib.util.spec_from_file_location("advisory_scan", HERE / "advisory-scan.py")
+A = importlib.util.module_from_spec(_spec)
+_spec.loader.exec_module(A)
+
+
+# ── fixture helpers ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+def adv(cve, patched=None, published=None, severity="high", ghsa=None):
+    """One GitHub advisory row as github_advisories() would emit it."""
+    return {"cve": cve, "ghsa": ghsa or f"GHSA-fake-{cve[-4:]}", "severity": severity,
+            "summary": f"summary for {cve}", "vulnerable_range": None, "patched": patched,
+            "url": None, "published_at": published}
+
+
+def gh(owner_repo, advisories, status="ok"):
+    return {"source": f"github-advisories:{owner_repo}", "status": status, "advisories": advisories}
+
+
+def vendor(url, cves=(), status="ok"):
+    return {"source": url, "status": status, "cves": list(cves),
+            "context": {c: f"...{c}..." for c in cves}}
+
+
+def run_scan(gh_entries=(), vendor_entries=(), tag_dates=None, *, v_from=None, v_to=None,
+             images=None, recipe="fixture", urls=None, releases=None):
+    """scan() with every network call replaced by fixtures.
+
+    `releases` maps CVE id -> tags whose release notes name it (the third, release-note method)."""
+    tag_dates = tag_dates or {}
+    releases = releases or {}
+    urls = urls if urls is not None else ["https://github.com/app/app"]
+    with unittest.mock.patch.object(A, "registry_urls", lambda r, d: (list(urls), "/fake/reg.md")), \
+         unittest.mock.patch.object(A, "github_advisories", lambda u: list(gh_entries)), \
+         unittest.mock.patch.object(A, "vendor_pages", lambda u: list(vendor_entries)), \
+         unittest.mock.patch.object(A, "osv", lambda r, v: None), \
+         unittest.mock.patch.object(A, "_tag_date", lambda o, r, v: tag_dates.get(v)), \
+         unittest.mock.patch.object(A, "release_fix_versions", lambda src, cve: list(releases.get(cve, []))):
+        return A.scan(recipe, v_from, v_to, "/fake", images)
+
+
+def parse_image_args(argv):
+    """Drive main()'s --image parsing exactly as the CLI does, returning the tuples scan() receives."""
+    captured = {}
+
+    def fake_scan(recipe, vf, vt, reg, images):
+        captured["images"] = images
+        return {"recipe": recipe, "from": vf, "to": vt, "registry": reg, "registry_urls": 0,
+                "sources": [], "cves": {}, "fixed_by_this_upgrade": [], "unclassified": [],
+                "sources_failed": [], "sources_benign": [], "count_known": True,
+                "cve_count_fixed": 0, "windows": {}, "classified_by": {}}
+
+    err = io.StringIO()
+    with unittest.mock.patch.object(A, "scan", fake_scan), \
+         unittest.mock.patch.object(sys, "argv", ["advisory-scan.py", *argv]), \
+         unittest.mock.patch.object(sys, "stdout", io.StringIO()), \
+         unittest.mock.patch.object(sys, "stderr", err):
+        A.main()
+    return captured["images"], err.getvalue()
+
+
+# ── A. version ordering ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+class TestVersionKey(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_strips_prefix_and_suffix(self):
+        self.assertEqual(A._vkey("v1.27.1"), (1, 27, 1))
+        self.assertEqual(A._vkey("1.27.1-rootless"), (1, 27, 1))
+        self.assertEqual(A._vkey("2024.06.55"), (2024, 6, 55))
+
+    def test_empty_and_none(self):
+        self.assertEqual(A._vkey(None), ())
+        self.assertEqual(A._vkey(""), ())
+
+    def test_dotted_minor_is_numeric_not_lexical(self):
+        # The bug this guards: "8.10" must be NEWER than "8.2.3". String compare says otherwise.
+        self.assertGreater(A._vkey("8.10"), A._vkey("8.2.3"))
+        self.assertGreater(A._vkey("1.27.10"), A._vkey("1.27.9"))
+
+    def test_shorter_prefix_orders_below_its_own_patch(self):
+        # 7.4 < 7.4.1, so a CVE patched in 7.4.1 IS fixed by moving off a bare 7.4 pin.
+        self.assertLess(A._vkey("7.4"), A._vkey("7.4.1"))
+
+
+class TestWindowMembership(unittest.TestCase):
+    """(from, to] membership — exclusive lower, inclusive upper, compared zero-padded."""
+
+    def _in(self, f, t, c):
+        return A._within(A._vkey(f), A._vkey(t), A._vkey(c))
+
+    def test_bounds(self):
+        self.assertTrue(self._in("1.27.0", "1.27.1", "1.27.1"))    # upper inclusive
+        self.assertFalse(self._in("1.27.0", "1.27.1", "1.27.0"))   # lower exclusive
+        self.assertFalse(self._in("1.27.0", "1.27.1", "1.26.9"))
+        self.assertFalse(self._in("1.27.0", "1.27.1", "1.28.0"))
+
+    def test_bare_major_upper_bound_includes_its_dot_zero(self):
+        # Regression: plain tuple order makes (18,) < (18,0), so a fix in 18.0 fell OUTSIDE a
+        # window ending at 18. Bare major tags are the norm for sidecars (postgres:18, redis:8).
+        self.assertTrue(self._in("17", "18", "18.0"))
+        self.assertTrue(self._in("7", "8", "8.0"))
+        self.assertTrue(self._in("7.4", "8.10", "8.0.4"))
+
+    def test_bare_major_upper_bound_excludes_later_patches(self):
+        # Conservative on the other side: nothing proves which 18.x a floating tag resolved to.
+        self.assertFalse(self._in("17", "18", "18.5"))
+
+    def test_bare_version_is_read_literally_as_dot_zero(self):
+        # from="8" means 8.0, so a fix in 8.0.4 is inside a window that ends at 9.
+        self.assertTrue(self._in("8", "9", "8.0.4"))
+        self.assertFalse(self._in("8", "9", "8.0"))   # == the stated lower bound
+
+    def test_prefix_lower_bound_still_counts_its_patches(self):
+        self.assertTrue(self._in("7.4", "8.10", "7.4.1"))
+        self.assertTrue(self._in("7.4", "8.10", "7.4.6"))
+
+    def test_the_false_133_cve_stays_out(self):
+        self.assertFalse(self._in("7.4", "8.10", "6.0.11"))
+
+
+# ── B. registry URL extraction ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+class TestRegistryUrls(unittest.TestCase):
+    def _write(self, tmp, text):
+        p = pathlib.Path(tmp) / "r.md"
+        p.write_text(text)
+        return A.registry_urls("r", tmp)
+
+    def test_strips_trailing_markdown_punctuation(self):
+        # Production defect: a captured backtick 404'd the fetch and rendered n8n/immich as '?'.
+        import tempfile
+        with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory() as tmp:
+            urls, _ = self._write(tmp, "see `https://docs.n8n.io/release-notes/` and "
+                                       "**https://example.com/sec.html**, plus https://a.test/x.")
+            self.assertIn("https://docs.n8n.io/release-notes/", urls)
+            self.assertIn("https://example.com/sec.html", urls)
+            self.assertIn("https://a.test/x", urls)
+            self.assertFalse([u for u in urls if u.endswith(("`", "*", ".", ","))])
+
+    def test_dedupes_and_reports_missing_registry(self):
+        import tempfile
+        with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory() as tmp:
+            urls, path = self._write(tmp, "https://a.test/x https://a.test/x")
+            self.assertEqual(urls.count("https://a.test/x"), 1)
+            self.assertTrue(path.endswith("r.md"))
+        urls, path = A.registry_urls("does-not-exist", "/nonexistent-dir")
+        self.assertEqual((urls, path), ([], None))
+
+
+# ── C. --image argument parsing ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+class TestImageArgParsing(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_single_and_repeated(self):
+        imgs, _ = parse_image_args(["r", "--image", "redis=7.4:8.10"])
+        self.assertEqual(imgs, [("redis", "7.4", "8.10")])
+        imgs, _ = parse_image_args(["r", "--image", "redis=7.4:8.10", "--image", "postgres=17:18"])
+        self.assertEqual(imgs, [("redis", "7.4", "8.10"), ("postgres", "17", "18")])
+
+    def test_malformed_is_skipped_with_a_warning_not_a_crash(self):
+        # It is an ADDITIVE pre-step: one typo must not abort the upgrade's scan step.
+        for bad in ("redis=7.4", "redis", "=7.4:8.10", "redis=:8.10", "redis=7.4:"):
+            imgs, err = parse_image_args(["r", "--image", bad])
+            self.assertEqual(imgs, [], f"{bad!r} should be rejected")
+            self.assertIn("malformed", err)
+
+    def test_good_and_bad_mixed_keeps_the_good(self):
+        imgs, err = parse_image_args(["r", "--image", "redis=7.4:8.10", "--image", "nope"])
+        self.assertEqual(imgs, [("redis", "7.4", "8.10")])
+        self.assertIn("malformed", err)
+
+
+# ── D. classification ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+class TestClassificationBoundaries(unittest.TestCase):
+    def _one(self, patched, v_from="1.27.0", v_to="1.27.1"):
+        rep = run_scan([gh("app/app", [adv("CVE-2026-0001", patched=patched)])],
+                       v_from=v_from, v_to=v_to)
+        return rep
+
+    def test_patched_at_upper_bound_counts(self):
+        self.assertEqual(self._one("1.27.1")["fixed_by_this_upgrade"], ["CVE-2026-0001"])
+
+    def test_patched_at_lower_bound_does_not_count(self):
+        # Already fixed in the version we were ON — this upgrade did not fix it.
+        rep = self._one("1.27.0")
+        self.assertEqual(rep["fixed_by_this_upgrade"], [])
+        self.assertEqual(rep["cve_count_fixed"], 0)
+
+    def test_patched_below_and_above_window_do_not_count(self):
+        self.assertEqual(self._one("1.26.0")["fixed_by_this_upgrade"], [])
+        self.assertEqual(self._one("1.28.0")["fixed_by_this_upgrade"], [])
+
+    def test_any_of_several_patched_lines_counts(self):
+        # n8n regression: one advisory patches several release lines; reading only the first
+        # dropped the line the deployment was on (CVE-2026-42231/42232 misclassified).
+        rep = self._one("1.123.32; 2.17.4; 2.18.1", v_from="2.17.0", v_to="2.17.4")
+        self.assertEqual(rep["fixed_by_this_upgrade"], ["CVE-2026-0001"])
+
+    def test_no_patched_data_is_not_counted(self):
+        self.assertEqual(self._one(None)["fixed_by_this_upgrade"], [])
+
+
+class TestPerImageWindows(unittest.TestCase):
+    """The false-133 family of defects: an image must only ever be judged by its OWN versions."""
+
+    APP = gh("discourse/discourse", [adv("CVE-APP-0001", patched="3.5.4", published="2026-03-01T00:00:00Z")])
+    REDIS = gh("redis/redis", [
+        adv("CVE-2021-21309", patched="6.0.11", published="2021-02-01T00:00:00Z"),
+        adv("CVE-2025-49844", patched="7.4.6; 8.0.4; 8.2.2", published="2025-10-01T00:00:00Z",
+            severity="critical"),
+    ])
+    URLS = ["https://github.com/discourse/discourse", "https://github.com/redis/redis"]
+
+    def test_sidecar_cve_is_not_judged_by_the_app_window(self):
+        # redis 6.0.11 sits numerically inside discourse 3.5.3 -> 2026.7.1. It must NOT count.
+        rep = run_scan([self.APP, self.REDIS], v_from="3.5.3", v_to="2026.7.1",
+                       tag_dates={"3.5.3": "2025-12-30T00:00:00Z", "2026.7.1": "2026-07-31T00:00:00Z"},
+                       urls=self.URLS)
+        self.assertNotIn("CVE-2021-21309", rep["fixed_by_this_upgrade"])
+        self.assertIn("CVE-2021-21309", rep["unclassified"])
+
+    def test_unwindowed_image_is_unclassified_never_counted(self):
+        rep = run_scan([self.APP, self.REDIS], v_from="3.5.3", v_to="3.5.4", urls=self.URLS)
+        self.assertEqual(rep["fixed_by_this_upgrade"], ["CVE-APP-0001"])
+        for cve in ("CVE-2021-21309", "CVE-2025-49844"):
+            self.assertIn(cve, rep["unclassified"])
+
+    def test_sidecar_window_counts_only_what_that_bump_fixed(self):
+        rep = run_scan([self.APP, self.REDIS], v_from="3.5.3", v_to="3.5.4",
+                       images=[("redis", "7.4", "8.10")], urls=self.URLS)
+        self.assertIn("CVE-2025-49844", rep["fixed_by_this_upgrade"])   # patched 7.4.6, in window
+        self.assertNotIn("CVE-2021-21309", rep["fixed_by_this_upgrade"])  # patched 6.0.11, below it
+        self.assertEqual(rep["cve_count_fixed"], 2)                     # app 1 + redis 1
+
+    def test_count_is_the_union_across_images(self):
+        rep = run_scan([self.APP, self.REDIS], v_from="3.5.3", v_to="3.5.4",
+                       images=[("redis", "7.4", "8.10")], urls=self.URLS)
+        self.assertEqual(sorted(rep["fixed_by_this_upgrade"]), ["CVE-2025-49844", "CVE-APP-0001"])
+
+    def test_each_image_classified_independently(self):
+        # App crosses a scheme change (date method); redis does not (version method). Both resolve.
+        rep = run_scan([self.APP, self.REDIS], v_from="3.5.3", v_to="2026.7.1",
+                       images=[("redis", "7.4", "8.10")], urls=self.URLS,
+                       tag_dates={"3.5.3": "2025-12-30T00:00:00Z", "2026.7.1": "2026-07-31T00:00:00Z"})
+        methods = rep["classified_by"]
+        self.assertIn("publish date", methods["github-advisories:discourse/discourse"])
+        self.assertEqual(methods["github-advisories:redis/redis"], "patched version ranges")
+        self.assertTrue(rep["count_known"])
+
+    def test_image_name_matches_as_substring(self):
+        rep = run_scan([self.APP, gh("discourse/discourse-postgres", [adv("CVE-PG-1", patched="18.0")])],
+                       v_from="3.5.3", v_to="3.5.4", images=[("postgres", "17", "18")],
+                       urls=["https://github.com/discourse/discourse",
+                             "https://github.com/discourse/discourse-postgres"])
+        self.assertIn("github-advisories:discourse/discourse-postgres", rep["windows"])
+        self.assertIn("CVE-PG-1", rep["fixed_by_this_upgrade"])
+
+    def test_primary_cannot_be_stolen_by_a_loose_image_name(self):
+        rep = run_scan([self.APP, gh("discourse/discourse-postgres", [adv("CVE-PG-1", patched="18.0")])],
+                       v_from="3.5.3", v_to="3.5.4", images=[("discourse", "1", "2")],
+                       urls=["https://github.com/discourse/discourse",
+                             "https://github.com/discourse/discourse-postgres"])
+        self.assertEqual(rep["windows"]["github-advisories:discourse/discourse"],
+                         {"from": "3.5.3", "to": "3.5.4"})
+
+    def test_unmatched_image_name_is_silently_ignored(self):
+        # Documents CURRENT behaviour: a typo'd name costs coverage without warning.
+        rep = run_scan([self.APP], v_from="3.5.3", v_to="3.5.4",
+                       images=[("nosuchimage", "1", "2")], urls=self.URLS[:1])
+        self.assertEqual(list(rep["windows"]), ["github-advisories:discourse/discourse"])
+        self.assertTrue(rep["count_known"])
+
+
+class TestSchemeChangeDateFallback(unittest.TestCase):
+    DATES = {"3.5.3": "2025-12-30T00:00:00Z", "2026.7.1": "2026-07-31T00:00:00Z"}
+
+    def _rep(self, advisories, dates=None):
+        return run_scan([gh("discourse/discourse", advisories)], v_from="3.5.3", v_to="2026.7.1",
+                        tag_dates=self.DATES if dates is None else dates)
+
+    def test_counts_advisories_published_inside_the_date_window(self):
+        rep = self._rep([adv("CVE-IN-1", published="2026-03-01T00:00:00Z"),
+                         adv("CVE-OUT-1", published="2025-06-01T00:00:00Z"),
+                         adv("CVE-OUT-2", published="2026-09-01T00:00:00Z")])
+        self.assertEqual(rep["fixed_by_this_upgrade"], ["CVE-IN-1"])
+
+    def test_date_boundaries_match_the_version_rule(self):
+        # Exclusive lower, inclusive upper — same as 4a, so the two methods agree at the edges.
+        rep = self._rep([adv("CVE-LOWER", published=self.DATES["3.5.3"]),
+                         adv("CVE-UPPER", published=self.DATES["2026.7.1"])])
+        self.assertEqual(rep["fixed_by_this_upgrade"], ["CVE-UPPER"])
+
+    def test_advisory_without_a_publish_date_is_not_counted(self):
+        self.assertEqual(self._rep([adv("CVE-NODATE", published=None)])["fixed_by_this_upgrade"], [])
+
+    def test_scheme_change_is_detected_not_version_compared(self):
+        rep = self._rep([adv("CVE-IN-1", patched="2026.1.0", published="2026-03-01T00:00:00Z")])
+        self.assertIn("publish date", rep["classified_by"]["github-advisories:discourse/discourse"])
+        self.assertIn("github-advisories:discourse/discourse", rep["date_window"])
+
+    def test_small_major_bump_still_uses_version_ranges(self):
+        rep = run_scan([gh("app/app", [adv("CVE-X", patched="3.0.0")])], v_from="2.9.0", v_to="3.0.0")
+        self.assertEqual(rep["classified_by"]["github-advisories:app/app"], "patched version ranges")
+
+
+# ── E. count guarantees ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+class TestCountGuarantees(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_unresolvable_window_yields_unknown_never_zero(self):
+        # Scheme change AND tag dates unresolvable -> must refuse to emit a number.
+        rep = run_scan([gh("app/app", [adv("CVE-1", published="2026-01-01T00:00:00Z")])],
+                       v_from="3.5.3", v_to="2026.7.1", tag_dates={})
+        self.assertIs(rep["cve_count_fixed"], None)
+        self.assertFalse(rep["count_known"])
+        md = A.markdown(rep)
+        self.assertIn("UNKNOWN", md)
+        self.assertIn("NOT zero", md)
+
+    def test_one_unresolvable_image_makes_the_whole_count_unknown(self):
+        # A partial number would understate a security figure, so it is suppressed entirely.
+        rep = run_scan([gh("app/app", [adv("CVE-APP", patched="1.1")]),
+                        gh("redis/redis", [adv("CVE-REDIS", patched="8.0")])],
+                       v_from="1.0", v_to="1.1", images=[("redis", "7.4", "9999.1")],
+                       tag_dates={}, urls=["https://github.com/app/app", "https://github.com/redis/redis"])
+        self.assertIs(rep["cve_count_fixed"], None)
+        self.assertFalse(rep["count_known"])
+
+    def test_genuine_zero_is_reported_as_zero(self):
+        rep = run_scan([gh("app/app", [adv("CVE-1", patched="9.9.9")])], v_from="1.0", v_to="1.1")
+        self.assertEqual(rep["cve_count_fixed"], 0)
+        self.assertTrue(rep["count_known"])
+        self.assertIn("0 identified", A.markdown(rep))
+
+    def test_404_advisory_feed_is_benign_not_a_failure(self):
+        rep = run_scan([gh("app/app", [adv("CVE-1", patched="1.1")]),
+                        gh("side/car", [], status="no-advisories-published")],
+                       v_from="1.0", v_to="1.1")
+        self.assertEqual(rep["sources_failed"], [])
+        self.assertIn("github-advisories:side/car", rep["sources_benign"])
+        self.assertEqual(rep["cve_count_fixed"], 1)
+
+    def test_template_url_is_benign_not_a_failure(self):
+        rep = run_scan([gh("app/app", [adv("CVE-1", patched="1.1")])],
+                       [vendor("https://x.test/changelog/v<VERSION>/", status="skipped: template URL")],
+                       v_from="1.0", v_to="1.1")
+        self.assertEqual(rep["sources_failed"], [])
+
+    def test_real_source_failure_is_surfaced(self):
+        rep = run_scan([gh("app/app", [adv("CVE-1", patched="1.1")], status="error: HTTP 500")],
+                       v_from="1.0", v_to="1.1")
+        self.assertIn("github-advisories:app/app", rep["sources_failed"])
+        self.assertIn("FAILED", A.markdown(rep))
+
+    def test_no_window_given_classifies_nothing(self):
+        rep = run_scan([gh("app/app", [adv("CVE-1", patched="1.1")])])
+        self.assertEqual(rep["fixed_by_this_upgrade"], [])
+        self.assertIn("CVE-1", rep["unclassified"])
+
+
+class TestVendorOnlyCves(unittest.TestCase):
+    """The gitea case: CVEs named ONLY on a vendor page, absent from the GitHub advisory feed."""
+
+    def test_vendor_only_cve_is_recorded_and_surfaced(self):
+        rep = run_scan([gh("go-gitea/gitea", [])],
+                       [vendor("https://blog.gitea.com/release-1.27.1/", ["CVE-2026-60004"])],
+                       v_from="1.27.0", v_to="1.27.1")
+        self.assertIn("CVE-2026-60004", rep["cves"])
+        self.assertIn("CVE-2026-60004", rep["unclassified"])
+
+    def test_vendor_only_cve_is_NOT_counted_but_IS_sent_for_judgement(self):
+        # It carries no version data, so no arithmetic can place it — the deterministic count must
+        # not include it. It must not be silently dropped either: pass 2 gets it with its evidence.
+        rep = run_scan([gh("go-gitea/gitea", [])],
+                       [vendor("https://blog.gitea.com/release-1.27.1/", ["CVE-2026-60004"])],
+                       v_from="1.27.0", v_to="1.27.1")
+        self.assertEqual(rep["fixed_by_this_upgrade"], [])
+        self.assertEqual(rep["cve_count_fixed"], 0)
+        self.assertIn("CVE-2026-60004", A.needs_judgement(rep))
+
+    def test_cve_in_both_vendor_and_advisory_feed_is_counted_once(self):
+        rep = run_scan([gh("go-gitea/gitea", [adv("CVE-2026-60004", patched="1.27.1")])],
+                       [vendor("https://blog.gitea.com/x/", ["CVE-2026-60004"])],
+                       v_from="1.27.0", v_to="1.27.1")
+        self.assertEqual(rep["fixed_by_this_upgrade"], ["CVE-2026-60004"])
+        self.assertEqual(rep["cve_count_fixed"], 1)
+        self.assertEqual(len(rep["cves"]["CVE-2026-60004"]["sources"]), 2)
+
+
+class TestIndeterminateBucket(unittest.TestCase):
+    """An advisory with no knowable fix version is neither counted nor dismissed."""
+
+    def test_tbd_patched_is_indeterminate_not_excluded(self):
+        rep = run_scan([gh("redis/redis", [adv("CVE-TBD", patched="TBD")])],
+                       v_from="7.4", v_to="8.10", urls=["https://github.com/redis/redis"])
+        self.assertEqual(rep["fixed_by_this_upgrade"], [])
+        self.assertIn("CVE-TBD", rep["indeterminate"])
+        self.assertEqual(rep["cve_count_indeterminate"], 1)
+
+    def test_placeholder_patched_is_indeterminate(self):
+        # "7.4.X" could be 7.4.1 — inside the window. Extracting a bare 7.4 and excluding it was
+        # how CVE-2024-46981 (high) went missing.
+        rep = run_scan([gh("redis/redis", [adv("CVE-X", patched="6.2.X, 7.2.X, 7.4.X")])],
+                       v_from="7.4", v_to="8.10", urls=["https://github.com/redis/redis"])
+        self.assertIn("CVE-X", rep["indeterminate"])
+
+    def test_real_versions_outside_the_window_are_decided_not_indeterminate(self):
+        rep = run_scan([gh("redis/redis", [adv("CVE-OLD", patched="6.0.11")])],
+                       v_from="7.4", v_to="8.10", urls=["https://github.com/redis/redis"])
+        self.assertEqual(rep["indeterminate"], [])
+        self.assertEqual(rep["cve_count_fixed"], 0)
+
+    def test_indeterminate_is_surfaced_in_the_markdown_and_not_read_as_zero(self):
+        rep = run_scan([gh("redis/redis", [adv("CVE-TBD", patched="TBD", severity="critical")])],
+                       v_from="7.4", v_to="8.10", urls=["https://github.com/redis/redis"])
+        md = A.markdown(rep)
+        self.assertIn("could NOT be judged", md)
+        self.assertIn("must NOT be read as unaffected", md)
+
+
+class TestReleaseNoteResolution(unittest.TestCase):
+    """Third method: a release whose notes NAME the CVE supplies the fix version the advisory lacks."""
+
+    def test_release_naming_the_cve_inside_the_window_counts_it(self):
+        rep = run_scan([gh("redis/redis", [adv("CVE-TBD", patched="TBD")])],
+                       v_from="7.4", v_to="8.10", urls=["https://github.com/redis/redis"],
+                       releases={"CVE-TBD": ["6.2.19", "7.2.10", "7.4.5", "8.0.3"]})
+        self.assertIn("CVE-TBD", rep["fixed_by_this_upgrade"])
+        self.assertEqual(rep["indeterminate"], [])
+        self.assertEqual(rep["resolved_by_release_notes"]["CVE-TBD"], ["7.4.5", "8.0.3"])
+
+    def test_naming_releases_all_below_the_window_means_ALREADY_fixed(self):
+        # Every known fix predates the version we were already on, so this upgrade did not deliver
+        # it. That is a DECISION, not an unknown — mailu's redis 8.8.0 → 8.10.0 crosses 12 such
+        # advisories, and calling them "could not judge" overstates the uncertainty.
+        rep = run_scan([gh("redis/redis", [adv("CVE-TBD", patched="TBD")])],
+                       v_from="7.4", v_to="8.10", urls=["https://github.com/redis/redis"],
+                       releases={"CVE-TBD": ["6.2.19"]})
+        self.assertEqual(rep["fixed_by_this_upgrade"], [])
+        self.assertEqual(rep["indeterminate"], [])
+        self.assertIn("CVE-TBD", rep["already_fixed_before_upgrade"])
+        self.assertIn("outside-window", rep["cves"]["CVE-TBD"]["classification"])
+
+    def test_naming_releases_only_ABOVE_the_window_stays_indeterminate(self):
+        # The fix landed after our target, so we are still exposed. Deliberately NOT decided as a
+        # tidy "not fixed": it is an open vulnerability and must stay visible to the operator.
+        rep = run_scan([gh("redis/redis", [adv("CVE-TBD", patched="TBD")])],
+                       v_from="7.4", v_to="8.10", urls=["https://github.com/redis/redis"],
+                       releases={"CVE-TBD": ["9.0.0"]})
+        self.assertEqual(rep["fixed_by_this_upgrade"], [])
+        self.assertIn("CVE-TBD", rep["indeterminate"])
+
+    def test_vendor_page_cve_on_the_same_repo_uses_release_notes(self):
+        # mailu announces its Roundcube CVEs only on github.com/Mailu/Mailu/releases. Requiring an
+        # advisory feed sent a deterministic case to pass 2; it is now decided in pass 1.
+        rep = run_scan([gh("Mailu/Mailu", [])],
+                       [vendor("https://github.com/Mailu/Mailu/releases", ["CVE-2026-54432"])],
+                       v_from="2024.06.55", v_to="2024.06.57",
+                       urls=["https://github.com/Mailu/Mailu"],
+                       releases={"CVE-2026-54432": ["2024.06.56"]})
+        self.assertIn("CVE-2026-54432", rep["fixed_by_this_upgrade"])
+        self.assertEqual(rep["cve_count_fixed"], 1)
+
+    def test_release_evidence_is_recorded_for_audit(self):
+        rep = run_scan([gh("redis/redis", [adv("CVE-TBD", patched="TBD")])],
+                       v_from="7.4", v_to="8.10", urls=["https://github.com/redis/redis"],
+                       releases={"CVE-TBD": ["7.4.5"]})
+        e = rep["cves"]["CVE-TBD"]
+        self.assertEqual(e["fix_versions_from_release_notes"], ["7.4.5"])
+        self.assertIn("named in release notes", e["classification"])
+
+    def test_it_does_not_override_a_version_range_decision(self):
+        # A CVE already counted by patched ranges is untouched; the method only rescues undecided.
+        rep = run_scan([gh("redis/redis", [adv("CVE-OK", patched="7.4.1")])],
+                       v_from="7.4", v_to="8.10", urls=["https://github.com/redis/redis"],
+                       releases={"CVE-OK": ["7.4.1"]})
+        self.assertNotIn("CVE-OK", rep.get("resolved_by_release_notes") or {})
+
+
+class TestReleaseLineSemantics(unittest.TestCase):
+    """A fix inside the numeric window is not a fix on the branch you actually land on."""
+
+    def test_fix_later_on_the_targets_own_line_is_not_counted(self):
+        # ClickHouse fixed CVE-2023-48704 in 23.9.6.20 AND 23.10.5.20. Landing on 23.10.4.25 crosses
+        # the 23.9 fix numerically but is BELOW its own line's fix, so it does not have it.
+        rep = run_scan([gh("ClickHouse/ClickHouse",
+                           [adv("CVE-2023-48704", patched="v23.10.5.20; v23.9.6.20; v23.8.8.20")])],
+                       v_from="23.4.2.11", v_to="23.10.4.25",
+                       urls=["https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickHouse"])
+        self.assertEqual(rep["fixed_by_this_upgrade"], [])
+
+    def test_fix_earlier_on_the_targets_own_line_is_counted(self):
+        rep = run_scan([gh("ClickHouse/ClickHouse",
+                           [adv("CVE-2023-47118", patched="v23.10.2.13; v23.8.6.16")])],
+                       v_from="23.4.2.11", v_to="23.10.4.25",
+                       urls=["https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickHouse"])
+        self.assertEqual(rep["fixed_by_this_upgrade"], ["CVE-2023-47118"])
+
+    def test_fix_exactly_at_the_target_is_counted(self):
+        rep = run_scan([gh("ClickHouse/ClickHouse",
+                           [adv("CVE-2023-48298", patched="v23.10.4.25; v23.9.5.29")])],
+                       v_from="23.4.2.11", v_to="23.10.4.25",
+                       urls=["https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickHouse"])
+        self.assertEqual(rep["fixed_by_this_upgrade"], ["CVE-2023-48298"])
+
+    def test_no_fix_on_the_target_line_falls_back_to_the_window(self):
+        # redis fixes 7.4.6/8.0.4/8.2.2 with no 8.10.x entry; landing on 8.10 still has them,
+        # because nothing on the 8.10 line is named as a LATER fix.
+        rep = run_scan([gh("redis/redis", [adv("CVE-2025-49844", patched="7.4.6; 8.0.4; 8.2.2")])],
+                       v_from="7.4", v_to="8.10", urls=["https://github.com/redis/redis"])
+        self.assertEqual(rep["fixed_by_this_upgrade"], ["CVE-2025-49844"])
+
+
+class TestAlreadyFixedOnFromLine(unittest.TestCase):
+    """A fix that landed on the line we upgrade FROM was already ours before the upgrade."""
+
+    def test_backport_to_our_own_line_is_not_credited(self):
+        # mattermost patches every maintained line at once. 10.11.22 -> 10.12.4 crosses 10.12.1, but
+        # 10.11.22 is already past 10.11.4, so the deployment HAD the fix. Counting it credits the
+        # upgrade with work it did not do.
+        rep = run_scan([gh("mattermost/mattermost",
+                           [adv("CVE-1", patched="10.11.4; 10.12.1; 10.5.12")])],
+                       v_from="10.11.22", v_to="10.12.4",
+                       urls=["https://github.com/mattermost/mattermost"])
+        self.assertEqual(rep["fixed_by_this_upgrade"], [])
+
+    def test_a_fix_ABOVE_our_position_on_the_same_line_still_counts(self):
+        rep = run_scan([gh("mattermost/mattermost", [adv("CVE-2", patched="10.11.30; 10.12.1")])],
+                       v_from="10.11.22", v_to="10.12.4",
+                       urls=["https://github.com/mattermost/mattermost"])
+        self.assertEqual(rep["fixed_by_this_upgrade"], ["CVE-2"])
+
+    def test_placeholders_never_feed_this_rule(self):
+        # "7.4.X" parses to a bare 7.4, which would read as "already fixed at 7.4" and silently drop
+        # a real fix — this is exactly how redis CVE-2024-46981 was lost when the rule was added.
+        rep = run_scan([gh("redis/redis", [adv("CVE-3", patched="6.2.X, 7.2.X, 7.4.X")])],
+                       v_from="7.4", v_to="8.10", urls=["https://github.com/redis/redis"])
+        self.assertIn("CVE-3", rep["indeterminate"])
+        self.assertEqual(rep["fixed_by_this_upgrade"], [])
+
+
+class TestChangelogAttribution(unittest.TestCase):
+    """Projects that publish no advisory feed still say which release fixed what — in their changelog."""
+
+    CHANGES = """
+Changes with nginx 1.31.3        11 Aug 2026
+    *) Security: a flaw ... (CVE-2026-60005)
+    *) Security: another ... (CVE-2026-56434)
+
+Changes with nginx 1.31.2        04 Aug 2026
+    *) Security: something ... (CVE-2026-48142)
+
+Changes with nginx 1.31.1        21 Jul 2026
+    *) Security: older ... (CVE-2026-9256)
+
+Changes with nginx 1.20.0        01 Jan 2021
+    *) Security: ancient ... (CVE-2013-2028)
+"""
+
+    def test_each_cve_is_attributed_to_the_release_that_fixed_it(self):
+        got = A._changelog_versions(self.CHANGES)
+        self.assertEqual(got["CVE-2026-60005"], "1.31.3")
+        self.assertEqual(got["CVE-2026-48142"], "1.31.2")
+        self.assertEqual(got["CVE-2026-9256"], "1.31.1")
+        self.assertEqual(got["CVE-2013-2028"], "1.20.0")
+
+    def _scan(self, wfrom, wto):
+        # nginx publishes NO GitHub advisories — the feed is empty and the changelog is everything.
+        return run_scan(
+            [gh("nginx/nginx", [])],
+            [{"source": "https://nginx.org/en/CHANGES", "status": "ok",
+              "cves": sorted(A._changelog_versions(self.CHANGES)),
+              "context": {}, "fixed_in": A._changelog_versions(self.CHANGES)}],
+            images=[("nginx", wfrom, wto)], urls=["https://github.com/nginx/nginx"])
+
+    def test_window_counts_only_the_releases_it_crosses(self):
+        rep = self._scan("1.31.1", "1.31.3")   # 1.31.1 is the FROM, so its CVE is already fixed
+        self.assertEqual(set(rep["fixed_by_this_upgrade"]),
+                         {"CVE-2026-48142", "CVE-2026-56434", "CVE-2026-60005"})
+
+    def test_a_narrower_window_counts_fewer(self):
+        rep = self._scan("1.31.2", "1.31.3")
+        self.assertEqual(set(rep["fixed_by_this_upgrade"]), {"CVE-2026-56434", "CVE-2026-60005"})
+
+    def test_ancient_entries_are_not_swept_in(self):
+        # The changelog lists the project's whole history; only the crossed releases may count.
+        rep = self._scan("1.31.1", "1.31.3")
+        self.assertNotIn("CVE-2013-2028", rep["fixed_by_this_upgrade"])
+
+    def test_evidence_is_recorded(self):
+        rep = self._scan("1.31.1", "1.31.3")
+        self.assertEqual(rep["resolved_by_changelog"]["CVE-2026-60005"], "1.31.3")
+
+
+class TestComposeDerivedWindows(unittest.TestCase):
+    """Windows read off a compose diff, so nobody has to remember which --image args an upgrade needs."""
+
+    OLD = """
+services:
+  app:
+    image: "plausible/analytics:v2.0.0"
+  db:
+    image: pgautoupgrade/pgautoupgrade:18-alpine
+  plausible_events_db:
+    image: clickhouse/clickhouse-server:23.4.2.11-alpine
+volumes:
+  data:
+"""
+    NEW = """
+services:
+  app:
+    image: "ghcr.io/plausible/community-edition:v3.2.1"
+  db:
+    image: pgautoupgrade/pgautoupgrade:18-alpine
+  plausible_events_db:
+    image: clickhouse/clickhouse-server:24.12-alpine
+volumes:
+  data:
+"""
+
+    def _windows(self, old=None, new=None):
+        pages = {"to": new if new is not None else self.NEW,
+                 "from": old if old is not None else self.OLD}
+        with unittest.mock.patch.object(A, "_fetch", lambda u, h=None: pages["to" if "to" in u else "from"]), \
+             unittest.mock.patch.object(A, "_gitea_auth", lambda u: {}):
+            return A.windows_from_compose("http://x/to", "http://x/from")[0]
+
+    def test_app_service_leads_and_sidecars_follow(self):
+        w = self._windows()
+        self.assertEqual(w[0], ("community-edition", "v2.0.0", "v3.2.1"))
+        self.assertIn(("clickhouse-server", "23.4.2.11-alpine", "24.12-alpine"), w)
+
+    def test_unchanged_images_are_not_windows(self):
+        # pgautoupgrade is identical in both; inventing a window for it would be a false count.
+        self.assertNotIn("pgautoupgrade", [n for n, _, _ in self._windows()])
+
+    def test_a_changed_image_REPO_is_still_the_same_service(self):
+        # plausible/analytics -> ghcr.io/plausible/community-edition. Keyed by image repo this reads
+        # as one image vanishing and another appearing, and the app window is lost entirely.
+        w = self._windows()
+        self.assertTrue(any(n == "community-edition" and f == "v2.0.0" for n, f, _ in w))
+
+    def test_no_change_yields_no_windows(self):
+        self.assertEqual(self._windows(old=self.NEW, new=self.NEW), [])
+
+    def test_templated_tags_are_skipped(self):
+        new = self.NEW.replace('ghcr.io/plausible/community-edition:v3.2.1', 'ghost:${IMAGE_VERSION}')
+        self.assertNotIn("ghost", [n for n, _, _ in self._windows(new=new)])
+
+
+class TestImageNameMatching(unittest.TestCase):
+    """An image name and its advisory source rarely spell each other exactly."""
+
+    def test_matches_when_the_image_name_is_LONGER_than_the_source(self):
+        # clickhouse/clickhouse-server vs source ClickHouse/ClickHouse — one-directional matching
+        # dropped this window silently when the key came from a compose file.
+        rep = run_scan([gh("ClickHouse/ClickHouse", [adv("CVE-1", patched="23.10.2.13")])],
+                       images=[("clickhouse-server", "23.4.2.11", "24.12")],
+                       urls=["https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickHouse"])
+        self.assertIn("github-advisories:ClickHouse/ClickHouse", rep["windows"])
+        self.assertEqual(rep["cve_count_fixed"], 1)
+
+    def test_matches_when_the_image_name_is_SHORTER_than_the_source(self):
+        rep = run_scan([gh("redis/redis", [adv("CVE-2", patched="7.4.1")])],
+                       images=[("redis", "7.4", "8.10")], urls=["https://github.com/redis/redis"])
+        self.assertEqual(rep["cve_count_fixed"], 1)
+
+
+class TestAdjudicationEvidenceAssembly(unittest.TestCase):
+    """Pass 2's JUDGEMENT is a model's and not testable; what IS testable is what it gets shown."""
+
+    def test_selects_indeterminate_and_vendor_only_cases(self):
+        rep = run_scan([gh("redis/redis", [adv("CVE-TBD", patched="TBD")])],
+                       [vendor("https://blog.test/sec", ["CVE-VENDOR"])],
+                       v_from="7.4", v_to="8.10", urls=["https://github.com/redis/redis"])
+        todo = A.needs_judgement(rep)
+        self.assertIn("CVE-TBD", todo)
+        self.assertIn("CVE-VENDOR", todo)
+
+    def test_does_not_re_ask_about_cases_pass_1_settled(self):
+        rep = run_scan([gh("redis/redis", [adv("CVE-OK", patched="7.4.1")])],
+                       v_from="7.4", v_to="8.10", urls=["https://github.com/redis/redis"])
+        self.assertNotIn("CVE-OK", A.needs_judgement(rep))
+
+    def test_evidence_bundle_carries_the_window_and_published_fields(self):
+        rep = run_scan([gh("redis/redis", [adv("CVE-TBD", patched="TBD")])],
+                       v_from="7.4", v_to="8.10", urls=["https://github.com/redis/redis"])
+        with unittest.mock.patch.object(A, "advisory_text", lambda g, s=None: {"status": "skipped"}), \
+             unittest.mock.patch.object(A, "release_fix_versions", lambda s, c: []):
+            ev = A.evidence_bundle(rep, "CVE-TBD")
+        self.assertEqual(ev["window"], {"from": "7.4", "to": "8.10"})
+        self.assertEqual(ev["patched_as_published"], "TBD")
+        self.assertIn("no fix version", ev["why_undecided"])
+
+    def test_pass_1_decisions_are_included_for_review(self):
+        rep = run_scan([gh("redis/redis", [adv("CVE-OK", patched="7.4.1"),
+                                           adv("CVE-OLD", patched="6.0.11"),
+                                           adv("CVE-TBD", patched="TBD")])],
+                       v_from="7.4", v_to="8.10", urls=["https://github.com/redis/redis"])
+        with unittest.mock.patch.object(A, "advisory_text", lambda g, s=None: {"status": "skipped"}), \
+             unittest.mock.patch.object(A, "release_fix_versions", lambda s, c: []):
+            block = A.adjudication_block(rep)
+        self.assertIn("Pass 1 decisions", block)
+        self.assertIn("CVE-OK", block)      # counted
+        self.assertIn("CVE-OLD", block)     # excluded as outside-window
+        self.assertIn("CVE-TBD", block)     # needs judgement
+
+    def test_truncation_is_announced_never_silent(self):
+        advs = [adv(f"CVE-2026-{1000+i}", patched="TBD") for i in range(30)]
+        rep = run_scan([gh("redis/redis", advs)], v_from="7.4", v_to="8.10",
+                       urls=["https://github.com/redis/redis"])
+        with unittest.mock.patch.object(A, "advisory_text", lambda g, s=None: {"status": "skipped"}), \
+             unittest.mock.patch.object(A, "release_fix_versions", lambda s, c: []), \
+             unittest.mock.patch.object(A, "MAX_ADJUDICATE", 5):
+            block = A.adjudication_block(rep)
+        self.assertIn("not shown", block)
+        self.assertIn("do not", block.lower())
+
+
+class TestMarkdownOutput(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_lists_every_window_with_its_method(self):
+        rep = run_scan([gh("discourse/discourse", [adv("CVE-A", patched="3.5.4")]),
+                        gh("redis/redis", [adv("CVE-B", patched="8.0")])],
+                       v_from="3.5.3", v_to="3.5.4", images=[("redis", "7.4", "8.10")],
+                       urls=["https://github.com/discourse/discourse", "https://github.com/redis/redis"])
+        md = A.markdown(rep)
+        self.assertIn("discourse/discourse: 3.5.3 → 3.5.4", md)
+        self.assertIn("redis/redis: 7.4 → 8.10", md)
+        self.assertIn("**CVEs fixed by this upgrade: 2**", md)
+
+    def test_severity_and_fixed_in_are_rendered(self):
+        rep = run_scan([gh("redis/redis", [adv("CVE-2025-49844", patched="7.4.6; 8.2.2",
+                                               severity="critical")])],
+                       v_from="7.4", v_to="8.10", urls=["https://github.com/redis/redis"])
+        md = A.markdown(rep)
+        self.assertIn("critical", md)
+        self.assertIn("7.4.6", md)
+
+
+# ── F. live regressions against published historic reports ────────────────────────────────────────
+
+class TestHistoricReportNumbers(unittest.TestCase):
+    """Re-derive counts published in week-2026-08-07. Network + GitHub token; opt in with --live."""
+
+    REGISTRY = str(HERE / "upstream")
+
+    @classmethod
+    def setUpClass(cls):
+        if not os.environ.get("ADVISORY_SCAN_LIVE"):
+            raise unittest.SkipTest("live tests: re-run with --live")
+
+    def _count(self, recipe, v_from, v_to, images=None):
+        rep = A.scan(recipe, v_from, v_to, self.REGISTRY, images)
+        self.assertEqual(rep["sources_failed"], [], f"{recipe}: source failures make the count unsafe")
+        self.assertTrue(rep["count_known"], f"{recipe}: count came back UNKNOWN")
+        return rep
+
+    def test_gitea_1_27_0_to_1_27_1_is_2(self):
+        rep = self._count("gitea", "1.27.0", "1.27.1")
+        self.assertEqual(rep["cve_count_fixed"], 2)
+        # Both CVSS-9.8 RCEs — the pair whose omission is why this tool exists.
+        self.assertEqual(set(rep["fixed_by_this_upgrade"]), {"CVE-2026-59774", "CVE-2026-60004"})
+
+    def test_discourse_app_only_is_123(self):
+        rep = self._count("discourse", "3.5.3", "2026.7.1")
+        self.assertEqual(rep["cve_count_fixed"], 123)
+        self.assertIn("publish date", rep["classified_by"]["github-advisories:discourse/discourse"])
+
+    def test_discourse_with_redis_sidecar_is_140(self):
+        # 123 app + 17 redis. Five redis advisories carry a usable patched_versions; the other
+        # twelve say "TBD" and are resolved from the release notes that name them.
+        rep = self._count("discourse", "3.5.3", "2026.7.1", [("redis", "7.4", "8.10")])
+        self.assertEqual(rep["cve_count_fixed"], 140)
+        self.assertEqual(len(rep.get("resolved_by_release_notes") or {}), 12)
+        self.assertEqual(rep["cve_count_indeterminate"], 0)
+        # The five redis advisories that a sidecar-blind scan missed, incl. one critical.
+        for cve in ("CVE-2024-31227", "CVE-2024-31228", "CVE-2024-31449",
+                    "CVE-2025-49844", "CVE-2025-62507"):
+            self.assertIn(cve, rep["fixed_by_this_upgrade"], f"{cve} missing from discourse+redis")
+        self.assertEqual(rep["cves"]["CVE-2025-49844"]["severity"], "critical")
+
+    def test_discourse_redis_delta_is_exactly_seventeen(self):
+        app = self._count("discourse", "3.5.3", "2026.7.1")
+        both = self._count("discourse", "3.5.3", "2026.7.1", [("redis", "7.4", "8.10")])
+        delta = set(both["fixed_by_this_upgrade"]) - set(app["fixed_by_this_upgrade"])
+        self.assertEqual(len(delta), 17)
+        for cve in delta:
+            self.assertIn("redis", both["cves"][cve]["sources"][0])
+
+    def test_mailu_finds_the_roundcube_pair_without_an_agent(self):
+        # Published as 2 on 2026-08-07, but only because an agent read the release notes; the scan
+        # itself contributed 0. It now reaches 2 deterministically: the CVEs appear only on
+        # github.com/Mailu/Mailu/releases, and release 2024.06.56 (inside the window) names them.
+        rep = self._count("mailu", "2024.06.55", "2024.06.57", [("redis", "8.8.0", "8.10.0")])
+        self.assertEqual(rep["cve_count_fixed"], 2)
+        self.assertEqual(set(rep["fixed_by_this_upgrade"]), {"CVE-2026-54432", "CVE-2026-54433"})
+        # The redis bump fixes nothing new — every advisory it crosses was fixed at or before 8.6.3.
+        self.assertEqual(rep["cve_count_indeterminate"], 0)
+
+    def test_keycloak_26_7_0_to_26_7_1_is_12(self):
+        # Was 7 while only the GHSA feed was consulted. keycloak lists five more CVEs in the 26.7.1
+        # release notes' fixed-issues section that it never filed as advisories — the gitea pattern.
+        rep = self._count("keycloak", "26.7.0", "26.7.1")
+        self.assertEqual(rep["cve_count_fixed"], 12)
+        self.assertEqual(len(rep.get("resolved_by_release_notes") or {}), 5)
+
+
+def _main():
+    live = "--live" in sys.argv
+    if live:
+        sys.argv.remove("--live")
+        os.environ["ADVISORY_SCAN_LIVE"] = "1"
+    unittest.main(verbosity=2)
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    _main()

cc-ci-plan/upstream/discourse.md

@@ -18,9 +18,33 @@
   support; monthly `release` channel gets ~2 months; `latest` is continuous. The `esr` Docker tag
   tracks the current ESR. Target the ESR line for stable deployments.
 - discourse/postgres tags are `pg<MAJOR>` (pg13..pg18), non-semver — abra can't parse them. Check Docker
-  Hub directly: https://hub.docker.com/r/discourse/postgres/tags . pg18 is the newest (2026-07-01); no
-  pg19 yet. The image auto-upgrades an older cluster in place on boot (pg_upgrade into versioned PGDATA);
+  Hub directly: https://hub.docker.com/r/discourse/postgres/tags . pg18 is the newest (no pg19 yet;
+  re-confirmed 2026-08-07: all of pg13..pg18 + latest re-pushed 2026-08-04, still no pg19). The image
+  auto-upgrades an older cluster in place on boot (pg_upgrade into versioned PGDATA);
   no manual dump/restore needed (the old "Welcome to hell" procedure is superseded for this image).
 - Redis 8.0 GA supports upgrade from 7.x data files. Discourse uses Redis only as a cache/queue (Sidekiq)
   with no persistence modules. Redis 8.0 integrates RediSearch/RedisJSON/etc. as built-ins; discourse
-  does not use those modules so this is transparent.
+  does not use those modules so this is transparent. Redis 8.10-alpine is a safe sidecar bump from 8.8.
+- **2026.1 ESR → 2026.7 ESR jump (2026-07-28 release; 2026.7.1 = July 31 security intermediate):**
+  the big ~6-month ESR jump. Behavior changes that arrive on their own (all surfaced via the new
+  Upcoming Changes opt-out system, so NOT hard breaks for the recipe boot): Discourse Reactions
+  enabled by default (opt out via `discourse_reactions_enabled`); Uncategorized being removed (opt-out
+  for now); `rich_editor` site setting gone (rich editor unconditional, per-user `composition_mode`
+  remains); simpler email subject lines (beta). Web server: **Discourse replaced Unicorn with Pitchfork
+  (default in 2026.2, Unicorn removed entirely in 2026.4)** — internal, healthcheck `curl /srv/status`
+  still works. Theme/plugin deprecations: `.hbs` deprecated (2026.7 is last ESR with support, drop in
+  2026.8.0-latest → 2027.1 first ESR without it; codemod available); `.js.es6` deprecated (rename to
+  `.js`); legacy widget shims removed (`discourse.breadcrumbs.*`, `add-flag-property`,
+  `add-header-panel`, `bootbox`). New features: Upcoming Changes config page, Nested replies
+  (experimental), one-time email code login (alpha), new admin category management, bulk actions
+  (tag/pin/suspend), livestreams in Discourse Events. Postgres: discourse-health-check flags anything
+  below pg15; recipe is on pg18 so fine — do NOT bump the pg major in the weekly cron (operator
+  decision). For a fresh CI deploy (no custom themes/plugins/data) the jump converges cleanly; the
+  breaking-change surface is operator-facing for existing sites with custom themes. No Ruby version
+  concern (Ruby ships in the image). Release notes: https://releases.discourse.org/changelog/v2026.7.1/
+  and https://releases.discourse.org/changelog/v2026.7.0/ ; community jump guide:
+  https://meta.discourse.org/t/jumping-from-2026-1-esr-to-2026-7-what-i-found/408779 .
+- **Recommended release bump for the ESR jump:** `-x` major (it's a 6-month ESR jump with web-server
+  swap, default-on behavior changes, and theme deprecations — signal operators to review). The recipe
+  version label is NOT bumped in the upgrade PR; the operator runs `abra recipe release discourse -x`
+  after the upstream PR merges.

cc-ci-plan/upstream/gitea.md

@@ -3,6 +3,12 @@
 | service | image | source repo | releases / changelog |
 |---------|-------|-------------|----------------------|
 | app     | gitea/gitea | https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea | https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/releases |
+
+**Security announcements: https://blog.gitea.com/ — per-release posts (e.g.
+https://blog.gitea.com/release-of-1.27.1/) carry the CVE list; the GitHub release notes do NOT.**
+This is where CVE-2026-60004 + CVE-2026-59774 (both CVSS 9.8, fixed in 1.27.1) were announced,
+and why the 2026-08-03/07 reports under-counted gitea's CVEs. advisory-scan.py fetches every URL
+in this file, so keep vendor security pages listed here.
 | db      | postgres | https://github.com/postgres/postgres | https://www.postgresql.org/docs/release/ |
 
 ## Standing notes
@@ -15,3 +21,4 @@
 - **1.26.2**: Multiple CVE security fixes — strongly recommended upgrade.
 - **1.26.3**: carries a regression (#38177 "context deadline exceeded" opening repo code pages) — upstream says upgrade straight to 1.26.4, skip 1.26.3.
 - **1.27.0** (released 2026-07-13, MINOR with BREAKING changes): `Feat(actions)!: improve support for reusable workflows` (#37478) and `Use Content-Security-Policy: script nonce` (#37232, may break custom inline JS / reverse-proxy CSP). Many security + feature additions. A dedicated minor-bump run should evaluate CSP / reusable-workflow impact before adopting.
+- **1.27.1** (released 2026-07-27, PATCH): security fix (oauth2 mandatory 2FA enforcement on authorize/grant endpoints, #38606), API swagger alignment, diff-contrast enhancement, and many bugfixes (actions reusable-workflow/job-stranding, OIDC end-session, repo-deletion cleanup, webhook/mail). No breaking changes; safe patch bump from 1.27.0. Release notes: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/releases/tag/v1.27.1

cc-ci-plan/upstream/immich.md

@@ -34,12 +34,29 @@
   `valkey:9@sha256:8e8d64b405ce18f41b8e5ee20aa4687a8ed0022d1298f2ce31cdcf3a76e09411`
   (a NEWER valkey build than v3.0.3's `4963247afc4cd…` — this `8e8d64b4…` is the same digest the live `9`
   tag had already moved to at the 2026-07-17 run; immich v3.1.0 now officially ships it, so it IS the
-  immich-tested combo → re-pin the recipe's `redis` service to `8e8d64b4…` for the v3.1.0 upgrade) and
+  immich-tested   combo → re-pin the recipe's `redis` service to `8e8d64b4…` for the v3.1.0 upgrade) and
   `postgres:14-vectorchord0.4.3-pgvectors0.2.0@sha256:bcf63357191…` (SAME combo as v3.0.3 — immich did NOT
   bump vectorchord/pgvectors, so the recipe STAYS AHEAD on `pgvectors0.3.0@sha256:87c050465…`; do NOT
   downgrade). Only **breaking change in v3.1.0** is `chore(mobile): drop support for iOS 14` (mobile
   client, NOT server-side — no server migration, no DB migration, no operator action for the recipe).
   Done in the 2026-07-31 upgrade (v3.0.1→v3.1.0, extending PR #4 again).
+- **2026-08-07: upstream main MOVED to v3.1.0 (published `1.10.0+v3.1.0`, commit `794560f`).** The
+  coopcloud maintainer published v3.1.0 independently of PR #4 (PR #4 tip `77d7937` is NOT in upstream
+  main, so the reconcile leaves it open — functionally superseded on the version bump). Upstream main
+  pins: `immich-server/ML v3.1.0`, `postgres:14-vectorchord0.4.3-pgvectors0.2.0@sha256:bcf633…` (immich's
+  OFFICIAL v3.1.0 combo — a DOWNGRADE from the recipe's prior `pgvectors0.3.0@87c0…`), and
+  `valkey:9@sha256:3acc0687f2a2e1091fae6450d7842dd658c941338cf0a873ddd9e14b9e4ea4dd` (DIVERGES from
+  immich v3.1.0's official valkey pin `8e8d64b4…` — upstream pin hygiene discrepancy, not an upgrade).
+  Immich is now **up-to-date** (v3.1.0 is latest stable per GitHub releases; no v3.1.x patch / v3.2.x).
+  PR #4 now diverges from upstream main only on `database` (pgvectors0.3.0 vs 0.2.0) + `redis`
+  (valkey:9@8e8d64b4 vs @3acc0687) pins — operator decides merge-vs-close.
+- **2026-08-07 INFRA note: cc-ci runner's gitea clone-token is STALE (HTTP 401).** `!testme` build
+  #1210 died at the recipe `git clone` step (~5s, before any deploy) with `could not read Username for
+  'https://git.autonomic.zone'` — the runner's mounted gitea token `13e299f2…` is rejected (verified
+  HTTP 401 on the gitea API + git endpoint; `.testenv` basic creds work). PR #4's tree `77d79379` was
+  GREEN on #1145 (2026-07-31) & #1180 (2026-08-04) — the RED is infra, not the recipe. Fix: rotate the
+  runner's gitea clone-token (swarm secret), then re-`!testme`. (The 2026-08-04 Drone-direct
+  `GITEA_TOKEN`-as-build-param workaround is disallowed for normal runs.)
 - **Historical (v2.7.5, 2026-04-13):** immich-server v2.7.5 pinned
   `postgres:14-vectorchord0.4.3-pgvectors0.2.0@sha256:bcf63357191…`. PR #2 bumped the recipe to
   `pgvectors0.3.0@sha256:87c050465…` (same PG14 + VectorChord 0.4.3, newer pgvectors 0.2.0→0.3.0).

cc-ci-plan/upstream/lasuite-docs.md

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
 | celery | lasuite/impress-backend | https://github.com/suitenumerique/docs | https://github.com/suitenumerique/docs/releases |
 | y-provider | lasuite/impress-y-provider | https://github.com/suitenumerique/docs | https://github.com/suitenumerique/docs/releases |
 | docspec | ghcr.io/docspecio/api | https://github.com/docspecIO/api | https://github.com/docspecIO/api/releases |
-| db | pgautoupgrade/pgautoupgrade | https://github.com/pgautoupgrade/pgautoupgrade | https://github.com/pgautoupgrade/pgautoupgrade/releases |
+| db | pgautoupgrade/pgautoupgrade | https://github.com/pgautoupgrade/docker-pgautoupgrade | https://github.com/pgautoupgrade/docker-pgautoupgrade/releases |
 | redis | redis | https://github.com/redis/redis | https://hub.docker.com/_/redis/tags |
 | minio | minio/minio | https://github.com/minio/minio | https://github.com/minio/minio/releases |
 | web | nginx | https://github.com/nginx/nginx | https://nginx.org/en/CHANGES |
@@ -18,6 +18,21 @@
 - AUTO_MIGRATIONS=true means DB migrations run automatically on backend startup. No manual step needed.
 - Minio tag uses a date-based RELEASE.YYYY-MM-DDTHH-MM-SSZ format — abra cannot parse it for upgrades;
   check manually on https://github.com/minio/minio/releases.
+- **2026-08-14: Minio stopped publishing Docker images after RELEASE.2025-09-07T16-13-09Z.**
+  GitHub has a newer release (`RELEASE.2025-10-15T17-29-55Z`, published 2025-10-16, with CVE fix
+  GHSA-jjjj-jwhf-8rgr), but the Docker image was never pushed to Docker Hub (returns 404; release
+  notes say "clone the source and build the latest container"). quay.io checked — only 2022-era
+  tags. As of this date, `RELEASE.2025-09-07T16-13-09Z` IS the newest available Docker image.
 - v5.2.0 adds two optional new env vars: DOCUMENT_ALL_ENDPOINT_ENABLED and OIDC_OP_USER_ENDPOINT_FORMAT.
   Both are backward-compatible (no action required for existing deployments).
 - Recipe version label convention: 0.X.Y+vA.B.C where A.B.C is the impress version.
+- **v5.4.0 removed Bearer/JWT auth on the API** (upstream PR suitenumerique/docs#2480 dropped
+  `mozilla_django_oidc.contrib.drf.OIDCAuthentication` from DRF DEFAULT_AUTHENTICATION_CLASSES).
+  The API now accepts only the app's session cookie from the real OIDC authorization-code flow.
+  Any test/assertion that sends `Authorization: Bearer <jwt>` to `/api/v1.0/*` will get 401 — this is
+  the NEW CORRECT behavior, not a regression. The cc-ci lasuite-docs tests were updated for this in
+  cc-ci PR #12 (merged 2026-08-03): test_oidc_login.py + test_create_doc.py now use session cookies
+  and assert Bearer is rejected. Don't revert to Bearer assertions.
+- redis sidecar (cache/broker for celery+backend): prefer the patch line (8.8.1 over 8.10.0) unless a
+  feature is needed — 8.8.1 is a security patch (RedisBloom/TDigest RESTORE RCE); 8.10.0 is a minor
+  with many new features.

cc-ci-plan/upstream/lasuite-drive.md

@@ -6,12 +6,12 @@
 | backend | lasuite/drive-backend | https://github.com/suitenumerique/drive | https://github.com/suitenumerique/drive/releases |
 | celery | lasuite/drive-backend | https://github.com/suitenumerique/drive | https://github.com/suitenumerique/drive/releases |
 | celery-beat | lasuite/drive-backend | https://github.com/suitenumerique/drive | https://github.com/suitenumerique/drive/releases |
-| db | pgautoupgrade/pgautoupgrade | https://github.com/pgautoupgrade/pgautoupgrade | https://github.com/pgautoupgrade/pgautoupgrade/releases |
+| db | pgautoupgrade/pgautoupgrade | https://github.com/pgautoupgrade/docker-pgautoupgrade | https://github.com/pgautoupgrade/docker-pgautoupgrade/releases |
 | redis | redis | https://github.com/redis/redis | https://github.com/redis/redis/releases |
 | mailcatcher | sj26/mailcatcher | https://github.com/sj26/mailcatcher | https://github.com/sj26/mailcatcher/releases |
 | minio | minio/minio | https://github.com/minio/minio | https://github.com/minio/minio/releases |
 | minio-createbuckets | minio/minio | https://github.com/minio/minio | https://github.com/minio/minio/releases |
-| collabora | collabora/code | https://github.com/CollaboraOnline/online | https://www.collaboraoffice.com/category/release-notes/ |
+| collabora | collabora/code | https://github.com/CollaboraOnline/online | https://www.collaboraonline.com/release-notes/ (per-version: .../collabora-online-25-04-release-notes/) |
 | onlyoffice | onlyoffice/documentserver-de | https://github.com/ONLYOFFICE/DocumentServer | https://github.com/ONLYOFFICE/DocumentServer/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md |
 | web | nginx | https://github.com/nginx/nginx | https://nginx.org/en/CHANGES |
 
@@ -19,5 +19,9 @@
 - lasuite/drive-frontend and lasuite/drive-backend share the same version tag (drive monorepo).
 - minio and onlyoffice tags use non-semver formats; abra cannot auto-detect upgrades for them.
 - collabora/code uses a 5-part version scheme; abra cannot auto-detect upgrades for it.
+- minio: Docker Hub `minio/minio` `latest` is frozen at `RELEASE.2025-09-07T16-13-09Z` (the
+  `RELEASE.2025-10-15T17-29-55Z` GitHub security release is NOT on Docker Hub `minio/minio`).
+  Newer minio releases moved to the **AIStor** product line (`quay.io/minio/aistor/minio`).
+  A future minio bump requires a registry+product switch — operator decision, not a routine tag bump.
 - nginx 1.31.x (1.31.0, 1.31.1) contains multiple security CVE fixes; upgrade is recommended.
 - nginx 1.31.0 breaking change: HTTP/2 and HTTP/3 requests with Connection/Proxy-Connection/Keep-Alive/Transfer-Encoding/Upgrade headers are now rejected (affects proxied HTTP/2 backends).

cc-ci-plan/upstream/lasuite-meet.md

@@ -5,24 +5,12 @@
 | app | lasuite/meet-frontend | https://github.com/suitenumerique/meet | https://github.com/suitenumerique/meet/releases |
 | backend | lasuite/meet-backend | https://github.com/suitenumerique/meet | https://github.com/suitenumerique/meet/releases |
 | celery | lasuite/meet-backend | https://github.com/suitenumerique/meet | https://github.com/suitenumerique/meet/releases |
-| db | pgautoupgrade/pgautoupgrade | https://github.com/pgautoupgrade/pgautoupgrade | https://github.com/pgautoupgrade/pgautoupgrade/releases |
-| redis | redis | https://github.com/redis/redis | https://hub.docker.com/_/redis/tags |
+| db | pgautoupgrade/pgautoupgrade | https://github.com/pgautoupgrade/docker-pgautoupgrade | https://github.com/pgautoupgrade/docker-pgautoupgrade/releases |
+| redis | redis | https://github.com/redis/redis | https://github.com/redis/redis/releases |
 | livekit | livekit/livekit-server | https://github.com/livekit/livekit | https://github.com/livekit/livekit/releases |
 | web | nginx | https://github.com/nginx/nginx | https://nginx.org/en/CHANGES |
 
 ## Standing notes
-- meet-frontend, meet-backend (used for both backend + celery services) share the same version tag from the suitenumerique/meet monorepo. Upgrade app, backend, and celery in lockstep.
-- AUTO_MIGRATIONS=true means DB migrations run automatically on backend startup. No manual step needed.
-- v1.17.0–v1.19.0: no breaking changes documented; feature additions only (participant muting, PiP, S3 recording, API exposure). Standard rolling upgrade applies.
-- v1.19.0: security fix for CVE-2026-45409 (idna ≥3.15) — no operator action needed (baked into image).
-- Recipe version label convention: 0.X.Y+vA.B.C where A.B.C is the meet version.
-- LiveKit version is decoupled from meet version; only bump if explicitly required.
-- v1.13.1: removes backwards compatibility for TURN auth without TTL (deprecated in v1.12.0). Operators who never set TURN TTL must add it before upgrading LiveKit to v1.13.x. No new required env vars for standard deployments.
-- v1.13.2: patch (Added/Changed/Fixed — Prometheus metrics for join latency, 512 KiB metadata cap, egress v2 api, etc.); no breaking changes within v1.13.x.
-- v1.13.3: patch (mock API server for SDK testing, data track schema metadata, whip ingress bitrates, webrtc interop fix for bundled datachannel, WHIP notifier fix); no breaking changes.
-- v1.22.0: feature release (purge deleted/pending files, generalized STT API, LiveKit egress_ended fallback for recordings, PiP tile cap/pagination, reject user access tokens on API, dedicated PostHog feature-flag domain, backend analytics). No breaking changes; no new required env vars for the standalone meet recipe.
-- v1.23.0: feature release (migrate visio integration to summary API v2, summary feature flag, Sentry monitoring for agents, MuteEveryoneButton admin/owner gate, dep upgrades). ⚠️ Special mention: removed `api/v1` code from the `summary` sub-project BUT kept meet→summary v1-API compatibility as the DEFAULT — `SUMMARY_SERVICE_VERSION: 2` is only needed if deploying the latest meet AND summary from the monorepo together. The lasuite-meet recipe deploys meet standalone (no summary service, no `SUMMARY_SERVICE_VERSION` env), so NO operator action is required for this recipe.
-- v1.24.0: feature release (deprecate `SUMMARY_SERVICE_VERSION=1` — only matters when deploying meet+summary together, NOT the standalone recipe; prioritize screen share in PiP; recording admin search by owner email; participant color gradient when camera off; PostHog external-user identification; new OPTIONAL env `AUTHENTICATED_PARTICIPANTS_CAN_EDIT_DISPLAY_NAME` defaulting `true` — set `false` to force SSO display name; mjml v5; info-panel crash fix for unregistered rooms; Outsource Outlook add-on calendar fix; whisper call error handling). No breaking changes / no required migrations / no new required env for the standalone meet recipe. AUTO_MIGRATIONS=true applies any Django migrations on backend startup. Standard rolling upgrade.
-- livekit v1.13.2/v1.13.3/v1.13.4: patch series within v1.13.x (Prometheus metrics for join latency, mock SDK test API, WHIP ingress bitrates, WEBRTC interop fix for bundled datachannel; v1.13.4 adds SIP mocking, IPv6-exclusion option, forward-stats API method, data-track buffering-under-congestion fix, goroutine-leak fix, pion/ice hang-on-close fix). No breaking changes within v1.13.x; the v1.13.1 TURN-TTL note (only relevant if TURN was ever configured) is the only standing operator action in this line.
-- nginx 1.31.3: SECURITY patch release (CVE-2026-42533 heap buffer overflow in `map` with regex; CVE-2026-60005 uninitialized memory with `slice`/background cache update; CVE-2026-56434 use-after-free in ssi filter on proxied backend responses). Change: HTTP/2 response header/trailer sizes now bounded by `proxy_buffer_size`/`grpc_buffer_size`; external entities disabled in xslt module by default. Bugfixes in HTTP/2 flow control, proxy_v2/ tunnel modules. No required config change for the recipe (nginx serves static frontend + proxies to backend); standard rolling upgrade.
-- Redis 8.8.0: compatible drop-in upgrade; includes ReJSON module with V5–V7 API exported. No config or persistence-format changes.
+- lasuite/meet-frontend and lasuite/meet-backend share the same version tag (meet monorepo, versioned together); celery uses the SAME image as backend.
+- livekit-server must stay compatible with the meet version's expected livekit API — take newest SAME-minor livekit tag, do NOT jump to a newer major/minor line unless meet release notes require it.
+- meet-backend runs Django DB migrations on boot (manage.py migrate) — watch backend logs on upgrade.

cc-ci-plan/upstream/mattermost-lts.md

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 | service  | image                                     | source repo                                       | releases / changelog                                              |
 |----------|-------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
-| app      | mattermost/mattermost-team-edition        | https://github.com/mattermost/mattermost          | https://docs.mattermost.com/about/mattermost-changelog.html       |
+| app      | mattermost/mattermost-team-edition        | https://github.com/mattermost/mattermost          | https://docs.mattermost.com/deploy/mattermost-changelog.html       |
 | postgres | postgres                                  | https://github.com/postgres/postgres              | https://www.postgresql.org/docs/release/                          |
 
 ## Standing notes
@@ -17,6 +17,33 @@
   The `release-11.7` Docker Hub floating tag always points to the latest 11.7.x patch.
   IMPORTANT: Do NOT use 11.7.0–11.7.2 — they have a schemeid migration bug in the `roles` table
   when upgrading from 10.11.17+; use 11.7.3 or later (current: 11.7.7).
+  - **2026-08-07 re-check** (endoflife.date/api/mattermost.json; GitHub releases API; Docker Hub):
+    Operator (weekly /upgrade-all) directed extending PR #2 to **11.10.0** (newest on the 11.x
+    innovation line, consistent with PR #2's existing line). **11.10.0 is a PRE-RELEASE** — GitHub
+    `prerelease=True`, published 2026-08-04 (rc1 2026-07-17, rc2 2026-07-30, rc3+v11.10.0 2026-08-04);
+    Docker Hub `mattermost/mattermost-team-edition:11.10.0` exists (462 MB, pushed 2026-08-04,
+    actively pulled). No detailed release notes published yet (body = "Mattermost Platform Release
+    11.10.0"). 11.10 cycle not yet on endoflife.date; monthly cadence → EOL ~2026-11-15. Innovation,
+    NOT ESR. This run bumps 11.9.0 → 11.10.0 per operator instruction and flags the pre-release +
+    ESR-vs-innovation choice prominently in the PR body + report. **ESR remains 11.7.8** (stable,
+    EOL 2027-05-15) — the real LTS/ESR alternative if the operator wants LTS. **Survey-hint
+    correction (again):** the 2026-08-07 survey claimed "alternative ESR = 10.12.4"; that is STILL
+    wrong — 10.12 is an EXPIRED innovation release (EOL 2025-12-15, lts:false on endoflife.date);
+    do NOT switch to 10.12.4. 10.11 ESR EOL 2026-08-15 (8 days); upstream main still pins 10.11.22.
+    postgres 15-alpine HELD (major DB bump out of scope for weekly cron).
+  - **2026-08-04 re-check** (endoflife.date/api/mattermost.json; GitHub releases; Docker Hub):
+    **11.7.8** released 2026-07-31 is the newest 11.7.x ESR patch (ESR supported through
+    2027-05-15). **11.9.0** (innovation, released 2026-07-08, cycle EOL **2026-10-15** ~10 weeks,
+    NOT ESR) and **11.8.4** (innovation, EOL 2026-09-15) remain innovation releases — the standing
+    guidance for AUTONOMOUS runs is still "do NOT target innovation; track 11.7 ESR." HOWEVER, the
+    2026-08-03 weekly /upgrade-all operator task **explicitly directed a bump to 11.9.0** (the survey
+    target), so this run targets 11.9.0 per operator instruction with the EOL/innovation status
+    flagged in the plan + PR body + report for operator reconsideration. 11.9.0 confirmed real:
+    GitHub tag `v11.9.0` (published 2026-07-08, not prerelease), Docker Hub
+    `mattermost/mattermost-team-edition:11.9.0` (458 MB, 2026-07-08). Features: Ranked Attributes,
+    ABAC per-action Permission Rules, Program Masking, Azure Blob Storage. `abra recipe upgrade`
+    lists 11.10.0 highest and 11.9.0 next. PR #2 extended 11.7.8 → 11.9.0 (fast-forward). 10.11 ESR
+    security support ENDS 2026-08-15 (~11 days).
   - **2026-07-24 re-check** (endoflife.date/api/mattermost.json; GitHub releases): **11.7.7**
     released 2026-07-17 is the newest 11.7.x ESR patch — bumped PR #2 `11.7.6 → 11.7.7` (ESR security
     patch, "Low to High severity security fixes", no migrations/breaking changes), `!testme` GREEN
@@ -48,3 +75,12 @@
   recreate DB, reimport dump. `DROP DATABASE WITH (FORCE)` requires PostgreSQL 13+ — safe on postgres:15-alpine.
   The previous inline-label approach (no restore hook) was a defect: raw PGDATA restore without a reload
   was a silent no-op. Fixed in PR #2 (restore fix cherry-picked from PR #1 ci/pg-restore).
+
+## NVD CPE fallback
+This project publishes nothing machine-readable we can reach — no GitHub advisory feed,
+no release-attributable changelog — so its CVE count was `?` (nothing measured). NVD is
+CPE-indexed and carries structured version ranges, so it can answer where the vendor
+cannot. It LAGS the vendor, so it is a fallback, never the primary source.
+
+- nvd-cpe: mattermost-team-edition = cpe:2.3:a:mattermost:mattermost_server:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
+- nvd-cpe: postgres = cpe:2.3:a:postgresql:postgresql:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

cc-ci-plan/upstream/mumble.md

@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+# Upstream sources — mumble
+
+| service | image | source repo | releases / changelog |
+|---------|-------|-------------|----------------------|
+| app | mumblevoip/mumble-server | https://github.com/mumble-voip/mumble | https://github.com/mumble-voip/mumble/releases |
+| web | rankenstein/mumble-web | https://github.com/rankenstein/mumble-web | https://github.com/rankenstein/mumble-web/releases |
+
+## Standing notes
+- This file was **missing entirely** until 2026-08-11. Without it the advisory scan had no source to
+  query, and still printed "0 identified by the deterministic scan" — which was then published as a
+  clean `0` in the 2026-08-11 CVE check. The scan now refuses to emit a count when it has no usable
+  source (it reports UNKNOWN), and `audit-sources.py` flags a missing registry file directly.
+- `mumblevoip/mumble-server` tracks the upstream server releases and DOES publish GitHub security
+  advisories, so it is the recipe's primary CVE source.
+- `rankenstein/mumble-web` is a **fork** of the original `Johni0702/mumble-web`, which has been
+  dormant since 2023-05. The fork itself last pushed 2023-07 and its Docker tag `0.5` was last built
+  well over five years ago. Neither is archived, but treat the web client as effectively unmaintained:
+  if a CVE lands there, expect no upstream fix and plan a replacement rather than an upgrade.
+- The server image tag is `v<version>-<build>` (e.g. `v1.6.870-4`); the trailing number is the image
+  build, not an app version, and moves independently of upstream releases — `abra recipe upgrade`
+  reports "no new versions" for it, so use `resolve-images.py` to see those bumps.
+
+## NVD CPE fallback
+This project publishes nothing machine-readable we can reach — no GitHub advisory feed,
+no release-attributable changelog — so its CVE count was `?` (nothing measured). NVD is
+CPE-indexed and carries structured version ranges, so it can answer where the vendor
+cannot. It LAGS the vendor, so it is a fallback, never the primary source.
+
+- nvd-cpe: mumble-server = cpe:2.3:a:mumble:mumble:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*