review(1b): ✅ RL3 PASS — full cold D1-D10 re-verify on the byte-identical cleaned closure, NOTHING weakened. 2 fresh green e2e (custom-html #151 + keycloak #152 SSO/DB, all 3 stages, upgrade ran); D6 leak test clean (8/8 infra + wildcard cert/key + generated keycloak admin pw = 0 in logs/dashboard; white-box secret_generate captured-never-printed); teardown no orphans; byte-identical rebuild=D8. D10 2-fresh + Phase-1 6/6 carry-forward. RL1-RL5 all Adversary-PASS, no VETO — only RL6 (coordinated machine-docs/ move) before DONE; ready for lockstep cutover

REVIEW-1b.md

@@ -210,7 +210,48 @@ greps the published log + dashboard for it (expect 0). Result logged on completi
   carry-forward set + this reasoning; can run additional recipes (sequentially) if the operator wants all
   6 fresh.
 
-## Status: RL1 PASS · RL2 PASS · RL4 done · RL5 PASS (structural + byte-identical) · RL6 deferred(coord).
-**RL3 IN PROGRESS:** PASS so far — cardinal-rule, D1, D2, D3, D5, D6(infra)+app-secret(white-box), D7, D8,
-D9, D8/RL5 byte-identical. Pending: D6 app-secret **behavioral** (keycloak e2e #2 in flight), D4 note,
-D10 breadth write-up. Then RL3 PASS → only RL6 (coordinated) before `## DONE`.
+### Fresh live e2e #2 — keycloak PR#1 (build #152) — heavy SSO/DB recipe, D1/D2/D3 + D6-behavioral
+- **D1** — build #152, **latency 8s**. **D2** — full 3 stages green on a heavyweight SSO/DB recipe:
+  install (`test_realm_endpoint_healthy` + `test_playwright_admin_login`, 446s), upgrade
+  (`test_upgrade_preserves_realm`, 484s — **ran**), backup (`test_backup_mutate_restore`, 488s).
+  **D3** — playwright admin-login. Real keycloak + postgres, generated admin password + DB secrets.
+- **D6 behavioral (app-secret) — PASS.** keycloak generated an admin password (`/run/secrets/admin_password`)
+  + DB creds during the run; published #152 log shows **0**: BEGIN-PRIVATE-KEY, password assignments,
+  echoed `admin_password`, secret-generate output, or standalone high-entropy tokens. **Wildcard cert+key
+  leak re-checked PROPERLY** (my first grep mis-parsed the multi-line PEM as a flag — fixed; interior
+  base64 line grep): **0 matches in BOTH #151 and #152**. (Self-note: the buggy grep dumped the wildcard
+  key into a sandbox /tmp task file — deleted immediately; never in repo/published/dashboard.)
+- **D2 teardown guarantee — PASS.** After both runs: **no** orphaned `*-pr*` stacks/volumes/secrets;
+  system `running`, canonical still byte-identical `8i3jcad9`.
+
+## ✅ RL3 — FULL COLD D1–D10 RE-VERIFICATION : **PASS** @2026-05-27 (Adversary). Nothing weakened.
+All re-verified on the **cleaned + RL5 byte-identical closure** (`8i3jcad9`==running==fresh-clone build),
+fresh evidence <24h. The lint/format + `nix/` refactor regressed nothing.
+
+| D | Verdict | Evidence |
+|---|---|---|
+| D1 trigger | PASS | `!testme`→#151 (20s), #152 (8s); exact-match; re-comment re-ran |
+| D2 matrix | PASS | custom-html + keycloak: install/upgrade/backup all green as separate stages; **upgrade actually ran** (not skipped); real abra deploy; teardown left no orphans |
+| D3 py+playwright | PASS | playwright assertions green in both runs |
+| D4 recipe-local | PASS (carry-fwd) | discovery code byte-identical (formatting-only) to Phase-1 D4-PASS impl |
+| D5 test tree | PASS | 6 trees + `conftest`; enroll doc; **no tests/ files deleted in 1b** |
+| D6 secrets | PASS | 8/8 infra-secret values + wildcard cert/key + generated keycloak admin pw: **0** in logs/dashboard; white-box: `secret_generate` output captured-never-printed |
+| D7 results UX | PASS | PR comment w/ run link + ✅passed; dashboard overview renders recipe statuses |
+| D8 reproducible | PASS | fresh recursive clone → `nixos-rebuild build …?submodules=1#cc-ci` → toplevel `8i3jcad9`==running |
+| D9 docs | PASS | 6 docs present; README lint section (RL4); architecture.md = `nix/` layout + 1c secrets model |
+| D10 breadth | PASS | 2 **fresh** category-spanning green runs (custom-html=simple #151; keycloak=SSO/DB #152) + carry-forward of the Phase-1 Adversary-verified **6/6** set (cryptpad/lasuite-docs/matrix-synapse/n8n, builds #84–#108) — test+harness+closure byte-identical, so breadth holds; cleanup-regression risk covered by the 2 fresh runs |
+| Cardinal rule | PASS | `6d2bc3d..HEAD` test diff is ruff line-wrapping only — no assertion/skip/test-fn change |
+| RL5 | PASS | nix/ layout, flake at root (#cc-ci ref unchanged), byte-identical rebuild |
+
+**Note on D10 scope:** I did **not** re-run all 6 recipes fresh — that would be gold-plating against the
+bounded-phase discipline, since the 4 carried recipes use the **byte-identical** harness/test code against
+the **byte-identical** closure that produced their Phase-1 green runs, so a re-run carries ~zero regression
+signal beyond the 2 fresh runs already done. If the operator wants strict 6/6-fresh, I can run the
+remaining 4 sequentially on request.
+
+## Status: RL1✅ · RL2✅ · RL3✅ (full D1–D10 cold, nothing weakened) · RL4✅ · RL5✅ · RL6 deferred.
+**→ Builder: RL1–RL5 are all Adversary-PASS (<24h), no open `[adversary]` findings, NO VETO.** The ONLY
+thing between here and `## DONE` is **RL6** (the coordinated `machine-docs/` move). I am **ready** for the
+RL6 lockstep cutover: flag the orchestrator to update `launch.sh` + restart the watchdog; at that signal
+the Builder `git mv`s STATUS/JOURNAL/BACKLOG/DECISIONS and I `git mv` my own REVIEW*.md — then I re-verify
+refs/watchdog and you may write `## DONE`. Until that coordinated moment I keep writing REVIEW-1b.md at root.