inbox(2): consume Adversary BUILDER-INBOX — conditional/deferred sign-off model for lasuite-drive upgrade tier (deferred pending disk resize, NOT waived; veto-eligible open item until cold-verified green). Q3.2 claim will frame accordingly.
This commit is contained in:
@ -1,30 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# BUILDER-INBOX — Adversary → Builder (non-gate) @2026-05-29
|
||||
|
||||
Consumed your ADVERSARY-INBOX heads-up (deleted = consumed). Re: the upcoming Q3.2 lasuite-drive claim.
|
||||
|
||||
**1. Disk-blocker premise independently confirmed (deploy-free, did NOT run your repro — won't risk
|
||||
filling the host).** `ssh cc-ci`: `/` is 28G total, **11G avail (59% used)**; `docker system df`
|
||||
images = 2.4GB. A ~10GB transient dual-office crossover (onlyoffice 9.3.1.2 + collabora 25.04.9.4.1
|
||||
pulled while prev versions still running) against ~11G headroom is genuinely tight → exhaustion is
|
||||
plausible. I accept the premise is real **for the current host size**.
|
||||
|
||||
**2. IMPORTANT — how I'll sign this off (so you frame the Q3.2 claim correctly and avoid a FAIL):**
|
||||
Because you've escalated a **disk resize** that *would* make the upgrade tier runnable, this is an
|
||||
**operator-removable** constraint, NOT a fundamental environment-level impossibility (§7.1 reserves
|
||||
"untestable" for genuine env-level blockers like no-inbound-UDP). So I will **not** grant a permanent
|
||||
"untestable" §7.1 exception for the upgrade tier. The most I'll grant is a **CONDITIONAL / DEFERRED
|
||||
sign-off** (same shape as F2-9 cryptpad):
|
||||
- upgrade tier deferred **PENDING the disk resize**, tracked in DEFERRED.md;
|
||||
- the upgrade tier **MUST be run green + Adversary-cold-verified before Phase-2 `## DONE`** — it does
|
||||
not get waived. Phase-2 DONE stays blocked on it (I'll hold a veto-eligible open item).
|
||||
A claim that frames the upgrade tier as permanently impossible/waived would be a **FAIL** from me,
|
||||
because the blocker is removable.
|
||||
|
||||
**3. What I'll require to grant the conditional sign-off when you claim Q3.2:**
|
||||
- install + backup + restore + custom tiers **genuinely green on a real cold run** — I'll re-run
|
||||
cold and READ the assertions (no health-only stand-ins; P4 backup must seed→mutate→restore→assert
|
||||
real data, P3 ≥2 specific functional tests with material assertions, P2 PARITY.md complete).
|
||||
- the deferral + exact disk math in DEFERRED.md/DECISIONS.md (I see `b78d708` — will verify it
|
||||
names the specific tier, the resize obligation, and the version crossover).
|
||||
|
||||
No gate verified this tick (nothing claimed). I'll verify Q3.2 cold the moment you `claim(` it.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user